RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently seen in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). When the severity of MR is moderate or less, the decision to undertake simultaneous mitral valve intervention can be challenging. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, PubMed (NCBI), Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to qualitatively assess the current evidence for concomitant mitral valve intervention for MR in patients with AS undergoing AVR. The primary outcome for this systematic review was the postoperative change in the severity of MR and other outcomes of interest included factors that predict improvement or persistence of MR and long-term impacts of residual MR. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included. The percentage of patients demonstrating improvement in MR severity following AVR ranged from 17.2% to 72%; the studies that exclusively included patients with moderate functional MR and reported longer term echocardiographic follow-up of greater than 12 months demonstrated an improvement in MR severity of 45% to 72%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that a proportion of patients can exhibit an improvement in MR following isolated surgical AVR, but whether this confers any long-term morbidity and mortality benefit remains unclear.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/complicaciones , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many extrapulmonary neoplasms metastasize to the lungs. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for oligometastatic disease at two centres in order to determine long-term outcomes. METHODS: The study institutions' thoracic surgery databases were searched for all patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy from 2000 to 2017. RESULTS: There were a total of 476 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy. Mean age at time of surgery was 57.2 ± 15.9 years. Mean number of pulmonary lesions was 1.9 ± 1.6. Mean disease-free interval (DFI) was 3.6 ± 4.3 years. The most common primary neoplasms were colorectal cancer (CRC) in 35.1% (167/476), sarcoma in 23.9% (114/476), melanoma in 16.2% (77/478), renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 7.3% (35/476) and germ cell tumour (GCT) in 4.4% (21/476). Hospital mortality was 0.4% (2/476). Mean follow-up time was 3.8 ± 2.9 years. Survival was 88.9% (95% confidence interval 85.77-91.5) at 1 year and 49.6% (95% confidence interval 44.4-54.6) at 5 years. On multivariate Cox-regression analysis GCT (P = 0.004), CRC (P = 0.03), DFI of 36+ months (P = 0.007), R0 resection (P = 0.002) and non-anatomical, sub-lobar (wedge) resection (P = 0.002) were protective against mortality. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with survival of 50% at 5-year follow-up. DFI of over 36 months, R0 resections, lesions resectable by wedge resection rather than anatomic resection and GCT and CRC primary cancers were associated with improved survival.