Persistent Valvular Regurgitation After Acute Rheumatic Fever: Early Predictors of Long Term Outcomes in a Pediatric Retrospective Cohort.

Describe the echocardiographic evolution of valvular regurgitation in patients with rheumatic carditis (RC) and to establish which features may predict long-term outcome, in the absence of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) relapse. Retrospective cohort study. 123 patients with confirmed RC, diagnosed at Turin Children's Hospital between 2010 and 2019. We reviewed the echocardiographic images recorded at diagnosis, after 6-8 weeks, after 6 months, then yearly, to assess which predictors at diagnosis are associated with the degree of improvement at 6 months. Secondly, we tested which variables predict the regression of pathological regurgitation of mitral (MV) or aortic valve (AV) during follow-up. At onset, 90.2% patients had MV regurgitation while 42.3% had AV involvement. 115 (93.5%) patients were treated with steroids and 70.8% experienced a downgrading of RC after 6 months. Steroids were associated with better outcomes at six months (p = 0.01). During follow-up (median 56.1 months), MV improved in 58.6% patients, AV in 46.2%. At multivariate analysis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was positively associated with regression of MV regurgitation (OR 1.02, p = 0.02), while higher degree of carditis at onset was negatively associated (OR 0.04, p < 0.01). Conversely, regression of AV regurgitation was more frequent in patients with bi-valvular involvement (OR 20.5, p = 0.03) and in absence of murmur at onset (OR 0.04, p = 0.01). This study indicates that valvular regurgitation improves overtime if there are no ARF recurrences during follow-up, especially when the MV is involved and in patients treated with steroids.

Outcomes of MIS-C patients treated with anakinra: a retrospective multicenter national study.

Background: The treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children unresponsive to first-line therapies (IVIG and/or steroids) is challenging. The effectiveness of IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, is debated. Patients and methods: We conducted an anonymous retrospective multicenter study on MIS-C patients treated with anakinra in Italy from January 2020 to February 2021. Our study outcomes included the percentage of patients who required further therapeutic step-up, the percentage of patients who experienced fever resolution within 24 h and a reduction of CRP by half within 48 h, and the percentage of patients who developed Coronary Artery Anomalies (CAA) during follow-up. Results: 35 cases of MIS-C were treated in 10 hospitals. Of these, 13 patients started anakinra while in the ICU, and 22 patients started anakinra in other wards. 25 patients (71.4%) were treated with corticosteroids at a starting dose 2-30 mg/Kg/day plus IVIG (2 g/Kg), 10 patients (28.6%) received only corticosteroids without IVIG. Anakinra was administered intravenously to all patients in Group A (mean dose 8 mg/Kg/day), and subcutaneously in Group B (mean dose 4 mg/Kg/day). Only two patients required further treatment step-up and no patients developed CAA after receiving anakinra. The most commonly observed side effect was an increase in ALT, occurring in 17.1% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort of severe MIS-C patients treated with anakinra we report favorable clinical outcomes with a low incidence of side effects. The simultaneous use of steroids ± IVIG in these patients hinders definitive conclusions regarding the need of IL-1 inhibition in MIS-C treatment.

Discordance between Clinical and Ultrasound Examinations in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: An Experimental Approach.

Clinical examination (CE) and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) of ten joints (knee, ankle, wrist, elbow, II-MCP) and their extra-articular (EA) compartments (tendons and bursae) were performed on 35 consecutive patients with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (active group) to test how the extension of MSUS examinations to EA changes the concordance between MSUS and CE. The overall concordance between CE and MSUS, measured with Cohen's Kappa (k), was moderate (k = 0.43); the addition of EA MSUS increased the concordance in all joints, with the exclusion of II-MCP (k = 0.49). In the ankle and wrist, the k increase was relevant (k from 0.13 to 0.27 and 0.11 to 0.41). In the active group patients, we observed 44 subclinical synovitis; the number of subclinical synovitis per patient was correlated with JADAS-27 (p = 0.03) and was higher in a control group composed of 15 patients with persistent disease remission (1.3 vs. 0.4 p = 0.03). Our results show that EA compartments should always be evaluated during MSUS. Furthermore, we demonstrate a moderate concordance between CE and MSUS in JIA; the finding of subclinical synovitis is common in patients with active diseases and is related to disease activity.

MIS-C Treatment: Is IVIG Always Necessary?

Background: MIS-C is a potentially severe inflammatory syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is considered the first-tier therapy, but it implies infusion of large fluid volumes that may worsen cardiac function. Patients and Methods: Since April 2020, we have developed a treatment protocol that avoids the infusion of IVIG as first-line therapy in the early phase of MIS-C. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of consecutive patients treated according to this protocol between 01/04/2020 and 01/04/2021. Results: In the last year, 31 patients have been treated according to the protocol: 25 with high-dose pulse MP (10 mg/kg) and 6 with 2 mg/kg. 67.7% of the patients responded to the initial treatment, while the others needed a step-up, either with Anakinra (25.8%) or with MP dose increase (6.5%). IVIG was administered in four patients. Overall, only one patient (3.2%) needed ICU admission and inotropic support; one patient developed a small coronary artery aneurysm. Conclusions: Timely start of MP therapy and careful fluid management might improve the outcomes of MIS-C patients.

Corrigendum: MIS-C Treatment: Is IVIG Always Necessary?

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.753123.].