RESUMEN
Over several months, representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science and National Institutes of Health (NIH) had a number of meetings that lead to the conclusion that innovations in the Nation's health care could be realized by more directed interactions between NIH and DOE. It became clear that the expertise amassed and instrumentation advances developed at the DOE physical science laboratories to enable cutting-edge research in particle physics could also feed innovation in medical healthcare. To meet their scientific mission, the DOE laboratories created advances in such technologies as particle beam generation, radioisotope production, high-energy particle detection and imaging, superconducting particle accelerators, superconducting magnets, cryogenics, high-speed electronics, artificial intelligence, and big data. To move forward, NIH and DOE initiated the process of convening a joint workshop which occurred on July 12th and 13th, 2021. This Special Report presents a summary of the findings of the collaborative workshop and introduces the goals of the next one.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Disciplinas de las Ciencias Naturales , Estados Unidos , Inteligencia Artificial , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , LaboratoriosRESUMEN
Preclinical studies inform and guide the development of novel treatment combination strategies that bridge the laboratory with the clinic. We aimed to evaluate approaches cancer researchers used to justify advancing new combinations of molecularly targeted agents and radiation treatment into early-phase human clinical trials. Unsolicited early phase clinical trial proposals submitted to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program between January 2016 and July 2020 were curated to quantify key characteristics and proportion of preclinical data provided by trialists seeking to conduct molecularly targeted agent-radiation combination studies in cancer patients. These data elucidate the current landscape for how the rationale for a molecularly targeted agent-radiation combination therapy is supported by preclinical research and illustrate unique challenges faced in translation at the intersection of precision medicine and radiation oncology.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapiaAsunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
With the ongoing dramatic growth of radiopharmaceutical therapy, research and development in internal radiation dosimetry continue to advance both at academic medical centers and in industry. The basic paradigm for patient-specific dosimetry includes administration of a pretreatment tracer activity of the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical; measurement of its time-dependent biodistribution; definition of the pertinent anatomy; integration of the measured time-activity data to derive source-region time-integrated activities; calculation of the tumor, organ-at-risk, and/or whole-body absorbed doses; and prescription of the therapeutic administered activity. This paper provides an overview of the state of the art of patient-specific dosimetry for radiopharmaceutical therapy, including current methods and commercially available software and other resources.
Asunto(s)
Radiofármacos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Radiometría , Distribución TisularRESUMEN
The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration-labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Radiometría , Humanos , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radiopharmaceutical targeted therapy (RPT) has been studied for decades; however, recent clinical trials demonstrating efficacy have helped renewed interest in the modality. METHODS: This article reviews National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s support of RPT through communication via workshops and interest groups, through funding extramural programs in academia and small business, and through intramural research, including preclinical and clinical studies. RESULTS: NCI has co-organized workshops and organized interest groups on RPT and RPT dosimetry to encourage the community and facilitate rigorous preclinical and clinical studies. NCI has been supporting RPT research through various mechanisms. Research has been funded through peer-reviewed NCI Research and Program Grants (RPG) and NCI Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Development Center, which funds small business-initiated projects, some of which have led to clinical trials. The NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)'s Radiopharmaceutical Development Initiative supports RPT in NCI-funded clinical trials, including Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) expertise in imaging QA and dosimetry procedures. Preclinical targeted a-emitter therapy (TAT) research at the NCI's intramural program is ongoing, building on foundational work dating back to the 1980s. Ongoing "bench-to-bedside" efforts leverage the unique infrastructure of the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) Clinical Center. CONCLUSION: Given the great potential of RPT, our goal is to continue to encourage its development that will generate the high-quality evidence needed to bring this multidisciplinary treatment to patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radiometría , Radiofármacos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
In a time of rapid advances in science and technology, the opportunities for radiation oncology are undergoing transformational change. The linkage between and understanding of the physical dose and induced biological perturbations are opening entirely new areas of application. The ability to define anatomic extent of disease and the elucidation of the biology of metastases has brought a key role for radiation oncology for treating metastatic disease. That radiation can stimulate and suppress subpopulations of the immune response makes radiation a key participant in cancer immunotherapy. Targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy delivers radiation systemically with radionuclides and carrier molecules selected for their physical, chemical, and biochemical properties. Radiation oncology usage of "big data" and machine learning and artificial intelligence adds the opportunity to markedly change the workflow for clinical practice while physically targeting and adapting radiation fields in real time. Future precision targeting requires multidimensional understanding of the imaging, underlying biology, and anatomical relationship among tissues for radiation as spatial and temporal "focused biology." Other means of energy delivery are available as are agents that can be activated by radiation with increasing ability to target treatments. With broad applicability of radiation in cancer treatment, radiation therapy is a necessity for effective cancer care, opening a career path for global health serving the medically underserved in geographically isolated populations as a substantial societal contribution addressing health disparities. Understanding risk and mitigation of radiation injury make it an important discipline for and beyond cancer care including energy policy, space exploration, national security, and global partnerships.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial/tendencias , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/tendencias , Oncología por Radiación/tendencias , Investigación/tendencias , Macrodatos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Terapia por Captura de Neutrón/métodos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Fotoquimioterapia , Oncología por Radiación/organización & administración , Tolerancia a Radiación , Radiobiología/educación , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Radioterapia/tendencias , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Investigación/organización & administración , Apoyo a la Investigación como AsuntoRESUMEN
Radiopharmaceuticals are reemerging as attractive anticancer agents, but there are no universally adopted guidelines or standardized procedures for evaluating agent validity before early-phase trial implementation. To validate a radiopharmaceutical, it is desirous for the radiopharmaceutical to be specific, selective, and deliverable against tumors of a given, molecularly defined cancer for which it is intended to treat. In this article, we discuss four levels of evidence-target antigen immunohistochemistry, in vitro and in vivo preclinical experiments, animal biodistribution and dosimetry studies, and first-in-human microdose biodistribution studies-that might be used to justify oncology therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in a drug-development sequence involving early-phase trials. We discuss common practices for validating radiopharmaceuticals for clinical use, everyday pitfalls, and commonplace operationalizing steps for radiopharmaceutical early-phase trials. We anticipate in the near-term that radiopharmaceutical trials will become a larger proportion of the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) portfolio.
RESUMEN
A two-step molecular targeting approach involving a self-assembling and disassembling (SADA) bispecific antibody platform and DOTA-radioconjugates allows tumor-specific delivery of diagnostic and therapeutic payloads. Low immunogenicity and the modular nature of SADA allow its optimization to safely and repeatedly deliver a variety of payloads to tumors expressing diverse tumor-specific antigens.See related article by Santich et al., p. 532.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Neoplasias , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Humanos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/genética , RadioinmunoterapiaRESUMEN
In radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT), a radionuclide is systemically or locally delivered with the goal of targeting and delivering radiation to cancer cells while minimizing radiation exposure to untargeted cells. Examples of current RPTs include thyroid ablation with the administration of 131I, treatment of liver cancer with 90Y microspheres, the treatment of bony metastases with 223Ra, and the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with 177Lu-DOTATATE. New RPTs are being developed where radionuclides are incorporated into systemic targeted therapies. To assure that RPT is appropriately implemented, advances in targeting need to be matched with advances in quantitative imaging and dosimetry methods. Currently, radiopharmaceutical therapy is administered by intravenous or locoregional injection, and the treatment planning has typically been implemented like chemotherapy, where the activity administered is either fixed or based on a patient's body weight or body surface area. RPT pharmacokinetics are measurable by quantitative imaging and are known to vary across patients, both in tumors and normal tissues. Therefore, fixed or weight-based activity prescriptions are not currently optimized to deliver a cytotoxic dose to targets while remaining within the tolerance dose of organs at risk. Methods that provide dose estimates to individual patients rather than to reference geometries are needed to assess and adjust the injected RPT dose. Accurate doses to targets and organs at risk will benefit the individual patients and decrease uncertainties in clinical trials. Imaging can be used to measure activity distribution in vivo, and this information can be used to determine patient-specific treatment plans where the dose to the targets and organs at risk can be calculated. The development and adoption of imaging-based dosimetry methods is particularly beneficial in early clinical trials. In this work we discuss dosimetric accuracy needs in modern radiation oncology, uncertainties in the dosimetry in RPT, and best approaches for imaging and dosimetry of internal radionuclide therapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Calibración , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón ÚnicoRESUMEN
Theranostics is a new and evolving combination diagnostic and/or therapeutic approach that is demonstrating efficacy for treatment of a growing number of cancers. In this approach, a diagnostic radiopharmaceutical is used in concert with positron-emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging to identify whether a cancer-specific membrane protein is strongly expressed on a patient's tumors. If the molecular target is detected with sufficient specificity and uptake, a therapeutic radiopharmaceutical, nearly identical to the diagnostic radiopharmaceutical except labeled with a longer-lived alpha or beta-emitting radionuclide, is administered at a therapeutic dose level to treat the cancer. Quantitative imaging methods are being used to elucidate patient-specific pharmacokinetics to select patients for whom the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical would be most beneficial. Similarly, quantitative imaging of the therapeutic radionuclide is being used to image pharmacodynamic response to therapy (cell kill) to guide personalized, patient-specific dosages designed to both reduce radiation toxicities and optimize radiotherapeutic benefit.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Radiofármacos , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Medicina de Precisión , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodosRESUMEN
In 2018, the National Cancer Institute and NRG Oncology partnered for the first time to host a joint workshop on systemic radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to specifically address dosimetry issues and strategies for future clinical trials. The workshop focused on current dosimetric approaches for clinical trials, strategies under development that would optimize dose reporting, and future desired or optimized approaches for novel emerging radionuclides and carriers in development. In this article, we review the main approaches that are applied clinically to calculate the absorbed dose. These include absorbed doses calculated over a variety of spatial scales, including whole body, organ, suborgan, and voxel, the last 3 of which are achievable within the MIRD schema (S value) and can be calculated with analytic methods or Monte Carlo methods, the latter in most circumstances. This article will also contrast currently available methods and tools with those used in the past, to propose a pathway whereby dosimetry helps the field by optimizing the biologic effect of the treatment and trial design in the drug approval process to reduce financial and logistical costs. We also briefly discuss the dosimetric equivalent of biomarkers to help bring a precision medicine approach to RPT implementation when merited by evidence collected during early-phase trial investigations. Advances in the methodology and related tools have made dosimetry the optimum biomarker for RPT.
Asunto(s)
National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Radiometría , Neoplasias , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Switch maintenance, or using alternative therapeutic agents that were not administered during a prior course of cancer treatment, has emerged as an active clinical research and regulatory agency-approvable path in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) drug-development sequence. To better inform the design of therapeutic radiopharmaceutical trials, we reviewed academic scholarship discussing the clinical use of maintenance approaches to cancer treatment. Women with advanced-stage primary platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma and their courses of treatment provide context for our discussion. Twenty-four (10%) out of 244 trials for women with ovarian carcinoma fit our search terms for maintenance trials. Five (2%) trials studied radiopharmaceuticals as switch maintenance. In our opinion, radiopharmaceutical switch maintenance merits further testing in prospective trials for women with advanced-stage primary platinum recurrent or refractory ovarian carcinoma.
RESUMEN
The evaluation of antibody-targeted or peptide-targeted radiopharmaceuticals as monotherapy or in oncological drug combinations requires programmatic collaboration within the National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trial enterprise. Phase 0 trials provide a flexible research platform for the study of radiopharmaceutical-drug pharmacokinetics, radiation dosimetry, biomarkers of DNA damage response modulation, and pharmacodynamic benchmarks predictive of therapeutic success. In this article, we discuss a phase 0 clinical development approach for human antibody-targeted or peptide-targeted radiopharmaceutical-agent combinations. We expect that early-phase radiopharmaceutical-agent combination trials will become a more tactical and more prevalent part of radiopharmaceutical clinical development in the near-term future for the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.