Parenchymal Volume Replacement by Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to Intervention: Predictive Factors and Functional Implications.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze predictors, extent and functional implications associated with renal parenchymal volume replacement (PVR) by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) prior to intervention. This phenomenon is well-recognized yet not adequately studied, and, if severe, can influence management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) patients with available preoperative nuclear-renal-scan and imaging demonstrating solitary RCC with normal contralateral kidney. Normal renal parenchymal volume of each kidney was measured by free-hand scripting from preoperative axial images. Primary endpoint was percent PVR which was estimated assuming that the contralateral-kidney serves as a control: PVR = (volume contralateral kidney - volume ipsilateral kidney) normalized by volume contralateral kidney. Multivariable linear-regression analysis assessed factors associated with preoperative PVR. Further analysis evaluated the functional effect of PVR prior to surgery. RESULTS: 146 PN and 136 RN patients with necessary studies were analyzed. For RN, the median PVR was 15% and a quarter of patients had PVR ≥27%. In contrast, PVR was negligible in PN patients for whom median preoperative parenchymal volumes were nearly identical in the ipsilateral/contralateral kidneys (179/180cc, respectively). PVR inversely correlated with preoperative renal function in the ipsilateral kidney (P <.01). Tumor-size (P <.01), stage (P = .03), and endophytic properties (P = .03) associated with PVR on multivariable-analysis. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that substantial replacement of normal parenchyma by RCC occurs in many patients selected for RN and can contribute to preexisting renal-insufficiency. PVR prior to intervention is mainly driven by tumor characteristics in RN patients, but is negligible in most PN patients.

Compensatory Changes in Parenchymal Mass and Function after Radical Nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Loss of renal function remains a major limitation of radical nephrectomy. The extent of renal functional compensation by the preserved kidney after radical nephrectomy has not been adequately studied in this elderly population with comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 273 patients treated with radical nephrectomy without end stage renal disease with available preoperative nuclear renal scans were included in the analysis. Renal functional compensation was defined as percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate of the preserved kidney after radical nephrectomy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration formula up to 5 years postoperatively. Preoperative/postoperative parenchymal volumes of the preserved kidney were measured from cross-sectional imaging. Multiple regression was used to identify predictive factors for renal functional compensation. RESULTS: Median age was 67 years and 67% of the patients were male. Overall 70% had hypertension, 26% diabetes and 37% preexisting chronic kidney disease. Locally advanced (T3a or greater) tumors were found in 53% of cases. Renal functional compensation was observed at 2 weeks (median 10%) and increased during the first 3 months (median 26%) after radical nephrectomy. Functional stability was then observed to 5 years. Renal parenchymal volume increased a median of 10% at 3 to 12 months but in addition, the functional efficiency per unit of parenchymal volume also increased 8% (estimated glomerular filtration rate units/cm3 of parenchyma was 0.236 postoperatively vs 0.208 preoperatively, p=0.004). Age (-0.85, p <0.01), global preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (-0.28, p <0.01) and split renal function of the removed kidney (0.61, p <0.01) were independent predictors of renal functional compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Percent renal functional compensation after radical nephrectomy is greater in younger patients, when preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate is lower and when the removed kidney has more robust function. Increases in measurable parenchymal mass and functional efficiency contribute substantially to renal functional compensation.

Can We Predict Functional Outcomes after Partial Nephrectomy?

PURPOSE: The percent of preserved parenchymal mass is the primary determinant of functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy. Accurate methods to predict the percent of preserved parenchymal mass based on preoperative imaging could facilitate patient counseling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the records of 428 patients who had undergone partial nephrectomy and the studies necessary to assess preserved ipsilateral parenchymal mass and function. Preoperative and postoperative ipsilateral parenchymal volumes were measured from contrast enhanced computerized tomography less than 2 months before and 3 to 12 months after partial nephrectomy and the actual percent of preserved parenchymal mass was determined. The ipsilateral percent of preserved parenchymal mass and the final global glomerular filtration rate were estimated based on preoperative imaging using subjective estimation, quantitative estimation, or estimation derived from the contact surface area or the R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior and location relative to polar lines) score. RESULTS: Median tumor diameter was 3.5 cm, median contact surface area was 24 cm2 and the median R.E.N.A.L. score was 8. The median actual ipsilateral percent of preserved parenchymal mass was 84% and the preserved percent of the global glomerular filtration rate was 89%. The median estimated ipsilateral percent of preserved parenchymal mass was 85%, 87%, 88% and 83% based on subjective estimation, quantitative estimation, contact surface area and the R.E.N.A.L. score, respectively. Correlations between the actual and the estimated percent of preserved parenchymal mass were relatively weak in all instances (all r ≤0.46). Prediction of the final global glomerular filtration rate was strong for all 4 methods (all r = 0.91). However, a similarly strong correlation was obtained when presuming that 89% of the preoperative global glomerular filtration rate would be saved in each case (r = 0.91). On multivariable analyses a solitary kidney, the preoperative glomerular filtration rate and various estimates of the percent of preserved parenchymal mass were significantly associated with the final global glomerular filtration rate. However, the preoperative glomerular filtration rate proved to be the strongest predictor. It had more than a tenfold impact compared to the estimated percent of preserved parenchymal mass or a solitary kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available methods to estimate the percent of preserved parenchymal mass have important limitations. The final global glomerular filtration rate, which is the most important functional outcome, could be predicted fairly accurately by all tested methods. However, none of them were better than simply presuming that 89% of function would be saved due to strong anchoring to the preoperative glomerular filtration rate.

Open partial nephrectomy when a non-flank approach is required: indications and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate indications/outcomes for open partial nephrectomy (OPN) when non-flank approaches are required, with comparison to patients managed with the flank approach. Outcomes with a non-flank approach are presumed less favorable yet there have been no previous reports on this topic. METHODS: 2747 OPNs were performed (1999-2015) and 76 (2.8%) required a non-flank approach. We also reviewed all traditional flank OPNs performed during odd years in this timeframe yielding 1467 patients for comparison. RESULTS: Overall, median tumor size was 3.5 cm and 274 patients (18%) had a solitary kidney. Non-flank patients were younger, and tumor size and clinical/pathologic stage were significantly increased for this cohort, but the groups were otherwise comparable. Indications for non-flank OPN included large tumor size/locally advanced disease (n = 21), need for simultaneous surgery (n = 25), previous flank incision or failed thermoablation (n = 13), or congenital/vascular abnormalities (n = 9). The most common non-flank approach was anterior subcostal (n = 39, 51%). Operative times, estimated blood loss, positive margins, and functional decline were all modestly increased for non-flank patients. Intraoperative and genitourinary complications were more common in non-flank patients (p < 0.05), although all were manageable, typically with conservative measures. There were no mortalities among non-flank patients and none required long-term dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our series, the first to address this topic, suggests that outcomes with non-flank OPN are generally less advantageous likely reflecting increased tumor/operative complexity. However, complications in this challenging patient population are manageable and final dispositions are generally favorable. Our findings should be useful for counseling regarding potential outcomes when a non-flank incision is required.

Impact of Comorbidities on Functional Recovery from Partial Nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Parenchymal mass preservation, and ischemia type and/or duration can influence functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. Some groups have hypothesized that relevant comorbidities may also impact nephron stability and functional recovery but this has not been adequately investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At our center 405 patients treated with partial nephrectomy from 2007 to 2015 had the necessary data to determine the function and parenchymal mass preserved in the ipsilateral kidney. Comorbidities potentially associated with renal functional status were reviewed, including various degrees of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, smoking status and related medications. Multivariable linear regression was done to assess factors associated with functional recovery, defined as the percent of preserved ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 3.5 cm and the median R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar lines and tumor touching main renal artery or vein) score was 8. Warm and cold ischemia were done in 264 (65%) and 141 patients for a median duration of 21 and 27 minutes, respectively. The median preserved ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate was 79%. Patient age, comorbidity index, hypertension and proteinuria were each associated with the preoperative glomerular filtration rate (all p <0.01). On univariable and multivariable analyses the preserved parenchymal mass, and ischemia type and duration were significantly associated with functional recovery (all p <0.001). On univariable analysis of comorbidities only hypertension was significantly associated with functional recovery. However, on multivariable analysis none of the analyzed comorbidities were associated with functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery of function after partial nephrectomy depends primarily on parenchymal mass preservation and ischemia characteristics. Comorbidities failed to be associated with functional outcomes. Comorbidities can impact function, leading to surgery, and may influence long-term functional stability. However, our data suggest that they do not influence short-term recovery after partial nephrectomy.