Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
Endoscopy ; 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599622

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: First-line over-the-scope (OTS) clip treatment has shown higher efficacy than standard endoscopic therapy in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) from different causes. We compared OTS clips with through-the-scope (TTS) clips as first-line mechanical treatment in the specific setting of peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter randomized controlled trial on consecutive patients with suspected NVUGIB. Patients with Forrest Ia-IIb gastroduodenal peptic ulcer were randomized 1:1 to OTS clip or TTS clip treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of 30-day rebleeding after successful initial hemostasis. Secondary outcomes included the rates of successful initial hemostasis and overall clinical success, defined as the composite of successful initial hemostasis and no evidence of 30-day rebleeding. RESULTS: 251 patients were screened and 112 patients were randomized to OTS (n = 61) or TTS (n = 51) clip treatment. The 30-day rebleeding rates were 1.6% (1/61) and 3.9% (2/51) in patients treated with OTS clips and TTS clips, respectively (Kaplan-Meier log-rank, P = 0.46). Successful initial hemostasis rates were 98.4% (60/61) in the OTS clip group and 78.4% (40/51) in the TTS clip group (P = 0.001). Overall clinical success rates were 96.7% (59/61) with OTS clips and 74.5% (38/51) with TTS clips (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low rates of 30-day rebleeding were observed after first-line endoscopic treatment of acute peptic ulcer bleeding with either OTS or TTS clips. However, OTS clips showed higher efficacy than TTS clips in achieving successful initial hemostasis and overall clinical success.

2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(11)2023 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37296694

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative gastric cancer (GC) staging is the most reliable prognostic factor that affects therapeutic strategies. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and radial endoscopic ultrasound (R-EUS) scans are the most commonly used staging tools for GC. The accuracy of linear EUS (L-EUS) in this setting is still controversial. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the accuracy of L-EUS and CECT in preoperative GC staging, with regards to depth of tumor invasion (T staging) and nodal involvement (N staging). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 191 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for GC were retrospectively enrolled. Preoperative staging had been performed using both L-EUS and CECT, and the results were compared to postoperative staging by histopathologic analysis of surgical specimens. RESULTS: L-EUS diagnostic accuracy for depth of invasion of the GC was 100%, 60%, 74%, and 80% for T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. CECT accuracy for T staging was 78%, 55%, 45%, and 10% for T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. L-EUS diagnostic accuracy for N staging of GC was 85%, significantly higher than CECT accuracy (61%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that L-EUS has a higher accuracy than CECT in preoperative T and N staging of GC.

3.
Dig Liver Dis ; 54(11): 1508-1512, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35614002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Very low-volume bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy with 1-liter polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (1L-PEG-Asc) has displayed high tolerability and quality of bowel cleansing. Concerns have been raised regarding its safety. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AEs) following BP with 1L-PEG-Asc or 2L-PEG-Asc. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2019 to September 2020, data from all consecutive adult outpatients who underwent colonoscopy in Our Unit were collected. AEs were assessed by reviewing the clinical and laboratory data of patients who attended the Emergency Department (ED) of Modena District Hospitals in the 7 days following the colonoscopy, and were classified as "BP-related" or "BP-unrelated". RESULTS: During the study, 4069 (68.03%) and 1912 (31.97%) patients underwent colonoscopy after taking 2L-PEG-Asc or 1L-PEG-Asc, respectively. Regarding AEs, 77 (1.29%) patients attended ED, 53 (53/4069, 1.30%) and 24 (24/1912, 1.25%) after taking 2L-PEG-Asc and 1L-PEG-Asc. BP-related AEs were observed in 5 (5/4069, 0.12%) and 4 (4/1912, 0.21%) patients, respectively. The most frequent BP-related AEs were tachyarrhythmias (6/5981, 0.10%). CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of clinically relevant BP-related AEs is extremely low. This strongly suggests that 1L-PEG-Asc colonoscopy BP is as safe as 2L-PEG-Asc BP in a real-life clinical setting of unselected patients.


Asunto(s)
Catárticos , Polietilenglicoles , Adulto , Humanos , Catárticos/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Colonoscopía , Laxativos , Ácido Ascórbico/efectos adversos
5.
Ann Gastroenterol ; 34(3): 370-377, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948062

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening disease, and the best option in cases of steroid-refractory disease is still debated. We compared the early- and long-term efficacy and safety of the 2 available "rescue therapies", infliximab (IFX) and cyclosporine (CYS), in this setting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients admitted for ASUC and treated with "rescue therapy". The primary endpoint was early colectomy-free survival (30 days) and colectomy-free survival until the end of follow up. The secondary endpoints were predictors of colectomy and long-term maintenance of the treatment strategy over time. RESULTS: Of 129 patients admitted, 68 received rescue therapy (47 with IFX), whereas 7 underwent early colectomy (10.3%). At 30 days, fewer patients treated with IFX showed a need for colectomy (8.5% vs. 14.3%) compared to those in the CYS group, though the difference was non-significant (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-4.69; P=0.47). No severe side effects due to IFX and CYS were observed. During a mean follow up of 40 months, 23 additional patients (37.7%) underwent colectomy, and the rate was significantly lower in the IFX group (25.6%) than in the CYS group (66.7%) (hazard ratio 0.25, 95%CI 0.10-0.61; P=0.003). Colectomy-free survival was significantly higher in the IFX group than in the CYS group (P=0.018) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the early outcomes of IFX and CYS for ASUC were comparable. IFX was associated with significantly lower colectomy rates during the observation period and had a similar safety profile to CYS.

7.
Endoscopy ; 53(1): 65-71, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32588416

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several scientific societies have endorsed non-anesthesiologist sedation (NAS) during gastrointestinal endoscopy, considering it a safe procedure when administered by adequately trained personnel. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of adverse events after implementation of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) sedation training program. METHODS: From January 2017 to August 2018, data from all consecutive endoscopic procedures in adults (≥ 18 years) performed at our endoscopy unit were collected using an electronic reporting system. RESULTS: All staff (physicians and nurses) completed the ESGE-ESGENA sedation course. In total, 12 132 patients underwent endoscopic procedures, 10 755 (88.6 %) of which were performed in a non-anesthesiological setting. Of these, about 20 % used moderate sedation with midazolam + fentanyl and 80 % used deep sedation with additional propofol. No sentinel, 5 (0.05 %) moderate risk, and 18 (0.17 %) minor risk adverse events occurred, all during moderate or deep sedation, and all managed by endoscopy staff without the need for anesthesiologist assistance. CONCLUSIONS: After completing the ESGE-ESGENA sedation training program, the rate of adverse events was very low in our institution. The findings support implementation of the program in all digestive endoscopy units and inclusion in the curriculum for physicians and nurses to ensure safe endoscopic procedures.


Asunto(s)
Gastroenterología , Propofol , Adulto , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Midazolam , Propofol/efectos adversos
8.
Endosc Int Open ; 8(4): E548-E549, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32258378

RESUMEN

Background and study aims We report on a case of a traumatic rectal perforation that occurred in a 16-year-old girl, which was successfully treated using an over-the-scope clip, avoiding major surgery and stoma.

12.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 11: 1653-1661, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28652703

RESUMEN

The introduction of biological agents has revolutionized the management of many life-threatening and debilitating immune-mediated diseases. Because of the high cost of biological drugs and their patent expiration, the market has opened to biosimilar agents, copy versions of the originators, which can lead to reduced health care expenditure and increase treatment access worldwide. CT-P13 is the first biosimilar of infliximab (IFX) and has been approved for the same indications as its originator drug. It obtained regulatory approval by the European Medicines Agency in September 2013 and by the US Food and Drug Administration in April 2016. The Phase I and Phase III clinical trials conducted in ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis have demonstrated pharmacokinetic and efficacy equivalence with comparable safety and immunogenicity to IFX. For these reasons, the use of CT-P13 has been extrapolated also to inflammatory bowel disease. There have been some initial concerns regarding the use of CT-P13 in inflammatory bowel disease patients, because of the lack of randomized controlled trials. However, emerging real-world data have further confirmed the comparability between CT-P13 and its reference product in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, in patients naïve to the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents and after switching from IFX, and will be summarized in this review.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Diseño de Fármacos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Artropatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Colitis Ulcerosa/inmunología , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/inmunología , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Infliximab/farmacocinética , Artropatías/diagnóstico , Artropatías/inmunología , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Espondilitis Anquilosante/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Expert Opin Ther Targets ; 21(4): 381-390, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28281904

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The pathogenesis of Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is multifactorial, with interactions between genetic and environmental factors. Despite the existence of genetic factors being largely demonstrated by epidemiological data and several genetic studies, only a few findings have been useful in term of disease prediction, disease progression and targeting therapy. Areas covered: This review summarizes the results of genome-wide association studies in Crohn's disease, the role of epigenetics and the recent discovery by genetic studies of new pathogenetic pathways. Furthermore, it focuses on the importance of applying genetic data to clinical practice, and more specifically how to better target therapy and predict potential drug-related toxicity. Expert opinion: Some genetic markers identified in Crohn`s disease have allowed investigators to hypothesize about, and in some cases, prove the usefulness of new specific therapeutic agents. However, the heterogeneity and complexity of this disease has so far limited the daily clinical use of genetic information. Finally, the study of the implications of genetics on therapy, either to predict efficacy or avoid toxicity, is considered still to be in its infancy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Animales , Enfermedad de Crohn/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Epigénesis Genética , Marcadores Genéticos , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
World J Gastroenterol ; 23(2): 197-203, 2017 Jan 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28127193

RESUMEN

Biologic compounds are obtained from living organisms or cell cultures by means of biotechnology methods. A similar biologic drug, commonly called biosimilar, is a product copied by a native approved biologic drug whose license has expired. Biosimilar drugs usually are marketed at a lower price and provide important financial savings for public healthcare systems. Some differences between biosimilars and original biologic drugs might exist but they are acceptable if they fall within defined "boundaries of tolerance": differences in some features between the two molecules are considered important only if clinical relevant. Considering that the efficacy of the innovator biologic drug has already been established, the clinical studies required for approval of a biosimilar could be reduced compared with those required for the approval of the originator. In this review, real life data available in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with biosimilars are reported, documenting in general satisfactory outcomes, sustained efficacy and no sign of increased immunogenicity, although, further controlled data are awaited.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Niño , Aprobación de Drogas , Humanos , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Dig Liver Dis ; 48(12): 1432-1437, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27553087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis previously exposed to immunosuppressive (IMS) therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 86 consecutive patients from 2008. Early outcome was evaluated as response to steroids, rescue therapy, and colectomy rate, whereas colectomy free-survival was determined along the follow-up. RESULTS: The overall response rates to steroids and rescue therapy was 33.7% and 90.5%, respectively, while early colectomy rate was 22.1%. Patients previously treated with IMS (n=47) showed a trend towards lower response to steroids (25.5% vs 43.6%; p=0.10), and a high-risk of early colectomy (29.8% vs 12.8%; p=0.07), but a similar response to rescue therapy (87.5% vs 94.4%, p=0.62) when compared with IMS-naïve patients (n=39). The overall cumulative probability to avoid the surgery was 67.5% and 56.6% at 12 and 60 months, respectively, regardless of previous exposure to IMS (p=0.30). At multivariate analysis the risk of early colectomy was increased by previous IMS (OR 5.16, p=0.017), anaemia (OR 4.26, p=0.02), and diagnosis above 40 years (OR 5.31, p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Patients previously treated with IMS showed a non-significant trend towards a worse response with steroid therapy, a satisfactory response rate to rescue therapy, and a similar probability of avoiding colectomy during the follow-up vs IMS-naive patients.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
16.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 15(10): 1427-37, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27462711

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate, which was initially developed in 1948 for the treatment of leukemia, is known to be an immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drug. It has been widely used for over 60 years as both a low and high-dose therapy in chronic inflammatory diseases. The aim of this review was to analyze and summarize the available data specifically on the safety of this drug in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. AREAS COVERED: A structured search of articles was conducted using the PubMed database up to April 2016. All articles in English with isolated or combined keywords were included according to their relevance to the aims of this study. EXPERT OPINION: Numerous of studies have established the efficacy of parenteral methotrexate in the management of steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant Crohn's disease, either for inducing or maintaining remission. However, its efficacy in ulcerative colitis has not been properly investigated. Additionally, methotrexate has been shown to reduce the effect of immunization with anti-TNF agents when combined. The drug has potential advantages over thiopurines such as its weekly administration, a possible shorter time of action, low cost, decreased risk for malignancy and overall a comparable safety profile.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Esteroides/uso terapéutico
17.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 10(10): 1109-1117, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27258545

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), which include Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation. Their etiology is multifactorial, with complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors, which are still largely unclear. Areas covered: The influence of genetics is clearly demonstrated by important epidemiological data, including familial aggregation and concordance in twins. In 2001, the first genetic susceptibility gene for IBD, the NOD2 gene, was identified. Currently, thanks to genetic wide association studies, over 200 susceptibility genetic markers are know. Expert commentary: However, clinically highly relevant gene associations are still very limited and the usefulness of these information in the current clinical strategies for treatment and surveillance of IBD is weak. Nevertheless, the recent identification of some genetic risk variants has clarified some newbiological pathways of these diseases thus paving the way for the discoveries in the near future of new targeted therapies.

18.
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs ; 20(2): 247-61, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25732091

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders with a 9 - 23% prevalence estimated in the general population. Patients can be subdivided into those who tend to have predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) or predominant constipation (IBS-C). Total annual productivity loss related to IBS in US is estimated at $205 million, with a significant impairment of health-related quality of life. A gold standard for the treatment of IBS is not established. Symptoms might improve with the use of few drugs and behavioral therapy, however, data concerning efficacy, safety and tolerability are limited. Therefore, development and validation of new therapies targeting at the molecular level are widely awaited. AREAS COVERED: We will specifically describe in this review Phase II and Phase III trials, with specific focus on treatment of IBS-D patients. Unfortunately, it is difficult to draw definite conclusions from Phase II and Phase III trials, because of the known high placebo effect. EXPERT OPINION: Drugs active on opioid receptor subtypes and neurokinin (NK) receptors seem to be the most promising, but substantial progress of information in this field is still needed. The achievement of more insights on the pathogenesis of IBS could surely better drive and target the therapy, but still strong efforts are awaited.


Asunto(s)
Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Diseño de Fármacos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Diarrea/etiología , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA