Increased Long-Term Risk of Dementia in Patients With Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning increases the incidence of dementia. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception to 14 August 2022. Two authors independently selected studies, assessed the quality of included studies, and extracted data. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with a third author. Only cohort study with an enough follow-up period was included for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-three full texts were initially searched, but only three studies met our inclusion criteria, and they were comprised of 134,563 participants who were initially free of dementia. The follow-up period ranged from 9 to 12 years. We found that CO poisoning increased the risk of dementia incidence (adjusted hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.56 to 4.36, p=0.0003). Subgroup analysis showed that the increased dementia risk was significant in males but not in females, and the highest risk was in young age group, followed by in middle age group, but not in the old one. CONCLUSION: Overall the evidence from prospective cohort studies supported a link between CO exposure and an increased dementia risk, although all the included studies were limited to Taiwanese population.

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for incident chronic kidney disease: A nationwide cohort study.

Objective: Diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease are multifactorial conditions with multiple etiologies that share similar pathophysiologies. This nationwide cohort study examined the impact of diabetes mellitus on the follow-up development of chronic kidney disease. Methods: By retrieving the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005, 5121 patients with diabetes mellitus were included in this study and 5121 patients without diabetes mellitus, who were matched according to sex, age, and Charlson comorbidity index made up the control group. The adjusted hazard ratios for chronic kidney disease were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of chronic kidney disease rate in the diabetes mellitus and control groups. Results: After adjusting for sex, age, and Charlson comorbidity index score, the diabetes mellitus group had a 1.380 times higher (95% CI: 1.277-1.492) risk of developing chronic kidney disease than the control group. Further stratified analysis showed that patients with diabetes mellitus had a significantly higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease regardless of their sex, age, and Charlson comorbidity index score, compared to those without diabetes mellitus. Conclusions: There is a possibility that diabetes mellitus serves as an independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease development. Early screening and monitoring of diabetes mellitus appear to be of great importance in the prevention of chronic kidney disease.

Analysis of sterilizer allocation and related factors in dental health-care settings in Yunnan Province, China: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the status and related factors of sterilizers in dental health-care settings in Yunnan Province, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis for the health administrative department to formulate regional quality control programs and systems, proposing reasonable suggestions for optimizing the allocation of sterilizer resources in Yunnan's dental health-care settings, thereby improving resource utilization efficiency. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2600 dental health-care settings in Yunnan Province in March 2020. Uni-variable linear regression, multi-variable linear regression, curve fitting and threshold effect analysis were used to understand the relationship between dental units and sterilizers. RESULTS: A total of 2600 dental health-care settings were included. The disinfection and sterilization work were mainly completed by the dental department in 1510(58.1%) institutions. 44(1.7%) institutions were not allocated sterilization equipment, and 1632 (62.8%) had only one sterilizer. The median allocation of sterilizers was 1.0. Uni-variable linear regression showed significant differences in covariates such as dental unit, dental handpiece, disinfection equipment, dentist, and dental assistant, which were more sensitive (p < 0.001) and statistically significant. The adjusted model was more stable in the multi-variable linear regression, and the differences in covariates between different settings were statistically significant. Curve fitting revealed an S-shaped curvilinear relationship between the number of dental units and sterilizers in oral healthcare settings. CONCLUSION: The disinfection and sterilization work was mainly completed by the dental department in dental health-care settings in Yunnan Province. Sterilizer allocation increases with the number of dental units, but some institutions have insufficient allocation of sterilizer and manpower resources, resulting in certain risks of infection control. Thus, it is necessary to strengthen supervision, inspection and regional quality control work in infection control of dentistry.

Identification of key potential risk areas and key potential failure modes in hemodialysis rooms by the FMEA method following routine prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hemodialysis is an important part of nosocomial infection prevention and control (IPC). This study aimed to identify the key potential risk areas and failure modes in hemodialysis rooms in hospitals and put forward a series of improvement measures to prevent and control the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hemodialysis patients are highly susceptible to COVID-19 and usually have a high incidence of severe illness and mortality after infection with COVID-19. Therefore, IPC in hemodialysis patients is of crucial strategic significance. Based on 30 domain experts' interviews and careful analysis of prevention and control documents, we constructed a comprehensive failure system for a model that identifies the potential risks for nosocomial COVID-19 infection in the hemodialysis room. Subsequently, a thorough risk assessment of the potential failure factors identified in our model was conducted. The failure key factors corresponding to the human element in medical waste (garbage) disposal (C2) are verified to be the highest risk factors. They are as follows: The cleaning staff did not dispose of different types of medical waste (garbage) (C21), did not wear masks according to the regulations (C22), and lacked knowledge and norms of nosocomial IPC (C23). This study provides valuable insights for hospital decision-makers on the potential failure factors related to COVID-19 infections in hemodialysis rooms. By working with hospital infection specialists, the suggested improvement measures can help reduce the risk of virus exposure among hospital medical staff, patients, and cleaning staff.

Type 2 diabetes associated with areca nut usage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate the potential association between chewing areca nuts and the occurrence of type 2 diabetes and to investigate whether chewing status (current chewers or ex-chewers) affects this association. METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases for relevant studies up to May 21, 2023, using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Three population-based studies conducted in Taiwan were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: When combined current or ex-chewers were more likely to develop diabetes (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-1.62) compared to the never chewers. Ex-chewers had a higher risk of diabetes (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.45-1.62) compared to never chewers. However, there was no evidence that current chewers were associated with a higher risk of diabetes compared to never chewers. Male current and ex-chewers were associated with higher risk of diabetes compared with never chewers (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.49-1.61). For females there was insufficient evidence. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Existing evidence suggests a link between chewing areca nuts and the development of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, areca chewers should monitor diabetes-related biomarkers.

Prevalence of eye and adnexal disorders among elderly inmates in Taiwan prisons.

BACKGROUND: Prisoner health is a topic of significant importance; however, it has received limited attention in epidemiological studies, likely because of challenges in obtaining relevant data. Specifically, research on ocular disorders among elderly prisoners is lacking. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of disorders of the eye and adnexa among elderly prisoners in Taiwan. METHODS: We investigated the presence of eye and adnexal disorders in elderly prisoners in Taiwan using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The ocular disorders were identified using the appropriate disease codes in the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision Clinical Modification (codes 360-379). In addition, the most common types of eye and adnexal disorders among the prisoners were identified. RESULTS: A total of 2215 elderly prisoners (age ≥ 65 years; 2073 men and 142 women) were examined. The prevalence of eye and adnexal disorders among the prisoners was 18.87%. The elderly female prisoners exhibited a higher prevalence of eye and adnexal disorders than the elderly male prisoners. The most common disorders were disorders of the conjunctiva, cataract, and disorders of the lacrimal system. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of elderly prisoners have disorders of the eye and adnexa. The overall quality of life of elderly prisoners can be improved by addressing their visual health, which contributes to the fulfillment of their basic human rights.

Application of failure mode and effect analysis in ICU admission of potentially COVID-19 infected patients.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the admission and treatment process of potentially COVID-19-infected patients in the intensive care unit under normalization, prevention, and control of the pandemic. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was assembled to develop a flowchart of potentially COVID-19-infected patients admitted to the intensive care unit and identify potential failure steps and modes throughout the process using the failure mode and effect analysis method. Through risk priority number (RPN) analysis of each failure mode, those with the highest impact on nosocomial infection were identified, and the priority of implementation was determined. Related corrective measures have been developed to continuously improve clinical practice and management. RESULTS: Eighty potential failure modes were identified, and 8 potential failure modes were identified with RPNs greater than 100. These high RPNs of the failure modes were associated with careless inquiries of epidemiological histories by nurses, inadequate implementation of management standards by nursing assistants, and exposure of attending physicians to potentially risky environments. Finally, 18 general corrective measures are proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the failure mode and effect analysis method for quality improvement is a powerful tool for predicting potential failures in the process and can suggest corrective measures that could help avoid nosocomial infection during a pandemic.

Association between COVID-19 and sexual health: an umbrella review.

PURPOSE: We conducted this umbrella review to review the current evidence on the relationship between COVID-19 and sexual health in both men and women. METHODS: We conducted searches in Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane dataset for meta-analyses that met our pre-set inclusion criteria. We included studies with detailed information investigating the link between COVID-19 and sexual health in men/women. We did not limit the language. RESULTS: The results of the included studies frequently relied on the Female Sexual Function Index to assess sexual health in women. For men, the International Index of Male Function and hospital diagnoses were commonly used to assess sexual health. Currently, there is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of COVID-19 on sexual health. However, since most studies were observational in nature, additional study designs are necessary to draw definitive conclusions across different contexts. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of sexual health among COVID-19 patients and people affected due to COVID-19. Further critical studies should investigate the mechanism underlying the association between COVID-19 and sexual health.

The association between abusive behaviour and physician-patient relations: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to explore the association between abusive behaviour and physician-patient relations in healthcare settings. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched for related studies on databases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, without restrictions on language, from inception until July 15, 2022. The risk of bias and the methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in this systematic review, the participants of which were physicians and patients. The research from all the studies highlighted the detrimental effects of abusive behaviour on the relationship between physicians and patients, regardless of who the abusers were. CONCLUSIONS: Abusive behaviour in a clinical setting has a negative influence on the physician-patient relationship, whoever the perpetrator might be. The research sheds light on the importance of teaching communication skills to physicians and training them to manage conflicts and aggressive behaviours in healthcare settings.

Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: This umbrella meta-analysis aims to provide comprehensive and synthesized evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccinations based on current studies. Methods: Studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE, published before 10 December 2021, were included in the analysis. The pooled results of effectiveness and safety were estimated and shown in forest plots. Results: We included nineteen studies (fifteen studies regarding safety and nine regarding effectiveness) in the analysis. The mRNA vaccines, adenovirus vector vaccines, subunit vaccines, and inactivated vaccines were found to be effective; however, mRNA vaccines, adenovirus vector vaccines and subunit vaccines were associated with local adverse events and systemic events when compared with inactivated vaccines. Conclusion: Our study suggested that till date, COVID-19 vaccination is still a preferred pharmaceutical way to control the widespread pandemic. However, all reported adverse events should be revisited to provide further evidence for mass vaccinations.

Effects of Baduanjin exercise on quality-of-life and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Exercise training is an efficient non-pharmacological intervention for patients with heart failure (HF). This study aimed to objectively evaluate the effects of Baduanjin exercise on the quality of life (QOL) and exercise capacity in patients with HF. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang data were searched from the date of their inception until 30 September 2022. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of Baduanjin exercise on QOL and exercise capacity in patients with HF were selected. The primary outcomes were QOL, assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and exercise capacity, evaluated using the 6-min walking test (6-MWT). A meta-analysis was performed by comparing the MLHFQ domain scores. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0, were used for the data analysis. RESULTS: Baduanjin exercise showed a favourable improvement of the overall QOL (mean difference = -8.25; 95% confidence interval: -13.62 to -2.89; P = 0.003) and exercise capacity (mean difference = 118.49; 95% confidence interval: 52.57 to 184.41; P = 0.0004). Meta-analyses of the MLHFQ domain score indicated that Baduanjin exercise significantly improved the patients' physical (mean difference = -2.83; 95% confidence interval: -3.76, -1.90; P < 0.00001), emotional (mean difference = -2.52; 95% confidence interval: -3.67 to -1.37; P < 0.0001), and general QOL (mean difference = -2.61; 95% confidence interval: -5.17 to -0.06; P = 0.05), based on the decrease in the MLHFQ domain score. Marked statistical heterogeneity (I2> 70%) was observed for all the QOL and exercise capacity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Baduanjin exercise is a safe, feasible, and acceptable intervention that can improve the QOL and exercise capacity in patients with HF. However, more RCTs with rigorous research designs are needed to assist in the rehabilitation of such patients.

Using hybrid consistent fuzzy preference relations-importance-performance analysis model to improve shared decision-making quality based on orthopaedic nurses' perceptions.

PURPOSE: To understand key factors for shared decision-making (SDM) and the quality improvement of nursing decisions in the orthopaedic clinical environment. METHOD: This study applied the consistent consistent fuzzy preference relations (CFPRs) and importance-performance analysis (IPA) methods to explore the attribute weights and SDM performance, respectively. The dataset was collected from 16 orthopaedic clinical nurses' experiences in a third-grade and first-level general hospital in Taizhou, China. This study was performed according to the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. RESULTS: The results showed that "I made clear to my patient or patient's family that a nursing care decision needs to be made", "I explained the advantages and disadvantages of the nursing care options to my patient or patient's family" and "I told my patient or patient's family that there are different nursing care options for caring his/her medical condition" were key factors for affecting SDM. The statistical significance confidence and difference error of weight results were 98.321% and 1.679%, respectively. In addition, "I asked my patient or patient's family which nursing care option he/she prefers" was the key factor for improving orthopaedic clinical nursing in the case hospital. CONCLUSION: The hybrid CFPRs-IPA model can help hospital managers effectively understand the key factors of SDM quality and improve the orthopaedic clinical nursing performance from nurses' perspectives. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A quantitative decision-making model can help nurses understand the key factors affecting the quality of SDM in nursing decision-making and promote nursing decision-making and patient-centred nursing service quality. A series of corresponding SDM training courses (i.e. concepts, knowledge and skills) can be provided for hospital and nursing department managers to maximise the potentially available resources. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The clinical care process should be committed to involving patients in their care decisions and also provide an opportunity for patients to gain a comprehensive understanding of the care decision-making process in order to inform future patient contributions to care decisions.

The Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Home Healthcare Nurses' Job Satisfaction Evaluation and Improvement.

Objectives: To investigate and evaluate the key factors related to job satisfaction performance of home healthcare nurses (HHNs). Methods: A total of 31 HHNs from three community hospitals in Zhejiang province were invited to participate in the study. They completed a questionnaire survey based on the home healthcare nurse job satisfaction scale (HHNJS) from February to March 2022. Consistent fuzzy preference relation (CFPR) methods and important-performance analysis (IPA) were used to obtain the attribute weights and performance for HHNs job satisfaction. Results: The results showed that the attributes of C 13, C 14, C 15, C 23, C 24, C 42, C 51, and C 52 were key factors influencing HHNs job satisfaction. Conclusion: The hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model can help home-healthcare-agency administrators better understand the key factors related to HHNs job satisfaction and establish reasonable improvement strategies.

Application of a Hybrid Multi-Criterion Decision-Making Model for Evaluation and Improvement of Nurses' Job Satisfaction.

Background: The global shortage and turnover of nurses is a current challenge. Past studies have shown that nurse job satisfaction may ameliorate nurse shortage. Although there are many studies on the criteria influencing nurses' job satisfaction, few have examined the causal relationships and weight of each criterion from a systematic perspective. Objective: Identify the key criteria and causal relationships that affect nurses' job satisfaction, and help nurse leaders identify high-weight, high-impact dimensions and contextualize them for improvement. Methods: The study developed a hybrid multi-criterion decision-making model, which incorporated the McCloskey/Mueller satisfaction 13-item scale (MMSS-13), and the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory and the Importance-Performance Analysis methods the model was used to analyze key factors of nurse satisfaction and their interrelationships based on the experience of 15 clinical nurse specialists. Results: In MMSS-13's dimension level, "satisfaction with work conditions and supervisor support" (C5) had the highest impact, and "satisfaction with salary and benefits" (C1) had the highest weight. In criteria level, "salary" (C11), "flexibility in scheduling time off" (C24), "maternity leave time" (C31), "opportunities for social contact after work" (C41), and "your head nurse or facility manager" (C51) had high influence under their corresponding dimensions. The "benefits package" (C13) was the top criterion with the highest impact on MMSS-13. Conclusions: This study assessed nurses' job satisfaction from a multidimensional perspective and revealed the causal relationships between the dimensions. It refined the assessment of nurse job satisfaction to help nurse leaders better assess nurse job satisfaction and make strategic improvements. The study found that compensation and benefits had the highest weight in nurses' job satisfaction. Meanwhile, support for family responsibilities and working conditions, and support from supervisors were the cause dimensions of job satisfaction. Among the more detailed criteria, salary, benefits package, maternity leave time, and leadership had a greater impact on nurses' job satisfaction. Nurse leaders should start with these dimensions to achieve efficient improvement of nurses' job satisfaction.

The DEMATEL method explores the interdependent relationship structure and weights for diagnosis-related groups system.

Purpose: This study constructs a structure of interaction between dimensions and criteria within the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) system from a quantitative system and identifies key factors affecting the overall performance of medical services. Method: From September to December 2020, the influence relation structure diagram (IRSD) of the dimensions and corresponding criteria was developed from the practical experience of a group of domain experts, based on the DEMATEL method. Subsequently, all dimensions and criteria construct influential weights from a systems perspective. Finally, the main influential factors were identified based on the analysis results. Results: The IRSD results showed that, in the overall performance of medical services, "Medical service capacity (C 1)" was the main influential dimension, influencing both "Medical service efficiency (C 2)" and "Medical service safety (C 3)." At the criteria level, "Case-mix index (CMI) (C 12)," "Time efficiency index (C21)," and "Inpatient mortality of medium-to-low group (C32)" were the main influential criteria in the corresponding dimensions. The influential weight results showed that "Medical service capacity (C 1)" was also a key dimension. "Case-mix index (CMI) (C 12)," "Cost efficiency index (C 22)," and "Inpatient mortality of medium-to-low group (C 32)" were the key criteria in their respective dimensions. Conclusion: Patients and managers should first focus on the capacity of medical service providers when making a choice or deciding using the results of the DRGs system. Furthermore, they should pay more attention to medical safety even if it is not as weighted as medical efficiency.

Group-based trajectory modeling to identify health beliefs of COVID-19 vaccination and its predictors: A cohort study in China.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize distinct patterns of change in health beliefs and their dimensions of COVID-19 vaccination and to evaluate the predictors of various trajectory groups. METHODS: A total of 1129 participants who completed two doses of COVID-19 vaccines in China were included in this prospective study. Participants' characteristics and health beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccination were collected before and after the two doses of COVID-19 vaccination. A group-based trajectory model was used to identify the distinct longitudinal patterns of health beliefs and their dimensions. A multinomial logistic regression model was conducted to determine the predictors of different trajectory groups. RESULTS: The group-based trajectory model identified two to four distinct patterns of global health beliefs and their domains, namely, very low-stable (16.1%), low-stable (30.2%), medium-stable (45.6%), and high-stable (8.1%) trajectories for global health beliefs. And the five domains of health beliefs showed two or three trajectory stable progression, which were similar to the global health beliefs trajectories. Sex, occupation post, adverse reactions foreboding, and quality of life were associated with the trajectory of global health beliefs or at least one domain of health beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: During the study, individuals' health beliefs about COVID-19 vaccination were stable without the interference of external factors. Based on the impact of sex, occupation post, adverse reactions foreboding, and quality of life on individuals' health beliefs, personalized interventions can be developed to improve public health beliefs about COVID-19 vaccination and reduce vaccination hesitancy.

Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: It has been speculated that patients with sarcopenia are aggravated by the current novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. However, there is substantial uncertainty regarding the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to systematically evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19, including stratification by gender, study location, study population, study design, and diagnostic criteria. Design: This is the systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Methods: An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and Scopus to identify observational studies reporting a prevalence estimate for sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19. Studies were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual for cross-sectional studies, and Stata 14.0 was used to perform meta-analyses. Results: A total of 4,639 studies were initially identified. After removing the duplicates and applying the selection criteria, we reviewed 151 full-text studies. A total of 21 studies, including 5,407 patients, were eligible for inclusion in this review finally. The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19 in individual studies varied from 0.8 to 90.2%. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in COVID-19 was 48.0% (95% confidence interval, CI: 30.8 to 65.1%, I 2 = 99.68%, p = 0.000). We did not find any significant differences in the prevalence estimates between gender specificity (OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.80-2.26; p = 0.001). By sex, the prevalence was 42.5% (95% CI: 31.7 to 53.4%) in men and 35.7% (95% CI: 24.2 to 47.2%) in women. The prevalence estimates significantly varied based on population settings and different diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia. ICU patients (69.7, 95% CI: 51.7 to 85.2%) were more likely to suffer from sarcopenia compared to other population settings. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis reporting on the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19. Sarcopenia is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19, with varying prevalence across population settings. This study would be useful for clinicians to prompt the increasing awareness of identifying sarcopenia and developing interventions at patients with COVID-19 with high risk of sarcopenia. Further prospective longitudinal studies to define the association of sarcopenia and its prognostic outcomes in COVID-19 survivors are urgently needed to propose the most appropriate treatment strategies during their admission and discharge. Systematic Review Registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022300431].

Belimumab combined with standard therapy does not increase adverse effects compared with a control treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The increasing administration of belimumab has demonstrated its biological benefits. Prior meta-analyses have examined the overall adverse events (AEs) associated with belimumab, but such knowledge needs to be updated with a high volume of new trials. However, little is known about the occurrence of AEs associated with different underlying diseases. This study aimed to address the safety of the intravenous (IV) administration of belimumab combined with standard of care (SoC) therapy in Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: We used PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to systematically search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting AEs and specific AEs in SLE patients receiving belimumab and SoC therapy before 30 November 2021. We extracted the data of the eligible studies and calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in SLE patients receiving belimumab and SoC therapy and experiencing various AEs. The main outcomes were as follows: (1) any AEs, any serious AEs (SAEs), and any severe AEs; (2) serious organ specific adverse events; (3) adverse events of special interest (AESIs). RESULTS: Of the 1,621 studies identified, nine RCTs involving 7,974 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups in terms of the incident of AEs: AEs (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.02, P = 0.68), SAEs (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81-1.02, P = 0.09), and severe AEs (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.75-1.14, P = 0.46). The pooled data also showed that there was no significant correlation between five types of SAEs grouped by organ class and the IV belimumab (10 mg/kg) intervention, except for 'infections and infestations' (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.97, P = 0.02) and 'musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders' (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.32-0.67, P < 0.0001). In addition, we found no significant association between AESIs and the IV administration of belimumab (10 mg/kg) (all malignancies: RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.69-3.36, P = 0.3; all post-infusion systemic reactions: RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.30, P = 0.63; depression: RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.92-2.20, P = 0.11; serious depression: RR = 2.60, 95% CI: 0.85-7.93, P = 0.09; suicide or self-injury: RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.48-1.96, P = 0.92; serious suicide or self-injury: RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.59-2.70, P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the meta-analysis, SLE patients did not have significantly increased risk of experiencing any type of AEs when receiving SoC therapy. Special caution should be exercised during close follow-ups and individual clinical management before drug prescription.

Comparison of the Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of STEMI Patients Presenting With vs. Those of Patients Presenting Without COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the differences in the characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes of patients with and that of those without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched up to July 2021. Observational studies that reported on the characteristics, management, or clinical outcomes and those published as full-text articles were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of all included studies. Results: A total of 27,742 patients from 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Significant delay in symptom onset to first medical contact (SO-to-FMC) time (mean difference = 23.42 min; 95% CI: 5.85-40.99 min; p = 0.009) and door-to-balloon (D2B) time (mean difference = 12.27 min; 95% CI: 5.77-18.78 min; p = 0.0002) was observed in COVID-19 patients. Compared to COVID-19 negative patients, those who are positive patients had significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and thrombus grade (p < 0.05) and showed more frequent use of thrombus aspiration and glycoprotein IIbIIIa (Gp2b3a) inhibitor (p < 0.05). COVID-19 positive patients also had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR = 5.98, 95% CI: 4.78-7.48, p < 0.0001), cardiogenic shock (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.02-3.76, p < 0.0001), and stent thrombosis (OR = 5.65, 95% CI: 2.41-13.23, p < 0.0001). They were also more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (OR = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.51-7.22, p < 0.0001) and had a longer length of stay (mean difference = 4.63 days; 95% CI: 2.56-6.69 days; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This study revealed that COVID-19 infection had an impact on the time of initial medical intervention for patients with STEMI after symptom onset and showed that COVID-19 patients with STEMI were more likely to have thrombosis and had poorer outcomes.

Application of Rough Set Theory to Improve Outpatient Medical Service Quality in Public Hospitals Based on the Patient Perspective.

Purpose: To analyze the key factors and decision-making behaviors affecting overall satisfaction based on perceptual data of outpatients. Methods: The official satisfaction questionnaire developed by the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China was used. Rough set theory was used to identify the perception patterns between condition attributes (i.e., service factors) and a decision attribute (i.e., overall service level) and to express them in rule form (i.e., if-then). Results: The four minimal-coverage rules, with strength exceeding 10% in the good class, and six crucial condition attributes were obtained: "Ease of registration (C1)," "Respected by registered staff (C2)," "Registered staff's listening (C3)," "Respected by doctor (C9)," "Signpost (C12)," and "Privacy (C16)." In addition, the average hit rate for 5-fold cross-validation was 90.86%. Conclusions: A series of decision rules could help decision-makers easily understand outpatients' situations and propose more suitable programs for improving hospital service quality because these decision rules are based on actual outpatient experiences.