RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Microblading is a common cosmetic procedure that can modify the appearance of one's eyebrows. Although generally well-tolerated, the procedure can cause a number of dermatologic issues; on rare occasions, granulomatous reactions can manifest. We use this case to highlight a presentation of a nonsarcoidal granulomatous dermatitis and review the literature on granulomatous reactions secondary to microblading. Of the 21 cases included in our review, approximately half (10/21) were diagnosed with foreign-body granulomas and the other half with sarcoidosis (7 of 21 with systemic sarcoidosis and 4 of 21 with cutaneous sarcoidosis). Although microblading remains a commonplace cosmetic technique, it is not without risk. Much like other types of tattoos, microblading can cause granulomatous reactions for which we must be vigilant, and further workup for sarcoidosis might be considered in select patients.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Cosméticas , Dermatitis , Granuloma de Cuerpo Extraño , Sarcoidosis , Tatuaje , Humanos , Dermatitis/complicaciones , Granuloma de Cuerpo Extraño/complicaciones , Sarcoidosis/diagnóstico , Tatuaje/efectos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As the number of dermatologists offering cosmetic procedures continues to increase, so does the need for hands-on exposure to cosmetic dermatology during residency. A resident cosmetic clinic (RCC) model presents as a mutually beneficial opportunity for trainees to obtain first-hand experience, while patients have access to more affordable pricing. OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess volume and variety of cosmetic dermatological procedures during residency. (2) To compare Loma Linda University (LLU) Dermatology RCC data with national residency program data. (3) To provide guidance for other dermatology residency programs who wish to incorporate cosmetic training into their educational curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional, retrospective, chart review study, resident training in cosmetic procedures at the LLU RCC was quantified and compared with that of national program averages, minimums, and maximums as reported by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medication Education. RESULTS: LLU RCC residents performed more nonablative skin rejuvenation, intense pulsed light, and soft tissue augmentation procedures as the resident surgeon compared with other dermatology residents across the nation. CONCLUSION: Institutional review highlights an unmet need for greater exposure to and training in a variety of dermatologic cosmetic procedures during residency. Practical considerations for achieving optimal learning experiences were provided through the implementation of a resident cosmetic clinic.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Internado y Residencia , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Universidades , Educación de Postgrado en MedicinaRESUMEN
Over time, cosmetic procedures have continued to grow in popularity and patients seeking these procedures have expanded to include more patients with skin of color. However, not all cosmetic procedures are created equally and it is important to understand the nuances associated with treating darker skin types. This review aims to provide clinical pearls and pitfalls when performing the following procedures in skin of color: chemical peels, microneedling, injectables (botulinum toxin and fillers), and laser treatments. These procedures have been demonstrated to be safe in skin of color as long as certain precautions are taken into consideration.
Asunto(s)
Hemangioma , Melanoma , Nevo de Células Epitelioides y Fusiformes , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Nevo de Células Epitelioides y Fusiformes/diagnóstico , Nevo de Células Epitelioides y Fusiformes/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoRESUMEN
Post-pemphigus acanthomas have been rarely discussed in the literature. A prior case series identified 47 cases of pemphigus vulgaris and 5 cases of pemphigus foliaceus, out of which 13 developed acanthomata as a part of the healing process. Additionally, a case report by Ohashi et al. reported similar recalcitrant lesions on the trunk of a patient with pemphigus foliaceus being treated with prednisolone, IVIG, plasma exchange, and cyclosporine. Some view post-pemphigus acanthomas as variants of hypertrophic pemphigus vulgaris, being difficult to diagnose when they present as only single lesions, with a clinical differential of an inflamed seborrheic keratosis or squamous cell carcinoma. Here, we present a case of a 52-year-old female with a history of pemphigus vulgaris and four months of only topical therapy (fluocinonide 0.05%) who presented with a painful, hyperkeratotic plaque on the right mid-back that was found to be a post-pemphigus acanthoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients' knowledge and understanding of biologic therapies outside traditional surveys. Here, we used social media data to examine IBD patients' understanding of the risks and benefits associated with biologic therapies and how this affects decision-making. METHODS: We collected posts from Twitter and e-forum discussions from >3000 social media sites posted between June 27, 2012 and June 27, 2015. Guided by natural language processing, we identified posts with specific IBD keywords that discussed the risks and/or benefits of biologics. We then manually coded the resulting posts and performed qualitative analysis using ATLAS.ti software. A hierarchical coding structure was developed based on the keyword list and relevant themes were identified through manual coding. RESULTS: We examined 1598 IBD-related posts, of which 452 (28.3%) centered on the risks and/or benefits of biologics. There were 5 main themes: negative experiences and concerns with biologics (n = 247; 54.6%), decision-making surrounding biologic use (n = 169; 37.4%), positive experiences with biologics (n = 168; 37.2%), information seeking from peers (n = 125; 27.7%), and cost (n = 38; 8.4%). Posts describing negative experiences primarily commented on side effects from biologics, concerns about potential side effects and increased cancer risk, and pregnancy safety concerns. Posts on decision-making focused on nonbiologic treatment options, hesitation to initiate biologics, and concerns about changing or discontinuing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Social media reveals a wide range of themes governing patients' experience and choice with IBD biologics. The complexity of navigating their risk-benefit profiles suggests merit in creating online tailored decision tools to support IBD patients' decision-making with biologic therapies.