For patients with rheumatic disease and hepatitis C infection: the end of interferon.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global pathogen and is the cause of rare but complex rheumatic complications but more commonly exists as a challenging comorbidity for patients with existing rheumatic diseases. Until recently, the standard of care of HCV has been the use of interferon-based regimens, which not only have limited effectiveness in curing the underlying viral illness but are poorly tolerated and in patients with rheumatic diseases especially problematic given their association with a wide variety of autoimmune toxicities. Numerous and other more effective and better tolerated regimens are rapidly emerging incorporating direct acting antiviral agents that do not require the use of interferon, that is, interferon free. The potential of interferon free treatment of HCV makes screening for this comorbidity more important than ever. Rheumatologists need to be knowledgeable about these therapeutic advances and partner with hepatologists to craft the most efficacious and toxicity-free regimes possible.

Fate of individuals with ischemic amputations in the REACH Registry: three-year cardiovascular and limb-related outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systemic and limb ischemic event rates of PAD patients with prior leg amputation and determine predictors of adverse outcomes. METHODS: The REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry provided a prospective multinational cohort of 7996 outpatients with PAD enrolled from primary medical clinics in 44 countries in 2003-2004. 1160 patients (14.5%) had a prior leg amputation at any level. Systemic (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, cardiovascular death) and limb (angioplasty, surgery, amputation) ischemic event rates were determined in a 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: PAD patients with leg amputations on entry had a 5-fold higher rate of a subsequent amputation (12.4% vs. 2.4%, P<.001), lower rate of peripheral angioplasty (8.3% vs. 10.7%, P = .005), and similar rates of surgical revascularization procedures compared with PAD patients without amputation. A nearly 2-fold increase in rates of cardiovascular death (14.5% vs. 7.7%, P<.001) and all-cause mortality (21.8% vs. 12.6%, P<.001) and an increase in the composite outcome of MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, or hospitalization (48.7% vs. 40.0%, P<.001) were noted. Recent (≤ 1 year) amputation was associated with higher rates of worsening PAD, subsequent lower extremity surgical revascularization procedures, re-amputation, non-fatal MI, and the composite outcome, including hospitalization. Adverse systemic and limb ischemic outcomes were similar regardless of amputation level. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a history of leg amputations have markedly elevated rates of systemic and limb-related outcomes. PAD patients with recent ischemic amputation have the highest risk of adverse events. A history of "minor" ischemic amputation may confer an identical systemic risk as "major" leg amputation.

Effects of adherence to guidelines for the control of major cardiovascular risk factors on outcomes in the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry Europe.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of cardiovascular risk factor control on 3-year cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable symptomatic atherothrombotic disease in Europe. METHODS: The REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry recruited patients aged ≥45 years with established atherothrombotic disease or three or more risk factors, of whom 20 588 symptomatic patients from 18 European countries were analysed in this study at baseline and 12, 24 and 36 months. 'Good control' of cardiovascular risk factors was defined as three to five risk factors at target values of international guideline recommendations (systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, fasting glycaemia <110 mg/dl, total cholesterol <200 mg/dl, non-smoking). Independent predictors of 'good control' of major risk factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among symptomatic patients in the REACH Registry Europe (mean age 67 years, 70.6% male), 59.4% had good control of risk factors at baseline. Good risk factor control was associated with lower cardiovascular death/non-fatal stroke/non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83) and mortality (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99) at 36 months, compared with poor control. Independent predictors of good control of risk factors included residence in western versus eastern Europe (OR 1.29), high level of education (OR 1.16), established coronary artery disease (OR 1.18), treatment with one or more antithrombotic (OR 1.59) and one or more lipid-lowering agent (OR 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: In REACH, less than 60% of patients with stable atherothrombotic disease had good control of the five major cardiovascular risk factors. Improved risk factor control is associated with a positive impact on 3-year cardiovascular event rates and mortality.

Patients with peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine whether clopidogrel plus aspirin provides greater protection against major cardiovascular events than aspirin alone in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a post hoc analysis of the 3096 patients with symptomatic (2838) or asymptomatic (258) PAD from the CHARISMA trial. The rate of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke (primary endpoint) was higher in patients with PAD than in those without PAD: 8.2% vs. 6.8% [hazard ratio (HR), 1.25; 95% CI 1.08, 1.44; P = 0.002]. Among the patients with PAD, the primary endpoint occurred in 7.6% in the clopidogrel plus aspirin group and 8.9% in the placebo plus aspirin group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.08; P = 0.18). In these patients, the rate of MI was lower in the dual antiplatelet arm than the aspirin alone arm: 2.3% vs. 3.7% (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96; P = 0.029), as was the rate of hospitalization for ischaemic events: 16.5% vs. 20.1% (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.95; P = 0.011). The rates of severe, fatal, or moderate bleeding did not differ between the groups, whereas minor bleeding was increased with clopidogrel: 34.4% vs. 20.8% (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.69-2.34; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dual therapy provided some benefit over aspirin alone in PAD patients for the rate of MI and the rate of hospitalization for ischaemic events, at the cost of an increase in minor bleeding.

Cardiovascular risk factor control and outcomes in peripheral artery disease patients in the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in risk factor (RF) management between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and coronary artery (CAD) or cerebrovascular disease (CVD), as well as the impact of RF control on major 1-year cardiovascular (CV) event rates. METHODS: The REACH Registry recruited >68000 outpatients aged >or=45 years with established atherothrombotic disease or >or=3 RFs for atherothrombosis. The predictors of RF control that were evaluated included: (1) patient demographics, (2) mode of PAD diagnosis, and (3) concomitant CAD and/or CVD. RESULTS: RF control was less frequent in patients with PAD (n=8322), compared with those with CAD or CVD (but no PAD, n=47492) [blood pressure; glycemia; total cholesterol; smoking cessation (each P<0.001)]. Factors independently associated with optimal RF control in patients with PAD were male gender (OR=1.9); residence in North America (OR=3.5), Japan (OR=2.5) or Latin America (OR=1.5); previous coronary revascularization (OR=1.3); and statin use (OR=1.4); whereas prior leg amputation was a negative predictor (OR=0.7) (P<0.001). Optimal RF control was associated with fewer 1-year CV ischemic symptoms or events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAD do not achieve RF control as frequently as individuals with CAD or CVD. Improved RF control is associated with a positive impact on 1-year CV event rates.

Cardiovascular risk profile and outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in out-patients with atherothrombosis: data from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Datasets regarding patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have almost universally been restricted to single geographic regions. We aimed to obtain data on the risk factor profile and cardiovascular (CV) co-morbidity among multi-ethnic patients with known AAA in the global REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) Registry. METHODS: The REACH Registry is an international, prospective, observational out-patient registry enrolling out-patients >/=45 years of age with established coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or with at least three atherothrombotic risk factors. This report includes observations pertaining to 68,236 out-patients enrolled in 44 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gender, ethnic origin, CV risk factors, established atherosclerotic disease (CAD, CVD and PAD) at baseline, and CV outcome events at 1-year were compared in patients with and without AAA. RESULTS: An AAA was reported in 1722 (2.5%) of 68,236 out-patients enrolled in the REACH Registry. Older age (73 +/- 8 vs 68 +/- 10, P < .0001), male gender (81% vs 63%, P < .0001), White ethnicity (79% vs 67%, P < .0001) and a history of smoking (81% vs 55%, P < .0001) were independently related to the diagnosis of AAA. There was a weaker association with hypertension or hypercholesterolemia, and an inverse relation with diabetes. Fatal and non-fatal coronary and cerebrovascular event rates were not different between the AAA and non-AAA cohorts, but individuals with AAA suffered increased rates of other cardiovascular deaths (1.39% vs 0.94%, P = .0135), hospitalizations for atherothrombotic events (14.1% vs 9.3%, P < .0001) due to increased rates of revascularization procedures, and new or worsening PAD (3.7% vs 1.3%, P < .0001) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study, the largest published to date, presents the CV risk profile and outcome of patients with an established diagnosis of AAA from a cohort of patients with either overt manifestations of CV disease or multiple risk factors, and further defines these patients in a multi-ethnic, global context.