Risk factors for occurrence of failed interscalene brachial plexus blocks for shoulder arthroscopy using 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain management after arthroscopic procedures improves patients' satisfaction with the performed procedure, as well as facilitating early rehabilitation. The aim of the current randomised, prospective clinical study was to assess the influence of anthropometric parameters and the interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) technique on the quality of post-operational analgesia. METHODS: 109 randomly selected patients of ASA I-III status were scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Reasons for non-inclusion were as follows: neurological deficit in the upper arm; allergies to amide Las; coagulopathy; and pregnancy. The patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for an ultrasound (US)-guided IBPB (group U), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-confirmation IBPB (group N), or US-guided, PNS-confirmed IBPB (dual guidance; group NU). RESULTS: We observed that the studied groups did not differ in mean time of sensory and motor block terminations and, surprisingly, in each group in individual cases the sensory block lasted up to 890-990 minutes providing satisfactory long-lasting post-operational analgesia in patients receiving IBPB. We observed a negative correlation between BMI and termination of the motor block and a positive correlation between age and termination of the sensory block in patients receiving US-guided IBPB (group U) in comparison with the two other groups. We found a positive correlation between the male gender and termination of the motor block in patients receiving PNS-guided IBPB (group N) in comparison with two other groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients received satisfactory analgesia in the post-operational period no matter what technique was used regardless of their age, gender or potentially uncommon anthropometry.

Risk factors for the development of Horner's syndrome following interscalene brachial plexus block using ropivacaine for shoulder arthroscopy: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Horner's syndrome is comprised of a set of symptoms caused by a permanent or transient ipsilateral sympathetic trunk lesion or paralysis. It may occur after numerous pathologies in the cervical region, epidural, spinal anaesthesia, and interscalene, transscalene, supraclavicular, or infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The aim of this randomised, prospective clinical study was to evaluate the effect of the interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) technique on the occurrence rate of Horner's syndrome and identify contributing risk factors. METHODS: 108 randomly selected patients of ASA I-III status were scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. The patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine either with ultrasound (US)-guided IBPB (U), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-confirmation IBPB (N), or US-guided, PNS-confirmed IBPB (dual guidance; NU). RESULTS: We observed that Horner's syndrome developed in 12% of the N group, 6% of the NU group, and 9% of the U group. The differences in the rates were not statistically significant (P = 0.616). Regardless of the technique used to induce IBPB, our study did not demonstrate any particular anthropometric parameter that predisposed the patients to the development of Horner's syndrome. Interestingly, our results showed that NU patients with Horner's syndrome were significantly younger than NU patients without Horner's syndrome. CONCLUSION: The precision of IBPB by use of the dual guidance technique may reduce the rate of Horner's syndrome. The higher water concentration in the prevertebral spaces of younger patients may create better conditions for the diffusion of ropivacaine, which may result in a statistically significant higher HS rate.

Randomised controlled trial of analgesic effectiveness of three different techniques of single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block using 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for shoulder arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroscopic procedures impose a challenge to anaesthesiologists in terms of postoperative analgesia. Proper pain management after arthroscopic procedures improves patient satisfaction and facilitates early rehabilitation. METHODS: We performed a randomized, prospective clinical study to assess the influence of anthropometric parameters and IBPB technique on the quality of postoperative analgesia. A total of 106 randomly selected patients of ASA I-III status scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Reasons for exclusion were neurological deficit in the upper arm, allergies to amide-type local anesthetics, coagulopathy, and pregnancy.The patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) (group U), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-confirmed IBPB (group N), or ultrasound-guided, PNS-confirmed IBPB (dual guidance; group NU). RESULTS: We observed that the three groups did not differ in mean time of sensory and motor block terminations. In individual cases in each group, sensory block lasted up to 890-990 minutes, providing satisfactory long lasting postoperative analgesia in patients receiving IBPB. We observed a negative correlation between body mass index and termination of motor block (P = 0.037, Pearson's correlation coefficient) and a positive correlation between age and termination of sensory block (P = 0.0314, Pearson's correlation coefficient) in group U compared to the other two groups. We found a positive correlation between male gender and termination of motor block (P = 0.0487, Pearson's correlation coefficient) in group N compared to the other two groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients received satisfactory analgesia in the postoperative period regardless of technique used, age, gender, or potentially uncommon anthropometry.

Randomized, comparative study of the effectiveness of three different techniques of interscalene brachial plexus block using 0.5% ropivacaine for shoulder arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block is an effective regional anesthesia technique for shoulder surgeries. The superiority of the popular ultrasound-guided blocks over peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks remains unclear. In this study the efficacy of these different block techniques was compared. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, clinical study included 109 patients (ASA grades I-III) who receive 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine with ultrasound-guided blocks (U group), peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks (N group), or ultrasound-guided and peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed blocks (dual guidance; NU group) for elective shoulder arthroscopy. Block onset time, duration, and effectiveness on the Lovett rating scale were assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in duration of block performance, irrespective of the technique (P = 0.232). Onset time of complete warmth sensation loss (P < 0.001) and muscle strength abolition (P < 0.001) was significantly longer and mean Lovett rating scale score distribution was significantly higher in the N group than in the other groups (P < 0.001). These findings show a statistically significant correlation between the performance of the used block technique and the necessity of conversion to general anesthesia because of insufficient block in the N group (58.54%) than in the U (24.44%) and NU (19.57%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral nerve stimulator-confirmed needle placement is not necessary to ensure effectiveness of ultrasound-guided blocks, which is expressed as a lack of necessity of conversion to general anesthesia. Nevertheless, the dual guidance technique is recommended to reduce the risk of complications and might be considered the regional anesthesia of choice for shoulder surgery.

[Selected techniques of regional anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery]. / Wybrane metody i techniki wykonywania znieczulen przewodowych w chirurgii ortopedycznej.

Central blocks, continuous subarachnoid-epidural anaesthesia, including combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSE) are used for long and painful procedures of lower limbs. They provide quick and good-quality anaesthesia as well as satisfactory postoperative analgesia. After their administration, ambulation is quick and rehabilitation instituted early, which is essential for the postoperative course of orthopaedic procedures. Peripheral blocks are an excellent alternative, especially in patients at high perioperative risk, who require anticoagulants. The novel techniques of location of peripheral nerves and plexuses, i.e., nerve stimulation- and ultrasound-guidance, improve the efficacy of blocks and shorten the duration of anaesthesia. Moreover, they improve safety and comfort of patients.