Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up.

Background and Objective: There is a paucity of literature comparing unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UITLIF) with bilateral instrumented TLIF (BITLIF) regarding radiological alignment, including the coronal balance, even though UITLIF might have asymmetric characteristics in the coronal plane. This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and long-term radiological outcomes of 1-level UITLIF and BITLIF in lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD) including lumbar spinal stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis (degenerative or spondylolytic). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent 1-level UITLIF with two rectangular polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages or BITLIF between November 2009 and June 2016 by four surgeons with ≥5 years of follow-up at a single hospital were included. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between the UITLIF and BITLIF. Results: In total, 63 and 111 patients who underwent UITLIF and BITLIF, respectively, were enrolled. The median follow-up was 85.55 months (range: 60-130). The UITLIF group had a significantly shorter operation time (185.0 [170.0-210.0] vs. 225.0 [200.0-265.0], p < 0.001) and lower estimated blood loss (300.0 [250.0-500.0] vs. 550.0 [400.0-800.0], p < 0.001) than the BITLIF group. Regarding the clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences in the intermittent claudication score (p = 0.495) and Kirkaldy-Willis criteria (p = 0.707) at 1 year postoperatively. The interval changes in the local coronal Cobb angle at the index level, L1-S1 lordotic angle, and coronal off-balance from the immediate postoperative radiograph to the last follow-up were not significantly different (p = 0.687, p = 0.701, and p = 0.367, respectively). Conclusions: UITLIF with two rectangular PEEK cages may provide comparable clinical outcomes and radiological longevity including coronal alignment to BITLIF in 1-level LDD. In addition, UITLIF has advantages over BITLIF in terms of operative time and blood loss.

Mid-Thoracic Vertebral Compression Fracture after Mini-Trampoline Exercise: A Case Series of Seven Patients.

Background and Objectives: Home-based training exercise gained popularity during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic era. Mini-trampoline exercise (MTE) is a home-based exercise that utilizes rebound force generated from the trampoline net and the motion of the joints of the lower extremities. It is known to be beneficial for improving postural balance, stability, muscle strength and coordination, bone strength, and overall health. However, we encountered several patients with mid-thoracic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) following regular MTE, which was never reported previously, despite having no history of definite trauma. This study aims to report mid-thoracic VCFs after regular MTE and arouse public attention regarding this spinal injury and the necessity of appropriate prior instructions about the correct posture. Patients and Methods: All consecutive patients diagnosed with acute VCFs following regular MTE were included. We collected data on patient demographics, history of MTE, characteristics of symptoms, and radiological findings such as the location of fractures and anterior vertebral body compression percentage. Results: Seven patients (one man and six women) and ten fractures (T5 = 1, T6 = 3, T7 = 2, and T8 = 4) were identified. Symptoms started 2.57 ± 1.13 weeks after the beginning of regular MTE. All patients reported that they were never properly instructed on the correct posture. They also stated that they were exercising with a hunchback posture and insufficient joint motion of the lower extremities while holding the safety bar with both hands, which resulted in increased peak vertical force along the gravity z-axis in the mid-thoracic area and consequent mid-thoracic VCFs. Conclusions: Mid-thoracic VCFs can occur following regular MTE even without high-energy trauma in case of improper posture during exercise. Therefore, public attention on mid-thoracic VCFs following MTE and the appropriate prior instructions are imperative.

Comparison of Primary Versus Revision Lumbar Discectomy Using a Biportal Endoscopic Technique.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of the biportal endoscopic technique for primary lumbar discectomy (BE-LD) and revision lumbar discectomy (BE-RLD). METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients who underwent BE-LD or BE-RLD, and could be followed up for at least 12 months were divided into two groups: Group A (BE-LD; n = 59) and Group B (BE-RLD; n = 22). Clinical outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab's criteria. Perioperative results included operation time (OT), length of hospital stay (LOS), amount of surgical drain, and kinetics of serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Clinical and perioperative outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 days and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Postoperative complications were noted. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement in pain (VAS) and disability (ODI) compared to baseline values at postoperative day 2, which lasted until the final follow-up. There were no significant differences in the improvement of the VAS and ODI scores between the groups. According to the modified MacNab's criteria, 88.1 and 90.9% of the patients were excellent or good in groups A and B, respectively. OT, LOS, amount of surgical drain, and kinetics in serum CRP and CPK levels were comparable. Complications in Group A included incidental durotomy (n = 2), epidural hematoma (n = 1), and local recurrence (n = 1) and in Group B incidental durotomy (n = 1) and epidural hematoma (n = 1). CONCLUSION: BE-RLD showed favorable clinical outcomes, less postoperative pain, and early laboratory recovery equivalent to BE-LD.

Contralateral retrodiscal transforaminal approach for percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis: A technical description and retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: Retrodiscal transforaminal (RdTF) epidural steroid injection (ESI) is clinically comparable to conventional transforaminal ESI and can avoid catastrophic complications. However, it poses a risk of inadvertent intradiscal, intravascular, and intrathecal injections. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) using the contralateral (Contra)-RdTF approach. METHODS: The electronic medical records of 332 patients with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy due to foraminal disk pathology were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group A (ESI using the RdTF approach) and Group B (PEA using the Contra-RdTF approach). Effective pain relief (EPR; ≥50% pain relief from baseline) in patients was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure. The presence of unintended fluoroscopic findings and complications was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were enrolled in the final analysis: 81 in Group A and 38 in Group B. Both groups showed lesser VAS scores after 4 and 12 weeks than at baseline (p < 0.05). However, the proportion of patients with EPR was significantly greater in Group B after 12 weeks (p = 0.015). No complications, including intrathecal injection, infectious discitis, and neurologic deterioration, were reported. However, inadvertent intradiscal and intravascular injections were reported to be significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (14.8% and 0%, respectively; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although applications of this study are limited by its retrospective design, the results suggest that PEA using the Contra-RdTF approach is feasible because it can achieve EPR and avoid unintended fluoroscopic findings.

How i do it: biportal endoscopic thoracic decompression for ossification of the ligamentum flavum.

BACKGROUND: Currently, decompressive laminectomy with or without concomitant fusion is a standard treatment for ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF). However, conventional thoracic decompressive laminectomy is not free of the inevitable destruction of the posterior ligamentous complex, and facet injury may lead to various sequelae. METHOD: We used the biportal endoscopic technique for posterior thoracic decompression (BE-PTD) and describe the steps with discussion regarding the indications, advantages, possible complications, and ways to overcome complications. CONCLUSION: BE-PTD can obtain endoscopic visualizations of all the boundaries of the OLF lesion and achieve direct neural decompression of thoracic OLF.

Repair of Incidental Durotomy Using Sutureless Nonpenetrating Clips via Biportal Endoscopic Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Technical report. OBJECTIVES: Dural tear is one of the most common complications of endoscopic spine surgery. Although endoscopic dural repair of the durotomy area may be difficult, we successfully repaired the dural tear area using nonpenetrating clips during biportal endoscopic surgery. We introduce the surgical technique of dural repair using nonpenetrating titanium clips in biportal endoscopic spine surgery and report its clinical outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 5 patients who were treated via primary dural repair using nonpenetrating titanium clips during biportal endoscopic lumbar surgery. The 2 methods of dural clipping and repair include 2 or 3 portals. We analyzed radiological parameters such as cerebrospinal fluid collection as well as clinical parameters, including postoperative clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Five patients underwent biportal endoscopic dural repair using nonpenetrating clips. Incidental durotomy was successfully repaired using nonpenetrating titanium clips in all 5 patients. No cerebrospinal fluid collection was detected in the postoperative magnetic resonance images. Clinically, preoperative symptoms improved significantly after surgery (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We repaired the dural tear area completely using nonpenetrating titanium vascular anastomosis clips in biportal endoscopic lumbar surgery. Dural repair via clipping method may be an effective alternative for incidental durotomy.

Biportal endoscopic posterior lumbar decompression and vertebroplasty for extremely elderly patients affected by lower lumbar delayed vertebral collapse with lumbosacral radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Lower lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in extremely elderly patients can often lead to lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) due to delayed vertebral collapse (DVC). Surgical intervention requires posterior instrumented lumbar fusion as well as vertebral augmentation or anterior column reconstruction depending on the cleft formation and intravertebral instability. However, it is necessary to decide on surgery in consideration of the patient's frail status, surgical invasiveness, and rehabilitation. In the lower lumbar DVC without intravertebral instability, biportal endoscopic posterior lumbar decompression and vertebroplasty (BEPLD + VP) can be simultaneously attempted. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of BEPLD + VP for the treatment of DVC-related LSR. METHODS: This retrospective case series enrolled 18 consecutive extremely elderly (aged ≥ 75-year-old) patients (6 men and 12 women) who had lower lumbar (at or below L3) DVC-related LSR. Patients who require anterior column reconstruction, such as cleft formation accompanied by intravertebral instability and patients who have not been followed for more than 6 months, were excluded from this study. All patients underwent BEPLD + VP under epidural anesthesia. Clinical results were evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) score and the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores. RESULTS: Most of the patients had DVC affecting level L4, with the deformation being a flat type or concave type rather than a wedge type. The VAS score (back and leg) significantly decreased from 7.78 ± 1.17 and 6.89 ± 1.13 preoperatively to 2.94 ± 0.64 and 2.67 ± 1.08 within 2 postoperative days (p < 0.001). The mJOA score significantly improved from 4.72 ± 1.27 preoperatively to 8.17 ± 1.15 in the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean recovery rate (RR) in the last follow-up was 56.07% ± 9.98. Incidental durotomy was reported in two patients and epidural hematomas in another two patients; however, all patients improved with conservative treatment, and no re-operation was required. CONCLUSIONS: BELPD + VP was a type of salvage therapy that reduces surgical morbidity, requires major spine surgery under general anesthesia and provides good clinical outcomes in extremely elderly patients with DVC-related LSR.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) with microscopic tubular technique is an established surgical procedure with several potential advantages, including decreased surgical-related morbidity, reduced length of hospital stay, and accelerated early rehabilitation. A recently introduced biportal endoscopic technique for spine surgery presents familiar surgical anatomy and can be conducted using a conventional approach with a minimal footprint; it is also applicable to TLIF. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic technique transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) and microscopic tubular technique transforaminal lumbar interbody (MT-TLIF) in patients with single- or two-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred two participants with neurogenic intermittent claudication or lumbar radiculopathy with single- or two-level lumbar spinal stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) score for the back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Short Form-36 health survey Questionnaire (SF-36). Demographic data, operative data (total operation time, estimated blood loss, amount of surgical drain, postoperative transfusion, and length of hospital stay), and laboratory results (plasma hemoglobin, serum creatine phosphokinase, and C-reactive protein) were also evaluated. The fusion rate was assessed using the Bridwell interbody fusion grading system. Postoperative complications were also noted. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: group A (BE-TLIF) and group B (MT-TLIF). The clinical outcomes, including VAS-Back and VAS-Leg, ODI, and SF-36 scores, were evaluated at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Differences in demographics, operative data, and the laboratory and radiological results were assessed between the two groups. The fusion rate was assessed using standard standing lumbar radiographs and computed tomography scans conducted 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were analyzed in this study, 47 from group A and 32 from group B. Demographic and operative data were comparable for both the groups. The VAS-Back and SF-36 scores were more significantly improved in group A than in group B at 1 month after surgery. However, there were no significant differences between groups for the mean VAS-Back, VAS-Leg, ODI, and SF-36 scores at 1year after the surgery. Although the total operation time was significantly longer in group A, the estimated blood loss and the amount of surgical drainage was significantly higher in group B (p < .001). There were no between-group differences for the fusion rate and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Both BE-TLIF and MT-TLIF provided equivalent and favorable clinical outcomes and fusion rates. Further large-scale, randomized, controlled trials with long-term follow-ups are warranted.

How I do it? Extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with biportal endoscopic technique.

BACKGROUND: The biportal endoscope-assisted unilateral foraminal approach is an option for various foraminal pathologies. Lumbar interbody fusion is the standard treatment for foraminal stenosis because both direct and indirect neural decompressions can be obtained. METHOD: We used the biportal endoscopic technique for extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-EFLIF) and have described the steps, with discussion regarding the indications, advantages, possible complications, and ways to overcome complications. CONCLUSION: BE-EFLIF achieves direct neural decompression of lateral spinal canal under endoscopic visualization. It achieves indirect neural decompression using a large footprint lordotic interbody cage, while preserving the lumbar posterior arch as much as possible.

Clinical outcome of biportal endoscopic revisional lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

BACKGROUND: Although literature provides evidence regarding the superiority of surgery over conservative treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation, recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) was the indication for reoperation in 62% of the cases. The major problem with revisional lumbar discectomy (RLD) is that the epidural scar tissue is not clearly isolated from the boundaries of the dura matter and nerve roots; therefore, unintended durotomy and nerve root injury may occur. The biportal endoscopic (BE) technique is a newly emerging minimally invasive spine surgical modality. However, clinical evidence regarding BE-RLD remains limited. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes after performing open microscopic (OM)-RLD and BE-RLD to evaluate the feasibility of BE-RLD. METHODS: This retrospective study included 36 patients who were diagnosed with RLDH and underwent OM-RLD and BE-RLD. RLDH is defined as the presence of herniated disc material at the level previously operated upon in patients who have experienced a pain-free phase for more than 6 months. BE-RLD was performed as follows: two independent surgical ports were made inside the medial pedicular line of the target segment and on the intact upper and lower laminas. Peeling off the soft tissue from the vertebral lamina helps to easily identify the traversing nerve root and the recurrent disc material without dealing with the fibrotic scar tissue. Clinical outcomes were obtained using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the modified Macnab criteria before and at 2 days, 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The data of 20 and 16 patients who underwent OM-RLD and BE-RLD, respectively, were evaluated. The demographic and perioperative data were comparable between the groups. During the year following the surgery, in the BE-RLD group, the VAS scores at each point were significantly improved over the baseline and remained improved up to 2 weeks after surgery (p < 0.05); however, no statistical difference between the two groups was observed after 6 weeks of surgery (p > 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria on the follow-up, the excellent or good satisfaction rates reported at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery were 81.25%, 81.25%, 75%, and 81.25%, respectively, in the BE-RLD group, and 50%, 75%, 75%, and 80%, respectively, in the OM-RLD group. CONCLUSION: BE-RLD yielded similar outcomes to OM-RLD, including pain improvement, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction, at 1 year after surgery. However, faster pain relief, earlier functional recovery, and better patient satisfaction were observed when applying BE-LRD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Safety Evaluation of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Assessment of Cervical Epidural Pressure During Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in cervical epidural pressure (CEP) during biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (BELD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In percutaneous uniportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, irrigation fluid (IF) introduced into the spinal canal during surgery can compress the thecal sac, and act as a potential risk for neurological complications by disturbing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation and increasing intracranial pressure. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, who underwent BELD, which was performed under automated pump system, an infusion pressure of 30 mmHg were enrolled. The change in CEP on C7-T1 level was measured. CEP was measured in each of the five phases of the procedure (1st phase-making surgical portals; 2nd phase-creating a workspace; 3rd phase-performing neural decompression and discectomy; 4th phase-factitious increase of pressure by clogging the outflow; 5th phase-dismission from fluid irrigation system). Neurological complications and independent risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: In the final 27 patients, changes in CEP during surgery were similar. The baseline CEP was 14.8 ±â€Š2.8 mmHg, and the mean CEP in the 3rd phase 18.8 ±â€Š5.1 mmHg was not significantly higher. In the 4th phase, however, the CEPs rose with linear correlation as the pressure increased. In the 5th phase, the elevated CEP returned to baseline in 2.5 ±â€Š5.6 minutes. No patient had neurological complications. No statistically significant risk factors were observed. CONCLUSION: In BELD, which is performed to allow continuous lavage with infusion pressure set to 30 mmHg, CEP does not increase beyond the physiological range. Therefore, BELD may be considered as a potentially safe technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Discectomy Using Biportal Endoscopic Approach: Technical Report and Preliminary Clinical Results.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral or huge disc herniations cause bilateral radiculopathy and severe lower back pain. In such cases, a bilateral discectomy may be required to resolve the radicular pain in both legs. We attempted a surgical technique involving bilateral lumbar discectomy via a unilateral approach using a percutaneous biportal endoscopic technique. The purpose of the present study was to describe our surgical technique and investigate the clinical outcomes in symptomatic bilateral lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Eleven patients with bilateral disc herniation of the L4-L5 or L5-S1 segments were surgically treated using the percutaneous biportal endoscopic approach. Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral discectomy was performed in all patients. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed 1 day after surgery, and the clinical parameters were investigated preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: All enrolled patients were successfully treated by biportal endoscopic bilateral discectomy via a unilateral approach. Surgery was performed at the L4-L5 level in 1 patient and the L5-S1 level in 10 patients. The mean operative time was 67.5 ± 13.1 minutes. A visual analog scale of leg pain and the Oswestry disability index showed significant improvement after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral discectomy using the percutaneous biportal endoscopic approach could be an effective and alternative treatment of symptomatic bilateral herniated disc disease affecting L4-L5 or L5-S1 segments.