Adult-Attained Height and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The influence of anthropometric characteristics on colorectal neoplasia biology is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if adult-attained height is independently associated with the risk of colorectal cancer or adenoma. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to August 2020 for studies on the association between adult-attained height and colorectal cancer or adenoma. The original data from the Johns Hopkins (Baltimore, MD) Colon Biofilm study was also included. The overall HR/OR of colorectal cancer/adenoma with increased height was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 47 observational studies involving 280,644 colorectal cancer and 14,139 colorectal adenoma cases. Thirty-three studies reported data for colorectal cancer incidence per 10-cm increase in height; 19 yielded an HR of 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-1.17; P < 0.001), and 14 engendered an OR of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.13; P < 0.001). Twenty-six studies compared colorectal cancer incidence between individuals within the highest versus the lowest height percentile; 19 indicated an HR of 1.24 (95% CI, 1.19-1.30; P < 0.001), and seven resulting in an OR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.92-1.25; P = 0.39). Four studies reported data for assessing colorectal adenoma incidence per 10-cm increase in height, showing an overall OR of 1.06 (95% CI, 1.00-1.12; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Greater adult attained height is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma. IMPACT: Height should be considered as a risk factor for colorectal cancer screening.

Self-reported Metabolic Risk Factor Associations with Adenomatous, Sessile Serrated, and Synchronous Adenomatous and Sessile Serrated Polyps.

Studies have found a positive association between metabolic risk factors, such as obesity and diabetes, and adenomatous polyps (AP). However, fewer studies have assessed the association between sessile serrated polyps (SSP) or synchronous diagnosis of APs and SSPs (synch polyps). Study participants (N = 1,370; ages 40-85) undergoing screening colonoscopy were enrolled between August 2016 and February 2020. Self-reported metabolic risk factors, including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and overweight/obesity, were evaluated for associations with new diagnoses of APs, SSPs, and synch polyps at the present colonoscopy. Average participant age was 60.73 ± 8.63 (SD) years; 56.7% were female and 90.9% white. In an assessment of individual metabolic risk factors, adjusted for age, sex, race, and smoking status, increased body mass index (BMI; overweight or obese vs. normal BMI of <25 kg/m2) was associated with an increased odds for new onset of colon APs (P trend < 0.001) as was a diagnosis of diabetes [adjusted conditional OR (aCOR) = 1.59 (1.10-2.29)]. No associations were seen between the metabolic risk factors and onset of SSPs. Being obese or hypertensive each increased the odds of new onset of synch polyps with aCOR values of 2.09 (1.01-4.32) and 1.79 (1.06-3.02), respectively. Self-reported risk factors may help assess polyp type risk. Because SSPs and synch polyps are rare, larger studies are needed to improve our understanding of the contribution of these factors to polyp risk. These data lead us to hypothesize that differences in observed metabolic risk factors between polyp types reflect select metabolic impact on pathways to colorectal cancer. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Self-reported medical history provides valuable insight into polyp risk, potentially enabling the use of larger retrospective studies of colonoscopy populations to assess knowledge gaps. More aggressive colonoscopy screening, critical to colorectal cancer prevention, may be considered in populations of individuals with metabolic risk factors and modifiable lifestyle risk factors.

Angiotensin II antagonism is associated with reduced risk for gastrointestinal bleeding caused by arteriovenous malformations in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is implicated in formation of gastrointestinal arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Angiotensin II signaling is involved in angiogenesis through the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin-2 pathways. We hypothesized that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy would be associated with a reduced risk of all-cause gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and AVM-associated GIB in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). METHODS: We reviewed records of all adult patients receiving a continuous-flow LVAD (HeartMate II or HeartWare HVAD) at Johns Hopkins Hospital between January 2004 and December 2014. Of 192 patients, 131 were included for final analyses. Logistic regression analysis adjusting for demographic, cardiovascular, and laboratory variables was used to assess the association of ACEI or ARB therapy with GIB. RESULTS: Of 131 patients, 100 received ACEI or ARB therapy during LVAD support. Of the 31 patients who did not receive ACEI or ARB, 15 experienced GIB (48%), with 9 caused by AVMs (29%). Of 100 patients who received ACEI or ARB therapy, 24 experienced GIB (24%), with 9 caused by AVMs (9%). Logistic regression hazards model demonstrated that ACEI or ARB therapy was independently associated with a reduced risk for all-cause GIB (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.72) and AVM-related GIB (odds ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II antagonism is associated with a reduced risk of AVM-related GIB in patients with LVADs. This association is independent of age, sex, blood pressure, renal function, international normalized ratio, LVAD type, and cardiomyopathy etiology.

Hospital experience and outcomes for esophageal variceal bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: Although higher hospital volume has been associated with better outcomes for many surgical procedures, this relationship does not appear to hold for most common medical diagnoses. We evaluated whether there is a volume-outcome relationship for a rarer and higher-mortality medical diagnosis, esophageal variceal bleeding. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective study of hospital discharge data. SETTING: All Maryland hospitals from 1992 through 1996. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: All patients with diagnosis codes for both esophageal variceal bleeding and cirrhosis in relevant diagnosis-related groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality for esophageal variceal bleeding. We classified hospitals by tertiles of admissions as high (> 17 cases of variceal bleeding per year), medium (12-17 cases per year) or low (< 12 cases per year) volume. RESULTS: There were seven high-volume, 13 medium-volume, and 29 low-volume hospitals. Overall in-hospital mortality was 15%. After multiple regression was used to adjust for differences in age, sex, ethnicity, emergency room admission, use of procedures, complexity, Medicaid status, transfer status, and clinical variables associated with mortality from variceal bleeding, there were no significant differences between the high-, medium-, and low-volume hospital groups in in-hospital mortality (16%, 15%, and 13%, respectively). There were also no significant differences in hospital charges (dollar 17 000, dollar 15 000, and dollar 14 000, respectively) or length of stay (8.5, 8.7, and 7.8 days, respectively) between hospital volume groups. CONCLUSIONS: The volume-outcome relationship may not pertain to some medical diseases such as esophageal variceal bleeding. Alternatively, the biases inherent in research using administrative data may make this relationship appear weaker for some medical than for surgical diagnoses in this type of study.