RESUMEN
Taste and smell disorders (TSDs) are common side effects in patients undergoing cancer treatments. Knowing which treatments specifically cause them is crucial to improve patients' quality of life. This review looked at the oncological treatments that cause taste and smell alterations and their time of onset. We performed an integrative rapid review. The PubMed, PROSPERO, and Web of Science databases were searched in November 2022. The article screening and study selection were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were analyzed narratively. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. A high heterogeneity was detected. Taste disorders ranged between 17 and 86%, while dysosmia ranged between 8 and 45%. Docetaxel, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, anthracyclines, and oral 5-FU analogues were found to be the drugs most frequently associated with TSDs. This review identifies the cancer treatments that mainly lead to taste and smell changes and provides evidence for wider studies, including those focusing on prevention. Further studies are warranted to make conclusive indication possible.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Trastornos del Olfato , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Olfato , Gusto , Trastornos del Gusto/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Initial findings in patients with cancer suggest a lower seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination possibly related to myelo-immunosuppressive therapies. We conducted a prospective study to assess factors predicting poor seroconversion and adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients on active treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer patients, candidates to two doses of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, were enrolled. Patients on active surveillance served as controls. The primary endpoint was poor seroconversion (anti S1/S2 IgG < 25 AU/mL) after 21 days from the second dose. RESULTS: Between March and July 2021, 320 subjects were recruited, and 291 were assessable. The lack of seroconversion at 21 days from the second dose was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-8.7) on active surveillance, 13.9% (8.2-21.6) on chemotherapy, 11.4% (5.1-21.3) on hormone therapy, 21.7% (7.5-43.7) on targeted therapy and 4.8% (0.12-23.8) on immune-checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI). Compared to controls, the risk of no IgG response was greater for chemotherapy (p = 0.033), targeted therapy (0.005) and hormonotherapy (p = 0.051). Lymphocyte count < 1 × 109/L (p = 0.04) and older age (p = 0.03) also significantly predicted poor seroconversion. Overall, 43 patients (14.8%) complained of AEFI, mostly of mild grade. Risk of AEFI was greater in females (p = 0.001) and younger patients (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy, lymphocyte count < 1 × 109/L, and increasing age predict poor seroconversion after two doses of BNT162b2 in up to 20% of patients, indicating the need for a third dose and long-term serological testing in non-responders. AEFI occur much more frequently in women and younger subjects who may benefit from preventive medications. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04932863.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Neoplasias/terapia , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunación , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Anciano , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Biomarcadores/sangre , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Seroconversión , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We recently conducted a de-escalation trial of low-dose tamoxifen 5 mg/day ("babytam", BT) or placebo given for 3 years in 500 women with noninvasive breast cancer. Women on babytam had a 52% reduction of recurrence (invasive breast cancer or DCIS) after 5 years. Since menopausal symptoms are major reasons for treatment withdrawal during tamoxifen preventive therapy, we compared and analyzed the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with the physician-reported adverse events and studied their association with recurrence. METHODS: Menopausal symptoms recorded by physicians using the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAEs) were compared with a patient self-reported validated questionnaire reviewed by a research nurse at baseline and every 6 months up to 36 months. Hot flashes (HF), the main outcome measure, were detected through a self-report 7-day diary for frequency and intensity. Treatment adherence and efficacy were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox model. RESULTS: The number of HF events at 12, 24, and 36 months for PROs versus CTCAEs was 246 versus 12, 238 versus 8, and 210 versus 4, respectively. The majority of events were grade 1. There was no difference in PROs between babytam and placebo except for HF daily frequency, which increased by 1.5 events (95% CI, 1.1-1.8) on placebo to 2.1 on babytam (95% CI, 1.7-2.5, p = 0.05). The presence of HF at baseline was a favorable prognostic factor for recurrence and a predictive factor for response to babytam. Adherence was similar between babytam and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PROs is effective for identifying frequent mild grade menopausal symptoms which are underestimated by physicians but important prognostic and predictive factors. Research nurse can use these results as a tool to reassure patients about symptoms, improve adherence to treatment, and limit dropouts.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Médicos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Sofocos/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Cancer patients are exposed to a greater risk of COVID-19 infection, resulting in treatment delays and unnecessary hospitalizations. International authorities have suggested reducing visits to hospitals and guarantee continuity of care. We developed a home care project called Home Se-Cure (HSC) to guarantee the continuity of oral, intramuscular, and subcutaneous cancer therapy during COVID-19. The Home Se-Cure project included cancer patients living near Galliera Hospital. Patients received home visits by registered nurses (RNs), whoperformed blood tests and delivered cancer therapies. Patients were instructed to take drugs after blood test results and therapy confirmation by oncologists. Sixty-six patients decided to participate and 38 declined the service. A customer satisfaction questionnaire was administered to a subgroup of patients participating in the project. The most prevalent disease in the HSC group was prostate cancer. The mean age of the patients in HSC was 78.4 years and 68.9 in the decliner group. The majority of the HSC participants appreciated the project because they could stay at home (71%) and reduce the risk of COVID-19 contagion (67.7%). Compared to decliners, the time the study group saved was 2033 hours. HSC guaranteed the continuity of care during the COVID-19 pandemic by reducing the number of patients in the hospital and avoiding crowds in the waiting room.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Neoplasias , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vaccines have shown 95% protection from COVID-19 disease in healthy populations. Initial findings in cancer patients suggest a lower seroconversion and greater toxicity possibly related to myelo-immunosuppressive therapies. AIM: We conducted a prospective study to assess factors predicting poor seroconversion and adverse events following immunization (AEFI) to the BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment. METHODS: Blood samples were collected by the research nurse at first dose (visit 1), second dose (visit 2), after 42 days (visit 3) and after 6 months (visit 4). At visit 1, 3 and 4 participants received: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Distress Thermometer. Patients who ended treatment >6 months on active surveillance served as controls. RESULTS: Between March and July 2021, 320 subjects were recruited and 291 were assessable. The lack of seroconversion at 21 days from the second dose was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-8.7) on active surveillance, 13.9% (8.2-21.6) on chemotherapy, 11.4% (5.1-21.3) on hormone therapy, 21.7% (7.5-43.7) on targeted therapy and 4.8% (0.12-23.8) on immunotherapy. Compared to controls, the risk of no IgG response was greater for chemotherapy (P=0.033), targeted therapy (0.005) and hormonotherapy (P=0.051). Lymphocyte count less than 1x109/L, older age and advanced stage also significantly predicted poor seroconversion. Overall, 43 patients (14.8%) complained of AEFI, mostly of mild grade. Risk of AEFI was greater in females (P=0.001) and younger patients (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: A third booster dose and long-term serological testing is required in subjects who have not responded to the vaccine. NURSING IMPLICATIONS: nurses must take responsibility for promoting and protecting the health of cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Vacunas , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Mensajero , SARS-CoV-2 , SeroconversiónRESUMEN
Liguria is a northwestern region of Italy that, since the WHO has declared COVID-19 as a pandemic (11 March 2020), presented 108 patients hospitalized, 34 of which were in the intensive care unit. Due to this serious epidemiological emergency, the transformation of a long-distance ferry ship into a hospital ship for COVID-19 patients who were still positive after the acute phase of the illness was carried out to free up hospital beds for patients in the acute phase. The ship was moored in the port of Genoa, the capital of Liguria. The conversion was localized to a single deck, where designated healthcare areas were identified. From 23 March to 18 June 2020, 191 patients were admitted onto the ship; they were provided with high-level healthcare guaranteed by the multi-disciplinary nature of clinical competencies available. Patients had a favorable outcome in all cases, confirmed by their recovery and negative swab results. Moreover, no cases of voluntary discharge were recorded. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only example in the world in which a passenger ship was transformed into a ship hospital for COVID patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitales/clasificación , Navíos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PandemiasRESUMEN
SETTING: Six Districts of the Health Authority "ASL3 Genovese" (Genoa-Italy), where 3764 patients in Oral Anticoagulation Therapy (OAT) are followed for monitoring International Normalized Ratio (INR). AIM: To increase knowledge of patients through group health education sessions conducted by nurses. METHOD: Training of nurses and production of a draft version of a booklet. The final version was developed with the contribution of hospital cardiologists, laboratory services, risk managers and General Practitioners. A questionnaire was administered to assess patients satisfaction with clarity of the presentations, relevance of the contents, appropriateness of educational method and usefulness of the booklet. RESULTS: From September to December 2008 1074 patients (51% of those invited) attended the 96 health education sessions that involved 120 nurses. Rate of attendance varied greatly in the six districts ranging from 26% to 68%. Mean age of the participants was 74 (range 33-95). The questionnaires were completed by 1039 participants (97%). The majority rated the contents of the session and the booklet clear, useful and appropriate. Problems encountered, strengths and limitations of the intervention were identified. Plan for action for continuing educational intervention was organised. CONCLUSIONS: Educational sessions were very appreciated. One of the major strengths was the involvement of all the professionals that contribute to patients care.