Examining the critical role of advanced practice providers on a multidisciplinary transplant team.

It is well documented that Physician Assistants (PAs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs), collectively known as Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), have a beneficial role beyond the field of primary care. APPs broad spectrum of knowledge make them particularly well suited for specializing in complex fields such as transplant. Variations in practice across transplant centers lead to questions regarding optimal use of APPs. Using job descriptions from transplant centers currently employing APPs, we sought to examine the critical role of transplant APPs beyond clinical care alone. In this review, we explore not only the general training of APPs and current utilization of APPs in transplant, but also safety, cost effectiveness, and comparison of APPs to other transplant providers. We aimed to highlight the importance of recruitment and retention of transplant specific trained APPs to provide continuity in transplant programs. Additionally, APPs expansion into transplant research, quality improvement, leadership, and management must be considered. We challenge transplant centers utilizing APPs to consider these important aspects when seeking ways to expand and optimize the critical role APPs provide on the transplant team.

Invasive pneumococcal infections in pediatric liver-small bowel-pancreas transplant recipients.

Children undergoing LSBPTx are at increased risk of IPI due to splenectomy. We aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of IPI in pediatric LSBPTx recipients. Between 2008 and 2016, 122 LSBPTx children at our center were retrospectively reviewed. Nine patients had 12 episodes of IPI; the median age at first infection was 3.5 years (range: 1.5-7.1 years). The median time from transplant to first infection was 3 years (range: 0.8-5.8 years). Clinical presentation included as follows: pneumonia (n = 1), bacteremia/sepsis (n = 7), pneumonia with sepsis (n = 1), meningitis with sepsis (n = 2), pneumonia and meningitis with sepsis (n = 1). The overall risk for IPI was 7.4% or 0.9% per year. The mortality rate was 22%. Seven (78%) children had received at least one dose of PCV13, four (44%) patients had received 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine prior to IPI. All patients were on oral penicillin prophylaxis. In conclusion, despite partial or complete pneumococcal immunization and reported antimicrobial prophylaxis, IPI in LSBPTx children can have a fatal outcome. Routine monitoring of pneumococcal serotype antibodies to determine the timing for revaccination might be warranted to ensure protective immunity in these transplant recipients.

Cidofovir in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients: University of Nebraska experience.

BACKGROUND: Clinical experience with cidofovir in pediatric solid organ transplantation is limited. We assessed the effect of cidofovir use on renal function in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine if changes in renal function were significant, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to test the association between changes in glomerular filtration rate and potential confounding factors, and MacNemar tests to compare the proportions of patients at different time points. RESULTS: We included 25 patients with a mean age of 4.2 years (SD 4.6). More patients were receiving renal replacement therapy while being treated with cidofovir compared with baseline (24% vs. 4%; P = 0.03). For patients not receiving renal replacement therapy, there was no evidence of a significant median change in glomerular filtration rate from baseline to 1 month after cidofovir treatment (P = 0.32) or to the end of cidofovir treatment (P = 0.23) or in creatinine from baseline to the end of cidofovir therapy (P = 0.2). There was a marginal decreased median change in creatinine from baseline to 1 month after cidofovir treatment (P = 0.06). Fewer patients had proteinuria (72.2% vs. 27.8%; P = 0.02) and hematuria (22.2% vs. 0%) after cidofovir treatment. CONCLUSION: In our pediatric transplant cohort, cidofovir did not significantly change renal function reflected by creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, hematuria or proteinuria, but a significant number of patients required renal replacement therapy because of fluid overload.