Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Invest ; 134(6)2024 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38175717

RESUMEN

Aneuploidy, a deviation from the normal chromosome copy number, is common in human embryos and is considered a primary cause of implantation failure and early pregnancy loss. Meiotic errors lead to uniformly abnormal karyotypes, while mitotic errors lead to chromosomal mosaicism: the presence of cells with at least 2 different karyotypes within an embryo. Knowledge about mosaicism in blastocysts mainly derives from bulk DNA sequencing (DNA-Seq) of multicellular trophectoderm (TE) and/or inner cell mass (ICM) samples. However, this can only detect an average net gain or loss of DNA above a detection threshold of 20%-30%. To accurately assess mosaicism, we separated the TE and ICM of 55 good-quality surplus blastocysts and successfully applied single-cell whole-genome sequencing (scKaryo-Seq) on 1,057 cells. Mosaicism involving numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities was detected in 82% of the embryos, in which most abnormalities affected less than 20% of the cells. Structural abnormalities, potentially caused by replication stress and DNA damage, were observed in 69% of the embryos. In conclusion, our findings indicated that mosaicism was prevalent in good-quality blastocysts, whereas these blastocysts would likely be identified as normal with current bulk DNA-Seq techniques used for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/métodos , Incidencia , Blastocisto , Aneuploidia , Mosaicismo , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ADN
2.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 20(1): 53, 2022 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35305653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite all research efforts during this era of novel time-lapse morphokinetic parameters, a morphological grading system is still routinely being used for embryo selection at the blastocyst stage. The blastocyst expansion grade, as evaluated during morphological assessment, is associated with clinical pregnancy. However, this assessment is performed without taking the dynamics of blastocoel expansion into account. Here, we studied the dynamics of blastocoel expansion by comparing longitudinal blastocoel surface measurements using time-lapse embryo culture. Our aim was to first assess if this is impacted by fertilization method and second, to study if an association exists between these measurement and ongoing pregnancy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including 225 couples undergoing 225 cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment with time-lapse embryo culture. The fertilization method was either conventional IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with ejaculated sperm or ICSI with sperm derived from testicular sperm extraction (TESE-ICSI). This resulted in 289 IVF embryos, 218 ICSI embryos and 259 TESE-ICSI embryos that reached at least the full blastocyst stage. Blastocoel surface measurements were performed on time-lapse images every hour, starting from full blastocyst formation (tB). Linear mixed model analysis was performed to study the association between blastocoel expansion, the calculated expansion rate (µm2/hour) and both fertilization method and ongoing pregnancy. RESULTS: The blastocoel of both ICSI embryos and TESE-ICSI embryos was significantly smaller than the blastocoel of IVF embryos (beta -1121.6 µm2; 95% CI: -1606.1 to -637.1, beta -646.8 µm2; 95% CI: -1118.7 to 174.8, respectively). Still, the blastocoel of transferred embryos resulting in an ongoing pregnancy was significantly larger (beta 795.4 µm2; 95% CI: 15.4 to 1575.4) and expanded significantly faster (beta 100.9 µm2/hour; 95% CI: 5.7 to 196.2) than the blastocoel of transferred embryos that did not, regardless of the fertilization method. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal blastocyst surface measurements and expansion rates are promising non-invasive quantitative markers that can aid embryo selection for transfer and cryopreservation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our study is a retrospective observational study, therefore trial registration is not applicable.


Asunto(s)
Blastocisto/fisiología , Embrión de Mamíferos/diagnóstico por imagen , Desarrollo Embrionario/fisiología , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Imagen de Lapso de Tiempo , Adulto , Blastocisto/citología , Proliferación Celular , Forma de la Célula , Células Cultivadas , Fase de Segmentación del Huevo/citología , Fase de Segmentación del Huevo/fisiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Técnicas de Cultivo de Embriones/métodos , Embrión de Mamíferos/citología , Embrión de Mamíferos/fisiología , Femenino , Fertilización/fisiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Países Bajos , Embarazo/fisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Propiedades de Superficie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA