Sex Differences in Heart Failure Mortality with Preserved, Mildly Reduced and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Large-Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Studies show that women have better survival rates than men despite higher hospitalizations. However, little is known about differences in mortality and predictors of death in women and men with HF with preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: From February 2017 to September 2020, mortality and predictors of death were analyzed in women and men with HF. Baseline data included clinical characteristics and echocardiographic findings. RESULTS: A total of 11,282 patients, 63.9 ± 14.4 years, including 6256 (55.4%) males, were studied. Females were older, had a higher baseline mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and lower left ventricular diastolic diameter. During follow-ups, 1375 (22%) men and 925 (18.4%) women died. Cumulative incidence of death was higher in men with HFrEF but similar for HFmrEF and HFpEF. Cox regression for death showed renal dysfunction, stroke, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, age, LVEF, valve disease, MI, and hypertensive CMP as independent death predictors for all HF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Women had a better prognosis than men in HFrEF and similar mortality for HFmrEF and HFpEF, but sex was not an independent predictor of death for all HF subtypes.

Por que os portadores de cardiomiopatia chagásica têm pior evolução que os não-chagásicos? / Why do patients with chagasic cardiomyopathy have worse outcomes than those with non-chagasic cardiomyopathy?

FUNDAMENTO: A insuficiência cardíaca é uma doença de alta prevalência, com prognóstico dependente de diferentes fatores preditores. OBJETIVO: A doença de Chagas é um preditor de mau prognóstico em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC) crônica. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar se ela também prediz pior evolução para pacientes agudamente descompensados. MÉTODOS: Estudamos 417 pacientes hospitalizados por IC descompensada. A idade média foi de 51,8 anos, sendo 291 (69,8 por cento) homens. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: 133 (31,9 por cento) chagásicos (CH) e 284 com outras etiologias. Num subgrupo de 63 pacientes (15,1 por cento com doença de Chagas), dosaram-se citocinas e noradrenalina. RESULTADOS: Na internação, 24,6 por cento necessitaram de inotrópicos, e em um ano a mortalidade foi de 54,7 por cento. Os CH apresentaram maior mortalidade (69,2 por cento vs. 47,9 por cento, p < 0,001). Na comparação de dados, os CH eram mais jovens (47,6 vs. 53,8 anos, p < 0,001) e apresentavam, em média, PA sistólica (96,7 vs. 111,2 mmHg, p < 0,001), fração de ejeção (32,7 vs. 36,4 por cento, p < 0,001), Na sérico (134,6 vs. 136,0, p = 0,026) mais baixos e TNF-alfa mais elevado (33,3 vs. 14,8, p = 0,001). A presença de hipotensão necessitando de inotrópicos, o diâmetro diastólico do ventrículo esquerdo (VE), os dados de função renal, os níveis de interleucina-6 e os de noradrenalina não diferiram nos dois grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes chagásicos hospitalizados com IC descompensada tiveram pior prognóstico quando comparados com aqueles de outras etiologias. Esse fato pode dever-se ao maior comprometimento cardíaco (fração de ejeção mais baixa), maior instabilidade hemodinâmica (pressão sistólica e freqüência cardíaca mais baixas) e maior ativação do sistema renina angiotensina (sódio mais baixo) e das citocinas (TNF-alfa).

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a highly prevalent disease, the prognosis of which depends on different predictive factors. OBJECTIVE: Chagas disease is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study is to investigate whether this condition also predicts poor outcome in acutely decompensated patients. METHODS: Four hundred and seventeen patients admitted for decompensated heart failure were studied. Mean age was 51.8 years, and 291 (69.8 percent) were male. They were divided into two groups: 133 (31.9 percent) patients with Chagas heart disease (CH) and 284 patients with heart failure of other etiologies. Cytokine and norepinephrine plasma levels were measured in a subgroup of 63 patients (15.1 percent with Chagas disease). RESULTS: At admission, 24.6 percent of the patients needed inotropic support, and one-year mortality was 54.7 percent. Mortality rates were higher in the CH group (69.2 percent vs. 47.9 percent, p < 0.001). When data were compared, patients with Chagas disease were younger (47.6 vs. 53.8 years, p < 0.001) and, on average, showed lower systolic blood pressure (96.7 vs. 111.2 mmHg, p < 0,001), ejection fraction (32.7 vs. 36.4 percent, p < 0.001), and serum Na (134.6 vs. 136.0, p = 0.026), in addition to higher TNF-α levels (33.3 vs. 14.8, p = 0.001). The presence of hypotension requiring inotropic support, left ventricular (LV) diastolic diameter, renal function findings, and interleukin-6 and norepinephrine plasma levels did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: Chagas disease patients admitted with decompensated heart failure had worse prognoses than patients with heart failure of other etiologies. This may be owing to a greater degree of cardiac impairment (lower ejection fraction) and hemodynamic instability (lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate), increased activation of the renin-angiotensin system (lower sodium), and increased cytokine levels (TNF-α).

Why do patients with chagasic cardiomyopathy have worse outcomes than those with non-chagasic cardiomyopathy?

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a highly prevalent disease, the prognosis of which depends on different predictive factors. OBJECTIVE: Chagas disease is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study is to investigate whether this condition also predicts poor outcome in acutely decompensated patients. METHODS: Four hundred and seventeen patients admitted for decompensated heart failure were studied. Mean age was 51.8 years, and 291 (69.8%) were male. They were divided into two groups: 133 (31.9%) patients with Chagas heart disease (CH) and 284 patients with heart failure of other etiologies. Cytokine and norepinephrine plasma levels were measured in a subgroup of 63 patients (15.1% with Chagas disease). RESULTS: At admission, 24.6% of the patients needed inotropic support, and one-year mortality was 54.7%. Mortality rates were higher in the CH group (69.2% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001). When data were compared, patients with Chagas disease were younger (47.6 vs. 53.8 years, p < 0.001) and, on average, showed lower systolic blood pressure (96.7 vs. 111.2 mmHg, p < 0,001), ejection fraction (32.7 vs. 36.4%, p < 0.001), and serum Na (134.6 vs. 136.0, p = 0.026), in addition to higher TNF-alpha levels (33.3 vs. 14.8, p = 0.001). The presence of hypotension requiring inotropic support, left ventricular (LV) diastolic diameter, renal function findings, and interleukin-6 and norepinephrine plasma levels did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: Chagas disease patients admitted with decompensated heart failure had worse prognoses than patients with heart failure of other etiologies. This may be owing to a greater degree of cardiac impairment (lower ejection fraction) and hemodynamic instability (lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate), increased activation of the renin-angiotensin system (lower sodium), and increased cytokine levels (TNF-alpha).