Efficacy and safety of tolterodine in people with neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare tolterodine with oxybutynin and placebo in people with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial plus open-label comparative stage. PARTICIPANTS: Ten participants with neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis who used intermittent catheterization. METHODS: Bladder capacity on cystometrogram, a 10-day record of catheterization volumes, number of incontinent episodes per day, and perceived dry mouth using a visual analog scale (VAS) were measured for the following: (a) a blinded comparison: tolterodine, 2 mg twice daily, vs placebo, twice daily; and (b) an unblinded comparison: oxybutynin vs tolterodine, each at self-selected doses (SSDs). RESULTS: Tolterodine, 2 mg twice daily, was superior to placebo in enhancing catheterization volumes (P < 0.0005) and reducing incontinence (P < 0.001), but was comparable with placebo in cystometric bladder capacity. Efficacy of tolterodine SSD was comparable with oxybutynin SSD with regard to catheterization volumes, degree of incontinence, and cystometric bladder capacity. The side effect profile (dry mouth) was comparable between tolterodine, 2 mg twice daily, and placebo, but differed significantly when comparing tolterodine SSD with oxybutynin SSD (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tolterodine, when used at SSDs, is comparable with oxybutynin at SSDs in enhancing bladder volume and improving continence, but with less dry mouth. Tolterodine at the recommended dosage of 2 mg twice daily improves incontinence and bladder volumes compared with placebo, and without significant dry mouth. Larger doses of tolterodine may be needed to achieve best effect in this population, but further studies are required.

The effects of sildenafil on the cardiovascular response in men with spinal cord injury at or above the sixth thoracic level.

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil is efficacious for erectile dysfunction in men with spinal cord injury (SCI), but can induce hypotension in neurologically intact people. Those with SCI at or above the sixth thoracic level (T6) often have pre-existing hypotension, yet the cardiovascular response to sildenafil has not been studied in this group. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of sildenafil on the cardiovascular response in men with complete SCI at or above T6. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Twenty-three SCI participants were each randomly given placebo; sildenafil, 50 mg; and sildenafil, 100 mg; separated by at least 1 week. The following were measured before administration, and hourly for 4 hours afterward: (a) blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), both supine and sitting; and (b) perceived dizziness on a visual analog scale upon sitting. RESULTS: Analysis was done using a 4-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. No significant changes occurred with placebo. Sildenafil caused the following changes. Systolic BP changed little in thoracic spinal cord-injured (TSCI) participants, but decreased significantly (P < 0.005) in cervical spinal cord-injured (CSCI) participants. Diastolic BP decreased in all participants (P < 0.005). HR increased in the TSCI participants for 1 hour (P < 0.05), but was not altered in the CSCI participants. Dizziness increased in the TSCI participants after administration of 100 mg (P < 0.05) and in the CSCI participants after administration of 50 mg (P < 0.05). There were no adverse events or outcomes. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil induces significant hypotension in people with cervical-level injuries--more so than in thoracic-level injuries--and can cause dizziness in both populations. It should be prescribed with caution and informed consent from the patient.