Rate and Predictors of Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Thiopurines: Results of a Multicentric Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mucosal healing (MH) with thiopurines has been poorly investigated in ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to assess MH rate in UC patients treated with thiopurine monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected all UC patients treated with thiopurines more than 6 months who have undergone colonoscopy at baseline and after at least 6 months of treatment. Patients were recruited from January 2005 to May 2015 through a personal database and/or standardized hospital inpatient diagnostic dataset. Patients were excluded in case of any use of other immunomodulator or biological agent. MH was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 and UCEIS ≤ 2. Histological healing (HH) was defined by the absence of epithelial polynuclear infiltrate, cryptic abscesses, or ulcerations. RESULTS: Eighty patients (31 women, median age 43 [IQR 32-58]) were included. Median disease duration was 10.5 [6-16] years. At baseline, median full Mayo score, endoscopic subscore, and UCEIS were 8 [6.8-10], 3 [2-3], and 5 [3-6], respectively. MH was first assessed after a mean follow-up of 38 ± 31 months. Median full Mayo score, endoscopic subscore, and UCEIS decreased to 3.5 [1-6], 2 [0-2.2], and 2 [0-4], respectively. MH was achieved in 43.7%, HH in 38%. In multivariate analysis, predictors of MH were thiopurine exposure duration ≥2 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.9, CI 95% (1.1-7.6), p = 0.03] and a prior acute severe colitis [OR 5.9, CI 95% (1.1-32), p = 0.04]. Factors associated with MH during treatment were partial Mayo score ≤2 (NPV = 100%), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (NPV = 75%), and MCV ≥ 95 fL (NPV = 73%). CONCLUSIONS: In UC, thiopurine monotherapy is associated with MH in 43.7% and HH in 38%.

Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Healthcare professionals are required to conduct quality control of endoscopy procedures, and yet there is no standardised method for assessing quality. The topic of the present study was to validate the applicability of the procedure in daily practice, giving physicians the ability to define areas for continuous quality improvement. METHODS: In ten endoscopy units in France, 200 patients per centre undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled in the study. An evaluation was carried out based on a prospectively developed checklist of 10 quality-control indicators including five dependent upon and five independent of the colonoscopy procedure. RESULTS: Of the 2000 procedures, 30% were done at general hospitals, 20% at university hospitals, and 50% in private practices. The colonoscopies were carried out for a valid indication for 95.9% (range 92.5-100). Colon preparation was insufficient in 3.7% (range 1-10.5). Colonoscopies were successful in 95.3% (range 81-99). Adenoma detection rate was 0.31 (range 0.17-0.45) in successful colonoscopies. CONCLUSION: This tool for evaluating the quality of colonoscopy procedures in healthcare units is based on standard endoscopy and patient criteria. It is an easy and feasible procedure giving the ability to detect suboptimal practice and differences between endoscopy-units. It will enable individual units to assess the quality of their colonoscopy techniques.

Gastric polyp prolapsed into the duodenum as a rare cause of acute pancreatitis.

Mechanical gastric polyp complications are very rare occurrences most commonly related to hyperplastic polyps. We report here the case of a young woman with a 12-cm adenomatous polyp on the great curvature of the stomach diagnosed incidentally during tests for anaemia. Later, the patient was referred to hospital for recurrent emergency due to acute pancreatitis caused by the polyp prolapsing into the duodenum. A two-step treatment was undertaken: the first procedure consisted of a surgical polypectomy followed by a second-step total gastrectomy for cancer necessitated by the presence of an invasive adenocarcinoma on the polyp. This case proves malignant adenomatous polyps to be exceptionally responsible for mechanical complications such as acute pancreatitis due to polyp prolapsing into the duodenum. In such a complicated case, we recommend deferredemergency resection of the polyp followed subsequently by gastrectomy for cancer when histologically indicated.

Gut dysfunction and endoscopic lesions after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest induces severe mesenteric ischaemia. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of gut dysfunction and endoscopic lesions following resuscitation after cardiac arrest, and to evaluate the potential value of gut endoscopy performance in these circumstances. METHODS: This is a retrospective data files survey of 3617 patients from the database in a medical intensive care unit. A systematic review of medical and endoscopic files was performed within this database, using a standardised chart. PATIENTS: One-hundred and thirty consecutive patients who survived up to 48 h were admitted to our unit after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Seventy-eight of these patients (60%) presented with early clinical signs of gut dysfunction and/or lesions. Thirty-six patients underwent gut endoscopies (26%) and were included in the survey. RESULTS: Endoscopic lesions were observed in all cases; in 15 cases, gastrointestinal haemorrhage requiring intervention was identified. The occurrence of haemorrhagic and/or necrotic lesions was found to be associated with an initial rhythm of asystole, higher SAPS II values and epinephrine requirements, compared with cardiac arrest patients without such lesions. CONCLUSION: The frequent occurrence of endoscopic lesions in the presence of gut dysfunction following a cardiac arrest could suggest systematic gut endoscopy in such patients. However, an alternative recommendation would be to watch these patients very closely, treat all with prophylactic proton pump inhibitors, and endoscope only those with evidence of bleeding.