Burden of compensated and decompensated cirrhosis: real world data from an Italian population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the annual healthcare resource utilization, costs and mortality rate for a large cohort of Italian patients with compensated (CC) and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted through the data-linkage of mortality for all-cause, hospitalizations and outpatient drugs and service databases of the Campania Region. All adults hospitalized with cirrhosis diagnosis (2007-2015) were grouped in CC and DC (prevalent patients) on January 1, 2016 and followed for 1-year. Incident patients with DC (2015) were also retrieved and followed from discharge date up to 1-year. Negative binomial regression was used to estimate Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs) for predictors of all-cause hospitalizations. Costs were evaluated from the Italian National Health Service perspective and expressed in euro patient/year. RESULTS: A total of 21,433 prevalent cirrhotic patients (57.1% CC and 42.9% DC) and 1,371 incident patients with DC were identified. During a 1-year, 21.5% of prevalent patients with CC were admitted for acute events, 26.8% of those with DC and 55.4% of incident patients with DC. Ascites (IRR=1.71;95% CI: 1.37-2.14) and hepatic encephalopathy (IRR=1.35; 95% CI: 1.04-1.77) at index admission were strong predictors of hospitalizations in incident DC patients. The 1-year mortality rate was respectively 5.8% and 10.1% for prevalent patients with CC and DC and 35.6% for incident patients with DC. Direct costs amounted to 3,194€ patient/year for the prevalent CC group and 4,001€ patient/year for the DC group and 13,806 € patient/year for incident individuals with DC. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of cirrhosis dramatically differs between CC and DC patients, especially after the first decompensation episode. Ascites and hepatic encephalopathy at index admission were strong predictors of hospitalizations in incident DC patients.

Virological patterns of hepatitis C virus patients with failure to the current-generation direct-acting antivirals.

There are few data on the virological characterisation of patients with failure to current-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), namely elbasvir/grazoprevir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. This study aimed to characterise virological patterns in patients with failure to current DAA regimens as well as the efficacy of re-treatment. All 61 consecutive hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment-naïve patients with failure to current DAAs from January 2018 to February 2019 were enrolled. Sanger sequencing of NS3, NS5A and NS5B proteins was performed using homemade protocols. NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) were more frequent in the 17 patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (89.5%) and 33 patients treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir (97%) compared with the 11 patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (18.2%) (P = 0.002 and 0.000, respectively). NS3 RASs were more often detected in the 33 patients with failure to elbasvir/grazoprevir (30.3%) than in the 11 patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (9.1%). NS3 RASs were also detected in 12% of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir-treated patients. NS5B RASs were infrequently identified. Of the glecaprevir/pibrentasvir-treated patients, 73% did not show RASs in any HCV regions, a prevalence higher than that observed in those treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir (0%; P < 0.05) or sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (12%; P < 0.05). Of the 61 patients, 21 (34.4%) were re-treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and voxilaprevir. All patients achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12). To our knowledge, this is one of the first real-life studies describing patients who failed current-generation DAAs; the prevalence of RASs differed according to the DAA regimen used, and the efficacy of re-treatment was high.

Treatment of morbid obesity and gastroesophageal reflux with hiatal hernia by Lap-Band.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal reflux is common in obese patients. Hiatal hernia is considered a potential contraindication to placement of a Lap-Band. METHODS: Esophageal investigation in patients who were candidates for a Lap-Band included clinical evaluation of symptoms (scoring system), endoscopic and radiologic evaluation, 24-h pH test, and stationary manometry. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with or without hiatal hernia underwent the Lap-Band procedure. RESULTS: GER was diagnosed in 12/40 morbidly obese patients, 11 of whom received a standard Lap-Band (3 patients were radiologically diagnosed with transient hiatal hernia). One patient with a large hiatal hernia underwent closure of the diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus, and the Lap-Band was positioned similarly to an Angelchik prosthesis. All but 1 patient who was lost at follow-up were symptom-free (range 1-24 months). CONCLUSION: GER with or without hiatal hernia is not a contraindication for obese patients undergoing a Lap-Band procedure. It accomplishes by a single operation satisfactory treatment of these two disturbing diseases.