Selection of endoscopic resection technique for large colorectal lesion treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥ 20 mm (LNPCPs) comprise 1% of all colorectal lesions. LNPCPs are more likely to contain advanced histology such as high-grade dysplasia and submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC). Endoscopic resection is the first-line approach for management of these lesions. Endoscopic resection options include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cold-snare EMR (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). This review aimed to critically evaluate current endoscopic resection techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence-based selective resection algorithms should inform the most appropriate endoscopic resection technique. Most LNPCPs are removed by conventional EMR but there has been a trend toward C-EMR for endoscopic resection of LNPCPs. More high-quality trials are required to better define the limitations of C-EMR. Advances in our understanding of ESD technique, has clarified its role within the colorectum. More recently, the development of a full thickness resection device (FTRD) has allowed the curative endoscopic resection of select lesions. SUMMARY: Endoscopic resection should be regarded as the principle approach for all LNPCPs. Underpinned by high-quality research, endoscopic resection has become more nuanced, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Prevalence of Endoscopically Curable Low-Risk Cancer amongst Large (≥20mm) Non-Pedunculated Polyps in the Right Colon.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly promoted for the treatment of all large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCP), to cure potential low-risk cancers (superficial submucosal invasion without additional high-risk histopathological features). The effect of a universal en bloc strategy on oncological outcomes for the treatment of LNPCP in the right colon is unknown. We evaluated this in a large Western population. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients referred for endoscopic resection (ER) of LNPCP was analysed. Patients found to have cancer after ER and those referred directly to surgery were included. The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of right colon LNPCP with low-risk cancer. RESULTS: Over 180 months until June 2023, 3294 sporadic right colon LNPCP in 2956 patients were referred for ER at 7 sites (median size 30mm [IQR 15]). 63 (2.1%) patients were referred directly to surgery and cancer was proven in 56 (88.9%). 2851/2956 (96.4%) LNPCP underwent ER (median size 35mm [IQR 20]) of which 75 (2.6%) were cancers. The overall prevalence of cancer in the right colon was 4.4% (131/2956). Detailed histopathological analysis was possible in 115/131 (88%) cancers (71 after ER, 44 direct to surgery). After excluding missing histopathological data, 23/2940 (0.78%) sporadic right colon LNPCP were low-risk cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of right colon LNPCP referred for ER containing low-risk cancer amenable to endoscopic cure was <1%, in a large, multicentre Western cohort. A universal ESD strategy for the management of right colon LNPCP is unlikely to yield improved patient outcomes given the minimal impact on oncological outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL: Australian Colonic Endoscopic Resection (ACE) cohort: NCT01368289 (https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT01368289); NCT02000141 (https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT02000141).

A Sub-epithelial Lesion Algorithm For Endoscopic (SAFE) Resection In The Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.

INTRODUCTION: Complete excision of upper gastrointestinal sub-epithelial lesions (U-SELs) eliminates diagnostic uncertainty, obviates the need for surveillance and may be necessary for definitive diagnosis and management. Current guidelines lack precision and cohesion, and surgery is associated with significant morbidity. Herein, we describe and report on the outcomes of our SEL algorithm for endoscopic (SAFE) resection. METHODS: U-SELs were enrolled prospectively over 115 months until March 2023. All underwent axial (CT) imaging and endoscopic-ultrasonography (EUS) to exclude a large exophytic component or invasion into local structures, and assess for muscularis propria involvement. RESULTS: 106 U-SELs were resected (mean age 60.6±13.4, 51.9% male; 41 oesophageal, 65 gastric). Oesophageal U-SELs underwent ESD (n=22) or STER if MP involvement was suspected (n=19). Gastric U-SELs underwent STER (n=6 at cardia), ESD (n=47) or exposing-EFTR (n=12). Technical success was 97.6% and 92.3% respectively. Five (7.7%) were completed laparoscopically due to deep and broad full-thickness involvement. Five (7.7%) required laparoscopic gastrotomy and surgical retrieval after successful resection and closure due to a large lesion size (mean 47 mm). There was no delayed bleeding, perforation or recurrence at 13 months. CONCLUSION: U-SELs may be effectively and safely treated by endoscopic resection. The SAFE approach provides a framework that facilitates structured decision-making. Oesophageal U-SELs suspected to involve the MP should undergo STER. Gastric SELs can be best managed by ESD with a view to proceed to exposing-EFTR. A laparoscopic UGI surgeon should be available in case surgical retrieval of the specimen or laparoscopic completion is required.

Cold versus hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for large (≥15 mm) flat non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Conventional hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (H-EMR) is effective for the management of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colon polyps (LNPCPs) however, electrocautery-related complications may incur significant morbidity. With a superior safety profile, cold snare EMR (C-EMR) of LNPCPs is an attractive alternative however evidence is lacking. We conducted a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of C-EMR to H-EMR. METHODS: Flat, 15-50 mm adenomatous LNPCPs were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to C-EMR or H-EMR with margin thermal ablation at a single tertiary centre. The primary outcome was endoscopically visible and/or histologically confirmed recurrence at 6 months surveillance colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB), delayed perforation and technical success. RESULTS: 177 LNPCPs in 177 patients were randomised to C-EMR arm (n=87) or H-EMR (n=90). Treatment groups were equivalent for technical success 86/87 (98.9%) C-EMR versus H-EMR 90/90 (100%); p=0.31. Recurrence was significantly greater in C-EMR (16/87, 18.4% vs 1/90, 1.1%; relative risk (RR) 16.6, 95% CI 2.24 to 122; p<0.001).Delayed perforation (1/90 (1.1%) vs 0; p=0.32) only occurred in the H-EMR group. CSPEB was significantly greater in the H-EMR arm (7/90 (7.8%) vs 1/87 (1.1%); RR 6.77, 95% CI 0.85 to 53.9; p=0.034). CONCLUSION: Compared with H-EMR, C-EMR for flat, adenomatous LNPCPs, demonstrates superior safety with equivalent technical success. However, endoscopic recurrence is significantly greater for cold snare resection and is currently a limitation of the technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04138030.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for relative indication early gastric cancer in nonsurgical candidates.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is effective in treating early gastric cancer (EGC). Its role in patients with comorbidities along with more advanced disease is unknown. We sought to evaluate this in a large Western cohort. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent ESD for EGC in a single tertiary Western endoscopy center over 10 years were prospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) up to 5 years. Secondary outcomes were efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: ESD for 157 cases of EGC in 149 patients was performed in an elderly and comorbid cohort with a mean age of 73.7 years and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4.2. Over a median follow-up of 51.6 months, no significant differences were found in 5-year OS (88.9% vs 77.9%, P = .290) and DFS (83.2% vs 75.1%, P = .593) between absolute indication (AI) EGC and relative indication (RI) EGC. The AI EGC cohort achieved higher en-bloc (96.3% vs 87.5%, P = .069) and R0 resection rates (93.6% vs 62.5%, P < .001) when compared with RI EGC. No significant differences were found in SAEs (7.3% vs 12.5%, P = .363). No mortality or surgical resection ensued from adverse events from ESD. CONCLUSIONS: ESD safely confers DFS in poor surgical candidates with RI EGC in a large Western cohort. Patients who are elderly and/or with comorbidities or decline surgical resection may benefit from ESD and avoid the risks of surgery and its long-term sequelae. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02306707.).

A simplified algorithm to evaluate the risk of submucosal invasive cancer in large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colonic polyps.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) in large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs) informs selection of the optimal resection strategy. LNPCP location, morphology, and size influence the risk of SMIC; however, currently no meaningful application of this information has simplified the process to make it accessible and broadly applicable. We developed a decision-making algorithm to simplify the identification of LNPCP subtypes with increased risk of potential SMIC. METHODS: Patients referred for LNPCP resection from September 2008 to November 2022 were enrolled. LNPCPs with SMIC were identified from endoscopic resection specimens, lesion biopsies, or surgical outcomes. Decision tree analysis of lesion characteristics identified in multivariable analysis was used to create a hierarchical classification of SMIC prevalence. RESULTS: 2451 LNPCPs were analyzed: 1289 (52.6%) were flat, 1043 (42.6%) nodular, and 118 (4.8%) depressed. SMIC was confirmed in 273 of the LNPCPs (11.1%). It was associated with depressed and nodular vs. flat morphology (odds ratios [ORs] 35.7 [95%CI 22.6-56.5] and 3.5 [95%CI 2.6-4.9], respectively; P<0.001); rectosigmoid vs. proximal location (OR 3.2 [95%CI 2.5-4.1]; P<0.001); nongranular vs. granular appearance (OR 2.4 [95%CI 1.9-3.1]; P<0.001); and size (OR 1.12 per 10-mm increase [95%CI 1.05-1.19]; P<0.001). Decision tree analysis targeting SMIC identified eight terminal nodes: SMIC prevalence was 62% in depressed LNPCPs, 19% in nodular rectosigmoid LNPCPs, and 20% in nodular proximal colon nongranular LNPCPs. CONCLUSIONS: This decision-making algorithm simplifies identification of LNPCPs with an increased risk of potential SMIC. When combined with surface optical evaluation, it facilitates accurate lesion characterization and resection choices.

When less is more: lower esophageal sphincter-preserving peroral endoscopic myotomy is effective for non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders.

BACKGROUND: Non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders (NAEMDs), encompassing distal esophageal spasm (DES) and hypercontractile esophagus (HCE), are rare conditions. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising treatment option. In NAEMDs, unlike with achalasia, the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) functions normally, suggesting the potential of LES preservation during POEM. METHODS: This retrospective two-center observational study focused on patients undergoing LES-preserving POEM (LES-POEM) for NAEMD. Eckardt scores were assessed pre-POEM and at 6, 12, and 24 months post-POEM, with follow-up endoscopy at 6 months to evaluate for reflux esophagitis. Clinical success, defined as an Eckardt score ≤3, served as the primary outcome. RESULTS: 227 patients were recruited over 84 months until May 2021. Of these, 16 underwent LES-POEM for an NAEMD (9 with HCE and 7 with DES). The median pre-POEM Eckardt score was 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.0-7.0), which decreased to 1.0 (IQR 0.0-1.8; P<0.001) 6 months post-POEM. This was sustained at 24 months, with an Eckardt score of 1.0 (IQR 0.0-1.8; P<0.001). Two patients (12.5%) developed Los Angeles grade A or B esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: LES-POEM for NAEMD demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes, with infrequent esophagitis and reintervention for LES dysfunction rarely required.