Hypertonic Sodium Lactate to Alleviate Functional Deficits Following Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury: An Osmotic or a Lactate-Related Effect?

BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in the use of hypertonic sodium lactate (HSL) solution following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans. However, little is known about the effects of HSL on functional deficits with respect to the hyperosmotic nature of HSL. METHODS: We have compared the effects of HSL solution and isotonic saline solution using sensorimotor and cognitive tests for 14 days post-trauma in animals. Thirty minutes after trauma (impact-acceleration model), anesthetized rats were randomly allocated to receive a 2-h infusion of isotonic saline solution (TBI-saline group) or HSL (TBI-HSL group) (n = 10 rats per group). In another series of experiments using a similar protocol, the effects of equiosmolar doses of HSL and hypertonic saline solution (HSS) were compared in TBI rats (n = 10 rats per group). Blood lactate and ion concentrations were measured during the 2-h infusions. RESULTS: Compared to the TBI-saline group, the TBI-HSL group had a reduced latency to complete the adhesive removal test: 6 s (5-9) (median [25-75th centiles]) versus 13 s (8-17) on day 7, and 5 s (5-9) versus 11 s (8-26) on day 14 (P < 0.05), respectively, and a shorter delay to complete the radial arm maze test on day 7: 99 s (73-134) versus 176 s (127-300), respectively (P < 0.05). However, no differences were found between the TBI-HSL and TBI-HSS groups in neurocognitive tests performance. Compared to the TBI-saline group, the HSL and HSS groups had higher serum osmolality: 318 mOsm/Kg (315-321) and 315 mOsm/Kg (313-316) versus 307 mOsm/Kg (305-309), respectively (P < 0.05), and the HSL group had a higher serum lactate concentration: 6.4 mmol/L (5.3-7.2) versus 1.5 mmol/L (1.1-1.9) and 1.6 mmol/L (1.5-1.7), respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that improvements in cognitive and sensorimotor tests with HSL infusion post-TBI could be related to elevation of serum osmolality, not to exogenous administration of lactate.

Which Protocol for Milrinone to Treat Cerebral Vasospasm Associated With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage?

BACKGROUND: Milrinone has emerged as an option to treat delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, substantial variation exists in the administration of this drug. We retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of 2 protocols in patients with angiographically proven cerebral vasospasm. METHODS: During 2 successive periods, milrinone was administered using either a combination of intra-arterial milrinone infusion followed by intravenous administration until day 14 after initial bleeding (IA+IV protocol), or a continuous intravenous milrinone infusion for at least 7 days (IV protocol). The primary endpoint was the reversion rate of vasospastic arterial segments following the first IA infusion of milrinone (IA+IV protocol) compared with the reversion rate during the first week of IV infusion (IV protocol). RESULTS: There were 24 and 77 consecutive patients in IA+IV and IV protocols, respectively. The reversion rate was comparable between the 2 protocols: 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-83%) in the IA+IV protocol versus 64% (95% CI, 58%-71%) in the IV protocol (P=0.36). Rescue procedures for persistence or recurrence of vasospasm, that is, mechanical angioplasty and/or IA milrinone infusion, were similar between the 2 protocols. Patients with a good neurological outcome at 1 year, that is, modified Rankin Scale scores 0-2, were comparable between the 2 protocols. Side effects of milrinone were uncommon and equally distributed within the 2 protocols. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that a continuous IV infusion of milrinone was as efficient as combined IA+IV infusion and suggest that this modality could be considered as a first easy-to-use option to treat patients with CVS.