Systematic literature review to inform the Portuguese recommendations for the management of Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis and other connective tissue diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DU) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and other connective tissue diseases (CTD), in order to inform the Portuguese recommendations for managing RP and DU in these patients. METHODS: A SLR was conducted until May 2022 to identify studies assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for RP and DU in SSc and other CTD. Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and their extensions for assessing efficacy and safety of interventions. Observational studies with a comparator were included for evaluating the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions and safety of pharmacological interventions. The risk of bias of each study was assessed using standard tools. RESULTS: Out of 71 publications meeting the inclusion criteria, 59 evaluated pharmacological and 12 non-pharmacological interventions. We found moderate quality evidence supporting the efficacy of calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, and intravenous prostacyclin analogues in reducing RP frequency, severity, and duration. Intravenous iloprost had a small to moderate effect size in improving DU healing. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors were effective in reducing total DU count, new DU occurrence, and enhancing DU healing. Bosentan effectively prevented new DU in SSc patients. No new safety concerns were associated with these treatments. The studies on non-pharmacological interventions were, in general, of low quality, and had a small sample size. Warming measures decreased frequency and duration of RP attacks; laser therapy improved RP-related outcomes; local oxygen-ozone therapy improved RP outcomes as an add-on therapy; bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation improved DU-associated pain; periarterial sympathectomy and vascular bypass reduced DU number and finger amputation risk. CONCLUSION: The available evidence supports the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions, namely nifedipine, sildenafil, iloprost, and bosentan in treating RP and DU in patients with SSc and other CTD. Scarce and low-quality evidence does support the use of some non-pharmacological interventions but with only a modest effect size. This SLR underscores the limited availability of high-quality evidence for determining the optimal treatment.

Severe infections in Portuguese patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biologic treatment - a multicenter, nationwide study (SIPPRA-B Study).

INTRODUCTION: Despite years of experience with biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), little is known about differences in infectious risk among bDMARDs. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and type of infections in RA patients on bDMARDs and to determine possible predictors. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt) with RA, and exposed to at least one bDMARD until April 2021. RA patients under bDMARD and with at least one episode of severe infection (SI), defined as infection that requires hospitalization, use of parenteral antibiotics or that resulted in death, were compared to patients with no report of SI. Demographic and clinical data at baseline and at the time of each SI were collected to establish comparisons between different groups of bDMARDs. Comparisons between different bDMARDs were assessed and logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of SI. RESULTS: We included 3394 patients, 2833 (83.5%) female, with a mean age at RA diagnosis of 45.5±13.7 years. SI was diagnosed in 142 of the 3394 patients evaluated (4.2%), totaling 151 episodes of SI. At baseline, patients with SI had a significantly higher proportion of prior orthopedic surgery, asthma, interstitial lung disease, chronic kidney disease and corticosteroid use, higher mean age and longer median disease duration at first bDMARD. Nine patients died (6.0%). Ninety-two SI (60.9%) occurred with the first bDMARD, the majority leading to discontinuation of the bDMARD within 6 months (n=75, 49.7%), while 65 (43.0%) restarted the same bDMARD and 11 (7.3%) switched to another bDMARD (6 of them to a different mechanism of action). In the multivariate analysis, we found that chronic kidney disease, asthma, infliximab, corticosteroid use, interstitial lung disease, previous orthopedic surgery, higher Health Assessment Questionnaire and DAS284V-ESR are independent predictors of SI. CONCLUSION: This study described the incidence and types of SI among Portuguese RA patients on biologics, identifying several predictors of SI, both globally and with different bDMARDs. Physicians should be aware of the real-word infectious risk in RA patients on bDMARDs when making treatment decisions.

Risk Factors for Infection, Predictors of Severe Disease, and Antibody Response to COVID-19 in Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases in Portugal-A Multicenter, Nationwide Study.

Objective: To identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and for severe/critical COVID-19, and to assess the humoral response after COVID-19 in these patients. Methods: Nationwide study of adult patients with inflammatory RMDs prospectively followed in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register-Reuma.pt-during the first 6 months of the pandemic. We compared patients with COVID-19 with those who did not develop the disease and patients with mild/moderate disease with those exhibiting severe/critical COVID-19. IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured ≥3 months after infection and results were compared with matched controls. Results: 162 cases of COVID-19 were registered in a total of 6,363 appointments. Patients treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi; OR = 0.160, 95% CI 0.099-0.260, P < 0.001) and tocilizumab (OR 0.147, 95% CI 0.053-0.408, P < 0.001) had reduced odds of infection. Further, TNFi tended to be protective of severe and critical disease. Older age, major comorbidities, and rituximab were associated with an increased risk of infection and worse prognosis. Most patients with inflammatory RMDs (86.2%) developed a robust antibody response. Seroconversion was associated with symptomatic disease (OR 13.46, 95% CI 2.21-81.85, P = 0.005) and tended to be blunted by TNFi (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-1.05; P = 0.057). Conclusions: TNFi and tocilizumab reduced the risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Treatment with TNFi also tended to reduce rates of severe disease and seroconversion. Older age, general comorbidities and rituximab were associated with increased risk for infection and worse prognosis, in line with previous reports. Most patients with RMDs developed a proper antibody response after COVID-19, particularly if they had symptomatic disease.