[Early cognitive rehabilitation for patients with severe neurological impairment]. / Prise en charge cognitive précoce des patients cérébrolésés sévères.

Improving the state and future of patients severely impaired following brain injury is at the heart of early rehabilitation, established from the first days of hospitalization. For cognitive deficits, this management involves several challenges, related to hospital conditions and to the patients' capacities during the acute phase. A relevant intervention can be provided, as long as it involves an assessment adapted to these particularities and a rehabilitation targeting the most limiting deficits at this stage. These findings, discussed in the light of our clinical experience and current knowledge in the field, have yet to be scientifically tested since randomized clinical trials are still lacking. The integration of new technologies to facilitate the bedside work presents another prospect for the future.

Améliorer sans délai l'état et le devenir des patients sévèrement touchés par une lésion cérébrale constitue l'essence de la rééducation précoce, instaurée dès les premiers jours de l'hospitalisation. Pour les aspects cognitifs, cette prise en charge comporte plusieurs défis, liés aux conditions hospitalières et aux capacités des patients. Une intervention pertinente peut être pratiquée, sous réserve d'une évaluation adaptée à ces particularités et d'une rééducation ciblant les déficits les plus limitants à ce stade. Ces constats, discutés à la lumière de notre expérience clinique et des connaissances actuelles, doivent encore être prouvés scientifiquement car les essais cliniques randomisés manquent cruellement. L'intégration des nouvelles technologies pour faciliter le travail au chevet des patients constitue une autre perspective d'avenir.

Comparison of In-Person and Online Recordings in the Clinical Teleassessment of Speech Production: A Pilot Study.

In certain circumstances, speech and language therapy is proposed in telepractice as a practical alternative to in-person services. However, little is known about the minimum quality requirements of recordings in the teleassessment of motor speech disorders (MSD) utilizing validated tools. The aim here is to examine the comparability of offline analyses based on speech samples acquired from three sources: (1) in-person recordings with high quality material, serving as the baseline/gold standard; (2) in-person recordings with standard equipment; (3) online recordings from videoconferencing. Speech samples were recorded simultaneously from these three sources in fifteen neurotypical speakers performing a screening battery of MSD and analyzed by three speech and language therapists. Intersource and interrater agreements were estimated with intraclass correlation coefficients on seventeen perceptual and acoustic parameters. While the interrater agreement was excellent for most speech parameters, especially on high quality in-person recordings, it decreased in online recordings. The intersource agreement was excellent for speech rate and mean fundamental frequency measures when comparing high quality in-person recordings to the other conditions. The intersource agreement was poor for voice parameters, but also for perceptual measures of intelligibility and articulation. Clinicians who plan to teleassess MSD should adapt their recording setting to the parameters they want to reliably interpret.