Switch therapy with ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis: similar efficacy at lower cost.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of a third-generation cephalosporin is optimal antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. AIMS: To compare an intravenous-oral step-down schedule with ciprofloxacin (switch therapy) to intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and to evaluate the impact of terlipressin and albumin in the treatment of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome on mortality. METHODS: A total of 116 cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, were randomly given switch therapy with ciprofloxacin (61 patients) or intravenous ceftazidime (55 patients). All patients who developed type 1 hepatorenal syndrome were treated with terlipressin (2-12 mg/day) and albumin (20-40 g/day). RESULTS: Resolution of infection was achieved in 46/55 patients treated with ceftazidime (84%) and in 49/61 patients treated with ciprofloxacin (80%, P = N.S.). An intravenous-oral step-down schedule was possible in 50/61 patients (82%) who received ciprofloxacin; 45/61 patients (74%) were discharged before the end of antibiotic treatment and completed it at home. The mean saving per patient due to the reduction of hospital stay in the ciprofloxacin group was 1150 . Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome was treated successfully in 12/19 patients (63%). As a consequence, the in-hospital mortality rate due to infection was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Switch therapy with cephalosporin is more cost-effective than intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients who are not on prophylaxis with quinolones.

Increased activity of guanosine 3'-5'-cyclic monophosphate phosphodiesterase in the renal tissue of cirrhotic rats with ascites.

A possible defect of guanosine 3'-5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) content in the renal tissue caused by an increased activity of cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) has, so far, not been evaluated in the pathogenesis of renal resistance to endogenous natriuretic peptides (ENP) in cirrhosis with ascites. To test this hypothesis the activity of cGMP-PDE and the concentration of cGMP were evaluated in vitro in the renal tissue of 10 control rats and 10 cirrhotic rats with ascites before and after the intravenous (IV) administration of Zaprinast (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), a specific cGMP-PDE inhibitor (30 microgram/kg/min). Moreover, the effects of the intravenous administration of Zaprinast (15 microgram/kg/min and 30 microgram/kg/min) on renal plasma flow (RPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and urinary sodium excretion (U(Na)V) were evaluated in 10 conscious control rats and 10 conscious cirrhotic rats with ascites. The effects of Zaprinast on plasma renin activity (PRA) was also evaluated in 10 control rats and in 10 cirrhotic rats with ascites. Finally, the effect of Zaprinast on RPF, GFR, and U(Na)V were evaluated in 10 cirrhotic rats after the IV administration of the ENP-receptor antagonist, HS-142-1. The renal content of cGMP was reduced in cirrhotic rats because of increased activity of cGMP-PDE. Zaprinast inhibited cGMP-PDE activity and increased the renal content of cGMP in these animals. The inhibition of cGMP-PDE was associated with an increase in RPF, GFR, and U(Na)V and a reduction in PRA. HS-142-1 prevented any renal effect of Zaprinast in cirrhotic rats. In conclusion, an increased activity of the cGMP-PDE in renal tissue contributes to the renal resistance to ENP in cirrhosis with ascites.

Reversal of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome with the administration of midodrine and octreotide.

The aim of the study was to verify the effects of the administration of an inhibitor of the release of endogenous vasodilators together with a vasoconstrictor agent in patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). This new medical perspective was compared with a traditional medical approach for HRS, such as the infusion of nonpressor doses of dopamine to produce renal vasodilation. Thirteen patients with type 1 HRS were enrolled in the study. Five of them were treated with the oral administration of midodrine and the parenteral administration of octreotide. In addition, the patients received 50 to 100 mL of 20% human albumin solution daily for 20 days. Midodrine and octreotide were dosed to obtain a stable increase of at least 15 mm Hg of mean arterial pressure. Eight patients were treated with the intravenous administration of nonpressor doses of dopamine (2-4 micrograms/kg/min) and the same daily amount of albumin. After 20 days of treatment with midodrine and octreotide, an impressive improvement in renal plasma flow (RPF), glomerular filtration rate, and urinary sodium excretion was observed in patients. This was accompanied by a significant reduction in plasma renin activity, plasma vasopressin, and plasma glucagon. No side effects were observed. Three patients were discharged from the hospital. One of them successfully underwent liver transplantation. One of the two remaining patients is still alive after 472 days with a preserved renal function, and the other died from terminal liver failure after 76 days. One of the two patients who were not discharged from the hospital successfully underwent liver transplantation, and the other died from pneumonia after 29 days. Seven out of eight patients who were treated with dopamine experienced a progressive deterioration in renal function and died during the first 12 days. Only one patient recovered renal function and underwent liver transplantation. In conclusion, the long-term administration of midodrine and octreotide seems to be an effective and safe treatment of type 1 HRS in patients with cirrhosis.

Acute effects of the oral administration of midodrine, an alpha-adrenergic agonist, on renal hemodynamics and renal function in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

The effects of the acute administration of arterial vasoconstrictors on renal plasma flow (RPF) and urinary sodium excretion (UNaV) in cirrhotic patients with ascites with or without hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) are still controversial. As a consequence, vasoconstrictors are not actually used in the treatment of renal sodium retention or HRS in these patients, regardless of the several lines of evidence suggesting that these renal functional abnormalities are related to a marked arterial vasodilation. The lack of an orally available effective arterial vasoconstrictor probably represents a further reason for this omission. Consequently, the present study was made to evaluate the acute effects of the oral administration of midodrine, an orally available -mimetic drug, on systemic and renal hemodynamics and on UNaV in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), left forearm blood flow (LFBF), left leg blood flow (LLBF), RPF, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), UNaV, plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma concentration of antidiuretic hormone (ADH), and the serum levels of nitrite and nitrate (NOx) were evaluated in 25 cirrhotic patients with ascites (17 without HRS and 8 with type 2 HRS) before and during the 6 hours following the oral administration of 15 mg of midodrine. During the first 3 hours after the drug administration, a significant increase in MAP (89.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 81.80 +/- 1.3 mm Hg; P < .0001) and SVR (1, 313.9 +/- 44.4 vs. 1,121.2 +/- 60.1 dyn . sec . cm-5; P < .0001) accompanied by a decrease in HR (69 +/- 2 vs. 77 +/- 3 bpm; P < .005) and CI (2,932.7 +/- 131.4 vs. 3,152.5 +/- 131.4 mL . min-1 . m2 BSA; P < .0025) was observed in patients without HRS. No change was observed in LFBF and LLBF. The improvement in systemic hemodynamics, which was also maintained during the the 3- to 6-hour period after midodrine administration, was accompanied by a significant increase in RPF (541.5 +/- 43.1 vs. 385.7 +/- 39.9 mL . min-1; P < .005), GFR (93.1 +/- 6.5 vs. 77.0 +/- 6.7 mL . min-1; P < .025), and UNaV (92.7 +/- 16.4 vs. 72.2 +/- 10.7 microEq . min-1; P < .025). In addition, a decrease in PRA (5.33 +/- 1.47 vs. 7.74 +/- 2.17 ng . mL-1 . h; P < .05), ADH (1.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.2 pg . mL-1; P < .05), and NOx (33.4 +/- 5.0 vs. 49.3 +/- 7.3 micromol-1; P < .05) was found. In patients with HRS, the effects of the drug on the systemic hemodynamics was smaller and shorter. Accordingly, regardless of a significant decrease in PRA (15.87 +/- 3.70 vs. 20.70 +/- 4.82 ng . mL-1 . h; P < .0025) in patients with HRS, no significant improvement was observed in RPF, GFR, or UNaV. In conclusion, the acute oral administration of midodrine is associated with a significant improvement in systemic hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. As a result, renal perfusion and UNaV also improve in these patients. By contrast, midodrine only slightly improves systemic hemodynamics in patients with type 2 HRS, with no effect on renal hemodynamics and renal function.