Nocturnal hypoglycemia is underdiagnosed in older people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: The HYPOAGE observational study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of real-life data regarding the frequency and predictive factors of hypoglycemia in older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to determine the frequency and predictors of hypoglycemia in older patients with insulin-treated T2D. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included 155 insulin-treated T2D patients aged 75 years and older with ≥2 self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) daily controls. Participants underwent a geriatric and diabetic assessment and received ambulatory blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 28 consecutive days with FreeStyle Libre Pro® sensor. Study population (n = 141) has >70% CGM active time. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with SMBG confirmed hypoglycemia (≥70 mg/dL) and with nocturnal level 2 time below range (glucose concentration <54 mg/dL during ≥15 consecutive min between 0.00 and 6.00 am). RESULTS: The mean age of the 141 analyzed patients was 81.5 ± 5.3 years and 56.7% were male. The mean baseline HbA1c was 7.9% ± 1.0%. After geriatric assessment, 102 participants (72.3%) were considered as complex and 39 (27.7%) as healthy. The primary endpoint (confirmed SMBG <70 mg/dL) occurred in 37.6% patients. In multivariable analysis, the risk of SMBG-confirmed hypoglycemia was positively associated with a longer duration of diabetes (OR (+1 year) =1.04, (1.00-1.08), p = 0.04) and glycemic variability assessed by CGM (CV %) (OR (+1%) = 1.12, [1.05-1.19], p = <0.001). Nighty-two patients (65.2%) experienced nocturnal time in hypoglycemia (i.e., <54 mg/dL during ≥15 consecutive min between midnight and 6 a.m.). In multivariable analyses, cognitive impairment (OR: 9.31 [2.59-33.4]), heart failure (OR: 4.81 [1;48-15.6]), and depressive disorder (OR: 0.19 [0.06-0.53]) were associated with nocturnal time in hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: Nocturnal hypoglycemia is very common and largely underdiagnosed in older patients with insulin-treated T2D. CGM is a promising tool to better identify hypoglycemia and adapt diabetes management in this population.

A retrospective study on the etiological exploration of osteoporosis in aging men in a French geriatric setting.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis in older men is common and causes significant mortality and morbidity. Some data suggest that conditions leading to bone fragility, including osteoporosis, are under-identified and undertreated in men. Additionally, 50% of the causes of osteoporosis are secondary in men. The latest Endocrine Society and different Rheumatology Societies Guidelines recommend additional laboratory investigations in men with osteoporosis so as to treat them more efficiently. MAIN GOAL OF THE STUDY: Our aim was to determine whether men managed in our geriatrics center, diagnosed with osteoporosis, underwent investigations to determine the aetiology of osteoporosis and other bone fragility conditions and what the secondary causes were. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective study including all men seen at the geriatric consult in 2016 diagnosed with osteoporosis. For each patient, we evaluated our clinical practice, whether common secondary causes were sought-after and what these aetiologies were. RESULTS: Among the 121 men with a diagnosis of osteoporosis seen at the geriatric consult at the Lille University Hospital in 2016, only 51 had undergone further investigations. Among the 3 major secondary causes were identified: 17.6% glucocorticoid induced, 13.7% treatment induced hypogonadism, 11.7% late onset hypogonadism. CONCLUSIONS: A more efficient etiological assessment of osteoporosis in older men could be achieved and would improve management for our patients. This can be achieved by a better knowledge of the recommendations for etiological assessment of bone fragility and osteoporosis and a dedicated consultation within the geriatric sector.

Persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the Lille University Hospital Fracture Liaison Service.

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: A Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) was set up at Lille University Hospital in 2016. The purpose of this study was to assess persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the FLS over a period of 1 year, and to determine predictors of discontinuation. METHODS: The study population comprised adults of both genders, aged 50 or over, admitted to Lille University Hospital between January 2016 and January 2019 for a low-trauma fracture and managed in our FLS. Outcomes included (1) persistence rate at 1 year after treatment initiation, (2) persistence rate at 2 years after treatment initiation, (3) persistence rate at 1 and 2 years after treatment initiation according to type of treatment, (4) predictors of non-persistence, and (5) reasons for discontinuing treatment over 1 year after initiation. Persistence was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In all, 1224 patients (≥50 years old) with a recent history of low-trauma fracture (≤12 months) were identified. Of these, 380 patients - 79.2% female; mean (SD) age 76 (11) years - were seen at the FLS. In those 380 patients, 410 fractures were found and 360 of them (87.8%) were major fractures, breaking down as follows: vertebra (44%), hip (19%), proximal humerus (10%), and pelvis (8%). Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed for 367 (96.6%) patients and 275 of them began the prescribed treatment. The following anti-osteoporosis drugs were prescribed: zoledronic acid (n=150, 54.5%), teriparatide (n=63, 22.9%), and denosumab (n=39, 14.2%). Oral bisphosphonates were prescribed for a few patients (n=23, 8.4%). Persistence with osteoporosis medication (any class) was estimated at 84.1% (95% CI: 79.1% to 88.1%) at 12-month follow-up, and dropped to 70.3% (95% CI: 63.7% to 75.9%) at 24 months. When drug-specific analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, persistence rates at 12 and 24 months were found to be higher with denosumab than with any other treatment. Independent predictors of non-persistence at 12 months were 'follow-up performed by a general practitioner (GP)' - Odds Ratio (OR) for GP vs. FLS = 3.68; 95% CI, 1.52 to 8.90, p=0.004 - and 'treatment with zoledronic acid' - OR for zoledronic acid vs. denosumab = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.21 to 9.50, p=0.019; OR for zoledronic acid vs. teriparatide = 8.86; 95% CI, 1.15 to 68.10, p=0.035. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of the success of our FLS in terms of long-term persistence with osteoporosis treatments. However, osteoporosis treatment initiation still needs to be improved.

[Discharge from hospital into nursing home: conditions and quality of transmissions]. / Retour en EHPAD après une hospitalisation : modalités et qualité des transmissions.

CONTEXT: Nursing home residents are very old, with multiple comorbidities and disabled for activities of daily living (ADLs). Therefore, they have a higher risk of accidents as falls or fractures or acute diseases as infections, which require hospitalization. Care's coordination and sharing of informations between hospitals and nursing homes are often insufficient even with agreements. Thus, discharge to nursing homes after hospitalization may be difficult for old patients because of incomplete oral or written transmissions. OBJECTIVE: To examine both protocols and the quality of the return to the nursing homes after an hospitalization for old residents. METHOD: A prospective multicenter study done by collecting data about consecutive returns into their nursing home after an hospitalization of more than 24 hours of nursing home residents aged 65 years and more. RESULTS: Twenty-eight nursing homes of the North of France were enrolled in the study. During the 3 months period of the study, 246 discharges after an hospitalization of 24 hours or more were registered. 225 residents (165 women and 60 men), mean age 85.0 ± 7.2, were concerned. Most of them were ADLs disabled, with a dementia for 47.1% of them. The average length of hospitalization was 11.6 days. At the end of hospitalization, the notification of return, which was made only in 82% of cases, was announced in average 1.3 days before the discharge. Unfortunately, in 32% of cases, the notification was made the day of the discharge. Residents went back home indifferently any day of the week but more often the Friday and less often the weekend. The day and the hour of the planned discharge were respected in 79.1% of cases. In most cases, nursing home caregivers have considered that the clinical status was stable or improved compared to the previous one. However in 28% of cases, a loss of autonomy was found. Medical doctors wrote a letter of discharge in 85.8% of cases. Nurses gave written transmissions only in 41.9% of cases. CONCLUSION: Many points concerning discharge from hospital, about old people living in nursing home, have to be improved: oral transmissions about patient's status, notification of the return, discharge's letter, nurse's transmissions and assessment of the loss of autonomy.