RESUMEN
Canine heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, can cause severe disease and sometimes death of the host. Associated clinical signs, lack of preventative usage and regional endemicity are unlikely sufficient by themselves to reach a definitive diagnosis. Several point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests are commercially available to aid in-clinic diagnosis, however, there is variable diagnostic accuracy reported and no synthesis of published evidence. This systematic review aims at meta-analysing the likelihood ratio of a positive result (LR+) to inform the selection and interpretation of POC tests in practice to rule-in heartworm infection when there is clinical suspicion. Three literature index interfaces (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus) were searched on November 11th, 2022, for diagnostic test evaluation (DTE) articles assessing at least one currently commercialised POC test. Risk of bias was assessed adapting the QUADAS-2 protocol and articles with no evidence of high risk of bias were meta-analysed if deemed applicable to our review objective. Substantial between DTE heterogeneity was investigated including potential threshold or covariate effects. A total of 324 primary articles were sourced and 18 were retained for full text review of which only three had low risk of bias in all four QUADAS-2 domains. Of the nine heartworm POC tests evaluated, only three, IDEXX SNAP (n DTEs = 6), Zoetis WITNESS (n DTEs = 3) and Zoetis VETSCAN (n DTEs = 5) could be analysed. Both WITNESS and VETSCAN DTEs showed substantial heterogeneity due to a putative threshold effect and no summary point estimates could be reported. SNAP DTEs showed acceptable heterogeneity, and a summary LR+ was estimated at 559.0 (95%CI: 24.3-12,847.4). The quality and heterogeneity of heartworm POC test DTEs was highly variable which restricted our summary of the diagnostic accuracy to only the SNAP test. A positive result from the SNAP test provides strong evidence of the presence of an infection with adult heartworm(s) in a dog patient and this test is warranted to rule-in clinical suspicion(s) in clinics. However, our review did not appraise the literature to assess the fitness of SNAP test, or any other POC tests, to rule-out heartworm infection in dogs without clinical suspicion or following heartworm therapy.