Neonatal Outcomes are Similar between Patients with Resolved and Those with Persistent Oligohydramnios.

OBJECTIVE: Oligohydramnios (defined as amniotic fluid volume < 5 cm or deepest vertical pocket < 2 cm) is regarded as an ominous finding on prenatal ultrasound. Amniotic fluid, however, is not static, and to date, there have been no studies comparing perinatal outcomes in patients who are diagnosed with oligohydramnios that resolves and those who have persistent oligohydramnios. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a National Institutes of Health-funded retrospective cohort study of singleton gestations delivered at a tertiary care hospital between 2002 and 2013 with mild hypertensive disorders and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR). Maternal characteristics, delivery, and neonatal information were abstracted by trained research nurses. Patients with a diagnosis of oligohydramnios were identified, and those with resolved versus persistent oligohydramnios at the time of delivery were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal resuscitation at delivery: administration of oxygen, bag-mask ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, intubation, chest compression, or cardiac medication administration. Secondary outcomes included FGR, timing, and mode of delivery. RESULTS: Of 527 women meeting study criteria, 42 had oligohydramnios that resolved prior to delivery, whereas 485 had persistent oligohydramnios. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between groups. The gestational age at diagnosis was significantly lower for patients with resolved versus persistent oligohydramnios (median: 33.0 [interquartile range, IQR: 29.1-35.9] vs. 38.0 [IQR: 36.4-39.3], p < 0.001). There was not a substantial difference in rate of neonatal resuscitation (41 vs. 32%, p = 0.31). Patients with resolved oligohydramnios were more likely to have developed FGR than those with persistent oligohydramnios (55 vs. 36%, p < 0.02). There were no significant differences for gestational age at delivery, birth weight, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. CONCLUSION: Patients whose oligohydramnios resolved were diagnosed earlier yet had similar rates of neonatal resuscitation but higher rates of FGR than those who had persistent oligohydramnios. KEY POINTS: · When diagnosed earlier in pregnancy, oligohydramnios was more likely to resolve prenatally.. · Patients who were diagnosed with oligohydramnios earlier in pregnancy had higher rates of FGR.. · There were no differences in the rates of the composite outcome of need for neonatal resuscitation when comparing those with resolved versus those with persistent oligohydramnios. No differences in composite neonatal morbidity were noted between those with resolved versus persistent oligohydramnios..

Utility of Repeat Uterine Cavity Evaluation in the Infertility Workup.

Background: Uterine cavity abnormalities contribute to infertility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, recurrence rates, and risk factors for uterine cavity abnormalities in women undergoing infertility workup and treatment, focusing on the utility of routinely repeated imaging. Methods: Retrospective cohort study at single academic medical center of 833 infertile women who had uterine cavity evaluations performed at least 9 months apart. Results: Of 833 eligible patients, 664 (79.7%) had normal initial imaging and 169 (20.3%) had abnormal initial imaging. Among the former, 10% had abnormal uterine cavity on repeat saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS); among the latter, 32% had abnormal repeat SIS [Chi-square p < 0.0001, risk ratio 2.30 (95% confidence interval 1.85-2.86)]. On average, 23.1 ± 13.6 months passed between studies. Regardless of initial imaging findings, women with abnormal repeat SIS were older than those with normal repeat SIS, with no difference in time elapsed between studies. There were no associations between repeat imaging outcomes and body mass index, uterine instrumentation, number of treatment cycles, or maximum peak estradiol levels in a single cycle between studies. There was no difference in live birth rate among cycles started within 1 year after repeat SIS across groups. Conclusions: Uterine cavity abnormalities were found in 10% of patients on repeat imaging despite initially normal testing. No risk factors for cavity abnormality on repeat imaging were identified besides age and prior abnormality. It would be prudent to continue performing routine repeat uterine cavity evaluation for women undergoing fertility treatment, particularly if corrective measures had been taken in the past.

From "disappointing" to "fantastic": Women's experiences with labor induction in a U.S. tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The series of interventions that comprise labor induction shape patient experiences; however, patient perceptions are not always considered when structuring the process of care. Through qualitative interviews, we elucidated women's expectations and experiences regarding labor induction. METHODS: Labor induction patients were recruited from a United States tertiary care hospital's postpartum mother-baby unit and invited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interview questions included expectations and experiences of the labor induction process, side effects and health outcomes of concern, reflections on personal tolerance of different interventions, and thoughts about an ideal process. RESULTS: Between April and September 2018, 36 women were interviewed. The labor induction process involved a wide range of experiences; when asked to characterize labor induction in one word, responses ranged from horrible, frustrating, and terrifying to simple, fast, and smooth. Inductions were often described as longer than what was expected. The most polarizing induction method was the Foley balloon catheter. Women's concerns regarding side effects largely centered on the health of their baby, and an ideal induction involved fewer interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences with labor induction vary greatly and are related to expectations. The way interventions are introduced influences women's perceptions of control and their ultimate level of contentment with the birthing process. Attention to experiences and preferences has the potential to improve quality of care through communication, shared decision-making, and education.

Reduced Compared With Traditional Schedules for Routine Antenatal Visits: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in maternal and child outcomes in studies comparing reduced routine antenatal visit schedules with traditional schedules. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of PubMed, Cochrane databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 12, 2022, searching for antenatal (prenatal) care, pregnancy, obstetrics, telemedicine, remote care, smartphones, telemonitoring, and related terms, as well as primary study designs. The search was restricted to high-income countries. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Double independent screening was done in Abstrackr for studies comparing televisits and in-person routine antenatal care visits for maternal, child, health care utilization, and harm outcomes. Data were extracted into SRDRplus with review by a second researcher. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials and five nonrandomized comparative studies compared reduced routine antenatal visit schedules with traditional schedules. Studies did not find differences between schedules in gestational age at birth, likelihood of being small for gestational age, likelihood of a low Apgar score, likelihood of neonatal intensive care unit admission, maternal anxiety, likelihood of preterm birth, and likelihood of low birth weight. There was insufficient evidence for numerous prioritized outcomes of interest, including completion of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists-recommended services and patient experience measures. CONCLUSION: The evidence base is limited and heterogeneous and allowed few specific conclusions. Reported outcomes included, for the most part, standard birth outcomes that do not have strong plausible biological connection to structural aspects of antenatal care. The evidence did not find negative effects of reduced routine antenatal visit schedules, which may support implementation of fewer routine antenatal visits. However, to enhance confidence in this conclusion, future research is needed, particularly research that includes outcomes of most importance and relevance to changing antenatal care visits. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021272287.

Televisits Compared With In-Person Visits for Routine Antenatal Care: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare benefits and harms of televisits and in-person visits in people receiving routine antenatal care. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of PubMed, Cochrane databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 12, 2022, for antenatal (prenatal) care, pregnancy, obstetrics, telemedicine, remote care, smartphones, telemonitoring, and related terms, as well as primary study designs. The search was restricted to high-income countries. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Double independent screening was done in Abstrackr for studies comparing televisits and in-person routine antenatal care visits for maternal, child, health care utilization, and harm outcomes. Data were extracted into SRDRplus with review by a second researcher. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials, four nonrandomized comparative studies, and one survey compared visit types between 2004 and 2020, three of which were conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Number, timing, and mode of televisits and who provided care varied across studies. Low-strength evidence from studies comparing hybrid (televisits and in-person visits) and all in-person visits did not indicate differences in rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission of the newborn (summary odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.28) or preterm births (summary OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.03). However, the studies with stronger, although still statistically nonsignificant, associations between use of hybrid visits and preterm birth compared the COVID-19 pandemic and prepandemic eras, confounding the association. There is low-strength evidence that satisfaction with overall antenatal care was greater in people who were pregnant and receiving hybrid visits. Other outcomes were sparsely reported. CONCLUSION: People who are pregnant may prefer hybrid televisits and in-person visits. Although there is no evidence of differences in clinical outcomes between hybrid visits and in-person visits, the evidence is insufficient to evaluate most outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021272287.

Predicting primary cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Prediction models have shown promise in helping clinicians and patients engage in shared decision-making by providing quantitative estimates of individual risk of important clinical outcomes. Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common complication of pregnancy, which places patients at higher risk of primary CD. Suspected fetal macrosomia diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound is a well-known risk factor for primary CD in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus, but tools incorporating multiple risk factors to provide more accurate CD risk are lacking. Such tools could help facilitate shared decision-making and risk reduction by identifying patients with both high and low chances of intrapartum primary CD. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and internally validate a multivariable model to estimate the risk of intrapartum primary CD in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus undergoing a trial of labor. STUDY DESIGN: This study identified a cohort of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus derived from a large, National Institutes of Health-funded medical record abstraction study who delivered singleton live-born infants at ≥34 weeks of gestation at a large tertiary care center between January 2002 and March 2013. The exclusion criteria included previous CD, contraindications to vaginal delivery, scheduled primary CD, and known fetal anomalies. Candidate predictors were clinical variables routinely available to a practitioner in the third trimester of pregnancy found to be associated with an increased risk of CD in gestational diabetes mellitus. Stepwise backward elimination was used to build the logistic regression model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to demonstrate goodness of fit. Model discrimination was evaluated via the concordance index and displayed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Internal model validation was performed with bootstrapping of the original dataset. Random resampling with replacement was performed for 1000 replications to assess predictive ability. An additional analysis was performed in which the population was stratified by parity to evaluate the model's predictive ability among nulliparous and multiparous individuals. RESULTS: Of the 3570 pregnancies meeting the study criteria, 987 (28%) had a primary CD. Of note, 8 variables were included in the final model, all significantly associated with CD. They included large for gestational age, polyhydramnios, older maternal age, early pregnancy body mass index, first hemoglobin A1C recorded in pregnancy, nulliparity, insulin treatment, and preeclampsia. Model calibration and discrimination were satisfactory with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P=.862) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.77). Internal validation demonstrated similar discriminatory ability. Stratification by parity demonstrated that the model worked well among both nulliparous and multiparous patients. CONCLUSION: Using information routinely available in the third trimester of pregnancy, a clinically pragmatic model can predict intrapartum primary CD risk with reasonable reliability in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus and may provide quantitative data to guide patients in understanding their individual primary CD risk based on preexisting and acquired risk factors.

Outcomes among Neonates after a Diagnosis of Persistent or Transient Fetal Growth Restriction Delivered at Term.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether transient fetal growth restriction (FGR) that resolves prior to delivery confers a similar risk of neonatal morbidity as uncomplicated FGR that persists at term. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a medical record abstraction study of singleton live-born pregnancies delivered at a tertiary care center between 2002 and 2013. Patients with fetuses that had either persistent or transient FGR and delivered at 38 weeks or later were included. Patients with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies were excluded. Persistent FGR was defined as estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th percentile by gestational age from diagnosis through delivery. Transient FGR was defined as EFW <10th percentile on at least one ultrasound, but not on the last ultrasound prior to delivery. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal morbidity: neonatal intensive care unit admission, Apgar's score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal resuscitation, arterial cord pH <7.1, respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, hypoglycemia, sepsis, or death. Baseline characteristics and obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon's rank-sum and Fisher's exact test. Log binomial regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Of 777 patients studied, 686 (88%) had persistent FGR and 91 (12%) had transient FGR. Patients with transient FGR were more likely to have a higher body mass index, gestational diabetes, diagnosed with FGR earlier in pregnancy, have spontaneous labor, and deliver at later gestational ages. There was no difference in the composite neonatal outcome (relative risk = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72, 1.47) for transient versus persistent FGR after adjusting for confounders (adjusted relative risk = 0.79, 95% CI 0.54, 1.17). There were no differences in cesarean delivery or delivery complications between groups. CONCLUSION: Neonates born at term after transient FGR do not appear to have differences in composite morbidity compared with those where uncomplicated FGR persists at term. KEY POINTS: · No differences in neonatal outcomes in uncomplicated persistent versus transient FGR at term.. · Transient FGR pregnancies more likely to deliver at later gestational ages.. · No differences in mode of delivery or obstetric complications in persistent versus transient FGR at term..

Changes to Prenatal Care Visit Frequency and Telehealth: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review patient, partner or family, and clinician perspectives, preferences, and experiences related to prenatal care visit schedules and televisits for routine prenatal care. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , PsycINFO, and SocINDEX from inception through February 12, 2022. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: This review of qualitative research is a subset of a larger review on both the qualitative experiences and quantitative benefits and harms of reduced prenatal care visit schedules and televisits for routine prenatal care that was produced by the Brown Evidence-based Practice Center for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. For the qualitative review, we included qualitative research studies that examined perspectives, preferences, and experiences about the number of scheduled visits and about televisits for routine prenatal care. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We synthesized barriers and facilitators to the implementation of reduced care visits or of televisits into 1 of 14 domains defined by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and a Best Fit Framework approach. We summarized themes within TDF domains. We assessed our confidence in the summary statements using the GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) tool. Four studies addressed the number of scheduled routine prenatal visits, and five studies addressed televisits. Across studies, health care professionals believed fewer routine visits may be more convenient for patients and may increase clinic capacity to provide additional care for patients with high-risk pregnancies. However, both patients and clinicians had concerns about potential lesser care with fewer visits, including concerns about quality of care and challenges with implementing new delivery-of-care models. CONCLUSION: Although health care professionals and patients had some concerns about reduced visit schedules and use of televisits, several potential benefits were also noted. Our synthesis of qualitative evidence provides helpful insights into the perspectives, preferences, and experiences of important stakeholders with respect to implementing changes to prenatal care delivery that may complement findings of traditional quantitative evidence syntheses. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021272287.

Frailty as a predictor of delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify whether frailty is associated with the time between surgery and the initiation of chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients 18 years or older with stage II to IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery at a tertiary medical center between July 2006 and July 2015. Basic demographics and clinical information were obtained from a departmental database and the electronic medical record. The Modified Frailty Index (mFI) was calculated based on 10 comorbidities and functional status yielding 11 items total. Patients were categorized by a total score: 0-1=no frailty, 2=moderate frailty and 3+=high frailty. RESULTS: Among 451 patients, 359 had mFI scores of 0-1, 60 had a score of 2, and 32 had scores of 3+. Mean time from surgery to initiation of chemotherapy was 37 days. Mean number of days between surgery and initiation of chemotherapy increased with increasing frailty score: 36 days for the not frail group, 39 days for the moderate frailty group, and 54 days for the high frailty group (p<0.001). Time to initiation of chemotherapy of 42 days or more occurred in 23% of the no frailty group, 28% in the moderate frailty group, and 63% in the high frailty group (p<0.001). Overall survival decreased with increasing frailty scores. CONCLUSION: High mFI scores lead to a greater delay between surgery and chemotherapy initiation. Being able to predict delays in initiation of chemotherapy may allow oncologists to consider neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pre-habilitation before surgery, and improved preoperative counseling in high-risk patients.

Prediction Model Assessing Risk of Delivery after Diagnosis of Abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler.

OBJECTIVE: Umbilical artery Doppler (UAD) velocimetry abnormalities are associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no risk stratification methods to assist in antepartum management such as timing of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS). Therefore, we sought to develop a model to predict risk of delivery within 7 days following diagnosis of abnormal UAD velocimetry in patients with fetal growth restriction (FGR). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single referral center study of liveborn singleton pregnancies complicated by FGR and ≥1 abnormal UAD velocimetry value (≥95th percentile for gestational age [GA]). We considered 17 variables and used backward stepwise logistic regression to create a multivariable model for the prediction of delivery within 7 days. We assessed model fit with calibration, discrimination, likelihood ratios, and area under the curve. Internal validation of the model was assessed by using the bootstrap method. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2015, a total of 176 patients were eligible and included for model development. Median (range) GA at initial eligibility was 32.1 weeks (28.1-36.1 weeks) and from initial eligibility until delivery was 21 days (0-104 days). Fifty-two patients (30%) were delivered in the 7 days following inclusion. GA at first abnormal UAD, severity of first abnormal UAD, oligohydramnios, preeclampsia, and pre-pregnancy BMI were included in the model. The model had an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-0.98), sensitivity of 85%, and specificity of 91%. If the model alone were used for ACS timing, 85% of the cohort who delivered in the following week would have received ACS, and ACS would not have been given to 91% who delivered later. Internal validation yielded similar results with a mean area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.88-0.98). CONCLUSION: If validated externally, our model can be used to predict risk of delivery in patients with FGR and abnormal UAD velocimetry, potentially improving timing of ACS. KEY POINTS: · Risk of delivery in seven days can be predicted.. · Risk of delivery can inform corticosteroid timing.. · External validation can further develop a clinical aid..

Risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome among high-risk early-term and full-term deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) differ between early-term and full-term births. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a large NIH-funded retrospective cohort study including patients who delivered at a tertiary-care obstetric hospital between January 2002 and March 2013 with comorbid diabetes, hypertensive disorders, and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR). Pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia and multifetal gestations were excluded. Maternal characteristics, delivery information, and neonatal information were abstracted by trained clinicians blinded to the comorbidity leading to study inclusion. In this secondary analysis of the infant health outcomes of pregnancies with one or more of the qualifying conditions, risk factors for RDS among neonates born early term (37w0d-38w6d gestation) were compared to risk factors for RDS among full-term neonates (39w0d-40w6d). RESULTS: Among 10,532 singleton newborns, there were 99 cases of early-term RDS (0.94%) and 95 cases of full-term RDS (0.90%). Maternal demographics were similar between those with and without RDS in both groups. Among early-term infants, lower gestational age, presence of meconium, non-spontaneous labor, and cesarean delivery were positively associated with RDS, whereas hypertensive disorders, diabetes, FGR, and many other comorbid delivery conditions were not. The strongest risk factor for RDS among early-term infants was delivery via cesarean (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.31, 3.01). Among full-term neonates, cesarean delivery was also positively associated with RDS, although presence of meconium, chorioamnionitis, and endometritis were all stronger risk factors with RRs >2.0. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of high-risk term deliveries, maternal demographics and comorbidities were found not to be associated with increased risk for RDS, but novel risk factors for RDS after 37 weeks' gestation - chorioamnionitis and endometritis - were identified. A focus on preventing infectious comorbidities may help reduce incidence of RDS at full-term.Key PointsRDS risk factors vary by gestational age.Novel risk factors for RDS at full-term identified.Intrauterine inflammation associated with RDS at term.

Development and Internal Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Acute Cardiovascular Morbidity in Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Women with preeclampsia are at increased short-term risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes during pregnancy and the early postpartum period. We aimed to develop and internally validate a risk assessment tool to predict acute cardiovascular morbidity in preeclampsia. METHODS: The study was conducted at an academic obstetrics hospital. Participants with preeclampsia at delivery from 2007 to 2017 were included. A model to predict acute cardiovascular morbidity at delivery and within 6 weeks after delivery was developed and evaluated. The primary composite outcome included pulmonary edema/acute heart failure, myocardial infarction, aneurysm, cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation, heart failure/arrest during surgery or procedure, cerebrovascular disorders, cardiogenic shock, conversion of cardiac rhythm, and difficult-to-control severe hypertension. We assessed model discrimination and calibration. We used bootstrapping for internal validation. RESULTS: A total of 4171 participants with preeclampsia were included. The final model comprised 8 variables. Predictors positively associated with acute cardiovascular morbidity (presented as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval) were: gestational age at delivery (20-36 weeks: 5.36 [3.67-7.82]; 37-38 weeks: 1.75 [1.16-2.64]), maternal age (≥ 40 years: 1.65 [1.00-2.72]; 35-39 years: 1.49 [1.07-2.09]), and previous caesarean delivery (1.47 [1.01-2.13]). The model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.74). Moreover, it was adequately calibrated and performed well on internal validation. CONCLUSIONS: This risk prediction tool identified women with preeclampsia at highest risk of acute cardiovascular morbidity. If externally validated, this tool may facilitate early interventions aimed at preventing adverse cardiovascular outcomes in pregnancy and postpartum.

Term Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk among Obese Women with and without Comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE: Findings of the recent ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) trial, showing reduced cesarean risk with elective labor induction among low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks' gestation, have the potential to change interventional delivery practices but require examination in wider populations. The aim of this study was to identify whether term induction of labor was associated with reduced cesarean delivery risk among women with obesity, evaluating several maternal characteristics associated with obesity, induction, and cesarean risk. STUDY DESIGN: We studied administrative records for 66,280 singleton, term births to women with a body mass index ≥30, without a prior cesarean delivery, in New York City from 2008 to 2013. We examined elective inductions in 39 and 40 weeks' gestation and calculated adjusted risk ratios for cesarean delivery risk, stratified by parity and maternal age. We additionally evaluated medically indicated inductions at 37 to 40 weeks among women with obesity and diabetic or hypertensive disorders, comorbidities that are strongly associated with obesity. RESULTS: Elective induction of labor was associated with a 25% (95% confidence interval: 19-30%) lower adjusted risk of cesarean delivery as compared with expectant management at 39 weeks of gestation and no change in risk at 40 weeks. Patterns were similar when stratified by parity and maternal age. Risk reductions in week 39 were largest among women with a prior vaginal delivery. Women with comorbidities had reduced cesarean risk with early term induction and in 39 weeks. CONCLUSION: Labor induction at 39 weeks was consistently associated with reduced risk of cesarean delivery among women with obesity regardless of parity, age, or comorbidity status. Cesarean delivery findings from induction trials at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous women may generalize more broadly across the U.S. obstetric population, with potentially larger benefit among women with a prior vaginal delivery. KEY POINTS: · We found reduced cesarean risk with induction at 39 weeks.. · Results were consistent for age and comorbidity subgroups.. · Risk reductions were largest among multiparous women..

The independent and combined influences of small for gestational age and socioeconomic status on newborn metabolite levels.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether socioeconomic status (SES) and small birthweight for gestational age (SGA) exhibit independent or joint effects on infant levels of 42 metabolites. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort of metabolic newborn screening information linked to hospital discharge data. SGA infants defined by birthweight <10th percentile for gestational age by sex. SES was determined by a combined metric including education level, participation in the WIC nutritional assistance program, and receiving California MediCal insurance. We performed linear regression to determine the effects of SES independently, SGA independently, and the interaction of SGA and SES on 42 newborn metabolite levels. RESULTS: 736,435 California infants born in 2005-2011 were included in the analysis. SGA was significantly associated with 36 metabolites. SES was significantly associated with 41 of 42 metabolites. Thirty-eight metabolites exhibited a dose-response relationship between SGA and metabolite levels as SES worsened. Fourteen metabolites showed significant interaction between SES and SGA. Eight metabolites showed significant individual and joint effects of SES and SGA: alanine, glycine, free carnitine, C-3DC, C-5DC, C-16:1, C-18:1, and C-18:2. CONCLUSIONS: SES and SGA exhibited independent effects on a majority of metabolites and joint effects on select metabolites. A better understanding of how SES and SGA status are related to infant metabolites may help identify maternal and newborn interventions that can lead to better outcomes for infants born SGA.

Health Outcomes Associated With Clinician-initiated Delivery for Hypertensive Disorders at 34-38 Weeks' Gestation.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians caring for the nearly 10% of patients in the United States with nonsevere hypertensive disorders in late pregnancy need better evidence to balance risks and benefits of clinician-initiated delivery. METHODS: We conducted a record-based cohort study of maternal and infant health outcomes among deliveries from 2002-2013 at Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island. Participants had gestational hypertension or nonsevere preeclampsia before 39 weeks' gestation (N=4,295). For each gestational week from 34 to 38, we compared outcomes between clinician-initiated deliveries (induction of labor or prelabor cesarean) and those not initiated in that week, using propensity score models to control confounding by indication. RESULTS: The analysis predicted an increment in risk of adverse maternal and infant outcomes sustained through week 37 if all patients underwent clinician-initiated delivery, with risk differences on the order of 0.2 for maternal outcomes and 0.3 for infant outcomes weeks 34 and 35. For women undergoing clinician-initiated delivery, the analysis identified increased risk of progression to severe disease in weeks 35 and 36, increases in all adverse infant outcomes only in week 34, increases in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission and infant hospital stay in weeks 35 and 36, and no meaningful increase in any of the adverse outcomes in weeks 37 or 38. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that hypertensive pregnancies chosen for intervention were minimally harmed by early delivery after 34 weeks' gestation but predict benefit from extension to 37 weeks. Our study also showed adverse infant health consequences associated with routine delivery prior to 37 weeks.

Outpatient Opioid Use After Cesarean Delivery.

OBJECTIVES: With a goal of informing opioid prescribing after cesarean delivery, we compared inpatient, prescribed, and outpatient Morphine Equivalent Doses (MED) and patient characteristics. METHODS: Patients were enrolled after cesarean delivery and followed for 2-5 weeks with demographic, opioid use, and clinical characteristics collected from participants and the medical record. T-test, ANOVA, linear regression, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used in analyses. RESULTS: Among 76 women, 21% used all opioids prescribed and 20% used none. History of psychiatric comorbidities was associated with higher outpatient opiate use (172 MED vs 103 MED; p = 0.046). There was no difference in opiates consumed inpatient and amount prescribed at discharge (p = 0.502). However, low, medium, and high inpatient consumers used 53 (SD 76), 111 (SD 96), and 195 (SD 132) MEDs outpatient, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient opioid prescribing based on inpatient needs may facilitate judicious opioid use after cesarean delivery. Significance What Is Already Known: Opioid abuse is a growing problem in this country, and excess prescribing contributes to the availability of opioids. Limited data exist regarding the amount of opioids patients need after cesarean delivery, or what factors are predictive of an individual patient's opioid needs. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study further supports the growing literature demonstrating that providers frequently over-prescribe opioids following cesarean delivery. It uniquely adds associations of patient-specific factors and outpatient opioid needs.