Non-opioid analgesic modes of pain management are associated with reduced postoperative complications and resource utilisation: a retrospective study of obstructive sleep apnoea patients undergoing elective joint arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the effectiveness of multimodal analgesia, particularly in patients at higher perioperative risk from obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), are lacking. We aimed to assess the impact of multimodal analgesia on opioid use and complications in this high-risk cohort. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of OSA patients undergoing elective lower extremity joint arthroplasty (2006-16, Premier Healthcare database). Multimodal analgesia was defined as opioid use with the addition of one, two, or more non-opioid analgesic modes including, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, paracetamol/acetaminophen, peripheral nerve blocks, steroids, gabapentin/pregabalin, or ketamine. Multilevel multivariable regression models measured associations between multimodal analgesia and opioid prescription (primary outcome; oral morphine equivalents). Secondary outcomes included opioid- and OSA-related complications, and resource utilisation. Odds ratios (OR) or % change and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. RESULTS: Among 181 182 OSA patients included, 88.5% (n = 160 299) received multimodal analgesia with increasing utilisation trends. Multivariable models showed stepwise beneficial postoperative outcome effects with increasing additional analgesic modes compared with opioid-only analgesia. In patients who received more than two additional analgesia modes (n = 64 174), opioid dose prescription decreased by 14.9% (CI -17.0%; -12.7%), while odds were significantly decreased for gastrointestinal complications (OR 0.65, CI 0.53; 0.78), mechanical ventilation (OR 0.23, CI 0.16; 0.32), and critical care admission (OR 0.60, CI 0.48; 0.75), all P<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: In a population at high risk for perioperative complications from OSA, multimodal analgesia was associated with a stepwise reduction in opioid use and complications, including critical respiratory failure.

Neuraxial anaesthesia techniques and postoperative outcomes among joint arthroplasty patients: is spinal anaesthesia the best option?

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial anaesthesia is frequently used for lower limb arthroplasty but it is unclear whether benefits vary among patients receiving different subtypes of neuraxial anaesthesia. We evaluated whether differences in risk for adverse postoperative outcomes exist between patients receiving combined spinal and epidural (CSE), epidural, or spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 40 852 patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) procedures under neuraxial anaesthesia (34 301 CSE, 2464 epidural, 4087 spinal) between 2005 and 2014 at a single institution. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the following outcomes: cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal/genitourinary, and thromboembolic complications, and prolonged length of stay. RESULTS: Compared with CSE, spinal anaesthesia was associated with reduced adjusted odds for cardiac [odds ratio (OR), 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.89], pulmonary (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.68), gastrointestinal (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32-0.78), and thromboembolic complications (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23-0.73), and prolonged length of stay (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.66-0.80). Patients who received epidural anaesthesia did not have significantly different odds for any outcomes compared with CSE patients. CONCLUSIONS: We identified clear differences in risk for certain postoperative events by subtype of neuraxial anaesthesia, suggesting that spinal anaesthesia is associated with the most favourable outcomes profile.

Postoperative delirium in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients: a study of perioperative modifiable risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium continues to pose major clinical difficulties. While unmodifiable factors (e.g. age and comorbidity burden) are commonly studied risk factors for delirium, the role of modifiable factors, such as anaesthesia type and commonly used perioperative medications, remains understudied. This study aims to evaluate the role of modifiable factors for delirium after hip and knee arthroplasties. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 41 766 patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasties between 2005 and 2014 at a single institution. Data were collected as part of routine patient care. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between anaesthesia type and commonly used perioperative medications (opioids, benzodiazepines, and ketamine) and postoperative delirium. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Various sensitivity analyses are also considered, including multiple imputation methods to address missing data. RESULTS: Postoperative delirium occurred in 2.21% (n=922) of all patients. While patients who received neuraxial anaesthesia were at lower risk for postoperative delirium (compared with general anaesthesia; epidural OR 0.59 CI 0.38-0.93; spinal OR 0.55 CI 0.37-0.83; combined spinal/epidural OR 0.56 CI 0.40-0.80), those given intraoperative ketamine (OR 1.27 CI 1.01-1.59), opioids (OR 1.25 CI 1.09-1.44), postoperative benzodiazepines (OR 2.47 CI 2.04-2.97), and ketamine infusion (OR 10.59 CI 5.26-19.91) were at a higher risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of hip and knee arthroplasty patients, anaesthesia type and perioperative medications were associated with increased odds for postoperative delirium. Our results support the notion that modifiable risk factors may exacerbate or attenuate risk for postoperative delirium.

Epidemiology, trends, and disparities in regional anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery.

Recent studies have linked the use of regional anaesthesia to improved outcomes. Epidemiological research on utilization, trends, and disparities in this field is sparse; however, large nationally representative database constructs containing anaesthesia-related data, demographic information, and multiyear files are now available. Together with advances in research methodology and technology, these databases provide the foundation for epidemiological research in anaesthesia. We present an overview of selected studies that provide epidemiological data and describe current anaesthetic practice, trends, and disparities in orthopaedic surgery in particular. This literature suggests that that even among orthopaedic surgical procedures, which are highly amenable to regional anaesthetic techniques, neuraxial anaesthetics and peripheral nerve blocks are used in only a minority of procedures. Trend analyses show that peripheral nerve blocks are gaining in popularity, whereas use of neuraxial anaesthetics is remaining relatively unchanged or even declining over time. Finally, significant disparities and variability in anaesthetic care seem to exist based on demographic and health-care-related factors. With anaesthesia playing an increasingly important part in population-based health-care delivery and evidence indicating improved outcome with use of regional anaesthesia, more research in this area is needed. Furthermore, prevalent disparities and variabilities in anaesthesia practice need to be specified further and addressed in the future.