Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
2.
JHEP Rep ; 6(4): 101021, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38617599

RESUMEN

Background & aims: This phase Ib/II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of capmatinib in combination with spartalizumab or spartalizumab alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Eligible patients who had progressed or were intolerant to sorafenib received escalating doses of capmatinib 200 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg twice a day (bid) plus spartalizumab 300 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) in the phase Ib study. Once the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined, the phase II study commenced with randomised 1:1 treatment with either capmatinib + spartalizumab (n = 32) or spartalizumab alone (n = 30). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability (phase Ib) and investigator-assessed overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 for combination vs. single-agent arms using a Bayesian logistic regression model (phase II). Results: In phase Ib, the RP2D for capmatinib in combination with spartalizumab was determined to be 400 mg bid. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 diarrhoea was reported in one patient at the capmatinib 400 mg bid + spartalizumab 300 mg q3w dose level. The primary endpoint in the phase II study was not met. The observed overall response rate in the capmatinib + spartalizumab arm was 9.4% vs. 10% in the spartalizumab arm. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, ≥20%) were nausea (37.5%), asthenia and vomiting (28.1% each), diarrhoea, pyrexia, and decreased appetite (25.0% each) in the combination arm; TRAEs ≥10% were pruritus (23.3%), and rash (10.0%) in the spartalizumab-alone arm. Conclusion: Capmatinib at 400 mg bid plus spartalizumab 300 mg q3w was established as the RP2D, with manageable toxicities and no significant safety signals, but the combination did not show superior clinical activity compared with spartalizumab single-agent treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had previously been treated with sorafenib. Impact and implications: Simultaneous targeting of MET and programmed cell death protein 1 may provide synergistic clinical benefit in patients with advanced HCC. This is the first trial to report a combination of capmatinib (MET inhibitor) and spartalizumab (programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) as second-line treatment after sorafenib for advanced HCC. The combination did not show superior clinical activity compared with spartalizumab single-agent treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had previously been treated with sorafenib. The results indicate that there is a clear need to identify a reliable predictive marker of response for HCC and to identify patients with HCC that would benefit from the combination of checkpoint inhibitor +/- targeted therapy. Clinical trial number: NCT02795429.

3.
Neurooncol Adv ; 4(1): vdac146, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36382109

RESUMEN

Background: Standard-of-care treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM), consisting of surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ), has improved outcomes compared with RT alone; however, prognosis remains poor. Trotabresib, a novel bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with high-grade gliomas. Methods: In this phase Ib, dose-escalation study (NCT04324840), we investigated trotabresib 15, 30, and 45 mg combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and trotabresib 15 and 30 mg combined with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting in patients with ndGBM. Primary endpoints were to determine safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. Secondary endpoints were assessment of preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamics were investigated as an exploratory endpoint. Results: The adjuvant and concomitant cohorts enrolled 18 and 14 patients, respectively. Trotabresib in combination with TMZ or TMZ+RT was well tolerated; most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate. Trotabresib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both settings were consistent with previous data for trotabresib monotherapy. The RP2D of trotabresib was selected as 30 mg 4 days on/24 days off in both settings. At last follow-up, 5 (28%) and 6 (43%) patients remain on treatment in the adjuvant and concomitant settings, respectively, with 1 patient in the adjuvant cohort achieving complete response. Conclusions: Trotabresib combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting was safe and well tolerated in patients with ndGBM, with encouraging treatment durations. Trotabresib 30 mg was established as the RP2D in both settings.

4.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 70(12): 3679-3692, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351436

RESUMEN

Debate is around the optimal immunization regimen for cancer vaccines since too intense vaccination schedules may exhaust reactive lymphocytes. GX301 is a telomerase-based cancer vaccine whose safety and immunological effects were tested in a phase I trial applying an eight administrations schedule. Main objective of this study was to comparatively analyse safety and immunological response to three GX301 regimens in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with response/disease stability after docetaxel chemotherapy. This was a multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial registered with EudraCT (2014-000095-26) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02293707, 2014). Ninety-eight patients were randomized to receive either eight (regimen 1), four (regimen 2) or two (regimen 3) vaccine administrations. Sixty-three patients were assessable for the primary immunological end-point. Vaccine-specific immune responses were evaluated by intracellular staining for IFN, elispot and cytotoxic assay at 90 and 180 days from baseline. No major side effects were recorded. A 54% overall immune responder rate was observed with 95% of patients showing at least one vaccine-specific immune response. Rate of immunological responders and number of immunizations were proportionally related, suggesting superiority of regimens 1 and 2 over regimen 3. Overall survival did not differ among regimens in both immunological responders and non-responders and was inversely associated (P = 0.002) with increase in the number of circulating CD8 + T regulatory cells at 180 days. These data indicate that GX301 cancer vaccine is safe and immunogenic in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Schedules with high number of administrations should be preferred in future studies due to their better immunological outcome.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/terapia , Telomerasa/inmunología , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunidad/inmunología , Inmunización/métodos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico/inmunología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología
5.
Kidney Blood Press Res ; 45(2): 166-179, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982867

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: An accurate assessment of renal function is needed in the majority of clinical settings. Unfortunately, the most used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formulas are affected by significant errors in comparison to gold standards methods of measured GFR (mGFR). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to determine the extent of the error of eGFR formulas compared to the mGFR in different specific clinical settings. METHODS: A total retrospectively consecutive cohort of 1,320 patients (pts) enrolled in 2 different European Hospitals (Center 1: 470 pts; Center 2: 850 pts) was collected in order to compare the most common eGFR formulas used by physicians with the most widespread mGFR methods in daily clinical practice (Iohexol Plasma Clearance -Center 1 [mGFR-iox] and Renal Scintigraphy -Center 2 [mGFR-scnt]). The study cohort was composed by urological, oncological, and nephrological pts. The agreement between eGFR and mGFR was evaluated using bias (as median of difference), precision (as interquartile range of difference) accuracy (as P30), and total deviation index. RESULTS: The most accurate eGFR formula in the comparison with gold standard method (Iohexol plasma clearance) in Center 1 was represented by s-creatinine and cystatin C combined Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration-cr-cy, even though the P30 is reduced (84%) under the threshold of 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Similar results were found in Center 2, with a wider discrepancy between mGFR-scnt and eGFR formulas due to the minor accuracy of the nuclear tool in respect to the mGFR-iox. CONCLUSIONS: The loss of accuracy observed for the formulas at lower values of GFR suggests the mandatory use of gold standards methods as Iohexol Plasma Clearance to assess the correct status of renal function for critical cases. The center 2 showed lower levels of agreement between mGFR and eGFR suggesting that the errors are partially accounted for the Renal Scintigraphy technique too. In particular, we suggest the use of mGFR-iox in oncological urological and nephrological pts with an eGFR lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Función Renal/métodos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Target Oncol ; 12(6): 775-785, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29067643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This phase I, four-arm, open-label study (NCT01347866) evaluated the PI3K/mTOR inhibitors PF-04691502 (arms A, B) and gedatolisib (PF-05212384; arms C, D) in combination with the MEK inhibitor PD-0325901 (arm A, D) or irinotecan (arm B, C) in patients with advanced solid tumors. OBJECTIVES: Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity with each combination. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose escalation followed a 3 + 3 design in arm C and a zone-based design in arm D. RESULTS: The PF-04691502 combination arms were closed prematurely due to low tolerability, and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were not determined for either arm. The MTD for the combination of gedatolisib with irinotecan 180 mg/m2 was estimated to be 110 mg weekly and for the combination with PD-0325901 was not reached at the highest dose evaluated (gedatolisib 154 mg weekly). Plasma concentrations of gedatolisib were generally similar across dose groups in arm C (with irinotecan) and arm D (with PD-0325901). Frequent dose delays or dose reductions were required for both combinations, potentially preventing sustained therapeutic drug concentrations. Gedatolisib plus irinotecan produced a response rate of ~5% and clinical benefit in 16% of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (progression-free survival, 2.8 months). Preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed with gedatolisib plus PD-0325901 in patients with ovarian cancer (three partial responses, n = 5) or endometrial cancer (one partial response, n = 1) and KRAS mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluations of gedatolisib are warranted in patients with advanced solid malignancies.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Difenilamina/análogos & derivados , Morfolinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/genética , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3 , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Triazinas/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Benzamidas/farmacología , Camptotecina/farmacología , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Difenilamina/farmacología , Difenilamina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Irinotecán , Masculino , Morfolinas/farmacología , Neoplasias/patología , Triazinas/farmacología
7.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 493, 2017 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28724419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vinflunine is the only chemotherapeutic agent shown to improve survival in platinum-refractory patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium (TCCU) in a phase III clinical trial, which led to product registration for this indication in Europe. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of vinflunine and to evaluate the prognostic significance of risk factors in a large, unselected cohort of patients with metastatic TCCU treated according to routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study. Italian cancer centers were selected if, according to the Registry of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), at least four patients had been treated with vinflunine between February 2011 and June 2014, after first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective was to test whether the efficacy measured by overall survival (OS) in the registration study could be confirmed in routine clinical practice. Multivariate analysis was carried out using Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were treated in 28 Italian centers. Median age was 69 years (IQR 62-76) and 84% were male; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was ≥ 1 in 53% of patients. The median number of cycles was 4 (IQR 2-6); 29%, 35%, and 36% received an initial dose of 320 mg/m2, 280 mg/m2 or a lower dose, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for the entire population was 3.2 months (2.6-3.7) and 8.1 months (6.3-8.9). A complete response was observed in six patients, partial response in 21, stable disease in 60, progressive disease in 108, with a disease control rate of 40%. Multivariate analysis showed that ECOG PS, number of metastatic sites and liver involvement were unfavorable prognostic factors for OS. Toxicity was mild, and grade 3-4 adverse effects were mainly: neutropenia (9%), anemia (6%), asthenia/fatigue (7%) and constipation (5%). CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice the results obtained with VFL seem to be better than the results of the registration trial and reinforce evidence supporting its use after failure of a platinum-based chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vinblastina/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Urotelio/efectos de los fármacos , Urotelio/patología , Vinblastina/efectos adversos , Vinblastina/uso terapéutico
8.
J Clin Oncol ; 33(19): 2158-65, 2015 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26014300

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We conducted a comprehensive review of the design, implementation, and outcome of first-in-human (FIH) trials of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to clearly determine early clinical development strategies for this class of compounds. METHODS: We performed a PubMed search using appropriate terms to identify reports of FIH trials of mAbs published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and April 2013. RESULTS: A total of 82 publications describing FIH trials were selected for analysis. Only 27 articles (33%) reported the criteria used for selecting the starting dose (SD). Dose escalation was performed using rule-based methods in 66 trials (80%). The median number of planned dose levels was five (range, two to 13). The median of the ratio between the highest planned dose and the SD was 27 (range, two to 3,333). Although in 56 studies (68%) at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity event was reported, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 47 trials (57%). The highest planned dose was reached in all trials, but the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined in only 13 studies (16%). The median of the ratio between MTD and SD was eight (range, four to 1,000). The recommended phase II dose was indicated in 34 studies (41%), but in 25 (73%) of these trials, this dose was chosen without considering toxicity as the main selection criterion. CONCLUSION: This literature review highlights the broad design heterogeneity of FIH trials testing mAbs. Because of the limited observed toxicity, the MTD was infrequently reached, and therefore, the recommended phase II dose for subsequent clinical trials was only tentatively defined.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Dosis Máxima Tolerada
9.
Clin Cancer Res ; 20(22): 5663-71, 2014 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25252757

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Because a dose-response relationship is characteristic of conventional chemotherapy, this concept is widely used for the development of novel cytotoxic (CTX) drugs. However, the need to reach the MTD to obtain optimal benefit with molecularly targeted agents (MTA) is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between dose and efficacy in a large cohort of phase I patients with solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We collected data on 1,182 consecutive patients treated in phase I trials in 14 European institutions in 2005-2007. Inclusion criteria were: (i) patients treated within completed single-agent studies in which a maximum-administered dose was defined and (ii) RECIST/survival data available. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients were included in trials with MTA (N = 854) and 28% in trials with CTX (N = 328). The objective response (OR) rate was 3% and disease control at 6 months was 11%. OR for CTX was associated with higher doses (median 92% of MTD); this was not the case for MTA, where patients achieving OR received a median of 50% of MTD. For trials with MTA, patients treated at intermediate doses (40%-80%) had better survival compared with those receiving low or high doses (P = 0.038). On the contrary, there was a direct association between higher dose and better OS for CTX agents (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Although these results support the development of novel CTX based on MTD, we found no direct relationship between higher doses and response with MTA in unselected patients. However, the longest OS was seen in patients treated with MTA at intermediate doses (40%-80% of MTD).


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Monitoreo de Drogas , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Invest New Drugs ; 32(6): 1188-96, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24898305

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Preclinical evidence supports synergy between the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin and various chemotherapy agents. Ombrabulin was combined with two standard taxane/platinum doublets in a phase I study to determine the recommended combination doses. METHODS: Ombrabulin (30-min infusion, day 1 every 3 weeks) was escalated from 15.5 to 35 mg/m(2) with two chemotherapy doublets; OCD, 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin (C), day 1 (cohort 1) or day 2 (cohort 2) with 60/75 mg/m(2) docetaxel (D), day 2; and OCP, AUC5/6 carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) 175 mg/m(2) (cohort 3) or 200 mg/m(2) (cohort 4), day 2. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were treated (32 OCD, 37 OCP). Four had DLTs in cycle 1, two in cohort 1 (grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 pulmonary embolism) and one each in cohorts 2 (grade 3 ALT elevation) and 4 (grade 3 peripheral ischemia). Ombrabulin escalation in cohorts 2, 3 and 4 was halted at the highest planned dose (35 mg/m(2)). Asthenia, nausea, paresthesia, alopecia, vomiting, and stomatitis were common, as was grade 3-4 neutropenia. Ombrabulin clearance was high with a short terminal half-life and a medium volume of distribution. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no clinically relevant drug interactions between the taxane-platinum doublet and ombrabulin or its active metabolite RPR258063, however docetaxel and carboplatin pharmacokinetics were slightly altered. One complete and 15 partial responses (10 OCD, 5 OCP; median duration 5.5 and 4.4 months, respectively) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ombrabulin to standard doses of cisplatin/docetaxel or carboplatin/paclitaxel proved feasible with manageable overlapping toxicities but appears to have limited impact on the efficacy of these doublets. Recommended combination doses are 35 mg/m(2) ombrabulin with 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin/75 mg/m(2) docetaxel or 200 mg/m(2) paclitaxel/AUC6 carboplatin, every 3 weeks.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/farmacocinética , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/farmacocinética , Docetaxel , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Serina/administración & dosificación , Serina/efectos adversos , Serina/análogos & derivados , Serina/farmacocinética , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Taxoides/farmacocinética , Adulto Joven
11.
Breast Cancer Res ; 15(5): R86, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24060333

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We examined if a combination of proliferation markers and estrogen receptor (ER) activity could predict early versus late relapses in ER-positive breast cancer and inform the choice and length of adjuvant endocrine therapy. METHODS: Baseline affymetrix gene-expression profiles from ER-positive patients who received no systemic therapy (n = 559), adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 years (cohort-1: n = 683, cohort-2: n = 282) and from 58 patients treated with neoadjuvant letrozole for 3 months (gene-expression available at baseline, 14 and 90 days) were analyzed. A proliferation score based on the expression of mitotic kinases (MKS) and an ER-related score (ERS) adopted from Oncotype DX® were calculated. The same analysis was performed using the Genomic Grade Index as proliferation marker and the luminal gene score from the PAM50 classifier as measure of estrogen-related genes. Median values were used to define low and high marker groups and four combinations were created. Relapses were grouped into time cohorts of 0-2.5, 0-5, 5-10 years. RESULTS: In the overall 10 years period, the proportional hazards assumption was violated for several biomarker groups indicating time-dependent effects. In tamoxifen-treated patients Low-MKS/Low-ERS cancers had continuously increasing risk of relapse that was higher after 5 years than Low-MKS/High-ERS cancers [0 to 10 year, HR 3.36; p = 0.013]. High-MKS/High-ERS cancers had low risk of early relapse [0-2.5 years HR 0.13; p = 0.0006], but high risk of late relapse which was higher than in the High-MKS/Low-ERS group [after 5 years HR 3.86; p = 0.007]. The High-MKS/Low-ERS subset had most of the early relapses [0 to 2.5 years, HR 6.53; p < 0.0001] especially in node negative tumors and showed minimal response to neoadjuvant letrozole. These findings were qualitatively confirmed in a smaller independent cohort of tamoxifen-treated patients. Using different biomarkers provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Early relapses are highest in highly proliferative/low-ERS cancers, in particular in node negative tumors. Relapses occurring after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen are highest among the highly-proliferative/high-ERS tumors although their risk of recurrence is modest in the first 5 years on tamoxifen. These tumors could be the best candidates for extended endocrine therapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Proliferación Celular , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Estrógenos/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitosis , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Receptores de Estrógenos/genética , Riesgo , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico
12.
Invest New Drugs ; 31(5): 1236-43, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23467812

RESUMEN

The aim of this phase I study was to identify a feasible dose and schedule for the combination of cisplatin and trabectedin. The regimen evaluated consisted of cisplatin at a fixed dose of 75 mg/m(2) 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by escalating doses of trabectedin 3-hour i.v. infusion, both administered on day 1 every 3 weeks (q3wks). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), grade 4 neutropenia longer than 7 days duration and grade 3 vomiting despite standard antiemetic therapy, occurred at the starting dose of trabectedin (0.75 mg/m(2)). The immediately lower dose (trabectedin 0.60 mg/m(2)) was evaluated in a total of 8 patients; no DLTs occurred and this was declared the recommended dose (RD). The safety profile of the combination at this dose and schedule was consistent with the known side effects of each agent alone: nausea, fatigue, transient transaminase elevations and neutropenia. No new or unexpected adverse reactions were observed. Two partial responses were reported at the RD in patients with pretreated ovarian cancer. Comparison with population pharmacokinetic data suggests a PK interaction between trabectedin and cisplatin leading to increased plasma exposure of trabectedin in the first 48 h, lower platinum clearance and longer half-life. In conclusion, although the trabectedin dose achieved with this combination was low (50 % of single-agent when given q3wks), this day 1 q3wks trabectedin plus cisplatin combination showed a feasible administration, a tolerable safety profile and some antitumor activity.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/farmacocinética , Dioxoles/administración & dosificación , Dioxoles/efectos adversos , Dioxoles/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/farmacocinética , Trabectedina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
13.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 22(5): 792-800, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22635029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an established treatment for relapsed ovarian cancer. Preclinical and clinical evidences in other tumor types suggest that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib can act synergistically with PLD. METHODS: Patients with relapsed ovarian cancer (N = 58), previously treated with platinum (100%) and taxane (95%), received bortezomib, 1.3 mg/m intravenous (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and PLD, 30 mg/m intravenous (day 1), every 3 weeks. Tumor responses were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria. An optimal 2-stage design was implemented. Gene expression profiling in peripheral blood was characterized before and during treatment in 10 platinum-sensitive patients enrolled in stage 2 of the study. RESULTS: Median number of bortezomib-PLD cycles was 3.5. Of 38 patients in the platinum-sensitive group, 9 responses were observed (median duration, 4.8 months). The platinum-resistant group was closed at stage 1 owing to lack of response. Toxicity was moderate and mainly consisted of hematologic, gastrointestinal, and mucositis events. Of the total 58 patients, peripheral neuropathy was reported in 9 patients (none were grade 3). Transcription profiling identified the prevalence of genes associated with ribonucleoprotein complexes, RNA processing, and protein translation. The gene expression changes were more robust in patients who responded or had stable disease compared with patients who had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of bortezomib and PLD was well tolerated, but the antitumor activity is insufficient to warrant further investigation in ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Antígeno Ca-125/metabolismo , Carcinoma Papilar/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Papilar/mortalidad , Carcinoma Papilar/patología , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidad , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Platino (Metal)/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
14.
J Clin Oncol ; 30(9): 996-1004, 2012 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22355064

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The appropriate selection of patients for early clinical trials presents a major challenge. Previous analyses focusing on this problem were limited by small size and by interpractice heterogeneity. This study aims to define prognostic factors to guide risk-benefit assessments by using a large patient database from multiple phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 2,182 eligible patients treated in phase I trials between 2005 and 2007 in 14 European institutions. We derived and validated independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality by using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality was 16.5% with a drug-related death rate of 0.4%. Trial discontinuation within 3 weeks occurred in 14% of patients primarily because of disease progression. Eight different prognostic variables for 90-day mortality were validated: performance status (PS), albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, number of metastatic sites, clinical tumor growth rate, lymphocytes, and WBC. Two different models of prognostic scores for 90-day mortality were generated by using these factors, including or excluding PS; both achieved specificities of more than 85% and sensitivities of approximately 50% when using a score cutoff of 5 or higher. These models were not superior to the previously published Royal Marsden Hospital score in their ability to predict 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Patient selection using any of these prognostic scores will reduce non-drug-related 90-day mortality among patients enrolled in phase I trials by 50%. However, this can be achieved only by an overall reduction in recruitment to phase I studies of 20%, more than half of whom would in fact have survived beyond 90 days.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
16.
Nat Clin Pract Oncol ; 5(7): 378-91, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18560389

RESUMEN

Since 2004, four antiangiogenic drugs have been approved for clinical use in patients with advanced solid cancers, on the basis of their capacity to improve survival in phase III clinical studies. These achievements validated the concept introduced by Judah Folkman that the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis could control tumor growth. It has been suggested that biomarkers of angiogenesis would greatly facilitate the clinical development of antiangiogenic therapies. For these four drugs, the pharmacodynamic effects observed in early clinical studies were important to corroborate activities, but were not essential for the continuation of clinical development and approval. Furthermore, no validated biomarkers of angiogenesis or antiangiogenesis are available for routine clinical use. Thus, the quest for biomarkers of angiogenesis and their successful use in the development of antiangiogenic therapies are challenges in clinical oncology and translational cancer research. We review critical points resulting from the successful clinical trials, review current biomarkers, and discuss their potential impact on improving the clinical use of available antiangiogenic drugs and the development of new ones.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Patológica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Bencenosulfonatos/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neovascularización Patológica/metabolismo , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib , Sunitinib
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA