Storylines of family medicine II: foundational building blocks-context, community and health.

Storylines of Family Medicine is a 12-part series of thematically linked mini-essays with accompanying illustrations that explore the many dimensions of family medicine, as interpreted by individual family physicians and medical educators in the USA and elsewhere around the world. In 'II: foundational building blocks-context, community and health', authors address the following themes: 'Context-grounding family medicine in time, place and being', 'Recentring community', 'Community-oriented primary care', 'Embeddedness in practice', 'The meaning of health', 'Disease, illness and sickness-core concepts', 'The biopsychosocial model', 'The biopsychosocial approach' and 'Family medicine as social medicine.' May readers grasp new implications for medical education and practice in these essays.

Negotiating a new chair package: context and considerations.

Negotiating a resource package as a potential new department chair is common practice in academic medicine. The foundations for this negotiation include the historical presence of the department in relation to the broader institution, projections for future growth, accounting for mission/vision, resource needs (space, personnel, finances, etc), faculty and staff development, and external partnerships within and outside the institution. Despite similarities in this process across departments, many nuances influence the development of a specific new chair package, such as, department size; desires, perspectives and talents of the incoming chair, the department faculty, the medical school and dean; prevailing agendas and mission imperatives; and the overall priorities of the institution. With strategy and forethought, a new chair package can promote a successful chair tenure and departmental growth. Assembled through the Association of Departments of Family Medicine with input from several dozen department chairs and senior leaders, this is intended to serve as a practical guide to new chair packages for chair candidates.

Antilipidemic adherence post-coronary artery disease diagnosis among those with and without an ICD-9 diagnosis of depression.

OBJECTIVES: An association between depression and coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established. Poor adherence to cardiac treatments may be one way depression could contribute to the increased risk of coronary events among depressed patients. We sought to evaluate whether adherence to antilipid medication, a therapy shown to be beneficial in secondary prevention of coronary events, differs among CAD patients with and without an ICD-9 depression diagnosis. METHODS: Patients were included if, at angiography, they were determined to have CAD (stenosis >or=70%), were discharged on an antilipid medication, and re-filled their prescriptions at a participating pharmacy. A patient was determined to have depression (ICD-9 codes 296.2-296.36, 311) if the diagnosis occurred prior to angiography or within 6 months of the CAD diagnosis. Adherence and long-term outcomes were evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 585 patients were included, with 73 (12.5%) having a diagnosis of depression prior to or within 6 months of CAD diagnosis. At all time-points, those with depression had a lower mean adherence compared to those without depression. Differences in adherence rates after adjustment were 7% (P=.001), 6% (P=.02), 13% (P<.0001) and 5% (P=.18) at 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 years, respectively. Though not statistically significant, there were clinically important associations between adherence and depression on the combined outcome of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization. CONCLUSION: Depression was the strongest predictor of antilipidemic medication adherence after 2 years of follow-up among CAD patients. Such results suggest that poor antilipid adherence may be one mechanism by which depression contributes to CAD events.

Depression after coronary artery disease is associated with heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of post-coronary artery disease (CAD) depression diagnosis on heart failure (HF) incidence. BACKGROUND: Depression has been shown to be a risk factor for poor outcomes among CAD patients. However, little is known about the influence of depression on HF development in CAD patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 13,708) without a diagnosis of HF and depression (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes: 296.2 to 296.36 and 311) and who were not prescribed antidepressant medication (ADM) at the time of CAD diagnosis (>or=70% stenosis) were studied. For those with available medication records (n = 7,719), patients subsequently diagnosed with depression were stratified by use of ADM. Patients were followed until HF diagnosis (physician-diagnosed or ICD-9 code: 428) or death. Results were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: A total of 1,377 patients (10.0%) had a post-CAD clinical depression diagnosis. The incidence of HF among those without a post-CAD depression diagnosis was 3.6 per 100 compared with 16.4 per 100 for those with a post-CAD depression diagnosis. Depression was associated with an increased risk for HF incidence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50, p < 0.0001). Results were similar among those with available follow-up medication information (vs. no depression: depression without ADM use [HR: 1.68, p < 0.0001]; depression with ADM use [HR: 2.00, p < 0.0001]). No difference was found between depressed patients with and without ADM treatment (HR: 0.84, p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Depression diagnosis was shown to be associated with an increased incidence of HF after CAD diagnosis, regardless of ADM treatment. This finding suggests the need to further study the effect of depression on HF risk among CAD patients.

Invasive meningococcal disease, Utah, 1995-2005.

Trends in invasive meningococcal disease in Utah during 1995-2005 have differed substantially from US trends in incidence rate and serogroup and age distributions. Regional surveillance is essential to identify high-risk populations that might benefit from targeted immunization efforts.

The Utah rural residency study: a blueprint for evaluating potential sites for development of a 4-4-4 family practice residency program in a rural community.

CONTEXT: Most graduates of rural residencies enter rural practice. Rural residencies therefore have emerged over the past 2 decades to increase the supply of rural physicians. However, researchers have published few descriptions of strategies to evaluate and select communities in which to locate rural residencies. PURPOSE: This report describes the development and application of such a strategy to assess 7 rural communities in Utah as potential sites for family practice residency training. METHODS: Criteria were developed on the basis of an examination of the literature, residency accreditation requirements, and characteristics of existing rural residency programs. Ten rural or frontier communities with hospitals were selected as study candidates, and 7 agreed to participate. Data were collected through hospital surveys, state hospital discharge records, and community site visits. FINDINGS: Specific evaluation criteria that were developed included the presence of a medical practice of the appropriate specialty and size, a sufficient number of medical subspecialty physicians, an adequate number and mix of hospitalized patients, an adequate number of ambulatory patients, adequate outpatient facility space to accommodate learners, and a commitment by the practicing physician and hospital to lead the program and teach residents. Two communities were found to be potentially capable of supporting a residency if physicians and hospital leaders in the communities were to become motivated to lead program development. CONCLUSIONS: These criteria may be useful in other states, but they have not been tested for validity or reliability and are subject to limitations such as exclusion of alternate rural residency models. Future research should address data needs and the relationship of the evaluation criteria to the quality of resident learning.