Storylines of family medicine VI: ways of being-in the office with patients.

Storylines of Family Medicine is a 12-part series of thematically linked mini-essays with accompanying illustrations that explore the many dimensions of family medicine, as interpreted by individual family physicians and medical educators in the USA and elsewhere around the world. In 'VI: ways of being-in the office with patients', authors address the following themes: 'Patient-centred care-cultivating deep listening skills', 'Doctor as witness', 'Words matter', 'Understanding others-metaphor and its use in medicine', 'Communicating with patients-making good use of time', 'The patient-centred medical home-aspirations for the future', 'Routine, ceremony or drama?' and 'The life course'. May readers better appreciate the nuances of patient care through these essays.

Writing an External Letter of Review for Promotion.

Academic promotion, representing achievement of a level of distinction in one's body of work, is an honorable accomplishment in a faculty member's career. External letters of review written by faculty at higher ranks are a critical component of the promotion portfolio. We discuss key considerations for writing external letters. These considerations can be used to mentor this skill for less experienced letter writers. We also highlight how professional societies can aid faculty in developing and strengthening writing and mentoring capabilities for this vital task.

Impact of Primary Care Exception Expansion on Family Medicine Resident Billing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Medicare Primary Care Exception (PCE) permits indirect supervision of residents performing lower-complexity visits in primary care settings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Medicare expanded the PCE to all patient visits regardless of complexity. This study investigates how PCE expansion changed resident billing practices at a family medicine residency during calendar year 2020. We hypothesized that residents not constrained by the PCE would bill more high-level visits. METHODS: We queried billing codes from attendings' and residents' established evaluation and management visits associated with the University of Washington Family Medicine Residency (UWFMR) from January to December 2020. We used χ2 tests to compare resident and attending physicians' use of low/moderate and high-level codes by quarter. RESULTS: Resident high-complexity code use increased after PCE expansion in Q4 (odds ratio [OR] 3.50 [2.34-5.23]) compared to Q1. No change was observed among attending physicians (OR 1.05 [0.86-1.28]). Resident and attending billing patterns became more similar following PCE expansion. CONCLUSIONS: With the PCE expansion, senior family medicine resident physicians at UWFMR used higher-complexity billing codes at a rate approximating that of attending physicians. The findings of this study have implications regarding the financial well-being and sustainability of primary care residency training and raise a relevant policy question about whether the PCE expansion should persist. More research is needed to determine whether these findings were replicated in other primary care residency practices, the impact on resident education, and the impact on patient outcomes.

Can Family Medicine's Counterculture History Help Shape an Anti-Racist Future?

Family medicine prides itself on community engagement and has embraced its counterculture roots. After the racial and social reckoning of 2020, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matters movement, family medicine, as a specialty, must embrace anti-racism as a core value to meet community needs. This article reflects on the foundational tenets of family medicine's origin. It highlights the current disparities regarding professional representation while offering equitable, intentional, and collaborative approaches to move toward and achieve anti-racism within the specialty, medical education, and the community.

Gender Differences in Authorship of Family Medicine Publications, 2002-2017.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Representation of women in medicine is increasing, including in academic family medicine. Despite this, women continue to hold a minority of senior faculty and leadership roles. This study examines the trends of women first and senior authorship between 2002 and 2017 in five family medicine journals: Family Medicine, Journal of Family Practice, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Annals of Family Medicine, and American Family Physician. The study also examines gender congruence between first and senior authors and women's membership on editorial boards. METHODS: We collected and analyzed data on a total of 1,671 original articles published in the five family medicine journals in 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017. We also examined the gender composition of the journals' editorial boards. RESULTS: Overall, women first authorship increased significantly from 32.6% in 2002 to 47.7% in 2017. There was no significant difference in women senior authorship or editorial board representation from 2002 to 2017. Both men and women senior authors partnered with women first authors significantly more over the 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: While there was a statistically significant increase in women first authors between 2002 and 2017, there is still a gap between women's authorship and editorial board representation and their representation within academic family medicine. These gaps could help to explain the continued lack of women represented within senior faculty positions.

Association of Family Medicine Interest at Matriculation to Medical School and FMIG Participation With Eventual Practice as a Family Physician.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An adequate family medicine workforce is needed to improve health and health care outcomes in the United States, yet few medical students in the US become family physicians. Indicators of family medicine interest upon medical school matriculation exist. Family medicine interest groups (FMIGs) may influence student choice. This study examines the association of FMIG participation with various matriculation interest indicators to predict which students go on to become family physicians. METHODS: The American Medical Association Masterfile was used to identify the practice specialty of 601 graduates of the University of Washington School of Medicine who matriculated between 2003 and 2007. Graduates' scores on the Family Medicine Interest Survey (FMIS) and whether a student listed family medicine as their top choice upon matriculation along with FMIG participation and demographic characteristics were used in a binary logistic regression model to predict eventual practice. The model output was used to calculate odds ratios and predicted probabilities of family medicine practice given initial family medicine interest and FMIG participation. RESULTS: FMIG participation was associated with higher odds ratios and increased predicted probability of becoming a family physician regardless of initial interest although the magnitude of the difference varied. FMIG participants who listed family medicine as their top specialty had a 68% predicted probability of entering family medicine compared to 8% probability if they did not list family medicine first and did not participate in FMIG. FMIG participation was associated with odds ratios between 3.27-4.19 for entering family medicine regardless of FMIS score. CONCLUSIONS: Among University of Washington students with family medicine as their top specialty choice upon matriculation, FMIG participation was associated with higher odds of entering the specialty. The same was true, although to a lesser degree, for students who had a high score on the FMIS.

The Persistence of Specialty Disrespect: Student Perspectives.

PURPOSE: One aspect of the hidden curriculum of medicine is specialty disrespect (SD)-an expressed lack of respect among medical specialties that occurs at all levels of training and across geographic, demographic, and professional boundaries, with quantifiable impacts on student well-being and career decision making. This study sought to identify medical students' perceptions of and responses to SD in the learning environment. METHODS: We conducted quantitative and content analysis of an annual survey collected between 2008 and 2012 from 702 third- and fourth-year students at the University of Washington School of Medicine. We describe the frequency of reported SD, its self-rated impact on student specialty choice, and major descriptive categories. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of respondents reported experiencing SD in the previous year. A moderate or strong impact on specialty choice was reported by 25.9% of respondents. In our sample, students matching into family medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and emergency medicine were most likely to report exposure. Content analysis identified two new concepts not previously reported. Internecine strife describes students distancing themselves from both disrespecting and disrespected specialties, while legitimacy questions the validity of the targeted specialty. CONCLUSIONS: SD is a consistent and ubiquitous part of clinical training that pushes students away from both disrespecting and disrespected specialties. These results emphasize the need for solutions aimed at minimizing disrespect and mitigating its effects upon students.

Impact of the Primary Care Exception on Family Medicine Resident Coding.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Medicare Primary Care Exception (PCE) allows residents to see and bill for less-complex patients independently in the primary care setting, requiring attending physicians only to see patients for higher-level visits and complete physical exams in order to bill for them as such. Primary care residencies apply the PCE in various ways. We investigated the impact of the PCE on resident coding practices. METHODS: Family medicine residency directors in a five-state region completed a survey regarding interpretation and application of the PCE, including the number of established patient evaluation and management codes entered by residents and attending faculty at their institution. The percentage of high-level codes was compared between residencies using chi-square tests. RESULTS: We analyzed coding data for 125,016 visits from 337 residents and 172 faculty physicians in 15 of 18 eligible family medicine residencies. Among programs applying the PCE criteria to all patients, residents billed 86.7% low-mid complexity and 13.3% high-complexity visits. In programs that only applied the PCE to Medicare patients, residents billed 74.9% low-mid complexity visits and 25.2% high-complexity visits. Attending physicians coded more high-complexity visits at both types of programs. The estimated revenue loss over the 1,650 RRC-required outpatient visits was $2,558.66 per resident and $57,569.85 per year for the average residency in our sample. CONCLUSIONS: Residents at family medicine programs that apply the PCE to all patients bill significantly fewer high-complexity visits. This finding leads to compliance and regulatory concerns and suggests significant revenue loss. Further study is required to determine whether this discrepancy also reflects inaccuracy in coding.

Medical Student Participation in Family Medicine Department Extracurricular Experiences and Choosing to Become a Family Physician.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many factors influence a medical student's decision to choose a family medicine career. The impact of participation in extracurricular programs sponsored by family medicine departments is currently unclear. Medical student participation in four University of Washington Department of Family Medicine-sponsored programs (Community Health Advancement Program, Family Medicine Interest Group, Rural Underserved Opportunity Program, and the Underserved Pathway) could be associated with becoming a family physician. METHODS: Demographic data, results from a matriculation career interest survey, records indicating participation in the four extracurricular programs, and Match lists showing the specialty of each graduate were linked. Based on responses to the matriculation survey, graduates were categorized into four levels of initial family medicine interest. Chi-square tests compared both demographic data with initial family medicine interest levels and initial family medicine interest levels with program participation. For residency-matched graduates, odds ratios of matching to family medicine versus other specialties for specific family medicine programs and number of programs were calculated, controlling for demographic variables and initial family medicine interest levels. RESULTS: Older age, female graduates, a rural upbringing, and high level of initial family medicine interest were independently and significantly associated with choosing family medicine. Participation in the Family Medicine Interest Group (OR 2.45) and the Underserved Pathway (OR 4.37) and two or more family medicine programs (OR 2.01--2.22) was significantly associated with entering family medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Certain demographic factors and high initial interest in family medicine is associated with entering the specialty. Some, but not all, family medicine department-sponsored extracurricular programs were associated with choosing family medicine.

Family medicine resident billing and lost revenue: a regional cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The financial margins for primary care clinics and residencies are narrow. It is important that residents bill properly for educational and financial purposes as well as for compliance. This study compares resident and attending Evaluation and Management (E&M) coding from family medicine residency programs across a five-state region, with established billing benchmarks. METHODS: We collected established visit E&M codes for faculty and residents from a network of family medicine residencies in the Northwest United States over a 6-month period. Aggregated codes were compared to billing benchmarks from the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) to estimate effects on revenue from these visits. RESULTS: We obtained coding data for 131,788 established problem-focused visits from 353 residents and 186 faculty physicians in 16 of 18 eligible family medicine residencies. Both residents and faculty billed lower numbers of high complexity codes than MGMA benchmarks. PGY-1s coded higher numbers of high complexity codes than PGY-3s. Annual estimated revenue loss was $481,654 for the programs overall. CONCLUSIONS: Residents do not bill established visits at the level of generally accepted benchmarks, which contributes to significant financial losses for programs and carries regulatory implications. The reasons for incorrect billing need to be established and interventions developed to overcome these barriers.

Using the Patient Centered Observation Form: Evaluation of an online training program.

OBJECTIVE: The Patient Centered Observation Form (PCOF) helps trainees identify and describe specific communication skills and enhance self-awareness about skill use. We studied the effectiveness and ease of use of the Improving Communication Assessment Program (ICAP), an online module that prepares trainees to use the PCOF. METHODS: Students, residents and medical educators viewed two videos (common and better skill use) of the same interaction and rated each video using the PCOF. Video sequence was randomized. We assessed agreement with experts, ease of use, concepts learned, and areas of confusion. RESULTS: Trainees (211) achieved strong agreement (.83) with experts and were highly satisfied (mean 4.18 out of 5). Viewing the common video first produced higher agreement (.87 vs .79; ES=.4) with experts and greater satisfaction (4.36 vs 4.02, ES .4) than viewing the better video first. Trainees reported diverse areas of learning and minimal confusion. CONCLUSION: ICAP training to use the PCOF may facilitate teaching and assessment of communication skills and enrich training through peer observation and feedback. We offer several educational strategies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Learning to use the PCOF via the ICAP module may accelerate communication training for medical students, residents, medical educators and practicing clinicians.

Clinical inquiry: does frenotomy help infants with tongue-tie overcome breastfeeding difficulties?

No evidence exists for improved latching after frenotomy, and evidence concerning improvements in maternal comfort is conflicting. At best, frenotomy improves maternal nipple pain by 10% and maternal subjective sense of improvement over the short term (0 to 2 weeks).