Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 37(6): 1113-1118, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Skin diseases are a common reason for emergency department (ED) consultations; however, few studies have focused on pediatric patients. Diagnostic consistency between ED physicians and dermatologists varies from 43% to 58%, meaning many patients seeking emergency care may receive incorrect diagnoses and treatments. We aimed to determine the diagnostic concordance between ED physicians and pediatric dermatologists. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study including all pediatric patients (<18 years) who were seen for a skin condition at the ED from December 1, 2017, to June 1, 2018, and consented to participate. We classified diagnoses according to their etiology. Patients were diagnosed by ED trainees and attending physicians, followed by blinded pediatric dermatology trainees and attending physicians. We evaluated concordance using Fleiss's kappa coefficient (κ) with a 95% confidence interval. We further stratified the data by level of training. RESULTS: We included 185 patients. Inflammatory conditions were the most common reason for consultation, followed by infections; 10 patients required hospitalization. Concordance between diagnoses given at the ED and at the dermatology clinic was moderate (κ 0.472, 95% CI: 0.389-0.455) with 62.7% agreement. Concordance between different diagnostic categories was lowest for autoimmune disorders and drug reactions (κ 0.392 with 95% CI: 0.248-0.536 and κ 0.258 with 95% CI: 0.114-0.402). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic concordance between ED physicians and dermatologists was moderate and differed according to training level and diagnoses. Dermatological education for ED providers, specifically focusing on autoimmune disorders and drug reactions, may improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.


Asunto(s)
Dermatólogos , Médicos , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , México , Estudios Prospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
2.
Clin Neuropharmacol ; 39(6): 311-319, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27563745

RESUMEN

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alteration in brain function, caused by an external force, which may be a hit on the skull, rapid acceleration or deceleration, penetration of an object, or shock waves from an explosion. Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a high prevalence rate in pediatric patients, in which treatment options are still limited, not available at present neuroprotective drugs. Although the therapeutic management of these patients is varied and dependent on the severity of the injury, general techniques of drug types are handled, as well as physical and surgical. Baclofen is a muscle relaxant used to treat spasticity and improve mobility in patients with spinal cord injuries, relieving pain and muscle stiffness. Pharmacological support with baclofen is contradictory, because disruption of its oral administration may cause increased muscle tone syndrome and muscle spasm, prolonged seizures, hyperthermia, dysesthesia, hallucinations, or even multisystem organ failure. Combined treatments must consider the pathophysiology of broader alterations than only excitation/inhibition context, allowing the patient's reintegration with the greatest functionality.


Asunto(s)
Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/uso terapéutico , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/clasificación , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA