Survival following devastating penetrating gunshots polytrauma with grade 5 liver injuries requiring multiple massive transfusion protocols: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: A devastating injury to the liver from a gunshot wound (GSW) challenges the most seasoned trauma surgeon. This challenge is intensified when patients develop severe shock with a high-grade injury. We present the case of a patient with a grade 5 liver injury after a GSW treated with operative and interventional radiology (IR) treatment simultaneously. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old male presented to our Trauma Center with hypotension, after an abdominal GSW. He was taken emergently to the operating room, which revealed a Grade 5 liver injury with massive hemorrhage. Operative intervention was initiated immediately and a non-anatomic left lobectomy with hepatorrhaphy was performed. IR was consulted intra-operatively and performed a left hepatic artery angioembolization. The patient received over 50 units of blood products during the combined procedures, with eventual bleeding control. On post-operative day 33, the patient became acutely hemodynamically unstable, and angiography revealed a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm, which was embolized but re-bled and resulted in splenectomy. The patient eventually recovered and follows up at 1-year revealed a patient doing well. DISCUSSION: High-grade liver injuries carry significant mortality. Mortality worsens when severe shock is present. Operative intervention is the standard approach for patients who remain in shock. To help improve outcomes patients may benefit from a combined approach with the interventional radiology team. CONCLUSION: The acute management of severe liver injuries when presenting with ongoing shock is beneficial to include both trauma surgeons with interventional radiologists. Further studies are needed to determine the best approach for this devastating injury.

A rare case of delayed splenic rupture following initial negative CT scan imaging: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Delayed splenic rupture is an often unpredictable event with high mortality. In this report, we discuss the successful management of delayed splenic rupture, presenting days after index injury, with no commonly associated injuries or blunt abdominal trauma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50 year old male, not on anticoagulants, presented with blunt trauma after driving his motorcycle into a tree. The patient sustained right 3-5 rib fractures, displaced right midclavicular fracture, 25 % right pneumothorax, T5-9 posterior spinous process fractures, left 2nd-5th metatarsal fractures, and scattered abrasions to the left foot, knee and hand. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) and admission abdominal multi-detector CT were negative for any intra-abdominal injuries. On hospital day 5, the patient acutely decompensated. FAST was grossly positive and emergent laparotomy revealed a splenic rupture. After a splenectomy, he recovered. DISCUSSION: The spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Although acute injury often presents with imaging findings or sequelae of hemorrhagic shock, complications of splenic trauma have the potential to result in delayed catastrophe. Bedside ultrasonography is a useful tool to assess acute decompensation in trauma patients along with CT imaging. Prompt identification and hemorrhage control are crucial to survival after trauma. CONCLUSION: Repeat CT scans are also important for the identification of delayed splenic rupture and timely intervention. Delayed hemorrhage after blunt trauma should never be ruled out regardless of the injury complexity or length of hospital admission.

EAST Oriens Award: Why I want a career in trauma and acute care surgery.

ABSTRACT: The opportunity to compose this essay for the Eastern Association for the Surgery Trauma's Oriens Award has been the most terrific privilege of my training thus far. This award gave my passion a voice. It helped me better understand myself and my need to be a part of this world, this universe that selflessly dedicates every moment of themselves to the care of the critically ill and injured patient. I found every single past Oriens Essay and Keynote Address is a testament to the pure resilience, strength, and grit necessary to embody the calm and collected exterior of the internally screaming trauma surgeon. To me, this award, and all the previous essays, represents the genuine passion of this community and its continued support of each other. As I continue to process the honor of being selected for this prestigious award, I would like to thank my peers, mentors, and the entire trauma community for your perpetual inspiration and education. Your success and timeless dedication to the evolution of this field simply fascinates me. In preparing to join this society, it is my hope that some of these words may inspire, in an effort to reprise my mentors and truly thank you for selecting my essay for this year's award.

Intra-abdominal Inferior Vena Cava Injuries: Operative Strategies and Outcomes.

Visceral vascular injuries are relatively uncommon even in busy urban trauma centers. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is the most frequently injured visceral vein and can be a complex operative challenge. Despite advances in early volume resuscitation, improved transport times, prompt operative intervention, and hemorrhage control, mortality rates have remained largely unchanged. This article conducts an in-depth review of the literature surrounding IVC injuries and a detailed discussion of operative strategies and management as survivability is ultimately dependent on the grade of injury, location, and the presence of hemorrhagic shock.

The 11-Item Modified Frailty Index as a Tool to Predict Unplanned Events in Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Frailty has been studied extensively in trauma, but there is minimal research detailing its impact on traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesized that the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) would predict complications and discharge outcomes in patients with TBI. METHODS: A retrospective review of our trauma quality improvement program (TQIP) registry was conducted for all patients with TBI. The mFI-11 score was calculated for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between mFI-11 and cardiovascular, infectious, pulmonary, renal, thromboembolic, and unplanned complications (ie, unplanned intensive care unit [ICU] admission, intubation, or return to the operating room). RESULTS: There were 2352 patients with TBI of whom 61.6% (n = 1450) were not frail, 19.3% (n = 454) were mildly frail, and 19.1% (n = 448) were moderately to severely frail. Higher frailty scores were associated with increasing age (P < .0001) and decreasing injury severity score [ISS] (P = 0.001). Higher frailty scores also correlated with increasing rates of a skilled nursing facility/long-term acute care hospital/rehabilitation discharge (P = .0002). On multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, ISS, mechanism, and sex, moderate to severe frailty increased the odds of acute kidney injury (odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% CI 1.07-3.99, P = .03) and any unplanned event (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Frailty measured by the mFI-11 is associated with greater rates of discharge to unfavorable locations and increased odds of acute kidney injury and unplanned events among patients with TBI. These findings suggest that frail patients with TBIs require greater vigilance to avoid such unanticipated outcomes.

Mass Casualty Shootings and Emergency Preparedness: A Multidisciplinary Approach for an Unpredictable Event.

Mass casualty events (MCE) are an infrequent occurrence to most daily healthcare systems however these incidents are the causation for new hospital preparedness and the development of coordinated emergency services. The broad support and operational plans outside the hospital include emergency medical services, local law enforcement, government agencies, and city officials. Modern-day hospital disaster preparedness goals include scheduled training for healthcare personnel to ensure effective and accurate triage for a high-volume of injured patients. This MDT collaboration strengthens the emergency response to optimize the delivery of life-saving care during MCEs. This review identifies the clinical importance of the interdisciplinary team interactions and the lessons learned from past MCE experiences, strengthening healthcare system readiness for such critical incidents.

Money well spent? A cost and utilization analysis of prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement in high-risk trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis in high-risk trauma patients is a controversial practice. Utilization of IVCF prophylaxis was evaluated at a level 1 trauma center. Daily cost of IVCF prophylaxis, time to IVCF, duration between IVCF and chemoprophylaxis, and number of patients needed to treat (NNT) to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE) was calculated. METHODS: A retrospective review of prophylactic IVCF over a 5-year period (2010-2014). Demographic, physiologic, injury, procedural, and outcome data were abstracted from the administrative trauma database. Medicare fees and days without chemoprophylaxis were used to determine daily IVCF cost. NNT was calculated using PE events in a cohort without IVCF. RESULTS: Over the 5-year period, 146 patients with mean age 56.3 y (SD ± 24.2), 67.8% male, underwent prophylactic IVCF. Predominant mechanisms of injuries were falls (45.9%) and motor vehicle accidents (20.5%) with median Injury Severity Score of 25 (intraquartile range [IQR] 16-29) and head Abbreviated Injury Score of 3 (IQR 3-5). Most common operative interventions required in 24.7% were orthopedic (25.3%) and neurosurgical (21.9%). Median time to IVCF was 78 h (IQR 48-144). Most common IVCF indications were closed head injury (48.6%) and spinal injuries (30.8%). Median time to administration of chemoprophylaxis was 96 h after IVCF (IQR 24-192) in 57.5%. Median IVCF cost was $759/d (IQR $361-$1897) compared with $4.32 for chemoprophylaxis. PE occurred in 0.26% without IVCF. PE did not occur with prophylactic IVCF. Estimated NNT was 379 (95% CI 265, 661). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic IVCF placement is a costly practice with relatively low benefit. Anticipated time without chemoprophylaxis and patient criteria should be considered before routine IVCF placement.