RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Vulvodynia (VVD) is a frequent and harrowing condition for which diagnosis and management remain insufficient. Our study aimed to describe and compare vulvovaginal signs and symptoms of Brazilian women with VVD and controls and describe previous medical assessment, past treatments, and vulvar pain relief among women with VVD. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study included Brazilian women with (n = 151) and without VVD (n = 106). All women were assessed for vaginal infection, vulvar pain intensity by means of a cotton swab test based on a numerical rate scale, and answered the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire and a structured instrument about current vulvar symptoms. Previous treatments were assessed in the VVD group, and vulvar pain relief achieved with previous treatments was qualified through a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Volunteers were mainly White, with mean age of 30 years. Vulvovaginal signs and symptoms were significantly more frequent in women with VVD (p < .05), and vulvar pain duration was 5.8 (±4) years. More than 50% consulted with three or more physicians, and 49% remained without a conclusive diagnosis. Previous diagnosis and treatment of vulvovaginal infection were often reported by women with VVD. Most of the tried prescriptions were self-reported as providing only low vulvar pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged duration of vulvar pain, multiple visits to health care professionals, and poor relief of pain are common aspects in the clinical history of women with VVD. In addition to pain, vulvar fissure, edema, erythema, vaginal discharge, and foul odor are common and should be considered to avoid misdiagnosis. Appropriate treatments to VVD are still poorly reported.
Asunto(s)
Vulvodinia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Dolor , Manejo del Dolor , Vulvodinia/diagnóstico , Vulvodinia/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present a series of 2 cases of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) due to the use of a ring-type pessary in the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and a literature review on the management of RVF related to the use of pessaries. METHODS: Two patients were selected from the medical records of the urogynecology service, and their demographic and clinical data were retrieved. An updated literature review was included presenting cases of RVF induced by or after use of a pessary. RESULTS: Both patients evolved with removal of the pessary and correction of the fistula. The surgical procedures of choice were Le Fort Colpocleisis and posterior colporraphy without major complications. In the literature review, we selected 17 studies with a total of 23 cases reporting RVFs induced or followed by the use of pessaries. CONCLUSIONS: Although the pessary is commonly indicated for the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, this device is not exempt from generating complications.
Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Pesarios , Femenino , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/terapia , Pesarios/efectos adversos , Fístula Rectovaginal/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction (PFMD) in women with urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed. Pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction was defined by pain of any intensity during palpation of the pelvic floor muscles and strength assessed by the modified Oxford scale, and was classified in grade I (mild pain), grade II (moderate), and grade III (severe). Univariate and multivariate analyses were calculated (5% significance level) to seek for the associated factors of PFMD. RESULTS: A total of 234 women with UI were included, 121 women in the PFMD group and 113 in the control group. The mean ages were 52.1 ± 10.2 and 53 ± 8.1 years, respectively. Pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction was more frequent among non-White women, and women with PFMD presented more dyspareunia and recurrent urinary tract infection. There was a higher frequency of mixed UI (MUI; 89.2%) in the PFMD group and stress UI (31.9%) in the control group. The prevalence of PFMD was 51.7%, with 10.6% of patients categorized into grade I, 18.8% in grade II, and 22.2% in grade III. In women with PFMD, there is an inverse relation between pain and muscle strength, with the highest strength values (3, 4, and 5) being in grade I (P = 0.028). The multivariate analysis has shown that women with MUI had a risk 4.9 times greater (adjusted odds ratio, 4.93 [2.34-10.42]; P < 0.001) of having PFMD, and non-White women had a 2.1-fold increased risk (adjusted odds ratio, 2.07 [1.10-3.91]; P = 0.024) of presenting with PFMD. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of PFMD was found among women with UI. Mixed UI and non-White race were the associated factors of PFMD.