Real-world anti-seizure treatment and adverse events among individuals living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand how people living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) navigate through lines of antiseizure medications (ASM) and experience adverse events (AEs) in the real-world setting in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with medical chart data from clinical practices in the United States. Eligible adults had a confirmed diagnosis of DRE and initiated a third-line ASM therapy between January 2013 and January 2020 (i.e., the index date). Subjects must have medical history data available for ≥1 year prior to (the baseline) and ≥2 years after the index date (the follow-up). Treatment patterns were captured from first to fourth lines. After the emergence of drug resistance, time to ASM discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, AE experience and AE management were reported separately during third and fourth lines of treatment and beyond. RESULTS: The study included a total of 345 individuals, with an average (standard deviation) age of 23.9 (11.9) years at first diagnosis. All individuals had at least three lines of ASMs with first and second lines during baseline, and third line during follow-up. The first line for most individuals was monotherapy. As individuals progressed through additional lines of ASM therapy, they were more likely to receive polytherapy. The regimens were more individualized after meeting drug resistance criteria. The top reasons for discontinuing were uncontrolled seizure and/or intolerance/AEs for both third and subsequent lines. More than a third of individuals experienced at least one AE. Among those with at least one AE, many individuals had to manage these AEs with dose adjustment (39.4%), discontinuation of offending ASM (37.9%), de novo pharmacotherapy (25.8%), emergency room visit (13.6%), and hospitalization (12.1%). SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that individuals living with DRE experience significant AEs, and many of these AEs lead to treatment disruption and significant healthcare resource utilization. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study examined how individuals with focal epilepsy are treated across various clinics in United States and reported the adverse events these individuals experienced during treatment, along with the consequence associated with these adverse events. We found that as individuals progressed through additional treatments, they were more and more likely to receive more than one antiseizure medication, and a significant portion of individuals experienced at least one adverse event, often manifested as headache, somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.

Estimating risk of rapid disease progression in pediatric patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a randomized trial of tolvaptan.

BACKGROUND: Tolvaptan preserves kidney function in adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at elevated risk of rapid progression. A trial (NCT02964273) evaluated tolvaptan safety and pharmacodynamics in children (5-17 years). However, progression risk was not part of study eligibility criteria due to lack of validated criteria for risk assessment in children. As risk estimation is important to guide clinical management, baseline characteristics of the study participants were retrospectively evaluated to determine whether risk of rapid disease progression in pediatric ADPKD can be assessed and to identify parameters relevant for risk estimation. METHODS: Four academic pediatric nephrologists reviewed baseline data and rated participant risk from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) based on clinical judgement and the literature. Three primary reviewers independently scored all cases, with each case reviewed by two primary reviewers. For cases with discordant ratings (≥ 2-point difference), the fourth reviewer provided a secondary rating blinded to the primary evaluations. Study participants with discordant ratings and/or for whom data were lacking were later discussed to clarify parameters relevant to risk estimation. RESULTS: Of 90 evaluable subjects, primary reviews of 69 (77%) were concordant. The proportion considered at risk of rapid progression (final mean rating ≥ 3.5) by age group was: 15-17 years, 27/34 (79%); 12- < 15, 9/32 (28%); 4- < 12, 8/24 (33%). The panelists agreed on characteristics important for risk determination: age, kidney imaging, kidney function, blood pressure, urine protein, and genetics. CONCLUSIONS: High ratings concordance and agreement among reviewers on relevant clinical characteristics support the feasibility of pediatric risk assessment.

Tolvaptan for Children and Adolescents with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Tolvaptan slows expansion of kidney volume and kidney function decline in adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Progression during childhood could be treated before irreversible kidney damage occurs, but trial data are lacking. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of tolvaptan in children/adolescents with ADPKD. METHODS: This was the 1-year, randomized, double-blind, portion of a phase 3b, two-part trial being conducted at 20 academic pediatric nephrology centers. Key eligibility criteria were ADPKD and eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Participants aged 12-17 years were the target group (group 1, enrollment goal n≥60); participants aged 4-11 years could additionally enroll (group 2, anticipated enrollment approximately 40). Treatments were tolvaptan or placebo titrated by body weight and tolerability. Coprimary end points, change from baseline in spot urine osmolality and specific gravity at week 1, assessed inhibition of antidiuretic hormone activity. The key secondary end point was change in height-adjusted total kidney volume (htTKV) to month 12 in group 1. Additional end points were safety/tolerability and quality of life. Statistical comparisons were exploratory and post hoc. RESULTS: Among the 91 randomized (group 1, n=66; group 2, n=25), least squares (LS) mean reduction (±SEM) in spot urine osmolality at week 1 was greater with tolvaptan (-390 [28] mOsm/kg) than placebo (-90 [29] mOsm/kg; P<0.001), as was LS mean reduction in specific gravity (-0.009 [0.001] versus -0.002 [0.001]; P<0.001). In group 1, the 12-month htTKV increase was 2.6% with tolvaptan and 5.8% with placebo (P>0.05). For tolvaptan and placebo, respectively, 65% and 16% of subjects experienced aquaretic adverse events, and 2% and 0% experienced hypernatremia. There were no elevated transaminases or drug-induced liver injuries. Four participants discontinued tolvaptan, and three discontinued placebo. Quality-of-life assessments remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan exhibited pharmacodynamic activity in pediatric ADPKD. Aquaretic effects were manageable, with few discontinuations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability and Efficacy of Tolvaptan in Children and Adolescents With ADPKD (Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease) NCT02964273.

Polycystic Kidney Disease-Related Disease Burden in Adolescents With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: An International Qualitative Study.

Rationale & Objective: Little is known about symptoms and disease impacts in adolescents with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). The objective of the study was to explore these issues from the adolescent patient's perspective. Study Design: Observational, qualitative study. Setting & Participants: Eligible participants were 12-17 years old and had a diagnosis of ADPKD. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 18 cities in 13 countries to elicit participant experiences of ADPKD-related symptoms and physical, social, and emotional impacts. Analytical Approach: Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Symptom and impact frequencies from the interviews were calculated, and representative quotes concerning elicited concepts were collated. Results: Thirty-three participants (mean age, 14.6 years; 42.4% female) completed interviews. Frequently reported symptoms included urinary urgency (n = 10; 30.3%) and back pain (n = 9; 27.3%). Consistent with previous findings in adults, participants experienced 3 primary types of pain: dull kidney pain, severe or sharp kidney pain, and a feeling of fullness and/or discomfort. Reported disease impacts included avoiding sports and physical activity (n = 10; 30.3%), missing school (n = 6; 18.2%) and social activities (n = 6; 18.2%), and feeling worried (n = 6; 18.2%), sad (n = 4; 12.1%), or frustrated (n = 3; 9.1%) about the disease and their future. Approximately one-fifth of participants (n = 7; 21.2%) reported that they were bothered or impacted by dietary limitations (primarily the need for reduced sodium intake and increased water intake). Limitations: The study had a small sample size. The researchers were unable to conduct focus groups with participants because of parental preferences. Conclusions: The findings from this exploratory study indicate that a substantial proportion of adolescents with ADPKD experience physical, social, and emotional impacts from their disease.

Implications of early diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A post hoc analysis of the TEMPO 3:4 trial.

It is unknown whether early diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) can enable earlier management and improve outcomes. We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from the TEMPO 3:4 trial. Subjects were stratified by ADPKD diagnosis at age ≤18 (childhood diagnosis [CD]) or>18 (adulthood diagnosis [AD]). Groups were compared for baseline characteristics and total kidney volume (TKV) growth and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline over 3 years. 294 CD and 1148 AD subjects were analyzed. At inclusion, CD subjects were younger (mean age 34.2 versus 39.8 years; p < 0.0001) and had better eGFR (mean ± SD 87.4 ± 23.9 versus 80.1 ± 20.7 mL/min/1.73 m2; p < 0.0001), while CD had more severe Mayo risk classification (p < 0.0001) and more PKD1 mutations (p = 0.003). No statistical differences were found in TKV or eGFR change. At study end, placebo-treated CD subjects had better eGFR than projected by a prediction equation (mean difference ±SD for observed versus predicted eGFR: 2.18 ± 10.7 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.0475). However, these results are not confirmed when excluding stage 1 CKD. Whether CD subjects, despite their risk profile, have a slower disease course than predicted remains inconclusive. Future studies are needed to confirm that early diagnosis and management can alter the disease course of ADPKD.

Tolvaptan use in children and adolescents with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: rationale and design of a two-part, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

This report describes the rationale and design of a study assessing tolvaptan in children with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Phase A is a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Phase B is a 2-year, open-label extension. The target population is at least 60 children aged 12-17 years, diagnosed by family history and/or genetic criteria and the presence of ≥ 10 renal cysts, each ≥ 0.5 cm on magnetic resonance imaging. Subjects will be allocated into 4 groups: females 15-17 years; females 12-14 years; males 15-17 years; and males 12-14 years. Up to 40 subjects aged 4-11 years may also enroll, provided they meet the entry criteria. Weight-adjusted tolvaptan doses, titrated once to achieve a tolerated maintenance dose, and matching placebo will be administered twice-daily. Assessments include spot urine osmolality and specific gravity (co-primary endpoints), height-adjusted total kidney volume, estimated glomerular filtration rate, pharmacodynamic parameters (urine volume, fluid intake and fluid balance, serum sodium, serum creatinine, free water clearance), pharmacokinetic parameters, safety (aquaretic adverse events, changes from baseline in creatinine, vital signs, laboratory values including liver function tests), and generic pediatric quality of life assessments.Conclusion: This will be the first clinical study to evaluate tolvaptan in pediatric ADPKD. What is Known: • Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetic disorder causing the development of cysts that impede kidney function over time and eventually induce renal failure • There are few data on the effects of tolvaptan, the only treatment approved for adults to slow disease progression, in pediatric ADPKD patients with early-stage disease What is New: • A phase 3, placebo-controlled study is evaluating tolvaptan over 3 years in children and adolescents with ADPKD • This study is designed to account for challenges of tolvaptan dosing and outcome assessment specific to the pediatric population.

Multicenter, open-label, extension trial to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of early versus delayed treatment with tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the TEMPO 4:4 Trial.

Background: In TEMPO 3:4, the vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan slowed total kidney volume (TKV) growth and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline relative to placebo. Methods: TEMPO 4:4 was designed to provide an additional 2 years of data on the long-term safety and efficacy of tolvaptan in subjects completing TEMPO 3:4. The objective was to assess the disease-modifying effects of tolvaptan on TKV and eGFR end-points including change from baseline over the combined duration of TEMPO 3:4 and TEMPO 4:4, and non-inferiority of slopes during TEMPO 4:4. Results: Of the 1445 subjects randomized to TEMPO 3:4, 871 (60.3%) enrolled in TEMPO 4:4. Percent changes in TKV from TEMPO 3:4 baseline to TEMPO 4:4 Month 24 were 29.9% and 31.6% (prior tolvaptan versus prior placebo, P = 0.38). Adjusting for baseline covariates improved the TKV treatment difference at Month 24 in TEMPO 4:4 from -1.70% to - 4.15% between the groups (P = 0.04). Slopes of TKV growth during TEMPO 4:4 were higher in early- versus delayed-treatment groups (6.16% versus 4.96% per year, P = 0.05). Analysis of secondary eGFR endpoints demonstrated a persistent effect on eGFR (3.15 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001), and non-inferiority in eGFR slopes. The safety profile on exposure to tolvaptan in TEMPO 4:4 was similar to that in TEMPO 3:4. Conclusions: The results of TEMPO 4:4 support a sustained disease-modifying effect of tolvaptan on eGFR. The lack of a sustained treatment difference on TKV may be accounted for by limitations of the trial design, including loss of randomization and baseline imbalances ensuing TEMPO 3:4. The safety profile was similar to that observed in TEMPO 3:4.

Low-dose tolvaptan PK/PD: comparison of patients with hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion to healthy adults.

PURPOSE: Tolvaptan (TLV) is indicated to treat hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate diuretic hormone (SIADH) in Europe. Treatment is to be initiated at 15 mg QD but post-approval reporting indicates increasing use of 7.5 mg as the starting dose. Physicians believe 7.5 mg is effective and has a lower incidence of overly rapid correction of serum sodium. METHODS: Single TLV doses of 3.75, 7.5, and 15 mg were administered to 14 healthy adults in a crossover design and to 29 subjects ≥18 years with SIADH and serum sodium between 120 and 133 mmol/L in a parallel-group design. Pharmacodynamics and TLV plasma concentrations were assessed for 24 h post-dose. RESULTS: In SIADH subjects, corrections of serum sodium (Δ of ≥8 mmol/L in the first 8 h or ≥12 mmol/L in the first 24 h) were observed in one, one, and two subjects in the 3.75-, 7.5-, and 15-mg dose groups. Fluid balance (FB) for 0-6 h post-dose was correlated (r 2 = 0.37) with maximum increases in serum sodium; subjects with large corrections had large (~1 L) negative FB. Compared to healthy adults, subjects with SIADH did not drink in response to their negative FB and had larger increases in serum sodium at 24 h. Median time of maximum increase in healthy adults was 6 h, with no rapid corrections, and FB was near 0 mL by 24 h. CONCLUSION: Starting titration with 7.5 mg TLV will not eliminate the risk of rapid corrections in serum sodium. Monitoring FB may indicate that a subject is at risk for over correction.