BEECH: a dose-finding run-in followed by a randomised phase II study assessing the efficacy of AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) combined with paclitaxel in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer, and in a PIK3CA mutant sub-population.

BACKGROUND: BEECH investigated the efficacy of capivasertib (AZD5363), an oral inhibitor of AKT isoforms 1-3, in combination with the first-line weekly paclitaxel for advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, and in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide mutation sub-population (PIK3CA+). PATIENTS AND METHODS: BEECH consisted of an open-label, phase Ib safety run-in (part A) in 38 patients with advanced breast cancer, and a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II expansion (part B) in 110 women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. In part A, patients received paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) with capivasertib taken twice daily (b.i.d.) at two intermittent ascending dosing schedules. In part B, patients were randomly assigned, stratified by PIK3CA mutation status, to receive paclitaxel with either capivasertib or placebo. The primary end point for part A was safety to recommend a dose and schedule for part B; primary end points for part B were progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall and PIK3CA+ sub-population. RESULTS: Capivasertib was well tolerated, with a 400 mg b.i.d. 4 days on/3 days off treatment schedule selected in part A. In part B, median PFS in the overall population was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 8.4 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; P = 0.308]. In the PIK3CA+ sub-population, median PFS was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR 1.11; P = 0.760). Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.0, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the capivasertib group were diarrhoea, hyperglycaemia, neutropoenia and maculopapular rash. Dose intensity of paclitaxel was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Capivasertib had no apparent impact on the tolerability and dose intensity of paclitaxel. Adding capivasertib to weekly paclitaxel did not prolong PFS in the overall population or PIK3CA+ sub-population of ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01625286.

The safety and tolerability of oral AZD5069, a selective CXCR2 antagonist, in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by neutrophil-dominated airway mucosal inflammation and elevated neutrophil counts in sputum and lung tissue. CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) is predominantly expressed on neutrophils and mediates the migration of neutrophils to inflammatory sites. AZD5069 is a small molecule CXCR2 antagonist with the potential to inhibit neutrophil migration into the airways in patients with COPD. METHODS: This 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center, Phase IIa study evaluated the safety and tolerability of AZD5069 in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01233232). The pharmacokinetics and effect of AZD5069 on blood neutrophil counts were also assessed. Patients completed daily diary cards and attended weekly clinic visits for safety assessments. RESULTS: 87 patients (mean FEV1 56% pred; mean age 64 years; 69% male) were randomized to receive placebo (n = 29), AZD5069 50 mg bid (n = 30) or AZD5069 80 mg bid (n = 28) for 4 weeks. AZD5069 was well tolerated with adverse events (AEs) reported in 9 (31%), 10 (33%) and 6 (21%) patients in the placebo, AZD5069 50 mg and AZD5069 80 mg groups, respectively. AEs were generally mild or moderate in severity. The incidence of infections, the most commonly reported AE, was similar across the three groups (17%, 17% and 11% of patients in the placebo, AZD5069 50 and 80 mg groups, respectively). Blood neutrophil counts decreased on average from baseline by 14-40% and 13-36% in the AZD5069 50 mg and 80 mg groups, respectively, and 4 patients discontinued from the study due to decreased neutrophil count, 3 in the AZD5069 50 mg group and 1 in the 80 mg group. The systemic exposure (AUC and Cmax) of AZD5069 increased less than in proportion to the dose and there was a large overlap in the individual exposures between the two dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: AZD5069 was well tolerated overall in those patients who completed study treatment, with no increase in infection rates in either dosage group compared with placebo. Further studies with AZD5069 appear to be warranted.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of AZD0837, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in young healthy male subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The novel oral anticoagulant AZD0837 is currently in clinical development for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. AZD0837 is bioconverted to AR-H067637, a selective and reversible direct thrombin inhibitor. This first-time-in-man study (study code D1250C00001) investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of AZD0837. METHODS: Healthy Caucasian male volunteers (n = 44, age 20 - 39 y) were enrolled into this study of single oral escalating doses of AZD0837 given in solution (15 - 750 mg, n = 4 per dose). PD was assessed by ex vivo measurements of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), ecarin coagulation time (ECT), thrombin time (TT) and thrombin generation in plasma. RESULTS: AZD0837 was rapidly absorbed, with a mean oral bioavailability of 22 - 52%, and bioconverted to the active form, AR-H067637. In fasting subjects, maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) for AR-H067637 occurred approximately 1 h post-dosing and declined with a mean half-life of 9.3 h. The Cmax and area under the curve for AR-H067637 showed a low to moderate inter-individual variability of 16% and 28%, respectively, and exhibited a slight deviation from dose-proportionality. AZD0837 produced a dose-dependent prolongation of APTT, ECT and TT, and decreased maximum free thrombin activity. AZD0837 was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: AZD0837 single oral doses (15 - 750 mg) are well tolerated in healthy male subjects and exhibit favorable PK properties and reproducible effects on ex vivo coagulation time variables that support further clinical development.

Population modelling of the effect of inogatran, at thrombin inhibitor, on ex vivo coagulation time (APTT) in healthy subjects and patients with coronary artery disease.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between the degree of anticoagulation, assessed by APTT, and the plasma concentration of inogatran in healthy subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: Data from five phase I studies in 78 healthy males and two phase II multicentre studies in 948 patients of both sexes with unstable angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction were evaluated. A total of 3296 pairs of concentration-APTT samples were obtained before, during, and after intravenous infusions of inogatran. Mixed effects modelling was used for population pharmacodynamic analysis of the drug effect and for describing the variability in baseline APTT. RESULTS: The population mean baseline APTT was 29 s, but large variations between individuals (s.d. 3.6 s) were observed. The variability between studies (1.3 s) and centres (1.8 s) were of less importance, though statistically significant. APTT increased in a nonlinear manner with increasing inogatran concentration and the relationship was well described by a combined linear and Emax model. A significant part of the overall variability could be ascribed to the APTT reagent and equipment used at the different study centres. These method-dependent differences were compensated for by including the lower limit of the normal reference range as a covariate, affecting both baseline and Emax, in the model. For the typical healthy subject and patient, the method-corrected population mean parameters were: APTTbaseline 35 and 31 s, slope 8.0 and 5.8 s x l x micromol(-1), Emax 36 and 34 s, and EC50 0.54 and 0.72 micromol x l(-1), respectively. The model predicted plasma concentration needed to double the APTT from the baseline value was 1.25 and 1.45 micromol x l(-1) in the healthy volunteer and patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The nonlinear relationship between APTT and inogatran concentration in plasma was well described by a combined linear and Emax model. Pooling of data was made possible by incorporating a centre-specific characteristic of the assay method in the model. Patients had lower baseline APTT and appeared to have less pronounced effect of inogatran than young healthy subjects.