Clinical Advantages of Implant Osteotomy through the Remaining Root in Mandibular Premolar Region.

The placement of a dental implant by creating the osteotomy through the remaining root can serve as a placement option that offers various advantages. These benefits include more precise drilling with reduced vibration in cases with limited available bone or with anatomical structures such as the mental foramen and inferior alveolar nerve in close proximity to the planned osteotomy, and facilitating the extraction of an ankylosed tooth following root canal treatment. This case report presents a detailed description of the surgical and restorative procedures involved in placing an implant in a mandibular premolar area.

A Modified Socket-Shield Technique: Simplifying the Root Sectioning Process.

Socket wall resorption leading to a loss of surrounding bone following tooth extraction has been documented in the dental literature. The use of various socket-shield techniques has been suggested as a solution to this issue. In these approaches, the tooth root is sectioned in two, and the coronal two-thirds of the buccal root is preserved in the socket. This allows the periodontium along with the bundle and buccal bone to remain intact, thus preventing or minimizing bone remodeling. According to the literature, this procedure is highly technique sensitive, especially when it comes to sectioning the root. Additionally, the procedure requires significant time, and several complications may occur, such as fenestration or luxation of the remaining root, requiring its complete extraction. This case report presents a modified socket-shield technique using a trephine bur guided by a computer-designed surgical guide to simplify root sectioning, thus reducing surgical time while increasing predictability of the outcome.

A Less-Invasive Window Design for Lateral Wall Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Single Implants.

Maxillary sinus window design is an important factor in sinus augmentation procedures, playing a key role in managing maxillary sinus elevation complications, avoiding the sinus septum, and providing lateral support for the graft material. A less-invasive window design in comparison to conventional maxillary sinus windows was introduced with an "I"-shaped window for single implant placement. However, drawbacks of this window design have included limited instrument accessibility to the anterior sinus and incomplete membrane elevation. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate a step-by-step surgical procedure for lateral wall maxillary sinus augmentation with a novel "J"-shaped window design for single implants.

The Custom Alveolar Ridge Splitting (CARS) Technique for Predictable Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in the Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Case Report.

The Custom Alveolar Ridge Splitting (CARS) technique was recently reported as a less-invasive treatment option for augmentation of the maxillary anterior area in cases where alveolar width deficiency exists due to bone resorption and remodeling. This technique creates an intraosseous defect to improve success when horizontal ridge augmentation is attempted. The purpose of the present case report was to demonstrate implant placement in an atrophic posterior mandibular site using the CARS technique. This technique was used in the mandibular right second premolar area, followed by placement of a single implant. The restored implant showed stable soft and hard tissue outcomes at 6 months postloading.

The Customized Alveolar Ridge-Splitting (CARS) Technique Combined with Guided Bone Regeneration or Sinus Elevation Augmentation in Maxillary Deficient Ridges.

Various techniques have been proposed to regenerate deficient ridges after tooth removal, including guided bone regeneration, block grafting, distraction osteogenesis, and ridge splitting. However, these procedures are technique-sensitive and often present complications which prevent reconstruction of the deficient ridge and implant placement. In an atrophic anterior or posterior maxilla, these techniques often fail to produce satisfactory long-term outcomes due to the poor bone quality, pneumatization of the maxillary sinus, and the highly cosmetic patient demands. The customized alveolar ridge-splitting (CARS) technique was introduced to improve outcomes and minimize the risk of complications. The synergistic combination of this technique with another augmentation procedure-including lateral window sinus augmentation and guided bone regeneration-allows implant placement into ridges with deficient bone volume both vertically and horizontally. This study presents two case reports that were successfully treated with the CARS technique and additional augmentation techniques to treat severely atrophic ridges in the anterior and posterior maxilla.

Treatment of a Soft Tissue Depression with a Xenograft Bone Substitute at the Second Stage of an Implant Procedure: A Case Report.

Following the extraction of a compromised tooth, the edentulous alveolar ridge undergoes physiologic bone remodeling, which may create a bone volume too deficient for implant placement. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) provides a predictable treatment option to increase the alveolar bone volume for implant placement, but a soft or hard tissue deficiency may remain even after this augmentation procedure has been completed. These deficiencies can be especially challenging in the esthetic zone, where patient expectations and esthetics often determine the satisfaction of the treatment outcome. This paper presents a case report of a xenograft bone substitute used at the second-stage surgery and abutment insertion to provide a solution to these deficiencies even after the patient had undergone a GBR procedure, thus improving the esthetic and functional outcomes of the final implant-supported restoration.

Clinical Considerations of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome for Implant Dentistry: Two Case Reports.

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a group of congenital connective tissue disorders that commonly affect joints, muscles, soft tissue, and blood circulation in the affected population. Many oral manifestations are displayed in EDS patients that can include gingival recession, lack of attached gingiva, early severe periodontal disease, and dental caries. However, the literature is limited and oftentimes contradictory regarding dental implants in EDS patients. The aim of this study is to report two successful cases of implants placed in EDS patients, one treated with bone augmentation and both restored with prosthetic implant rehabilitations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2023;43:e81-e87. doi: 10.11607/prd.5842.

Successful Implant Placement into a Site with Two Previous Failures: A Clinical and Histologic Case Report.

Implants present a predictable fixed option for patients who require tooth extraction. However, complications such as implant failure reduce the success of replacement implant restorations. A patient presented to the Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry (New York University College of Dentistry) with pain related to a broken implant-supported prosthesis. Two failed implants were removed, and new implants were placed. After restoration delivery, the patient reported soreness on the implant at site 35 (FDI tooth-numbering system), which was then removed (along with a sequestrum of bone) and sent for biopsy. A new implant was placed and restored successfully at the 1-year follow-up. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate that with proper planning, surgery, and restoration, a new implant can be successfully placed and restored on a site with two previous failures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2023;43:167-172. doi: 10.11607/prd.5410.

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome in Prosthodontics, Periodontology, and Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is one of the most common congenital connective tissue disorders, affecting the synthesis and production of collagen cells. The medical implications for joints, muscles, soft tissue, and blood circulation have been documented in the literature. Many oral manifestations are displayed in EDS patients, including gingival recession, lack of attached gingiva, early severe periodontitis, and dental anomalies and dental caries. However, the literature is limited and oftentimes contradictory, and therefore provides no consensus for guidelines regarding prosthodontic, periodontal, and implant treatment of patients with EDS. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to analyze the pertinent literature regarding prosthodontics, periodontology, and implant dentistry in EDS patients.

A Retrospective Study of Implant Placement Lateral to the Inferior Alveolar Nerve (ILIAN) in Severely Atrophic Posterior Mandibular Ridges

Currently, there are several techniques being used in the posterior mandible to increase alveolar bone height and width. However, each of these has potential complications and limitations. The purpose of the current study was to present the surgical technique and restorative considerations for implant placement lateral to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) in cases of severely atrophic edentulous posterior mandibles. In the current study, 26 implants in 16 patients were successfully placed lateral to IAN and restored with splinted screw-retained prostheses with a follow-up time after loading ranging from 3 months to 6 years. Two patients reported complications. One patient had a temporary paresthesia that resolved 3 months after implant placement and the second patient had minor paresthesia which was reduced after implant removal but remained in a small area on the left corner of her lip.

Reconstructing Peri-implant and Papillary Soft Tissue in the Esthetic Area Using Interdental Tissue, a Tuberosity Connective Tissue Graft, and a Tunneling Approach: A Case Report.

Long-term survival of dental implants in both fully and partially edentulous patients has been proven successful, as reported in the literature. However, maintenance of soft-tissue quality and volume is often difficult due to the multiple surgeries involved in implant placement and the physiological resorption of bone after tooth extraction. Soft-tissue augmentation is frequently necessary to improve soft-tissue contour and can be done simultaneously with implant or abutment placement or following the final insertion of the implant-supported prostheses. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate a surgical procedure used to augment a peri-implant buccal soft-tissue defect using interdental palatal tissue from a pocket reduction procedure in combination with a distal wedge graft from the tuberosity as connective tissue utilizing a tunneling approach in the esthetic area. The implant restorations in the reported case were delivered 1 year prior to the soft-tissue reconstruction.

Repair of a Non-Retentive Crown Over a Press-Fit Implant Placed 30 Years Prior: A Case Report.

Dental implant treatment has been proven to be a successful therapy to rehabilitate single, partial, and fully edentulous sites. Evidence shows that the use of implant-supported restorations is predictable and can deliver long-term success. However, discontinuation of implant systems can be challenging for prosthesis maintenance. In this case report, a 70-year-old female patient presented to the implant department at New York University College of Dentistry with a press-fit implant with a one-piece cementable abutment that was placed more than 30 years prior. The patient's chief complaint was that the crown kept falling off. Upon evaluation, it was found that the implant was well-integrated in bone with no signs of infection. Explantation and replacement of the well-integrated implant was not considered the best option. An alternative approach was to address the retention of the abutment. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate an intraoral technique for fabricating a custom cement-retained crown over a non-retentive one-piece press-fit implant.

Surgical Strategies Used to Successfully Re-implant an Implant that Failed Four Times at the Same Site: A Case Report.

Although implants have been shown to have high success rates, complications such as implant failure can occur. This presents a challenging dilemma for clinicians when attempting another implant placement in the failed site. The patient in this clinical case report presented with implant failure four times at the same site. This case report describes implant placement in a site where four failed implants were previously removed and evaluates the approach used to achieve a successful outcome.

Long-term Results of Maxillary Full-Arch Reconstruction Using Transitional Implants: A Case Report With 20-Year Follow-up.

Because of their documented long-term success rates, dental implants have become a predictable treatment option to replace hopeless or missing teeth. However, full-arc transition from a hopeless dentition to a prosthesis supported by dental implants remains a challenge. One treatment option for this process is the use of transitional implants, an approach that allows for the transitioning of full-arch reconstructions from teeth to implant-supported prostheses without immediate loading the permanent implants or the need for provisional removable partial dentures. This article, which presents a long-term clinical case report, describes the steps and sequence of therapy involved in transitioning from a hopeless dentition to a maxillary full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitation with the use of transitional implants, avoiding removable provisional prostheses. An assessment of the 20-year follow-up, dental implant survival rates, and marginal bone loss is also presented.

Histologic Findings 8 Weeks After Customized Alveolar Ridge-Splitting Technique.

Different techniques have been introduced when replacement with an implant is planned after tooth extraction. The conventional approach consists of waiting 3 to 4 months before implant placement. However, many other options are available for implant placement, including immediate implant placement (IIP), IIP and immediate provisionalization (IIPIP), and early implant placement (EIP). When the ridge is deficient, guided bone regeneration (GBR) with simultaneous implant placement is often performed. However, this procedure has potential for postoperative complications and patient discomfort, as well as an extended treatment time. The recent introduction of the Customized Alveolar Ridge-Splitting (CARS) technique can help avoid many of these problems and treat atrophic ridges that will require two or three GBR surgeries. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate the step-by-step surgical and restorative procedures for the CARS technique and present histologic data of the new bone generated utilizing this technique.

Improving Free Gingival Graft Success Around Implants Using a Completed Implant Restoration.

Keratinized mucosa around implants is considered essential for maintaining peri-implant health. Clinicians may find it necessary to augment keratinized tissue after implant loading when complications arise. Immobilizing the graft can be challenging when there is a complete absence of attached gingiva or when the vestibule is shallow creating an opportunity for muscle forces to move the graft. To overcome these limitations, various stents have been created aimed at improving the stability of soft-tissue grafts around implants; however, many of these stents have drawbacks. This case report presents a novel approach for improving free gingival graft immobility and success around implants that utilizes a completed implant restoration.

A New Concept of Safety Distance to Place Implants in the Area of the Inferior Alveolar Canal to Avoid Neurosensory Disturbance.

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) damage following implant placement is a severe complication that can compromise a patient's quality of life. Previous studies have suggested that a safety zone of 2 mm, if maintained, might avoid this problem. This retrospective study evaluates implants placed in closer proximity to the IAN without resulting in any postoperative neurologic complications and suggests a new concept of safety distance. A total of 60 consecutive patients receiving 101 mandibular implants < 2 mm from the IAN were included in this study. All enrolled patients had a CBCT scan done for radiologic assessment before implant placement and following final restoration. Measurements were obtained through cross-sectional views using Simplant software. In patients without neurologic disturbances, a mean distance of +0.75 mm was seen from the closest portion of the implant to the nerve bundle. In cases where a direct transection and/or compression of the nerve was not observed, the patients did not experience neurosensory disturbances.

The Custom Alveolar Ridge-Splitting (CARS) Technique for Predictable Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla: A Retrospective Case Series Study.

Implant-supported restorations have proven to be a predictable option for replacing missing teeth. In cases of inadequate bone quantity, the bone volume can be increased by bone augmentation procedures. Several factors can affect bone regeneration, including the morphology of the defect at the implant site. A defect surrounded by bony walls (an intraosseous defect) is known to yield a highly successful regeneration. The purpose of this retrospective case series study was to present a new step-by-step surgical procedure known as the Custom Alveolar Ridge-Splitting (CARS) technique for maxillary anterior ridge augmentation. This technique creates an intraosseous defect while splitting and augmenting an atrophic ridge. Sixteen consecutive cases were treated with the CARS procedure. All implants were restored and followed for 12 to 24 months after loading, and all cases were effectively treated with successful implant placement. According to this retrospective study, the CARS procedure is simple, successful, and predictable and may be used as a surgical option for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla.

Patient-Related Risk Factors for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review.

The posterior maxilla has traditionally presented a challenge for successful placement of dental implants due to a combination of poor bone quality, ridge atrophy, and pneumatization of the sinus floor following tooth extraction. However, with the successful and predictable surgical outcomes reported in the literature, more clinicians and patients are choosing an implant-supported restoration in the edentulous posterior maxilla. Consequently, sinus elevation and augmentation have gained more popularity. Extensive research has been conducted on types of bone graft materials and implants, less-invasive techniques to perform sinus augmentation, and timing for implant placement for sinus grafting. Despite the predictability of the techniques and biomaterials employed in sinus grafting procedures, intra- and postoperative complications are common. Much of the current literature discusses the local risk factors related to sinus augmentation, with few studies focusing on the patient-related risk factors. The purpose of this review is to identify, evaluate, and discuss the possible management of patient-related risk factors to allow for more predictable maxillary sinus floor augmentation outcomes.

A Novel Method for Immediate Implant Placement in Defective Fresh Extraction Sites.

PURPOSE: This study assessed a novel treatment protocol for immediate implant placement in defective fresh extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-arm clinical study was conducted including 12 fresh extraction sockets divided into two groups: those with intact and those with a deficient facial plate of bone. Hopeless teeth were atraumatically extracted, a vestibular access horizontal incision was made 3 to 4 mm apical to the mucogingival junction, a mucoperiosteal tunnel was created from the labial orifice of the socket, a slowly resorbing membrane shield was stabilized under the tunnel, implants were placed using a surgical guide, and a subepithelial connective tissue graft was harvested and secured over the membrane shield. Definitive restorations were delivered at 3 months postoperatively. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken at baseline and after 6 and 13 months to measure facial bone thickness and height. Pink esthetic score (PES) was recorded at 6 and 13 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, the mean ± SD facial bone thickness was 1.88 ± 0.73 mm for sockets with intact facial bone compared to 0.76 ± 0.42 at baseline and 2.34 ± 0.78 mm for sockets with deficient facial bone compared with 0 ± 0 at baseline, whereas at 13 months, the thickness was 1.84 ± 0.74 and 2.18 ± 0.73 mm, respectively. The facial bone crest coincided with the implant platform in sockets with an intact facial bone plate and those with a deficient facial bone plate at 6 months, whereas at 13 months, the distance for sockets with a deficient facial bone plate increased to 0.20 ± 0.13 mm. The mean PES at 6 and 13 months was 11.33 for both groups out of a maximum score of 14. CONCLUSION: The proposed technique provided a minimally invasive treatment with predictable esthetic outcome allowing immediate implant placement in sockets with intact and with deficient facial plates.