Association of norepinephrine with pressure ulcer development in critically ill patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: A dose-response analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between varying doses of norepinephrine (NE) and the incidence of pressure injuries (PIs) in COVID-19 patients in intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 1,078 COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring mechanical ventilation. The research spanned from March 2020 to April 2021 across five university-affiliated hospitals in Iran. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses, along with linear and non-linear dose-response assessments, were utilized to evaluate the relationship between NE dosages and the probability of PI development. FINDINGS: The multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between higher doses of NE administered over 24 h (OR: 1.832, 95 % CI: 1.218-2.754, P=0.004) and cumulative doses (OR: 1.408, 95 % CI: 1.204-1.975, P=0.048) with the occurrence of PIs. Moreover, patients receiving high NE doses had a nearly fourfold increased risk of developing PIs, regardless of PIs stage, compared to those on low or moderate doses (>15 µg/min vs. ≤ 15 µg/min; OR: 4.401, 95 % CI: 3.339-5.801, P=0.001). Although the linear dose-response analysis did not show a significant correlation between NE doses (µg/min) and PI development (P>0.05), the non-linear analysis indicated that NE doses ≤ 9 µg/min were associated with a reduced risk of PI development. CONCLUSION: Maintaining NE infusion within the range of 1-9 µg/min appears to be most effective in reducing the likelihood of PIs in ICU patients with COVID-19. Lower NE doses (≤9 µg/min) were associated with a lower risk of PI development, suggesting that factors beyond NE dosage or the use of other vasopressors may play a crucial role in PI formation in this patient cohort. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Rather than suggesting a specific threshold, clinicians should consider further studies to determine the optimal dose that balances microvascular perfusion and patient outcomes. It is crucial to comprehensively evaluate additional factors and selectively use vasopressors. Individualized care, including regular monitoring and personalized treatment plans, is essential for achieving the best outcomes in this patient population.

ANGIOTENSIN II IN THE TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTIVE SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC-REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

ABSTRACT: Objective: While nonnorepinephrine vasopressors are increasingly used as a rescue therapy in cases of norepinephrine-refractory shock, data on their efficacy are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize existing literature on the efficacy of angiotensin II (ATII) in distributive shock. Methods: We preregistered our meta-analysis with PROSPERO (CRD42023456136). We searched PubMed, Scopus, and gray literature for studies presenting outcomes on ATII use in distributive shock. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was all-cause mortality. We used a random effects model to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: By incorporating data from 1,555 patients included in 10 studies, we found that however, all-cause mortality was similar among patients receiving ATII and controls (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.16, P = 0.81), the reduction in norepinephrine or norepinephrine-equivalent dose at 3 h after treatment initiation was greater among patients receiving ATII (MD = -0.06; 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.02, P = 0.008), while there were no higher rates of adverse events reported among ATII patients. Conclusions: While ATII did not reduce mortality among distributive shock patients, it allowed for significant adjunctive vasopressor reduction at 3 h without an increase in reported adverse events, deeming it a viable alternative for the increasingly adopted multimodal vasopressor for minimizing catecholamine exposure and its adverse events.

Effect of peri-intubation non-pharmacological interventions on postoperative laryngeal symptoms: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of peri-intubation non-pharmacological interventions in reducing postoperative sore throat (POST), cough (PEC), and hoarseness in surgical patients. DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. SETTING: Elective surgery under general anesthesia in operating rooms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluate the impact of non-pharmacological interventions, including pre-intubation (gargling with Sodium Azulene Sulfonate, licorice, or using Strepsils tablets of honey and lemon lozenge), during-intubation (inflating the TT cuff with normal saline and softening the ETT cuff with warm normal saline), and post-intubation (cold vapor therapy, gargling with honey lemon water, and using green tea gargle), on the occurrence of POST, PEC, and hoarseness. RESULTS: Nineteen trials with 2,136 participants were included. Pre-intubation intervention significantly reduced POST immediately after extubation (n = 861; OR: 0.28, 95 % CI: 0.20-0.38, P < 0.001), and 24 h post-extubation (n = 1006; OR: 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.28, P < 0.001). During-intubation intervention did not show significant effects on POST. Pre-intubation intervention also reduced POST-associated pain score at 24 h post-extubation (n = 440; MD: -0.50, 95 % CI: -0.81 to -0.18, P < 0.001). Post-intubation interventions were effective in reducing POST-associated pain scores at different time points post-extubation (P < 0.05). Pre-intubation intervention significantly reduced PEC (OR: 0.13, 95 % CI: 0.02-0.70, P = 0.02) and hoarseness (OR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.15-0.86, P = 0.02) at 24 h post-extubation. However, during-intubation interventions did not reduce hoarseness at 24 h post-extubation. CONCLUSION: Pre-intubation non-pharmacological interventions were found to be the most effective in reducing the incidence and severity of POST, PEC, and hoarseness. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Implementing pre-intubation non-pharmacological interventions can be beneficial for bedside nurses and healthcare professionals in reducing postoperative complications and nurses can contribute to improving patient comfort and recovery outcomes following surgery. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews on 2 January 2024 (CRD42023492813).

Obesity, Inflammation, and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

CONTEXT: Obesity is a risk factor for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related outcomes; however, the mechanism remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to determine whether inflammation mediates the association between obesity and COVID-19 outcomes. DESIGN: The International Study of Inflammation in Covid-19 (ISIC): A Prospective Multi-Center Observational Study Examining the Role of Biomarkers of Inflammation in Predicting Covid-19 Related Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients. SETTING: Ten hospitals in the United States and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Adults hospitalized specifically for COVID-19 between February 1, 2020, through October 19, 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inflammatory biomarkers, including soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), were measured at admission. Associations were examined between body-mass index (BMI, kg/m2) and a composite of death, need for mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy, stratified by pre- and post-Omicron variants. The contribution of inflammation to the relationship between obesity and outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Among 4644 participants (mean age 59.3, 45.6% male, 21.8% BMI≥35), those with BMI>40 (n=485) had 55% higher odds of the composite outcome (95% CI[1.21 to 1.98]) compared to non-obese individuals (BMI<30, n=2358) in multivariable analysis. In multiple mediation analysis, only suPAR remained a significant mediator between BMI and composite outcome. Associations were amplified for participants younger than 65 years and with pre-Omicron variants. CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19, notably in younger participants and in the pre-Omicron era. Inflammation, as measured by suPAR, is a significant mediator of the association between obesity and COVID-19 outcomes.

Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic ability of ischemia modified albumin in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 can rapidly deteriorate and develop acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Prominent features of the disease include severe inflammation, endotheliitis, and thrombosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic effectiveness of ischemia modified albumin (ΙΜΑ) in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This prospective observational study included adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test, who were hospitalized specifically for COVID-19. The outcomes of interest were progression to severe acute respiratory failure during the index hospitalization defined as partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen lower or equal to 150, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital mortality. Admission IMA levels were determined using the commercially available "IMA Assay Kit" method (Abbexa LTD, Cambridge, UK). Adults without SARS-CoV-2 infection were used as controls. RESULTS: 135 COVID-19 patients and 64 controls were included. Admission IMA levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients compared to controls [[24.38 (11.94) ng/ml vs. 14.69 (3.52) ng/ml, p < 0.01]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of admission IMA showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 94% (p < 0.0001) for COVID-19 diagnosis (cut-off value: 17.5 ng/ml; sensitivity: 90.37%; specificity: 87.5%). Admission IMA was also associated with mortality (AUC: 68%, p = 0.01). However, it was not associated with severe acute respiratory failure (AUC: 47%, p = 0.53) or ICU admission (AUC: 58%, p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: Admission IMA was significantly increased in COVID-19 patients and was associated with in-hospital mortality.

Effect of Centhaquine on the Coagulation Cascade in Normal State and Uncontrolled Hemorrhage: A Multiphase Study Combining Ex Vivo and In Vivo Experiments in Different Species.

Centhaquine is a novel vasopressor acting on α2A- and α2B-adrenoreceptors, increasing venous return and improving tissue perfusion. We investigated the effects of centhaquine on blood coagulation in normal state and uncontrolled hemorrhage using ex vivo and in vivo experiments in different species. Thromboelastography (TEG) parameters included clotting time (R), clot kinetics [K and angle (α)], clot strength (MA), and percent lysis 30 min post-MA (LY30). In normal rat blood, centhaquine did not alter R, K, α, MA, or LY30 values of the normal vehicle group or the antithrombotic effects of aspirin and heparin. Subsequently, New Zealand white rabbits with uncontrolled hemorrhage were assigned to three resuscitation groups: Sal-MAP 45 group (normal saline to maintain a mean arterial pressure, MAP, of 45 mmHg), Centh-MAP 45 group (0.05 mg kg-1 centhaquine plus normal saline to maintain a MAP of 45 mmHg), and Sal-MAP 60 group (normal saline to maintain a MAP of 60 mmHg). The Sal-MAP 45 group was characterized by no change in R, reduced K and MA, and increased α. In the Centh-MAP 45 group, TEG showed no change in R, K, and α compared to saline; however, MA increased significantly (p = 0.018). In the Sal-MAP 60 group, TEG showed no change in R, an increase in α (p < 0.001), a decrease in K (p < 0.01), and a decrease in MA (p = 0.029) compared to the Centh-MAP 45 group. In conclusion, centhaquine does not impair coagulation and facilitates hemostatic resuscitation.

Intubation Decision Based on Illness Severity and Mortality in COVID-19: An International Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of intubation timing, guided by severity criteria, on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients, amidst existing uncertainties regarding optimal intubation practices. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted from February 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. SETTING: Ten academic institutions in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: Adults (≥ 18 yr old) confirmed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and hospitalized specifically for COVID-19, requiring intubation postadmission. Exclusion criteria included patients hospitalized for non-COVID-19 reasons despite a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. INTERVENTIONS: Early invasive mechanical ventilation (EIMV) was defined as intubation in patients with less severe organ dysfunction (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] < 7 or Pa o2 /F io2 ratio > 250), whereas late invasive mechanical ventilation (LIMV) was defined as intubation in patients with SOFA greater than or equal to 7 and Pa o2 /F io2 ratio less than or equal to 250. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days of hospital admission. Among 4464 patients, 854 (19.1%) required mechanical ventilation (mean age 60 yr, 61.7% male, 19.3% Black). Of those, 621 (72.7%) were categorized in the EIMV group and 233 (27.3%) in the LIMV group. Death within 30 days after admission occurred in 278 patients (42.2%) in the EIMV and 88 patients (46.6%) in the LIMV group ( p = 0.28). An inverse probability-of-treatment weighting analysis revealed a statistically significant association with mortality, with patients in the EIMV group being 32% less likely to die either within 30 days of admission (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; p = 0.008) or within 30 days after intubation irrespective of its timing from admission (adjusted HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In severe COVID-19 cases, an early intubation strategy, guided by specific severity criteria, is associated with a reduced risk of death. These findings underscore the importance of timely intervention based on objective severity assessments.

Protease-Activated Receptors (PARs): Biology and Therapeutic Potential in Perioperative Stroke.

Perioperative stroke is a devastating complication that occurs during surgery or within 30 days following the surgical procedure. Its prevalence ranges from 0.08 to 10% although it is most likely an underestimation, as sedatives and narcotics can substantially mask symptomatology and clinical presentation. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology and identifying potential therapeutic targets are of paramount importance. Protease-activated receptors (PARs), a unique family of G-protein-coupled receptors, are widely expressed throughout the human body and play essential roles in various physiological and pathological processes. This review elucidates the biology and significance of PARs, outlining their diverse functions in health and disease, and their intricate involvement in cerebrovascular (patho)physiology and neuroprotection. PARs exhibit a dual role in cerebral ischemia, which underscores their potential as therapeutic targets to mitigate the devastating effects of stroke in surgical patients.

Continuous vs intermittent Non-Invasive blood pressure MONitoring in preventing postoperative organ failure (niMON): study protocol for an open-label, multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure has become one of the most important vital signs to monitor in the perioperative setting. Recently, the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) recommended, with low level of evidence, continuous monitoring of blood pressure during the intraoperative period. Continuous monitoring allows for early detection of hypotension, which may potentially lead to a timely treatment. Whether the ability to detect more hypotension events by continuous noninvasive blood pressure (C-NiBP) monitoring can improve patient outcomes is still unclear. Here, we report the rationale, study design, and statistical analysis plan of the niMON trial, which aims to evaluate the effect of intraoperative C-NiBP compared with intermittent (I-NiBP) monitoring on postoperative myocardial and renal injury. METHODS: The niMon trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, international, open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive C-NiBP or I-NiBP as an intraoperative monitoring strategy. The proportion of patients who develop myocardial injury in the first postoperative week is the primary outcome; the secondary outcomes are the proportions of patients who develop postoperative AKI, in-hospital mortality rate, and 30 and 90 postoperative days events. A sample size of 1265 patients will provide a power of 80% to detect a 4% absolute reduction in the rate of the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The niMON data will provide evidence to guide the choice of the most appropriate intraoperative blood pressure monitoring strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05496322, registered on the 5th of August 2023.

SuPAR, biomarkers of inflammation, and severe outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19: The International Study of Inflammation in COVID-19.

Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a hyperinflammatory syndrome. The biomarkers of inflammation best suited to triage patients with COVID-19 are unknown. We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study of adult patients hospitalized specifically for COVID-19 from February 1, 2020 to October 19, 2022. Biomarkers measured included soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, procalcitonin, ferritin, and D-dimer. In-hospital outcomes examined include death and the need for mechanical ventilation. Patients admitted in the United States (US, n = 1962) were used to compute area under the curves (AUCs) and identify biomarker cutoffs. The combined European cohorts (n = 1137) were used to validate the biomarker cutoffs. In the US cohort, 356 patients met the composite outcome of death (n = 197) or need for mechanical ventilation (n = 290). SuPAR was the most important predictor of the composite outcome and had the highest AUC (0.712) followed by CRP (0.642), ferritin (0.619), IL-6 (0.614), D-dimer (0.606), and lastly procalcitonin (0.596). Inclusion of other biomarkers did not improve discrimination. A suPAR cutoff of 4.0 ng/mL demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.4% (95% CI: 92.4%-98.0%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.5% (95% CI: 87.5%-96.9%) for the composite outcome. Patients with suPAR < 4.0 ng/mL comprised 10.6% of the cohort and had a 0.8% probability of the composite outcome. Applying this cutoff to the validation cohort yielded a sensitivity of 93.8% (90.4%-96.7%) and NPV of 95.5% (93.1%-97.8%) for the composite outcome. Among commonly measured biomarkers, suPAR offered stronger discriminatory ability and may be useful in triaging low-risk patients with COVID-19.

Novel insights into voltage-gated ion channels: Translational breakthroughs in medical oncology.

Preclinical evidence suggests that voltage gradients can act as a kind of top-down master regulator during embryogenesis and orchestrate downstream molecular-genetic pathways during organ regeneration or repair. Moreover, electrical stimulation shifts response to injury toward regeneration instead of healing or scarring. Cancer and embryogenesis not only share common phenotypical features but also commonly upregulated molecular pathways. Voltage-gated ion channel activity is directly or indirectly linked to the pathogenesis of cancer hallmarks, while experimental and clinical studies suggest that their modulation, e.g., by anesthetic agents, may exert antitumor effects. A large recent clinical trial served as a proof-of-principle for the benefit of preoperative use of topical sodium channel blockade as a potential anticancer strategy against early human breast cancers. Regardless of whether ion channel aberrations are primary or secondary cancer drivers, understanding the functional consequences of these events may guide us toward the development of novel therapeutic approaches.

Peri-operative night-time work of anaesthesiologists: A qualitative study of critical issues and proposals.

BACKGROUND: Qualitative data on the opinions of anaesthesiologists regarding the impact of peri-operative night-time working conditions on patient safety are lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to achieve in-depth understanding of anaesthesiologists' perceptions regarding the impact of night-time working conditions on peri-operative patient safety and actions that may be undertaken to mitigate perceived risks. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of responses to two open-ended questions. SETTING: Online platform questionnaire promoted by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). PARTICIPANTS: The survey sample consisted of an international cohort of anaesthesiologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We identified and classified recurrent themes in the responses to questions addressing perceptions regarding (Q1) peri-operative night-time working conditions, which may affect patient safety and (Q2) potential solutions. RESULTS: We analysed 2112 and 2113 responses to Q1 and Q2, respectively. The most frequently reported themes in relation to Q1 were a perceived reduction in professional performance accompanied by concerns regarding the possible consequences of work with fatigue (27%), and poor working conditions at night-time (35%). The most frequently proposed solutions in response to Q2 were a reduction of working hours and avoidance of 24-h shifts (21%), an increase in human resources (14%) and performance of only urgent or emergency surgeries at night (14%). CONCLUSION: Overall, the surveyed anaesthesiologists believe that workload-to-staff imbalance and excessive working hours were potential bases for increased peri-operative risk for their patients, partly because of fatigue-related medical errors during night-time work. The performance of nonemergency elective surgical cases at night and lack of facilities were among the reported issues and potential targets for improvement measures. Further studies should investigate whether countermeasures can improve patient safety as well as the quality of life of anaesthesia professionals. Regulations to improve homogeneity, safety, and quality of anaesthesia practice at night seem to be urgently needed.

Shear Stress and Endothelial Mechanotransduction in Trauma Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock: Hidden Coagulopathy Pathways and Novel Therapeutic Strategies.

Massive trauma remains a leading cause of death and a global public health burden. Post-traumatic coagulopathy may be present even before the onset of resuscitation, and correlates with severity of trauma. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the development of abnormal coagulation processes, but the heterogeneity in injuries and patient profiles makes it difficult to define a dominant mechanism. Regardless of the pattern of death, a significant role in the pathophysiology and pathogenesis of coagulopathy may be attributed to the exposure of endothelial cells to abnormal physical forces and mechanical stimuli in their local environment. In these conditions, the cellular responses are translated into biochemical signals that induce/aggravate oxidative stress, inflammation, and coagulopathy. Microvascular shear stress-induced alterations could be treated or prevented by the development and use of innovative pharmacologic strategies that effectively target shear-mediated endothelial dysfunction, including shear-responsive drug delivery systems and novel antioxidants, and by targeting the venous side of the circulation to exploit the beneficial antithrombogenic profile of venous endothelial cells.