RESUMEN
Thyroid surgery is characterized by large volumes and typically affects a young female population. Mini-invasive or remote access surgical techniques are born driven by the desire to improve aesthetic outcomes of the traditional technique, following technological advances that have upset the surgical world in the last 20 years. In our multicenter, retrospective observational study, we first compared an endoscopic technique with a robotic one: minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT). We evaluated intraoperative features, complications, and cosmetic outcomes in a cohort of 609 patients. The efficacy and safety of these techniques are proven by a large literature and the comparison made in our study does not show inferiority of one technique compared to the other. Even the aesthetic results tend to be equal in the long term. It is desirable that further prospective and randomized studies are conducted to evaluate the outcomes of these procedures and the cost-benefit ratio.
Asunto(s)
Robótica , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Femenino , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Endoscopía , Glándula Tiroides , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
De novo tumors in renal allograft recipients are a severe complication during long-term follow-up after transplantation and may require transplantectomy. Herein we present a case of de novo renal tumor arising in the renal allograft, treated with the less invasive image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with long-term follow-up. A tumor was detected during the routine annual follow-up in a patient with good renal function who underwent renal transplantation in 1989. Computed tomography (CT) showed a mass in the allograft whose shape, vascularization, and density suggested the presence of a solid, malignant mass, located in the upper renal pole, that measured 17 mm. CT-guided RFA was performed successfully, and the outcome was verified by an immediate control CT after the intervention. No residual pathologic tissue, major bleeding, or damage to the adjacent parenchyma was evidenced. The patient was discharged with stable renal function. CT scan and ultrasound were performed 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after RFA. No signs of change in renal function, recurrence, neovascularization, or damage to the adjacent microcirculation were observed during the 3-year follow-up. In conclusion, percutaneous RFA of small renal tumors occurring in renal allografts can be considered a function-sparing, safe, and effective therapeutic option when difficult surgical removal may be anticipated. Our experience also supports the need for yearly renal allograft ultrasound follow-up for early identification of small neoplasm than can be treated less invasively.