Postoperative and amputation-free survival outcomes after femorodistal bypass grafting surgery: findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

PURPOSE: A noncardiac surgery risk model was used as a means of analyzing variations in postoperative mortality and amputation-free survival for older veterans undergoing femorodistal bypass grafting surgery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was undertaken in 105 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals at the time of index operation from 1991 to 1995. Each patient was linked to subsequent hospitalizations, major amputation surgery, and survival through 1999. Logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used as a means of developing risk indices on the basis of risk factors from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. A total of 4288 male veterans 40 years or older underwent artificial, vein, or in situ bypass grafting surgery at the femoral to tibial level. The main outcome measures were 30-day postoperative mortality and amputation-free survival. RESULTS: Approximately half of all patients had undergone an earlier revascularization or amputation at any level for vascular disease. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.1% and varied greatly between mortality risk index quartiles (0.6%-5.2%). In a median 44.3 months of follow-up, surviving patients had 17,694 subsequent VA hospitalizations, 1147 patients (26.7%) underwent subsequent major amputation, and 1913 patients (44.6%) died. The overall survival probability was 88% at 1 year and 63% at 5 years; 1- and 5-year (any sided) limb salvage rates were 87% and 74%, respectively, for patients who underwent a femoropopliteal bypass grafting procedure, compared with 77% and 63%, respectively, for patients who underwent a tibial bypass grafting procedure. When amputation and death were combined as end points, amputation-free survival probability rates at 1, 3, and 7.5 years were 74%, 56%, and 29%, respectively. Patients with the best 20% survival risk scores had observed mean survival probability rates 30% higher than patients in the poorest 20% of survival risk. CONCLUSION: Risk indices derived from the preoperative workup may be of use to clinicians in assessing and communicating risk and prognosis. Risk-adjustment of outcomes is critical for evaluating future disease management initiatives for patients with advanced peripheral arterial disease.

Postoperative and late survival outcomes after major amputation: findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: A surgical risk model is used to analyze postoperative mortality and late survival for older veterans who underwent above- or below-knee amputations in 119 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals from 1991 to 1995. METHODS: Preoperative medical conditions and laboratory values abstracted by the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were linked to subsequent hospitalization and survival through 1999. Logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used to develop risk indexes for postoperative mortality and long-term survival. RESULTS: Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 6.3% for 1909 below-knee and 13.3% for 2152 above-knee amputees. Mortality varied greatly between the lowest-highest risk index quartiles (0.8%-18.4% for below-knee amputation and 2.3%-31.1% for above-knee amputation). Surviving patients had 10,827 subsequent VA hospitalizations during a median 32-month follow-up. Survival probabilities for below- and above-knee amputees were 77% and 59% at 1 year, 57% and 39% at 3 years, and 28% and 20% at 7.5 years. The lowest quartile of survival risk had a 61% five-year survival compared with 14% for the highest-risk quartile. CONCLUSION: A generic surgical risk model can be of use in stratifying prognosis after major amputation. The heavy burden of hospital use by these patients suggests the need for better disease management for this high-risk, high-cost patient population.

Database and informatics support for QUERI: current systems and future needs. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective is to provide an overview of database and informatics support for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). METHODS: We discuss the role of information technology resources in the QUERI process. We also review current VA information systems and specific databases in terms of strengths and weaknesses for addressing the QUERI goals. A synthesis of the issues and strategies for addressing specific data needs are presented by use of examples from 2 of the QUERI disease modules: Diabetes Mellitus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Finally, we discuss issues that need to be considered during development of new information systems to address the needs of clinical quality-improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Quality enhancement in VA health care requires coordination and careful planning among clinical, administrative, research, policy, and information technology leaders to ensure that key clinical process and outcome measures are reliably collected in the VA information systems. As the QUERI progresses, data needs will probably shift from addressing data gaps to developing approaches for feedback and evaluation. Continued and enhanced cooperation among all VHA business processes is vital to the success of the QUERI.

Using Department of Veterans Affairs Administrative databases to examine long-term care utilization for men and women veterans.

We examined long-term care (LTC) utilization by male and female veterans using administrative databases maintained by VA. Research questions included: (1) Which LTC services are utilized? (2) Do utilization patterns of older veterans differ from those of elderly persons in the general U.S. population? (3) Do LTC needs of veterans vary by gender? We were unable to track LTC utilization of individuals across administrative databases. Some databases could only provide information at the national level, or alternatively, were available only at local facilities, or only at the patient or program-level data--making it impossible to get a clear picture of all the services received by an individual. Those planning to use administrative databases to conduct research must: (1) take more time than expected; (2) be flexible/willing to compromise, (3) "ferret out" information, and (4) recognize that because of dynamism inherent in information systems, results may change over time.

Using administrative databases for outcomes research: select examples from VA Health Services Research and Development.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates and maintains one of the largest health care systems under a single management structure in the world. The coordination of administrative and clinical information on veterans served by the VA health care system is a daunting and critical function of the Department. This article provides an overview of VA Health Services Research and Development Service initiatives to assist researchers in using extant VA databases to study patient-centered health care outcomes. As examples, studies using the VA's Patient Treatment File (PTF) and the Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) Death File are described.

An evaluation of radical prostatectomy at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers: time trends and geographic variation in utilization and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine temporal trends and geographic variation in utilization of radical prostatectomy (RP) as well as 30-day mortality and complication rates. DESIGN: Administrative data-base study of radical prostatectomy (RP) using the Department of Veterans Affairs Patient Treatment File and Outpatient Clinic File between 1986 to 1996. Logistic regression was used to estimate temporal and geographic effects on the use of RP. SETTING: All Departments of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMC) in the contiguous United States. PATIENTS: Men aged 45 to 84 years who underwent RP at a VAMC (n = 13,398). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and utilization of RP, rate of 30-day mortality, major cardiopulmonary or vascular complications, and colorectal injuries requiring surgical repair within 30 days of RP. RESULTS: From 1986 to 1996, the annual number of RP at VAMCs (range, 695-1,545 RP) more than doubled, and the rate of RP at VAMCs per male VA user increased by 40% (range, 48/100,000-66/100,000). After controlling for age and year, the utilization of RP in West North Central, Mountain, West South Central, and Pacific census divisions was 70%, 14%, 10%, and 8% higher, respectively, whereas the utilization of RP in New England, East North Central, and Mid-Atlantic divisions was 38%, 31%, and 25% lower, respectively, than the rest of the nation (P<0.001). Geographic variation in utilization decreased during the period between 1986 and 1996, but a twofold difference in RP utilization in 1996 remained between high- and low-utilization divisions. Major cardiopulmonary complications, vascular complications, and colorectal injuries occurred in 1.7%, 0.2%, and 1.8% of men, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.73%, declined from 1986 to 1996, and was associated with a history of diabetes and congestive heart failure. CONCLUSION: Utilization of RP at VAMCs increased over time and varied across geographic areas. Thirty-day mortality was less than 1% and decreased with time. Differences in utilization may be caused by uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of early detection and treatment of prostate cancer.

Dual use of VA and non-VA primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how frequently veterans use non-Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sources of care in addition to primary care provided by the VA and to assess the association of this pattern of "dual use" to patient characteristics and satisfaction with VA care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey of randomly selected patients from four VA medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1,240 eligible veterans, 830 (67%) participated in the survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survey data were used to assess whether a veteran reported receiving primary care from both VA and non-VA sources of care, as well as the proportion of all primary care visits made to non-VA providers. Of 577 veterans who reported VA primary care visits, 159 (28%) also reported non-VA primary care visits. Among these dual users the mean proportion of non-VA primary care visits was 0.50. Multivariate analysis revealed that the odds of dual use were reduced for those without insurance (odds ratio [OR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18, 0.66) and with less education (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.38, 0.92), while increased for those not satisfied with VA care (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.40, 4.13). Among primary care dual users, the proportion of primary care visits made to non-VA providers was decreased for patients with heart disease ( p <.05) and patients with alcohol or drug dependence ( p <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Primary care dual use was common among these veterans. Those with more education, those with any type of insurance, and those not satisfied with VA care were more likely to be dual users. Non-VA care accounted for approximately half of dual users' total primary care visits.

Letter writing to parents following paediatric outpatient consultation: a survey of parent and GP views.

This study examined the practice of writing to parents following paediatric outpatients consultation (general practitioners (GPs) receive a copy of the letter to parents). One hundred and three questionnaires were sent to both parents and GPs in order to elicit their views. Fifty-one parents responded (RR 50.5%) and 56 GPs (RR 54.4%). All parents were in favour of the idea of specialists writing directly to parents/patients and none of the parents were in favour of the letter being sent to the GP alone. The majority of GPs considered that the letter(s) would improve parental satisfaction (85.7%) and improve compliance with medical advice (83.3%); 83.6% of GPs stated that the copy of the letter to parents was at least as helpful, if not more so, than the usual type of clinic letters they receive. Despite this, GPs expressed mixed feelings about the idea of all specialists writing direct to patients/parents, with 46.3% in favour of the idea and 40.7% against.

Late survival risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: experience from fourteen Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates late survival risk factors for patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgical procedures performed at 14 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals across the United States between 1985 and 1987. METHODS: Preoperative risk factors for a representative sample of 280 male veterans were obtained from an extensive Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Quality Management study and subsequent chart review. The National Death Index was used to determine survival through December 1991. RESULTS: Mortality at 30 days was 2.9%. Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities were 89% (+/- 2%) at 1 year and 64% (+/- 3%) at 5 years. Multivariate hazards models indicated significantly poorer survival for patients with age greater than 69 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, and left ventricular hypertrophy. A history of coronary artery disease including previous myocardial infarction or bypass operation did not predict late survival for this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Given the substantial burden of comorbidity of veterans who use Department of Veterans Affairs facilities, the overall survival experience of this all male cohort compares well with previously published series and with overall U.S. male life expectancy. The fact that a history of coronary artery disease did not predict survival for this cohort may be related to selection bias; however, a more likely explanation is the presence of unsuspected coronary disease among patients without a documented history of angina or myocardial infarction.

The ratio of observed-to-expected mortality as a quality of care indicator in non-surgical VA patients.

This study attempts to validate the use of the observed-to-expected (O/E) mortality ratio as an indicator of quality of care. The primary objective is to determine whether medical records of 111 patients who died in Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with high overall ratios of observed-to-expected mortality rates show greater evidence that life might have been meaningfully prolonged with more expert care than the records of matched patients who died in VA hospitals with low O/E ratios. Patient matching criteria included: age, diagnosis responsible for length of stay, type of VA hospital, and the mortality probability predicted by logistic regression. Expert physicians blindly and independently reviewed pairs of medical records, assessing comparative care on a symmetrical, nine-alternative visual analog scale. A slight shift in distribution toward better care in low-ratio hospitals was not statistically significant. Results of an additional analysis, not dependent on pairing, showed that preventability of death is more strongly related to physicians' estimates of mortality risk at admission, whether transferred from a nursing home, do-not-resuscitate status, and accuracy of discharge coding than to VA Medical Center O/E ratios.

Veteran interstate migration and VA health service use.

Resource allocations within the VA health care system are based in part on the number of veterans in an area plus the number of veterans expected to move into the area. This paper examines the relative importance of geographic mobility as a factor affecting the use of VA health services by the older veteran population in the U.S. Using a variety of secondary data sources, we found that the variation in state VA health service admission rates is better explained primarily by the characteristics of the resident nonmobile veteran population and the characteristics of veterans migrating to the state, not just by their numbers. Health care demand projections should take these findings into account.

The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: the anatomy of the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical District 17 Health Services Research and Development Field Program.

The Medical District 17 Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Field Program was funded by the Veterans Administration (now the Department of Veterans Affairs--VA) in January 1983. This article describes the organization, progress, and accomplishments of this field program, and it provides a review of the breadth of health services research that is being conducted in Medical District 17. Overall, the field program has conducted research that addresses significant problems in the delivery of health care within the VA system. Resource utilization, cost effectiveness, and the care of geriatric patients have been some of the areas in which the Medical District 17 HSR&D Field Program has provided important research findings for VA. The field program plans to continue its response to the needs of VA. Moreover, HSR&D investigators will be collaborating with researchers of other services to conduct research that is both enlightening and highly relevant to the delivery of health care to the nation's veterans. The proposal for an HSR&D field program was developed by the Edward A. Hines Jr. VA Hospital in collaboration with the Center for Health Services and Policy Research (CHSPR) of Northwestern University. The program was funded in January 1983, as the result of a national competition to establish an HSR&D field program in each of the VA regions. The goals of the Medical District 17 Field Program are to improve the health care of veterans by conducting relevant research on the processes and outcomes of patient care; to provide comprehensive technical research assistance; and to educate VA managers, planners, and clinicians, as well as the general medical community, about advances in health care delivery. The field program's commitment to excellence is strengthened by its multidisciplinary approach, which enables physicians, nurses, social workers, psychologists, sociologists, economists, statisticians, administrators, and individuals in various related disciplines to cooperate in efforts to address a wide range of topical issues. These collaborations are a major strength of the field program. Primary research priorities of the field program are cost effectiveness of VA services (e.g., patient care technologies, delivery systems), long-term care, and rehabilitation. Investigators, however, are not limited to these topics and explore many other health services research issues of particular interest to them.