Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Nanomaterials (Basel) ; 14(17)2024 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39269055

RESUMEN

The long-wave infrared (LWIR) interband cascade detector with type-II superlattices (T2SLs) and a gallium-free ("Ga-free") InAs/InAsSb (x = 0.39) absorber was characterized by photoluminescence (PL) and spectral response (SR) methods. Heterostructures were grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on a GaAs substrate (001) orientation. The crystallographic quality was confirmed by high-resolution X-Ray diffraction (HRXRD). Two independent methods, combined with theoretical calculations, were able to determine the transitions between the superlattice minibands. Moreover, transitions from the trap states were determined. Studies of the PL intensity as a function of the excitation laser power allowed the identification of optical transitions. The determined effective energy gap (Eg) of the tested absorber layer was 116 meV at 300 K. The transition from the first light hole miniband to the first electron miniband was red-shifted by 76 meV. The detected defects' energy states were constant versus temperature. Their values were 85 meV and 112 meV, respectively. Moreover, two additional transitions from acceptor levels in cryogenic temperature were determined by being shifted from blue to Eg by 6 meV and 16 meV, respectively.

2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(8): 923-933, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35675085

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the effects of a high versus a low intraoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2 ) in adults undergoing general anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effect of a high versus a low FiO2 on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched on March 22, 2022 for randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of different FiO2 levels in adults undergoing general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed for relevant outcomes, and potential effect measure modification was assessed in subgroup analyses and meta-regression. The evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE. RESULTS: This review included 25 original trials investigating the effect of a high (mostly 80%) versus a low (mostly 30%) FiO2 . Risk of bias was intermediate for all trials. A high FiO2 did not result in a significant reduction in surgical site infections (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.02 [p = .10]). No effect was found for all other included outcomes, including mortality (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.90-1.79 [p = .18]) and hospital length of stay (mean difference = 0.03 days, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.30 [p = .84). Results from subgroup analyses and meta-regression did not identify any clear effect modifiers across outcomes. The certainty of evidence (GRADE) was rated as low for most outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In adults undergoing general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery, a high FiO2 did not improve outcomes including surgical site infections, length of stay, or mortality. However, the certainty of the evidence was assessed as low.


Asunto(s)
Oxígeno , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Adulto , Anestesia General , Humanos
3.
Anesth Analg ; 135(5): 971-985, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35703253

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal ventilation strategy during general anesthesia is unclear. This systematic review investigated the relationship between ventilation targets or strategies (eg, positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], tidal volume, and recruitment maneuvers) and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched on March 8, 2021, for randomized trials investigating the effect of different respiratory targets or strategies on adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Two investigators reviewed trials for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed for relevant outcomes, and several subgroup analyses were conducted. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: This review included 63 trials with 65 comparisons. Risk of bias was intermediate for all trials. In the meta-analyses, lung-protective ventilation (ie, low tidal volume with PEEP) reduced the risk of combined pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.49; 9 trials; 1106 patients), atelectasis (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.60; 8 trials; 895 patients), and need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13-1.00; 5 trials; 636 patients). Recruitment maneuvers reduced the risk of atelectasis (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92; 5 trials; 328 patients). We found no clear effect of tidal volume, higher versus lower PEEP, or recruitment maneuvers on postoperative pulmonary complications when evaluated individually. For all comparisons across targets, no effect was found on mortality or hospital length of stay. No effect measure modifiers were found in subgroup analyses. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low, low, or moderate depending on the intervention and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Although lung-protective ventilation results in a decrease in pulmonary complications, randomized clinical trials provide only limited evidence to guide specific ventilation strategies during general anesthesia for adults undergoing noncardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Respiración con Presión Positiva , Atelectasia Pulmonar , Adulto , Humanos , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Respiración con Presión Positiva/efectos adversos , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiología , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Pulmón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
4.
Br J Anaesth ; 128(3): 416-433, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34916049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery, there remain knowledge gaps regarding the effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on patient-centred outcomes. METHODS: Included clinical trials investigated goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery and reported at least one patient-centred postoperative outcome. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles on March 8, 2021. Two investigators performed abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and bias assessment. The primary outcomes were mortality and hospital length of stay, whereas 15 postoperative complications were included based on availability. From a main pool of comparable trials, meta-analyses were performed on trials with homogenous outcome definitions. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS: The main pool consisted of 76 trials with intermediate risk of bias for most outcomes. Overall, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy might reduce mortality (odds ratio=0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09) and shorten length of stay (mean difference=-0.72 days; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.35) but with low certainty in the evidence. For both outcomes, larger effects favouring goal-directed haemodynamic therapy were seen in abdominal surgery, very high-risk surgery, and using targets based on preload variation by the respiratory cycle. However, formal tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy decreased risk of several postoperative outcomes, but only infectious outcomes and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia might decrease mortality, hospital length of stay, and several postoperative complications. Only infectious postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty in the evidence.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/mortalidad , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Cirugía General/métodos , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
5.
Blood Press ; 30(6): 341-347, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34263666

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Twenty-four hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recommended in several guidelines as the best method for diagnosing hypertension. In general, the prognostic value of ABPM is superior to single office blood pressure (BP) measurements. Unfortunately, some patients experience considerable discomfort during frequently repeated forceful cuff inflations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study we investigated the difference in mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) between low-frequency ABPM (LF-ABPM), measuring once every hour, and high-frequency ABPM (HF-ABPM), measuring three times an hour during daytime, and two times an hour during night-time. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis. All included patients had an HF-ABPM performed first and within a few weeks they underwent an LF-ABPM. The average day time difference in SBP between the two frequencies was 3.8 mmHg (p-value = 0.07) for mild, 8.2 mmHg (p-value < 0.01) for moderate and 15 mmHg (p-value < 0.001) for severe hypertension. A similar pattern was seen for night-time SBP. This study suggests that mean BP is similar between the two measuring frequencies for normotensive and mild hypertensive patients, while HF-ABPM results in a higher 24-h mean BP for moderate- and severe hypertensive patients. CONCLUSION: LF-ABPM may more correctly reflect the resting blood pressure in patients with moderate and severe hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Hipertensión , Presión Sanguínea , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Sístole
6.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 176(16)2014 Apr 14.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351397

RESUMEN

Traditionally, haloperidol has been the recommended antipsychotic drug for pharmacological treatment of delirium, which is a frequent complication in the critical care setting. Due to a less frequent occurrence of extrapyramidal adverse effects, second-generation antipsychotic drugs have been evaluated. In the present paper we review the current randomized prospective studies of second-generation antipsychotics as treatment for delirium in hospitalized patients and conclude that so far the evidence in favour of these drugs compared with haloperidol is still sparse.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Amisulprida , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Olanzapina , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Sulpirida/análogos & derivados , Sulpirida/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico
7.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 176(40)2014 Sep 29.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25294505

RESUMEN

Traditionally, haloperidol has been the recommended antipsychotic drug for pharmacological treatment of delirium, which is a frequent complication in the critical care setting. Due to a less frequent occurrence of extrapyramidal adverse effects, second-generation antipsychotic drugs have been evaluated. In the present paper we review the current randomized prospective studies of second-generation antipsychotics as treatment for delirium in hospitalized patients and conclude that so far the evidence in favour of these drugs compared with haloperidol is still sparse.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Amisulprida , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Olanzapina , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Sulpirida/análogos & derivados , Sulpirida/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA