A gastroretentive gabapentin formulation for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: efficacy and tolerability in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

AIMS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 147 patients to determine the efficacy and safety of a gastroretentive formulation of gabapentin (G-GR) in treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). METHODS: Diabetic patients with symmetrical painful symptoms in distal extremities for 1-5 years and a baseline average daily pain (ADP) score of ≥4 received G-GR 3000mg, as a single evening daily dose (G-GR-QD) or a divided dose (G-GR-DD, 1200mg AM/1800mg PM), or placebo for 4 weeks. G-GR was titrated from 300 to 3000mg/day over 2 weeks, followed by 2 additional weeks at 3000mg/day. Efficacy measures included changes from baseline to Week 4 in ADP score and average daily sleep interference score (SIS). RESULTS: A significantly larger decrease in ADP score was observed in the G-GR-QD dose group compared with placebo (-2.50 versus -1.30; p=0.002). A ≥50% reduction in ADP score was achieved in 34.8% of G-GR-QD recipients compared with 7.8% of placebo recipients (p=0.001). Similar results were observed for changes in SIS. The incidences of dizziness and somnolence, commonly associated with gabapentin, were low. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily G-GR was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of pain due to DPN.

Efficacy and tolerability of gastric-retentive gabapentin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a gastric-retentive, extended-release gabapentin (gabapentin ER) taken once or twice daily for treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. METHODS: Using an enrichment design, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 158 patients who had experienced pain for at least 3 months after healing of acute herpes zoster skin rash and who had a baseline average daily pain (ADP) score of > or =4 on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale. Patients received gabapentin ER either once daily (1800 mg PM) or twice daily (600 mg AM, 1200 mg PM) or placebo for 4 weeks. Efficacy measures included changes from baseline to end point in ADP score and average daily sleep interference score. RESULTS: Mean (SEM) changes for ADP score were -1.93 (0.28), -2.24 (0.29), and -1.29 (0.29) in the gabapentin ER once daily, twice daily, and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.089 and 0.014 for gabapentin ER once daily and twice daily, respectively, vs. placebo), with 25.5%, 28.8%, and 11.8% of patients, respectively, reporting > or =50% decrease from baseline in ADP score. Mean (SEM) changes in sleep interference scores were -1.94 (0.30), -2.28 (0.30), and -1.16 (0.30), respectively (P=0.048 and 0.006 for gabapentin ER once daily and twice daily, respectively, vs. placebo). Common adverse events in the gabapentin ER once daily, twice daily, and placebo groups, respectively, were dizziness (22.2%, 11.3%, and 9.8%) and somnolence (9.3%, 7.5%, and 7.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin ER administered twice daily is effective and safe for the treatment of pain associated with postherpetic neuralgia.

Clinical development of metformin extended-release tablets for type 2 diabetes: an overview.

Glumetz (Depomed, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) is a recently approved gastric retentive extended-release formulation of metformin (M-ER) that provides effective, sustained and well-tolerated glycemic control with once daily administration. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated a similar bioavailability of M-ER administered once daily to immediate-release metformin given twice daily. In addition, M-ER has demonstrated a nearly linear dose proportionality with a relative bioavailability of highest dose to lowest dose of 80%, whereas with immediate-release metformin the relative bioavailability of the highest dose to the lowest dose is only 58%. M-ER demonstrated a positive food effect and should be administered with a meal, preferably the evening meal. Because metformin is only eliminated through renal mechanisms, the use of M-ER, as is the case with other formulations, is contraindicated in patients with renal impairment. Administration of M-ER with sulfonylureas (SUs) had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of metformin. In controlled clinical trials M-ER demonstrated efficacy for 24 weeks as a monotherapy or in combination with SU. Additionally, glycemic control was maintained for an extra 24 weeks in an open-label monotherapy extension study of M-ER. M-ER was well tolerated in all studies.

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a novel extended-release metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults with type 2 diabetes (newly diagnosed, treated with diet and exercise only, or previously treated with oral diabetic medications) were randomly assigned to receive one of three extended-release metformin treatment regimens (1,500 mg/day q.d., 1,500 mg/day twice daily, or 2,000 mg/day q.d.) or immediate-release metformin (1,500 mg/day twice daily) in a double-blind 24-week trial. RESULTS: Significant decreases (P < 0.001) in mean HbA(1c) (A1C) levels were observed by week 12 in all treatment groups. The mean changes from baseline to end point in the two groups given 1,500 mg extended-release metformin (-0.73 and -0.74%) were not significantly different from the change in the immediate-release metformin group (-0.70%), whereas the 2,000-mg extended-release metformin group showed a greater decrease in A1C levels (-1.06%; mean difference [2,000 mg extended-release metformin - immediate-release metformin]: -0.36 [98.4% CI -0.65 to -0.06]). Rapid decreases in fasting plasma glucose levels were observed by week 1, which continued until week 8, and were maintained for the duration of the study. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar for all treatment groups, but fewer patients in the extended-release metformin groups discontinued treatment due to nausea during the initial dosing period than in the immediate-release metformin group. CONCLUSIONS: Once- or twice-daily extended-release metformin was as safe and effective as twice-daily immediate-release metformin and provided continued glycemic control for up to 24 weeks of treatment.

Efficacy and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release ciprofloxacin tablet formulation for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women.

The efficacy and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin ER) 500-mg dose were compared with those of an immediate-release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin IR) 250-mg twice-daily dose, each administered orally for 3 days in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in women. Adult female outpatients (mean age, 39 years) with clinical signs and symptoms of acute uUTI and a positive pretreatment urine culture (> or =10(5) CFU/ml) were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial. Patients were assessed at a test-of-cure visit (4 to 11 days posttreatment) and a late-posttreatment visit (4 to 6 weeks posttreatment) for microbiological and clinical outcomes and safety. The primary efficacy endpoint and microbiological eradication rate at the test-of-cure visit in the ciprofloxacin ER group (254/272; 93.4%) were noninferior to those in the ciprofloxacin IR group (225/251; 89.6%) (95% confidence interval [CI] of difference, -0.99%, 8.59%). Clinical-cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 85.7% (233/272) for ciprofloxacin ER and 86.1% (216/251) for ciprofloxacin IR (95% CI of difference, -6.37%, 5.57%). At the late-posttreatment visit, microbiological and clinical outcomes were similar for the two treatments and consistent with test-of-cure results. Both treatments were well tolerated, but the frequencies of nausea and diarrhea were lower in the ciprofloxacin ER group than in the ciprofloxacin IR group (nausea, ER, 0.6%; IR, 2.2%; P = 0.033; diarrhea, ER, 0.2%; IR, 1.4%; P = 0.037). Once-daily ciprofloxacin ER was safe, effective, and noninferior to twice-daily ciprofloxacin IR in the treatment of acute uUTI. Additionally, ciprofloxacin ER was associated with significantly reduced frequencies of nausea and diarrhea.