RESUMEN
We retrospectively analyzed 1802 nonrectal Chlamydia trachomatis-positive specimens to determine if the L strains responsible for rectal Lymphogranuloma venereum in men who have sex with men could spread to the heterosexual population. No evidence for Lymphogranuloma venereum transmission among heterosexuals in France was observed in 2013. L2b strains seem to be restricted to the men who have sex with men population.
Asunto(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/microbiología , Proctitis/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Genitales/microbiología , Heterosexualidad , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/epidemiología , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/transmisión , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Especificidad de la Especie , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Worldwide, many infected individuals are unaware of their hepatitis B virus (HBV) status. We evaluated the effectiveness of HBV rapid testing in promoting linkage-to-care. METHODS: In 2012, volunteers were recruited from five Parisian centers. Participants were randomized 1 : 1 to receive standard serology (S) or rapid testing (VIKIA-HBsAg/Quick Profile anti-HBsAb) with confirmatory serology (R+S). The primary endpoint was percentage of individuals with appropriate linkage-to-care (nonimmunized individuals starting vaccination or HBsAg-positive individuals receiving medical evaluation). The secondary outcomes were percentage receiving HBV-test results and performance of HBV rapid tests. RESULTS: In total, 995 individuals were screened. Among the HBV-infection groups included in the primary endpoint (n=409), 20 (4.9%) received appropriate linkage-to-care, with no difference between S and R+S groups (5.7 vs. 4.1%, P=0.5). Two of eight HBsAg-positive participants had a medical visit (1/6 and 1/2 in the S and R+S groups, respectively) and 18/401 (4.5%) nonimmunized participants initiated HBV-vaccination (11/205 and 7/196). Factors that tended to be associated with linkage-to-care were female sex, birth country of high HBV prevalence, and extended medical stay. Test results were not obtained in 4.7% of participants, which was significantly higher in the S arm (P=0.02). Both sensitivity and specificity were 100% for the VIKIA-HBsAg rapid test and 94.4 and 80.8%, respectively, for the anti-HBsAb Quick Profile rapid test. CONCLUSION: Despite a higher proportion of participants obtaining their results in the R+S arm and better performance of anti-HBsAb rapid tests than described previously, we found no evidence that HBV screening based initially on rapid tests leads to increased HBV-vaccination rates or medical evaluation. This strategy should be evaluated in more hard-to-reach populations.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B/diagnóstico , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto , Femenino , Hepatitis B/inmunología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Hepatitis B/terapia , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paris , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In low hepatitis B virus (HBV)-prevalent countries, most HBV-infected persons are unaware of their status. We aimed to evaluate whether (i) previous HBV-testing, (ii) physicians decision to screen, and (iii) CDC's recommendations identified infected individuals and which risk-factor groups needing testing. METHODS: During a mass, multi-center HBV-screening study from September 2010-August 2011, 3929 participants were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HBs and anti-Hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBcAb). Questions on HBV risk-factors and testing practices were asked to participants, while participants' eligibility for HBV-testing was asked to study medical professionals. RESULTS: 85 (2.2%) participants were HBsAg-positive, while 659 (16.8%) had either resolved HBV infection or isolated anti-HBcAb. When comparing practices, HBV-testing was more likely to occur in HBV-infected participants if Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations were used (Sensitivityâ=â100%, 95%CI: 95.8-100) than physicians' discretion (Sensitivityâ=â87.1%, 95%CI: 78.0-93.4) or previous HBV-test (Sensitivityâ=â36.5%, 95%CI: 26.3-47.6) (p<0.0001). Nevertheless, many non-infected individuals would still have been screened using CDC-recommendations (Specificityâ=â31.1%, 95%CI: 29.6-32.6). Using multivariable logistic regression, HBsAg-positive status was significantly associated with the following: males, originating from high HBV-endemic region, contact with HBV-infected individual, without national healthcare, and intravenous-drug user (IDU). Of these risk-factors, physician's discretion for testing HBV was not significantly associated with participants' geographical origin or IDU. CONCLUSIONS: Missed opportunities of HBV-screening are largely due to underestimating country of origin as a risk-factor. Applying CDC-recommendations could improve HBV-screening, but with the disadvantage of many tests. Further development of HBV-testing strategies is necessary, especially before severe disease occurs.
Asunto(s)
Ciudades/epidemiología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatitis B/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Femenino , Hepatitis B/sangre , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the public health benefits of community-based, non-medicalized rapid HIV testing offers (CBOffer) specifically targeting men who have sex with men (MSM), compared with the standard medicalized HIV testing offer (SMOffer) in France. This study aimed to verify whether such a CBOffer, implemented in voluntary counselling and testing centres, could improve access to less recently HIV-tested MSM who present a risk behaviour profile similar to or higher than MSM tested with the SMOffer. METHOD: This multisite study enrolled MSM attending voluntary counselling and testing centres' during opening hours in the SMOffer. CBOffer enrolees voluntarily came to the centres outside of opening hours, following a communication campaign in gay venues. A self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate HIV testing history and sexual behaviours including inconsistent condom use and risk reduction behaviours (in particular, a score of "intentional avoidance" for various at-risk situations was calculated). A mixed logistic regression identified factors associated with access to the CBOffer. RESULTS: Among the 330 participants, 64% attended the CBOffer. Percentages of inconsistent condom use in both offers were similar (51% CBOffer, 50% SMOffer). In multivariate analyses, those attending the CBOffer had only one or no test in the previous two years, had a lower intentional avoidance score, and met more casual partners in saunas and backrooms than SMOffer enrolees. CONCLUSION: This specific rapid CBOffer attracted MSM less recently HIV-tested, who presented similar inconsistent condom use rates to SMOffer enrolees but who exposed themselves more to HIV-associated risks. Increasing entry points for HIV testing using community and non-medicalized tests is a priority to reach MSM who are still excluded.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual/fisiología , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The systematic use of rapid tests performed at points-of-care may facilitate hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening and substantially increase HBV infection awareness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of such tests for HBsAg and anti-HBsAb detection among individuals visiting a variety of healthcare centers located in a low HBV-prevalent area. METHODS: Three rapid tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) detection (VIKIA, Determine and Quick Profile) and one test for anti-hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBsAb) detection (Quick Profile) were evaluated in comparison to ELISA serology. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) and area under the ROC curve were used to estimate test performance. Non-inferiority criteria of the joint Se, Sp were set at 0.80, 0.95. RESULTS: Among the 3956 subjects screened, 85 (2.1%) were HBsAg-positive and 2225 (56.5%) had a protective anti-HBsAb titer. Test Se and Sp (lower bound of 97.5% CI) were as follows: 96.5% (89.0%), 99.9% (99.8%) for Vikia; 93.6% (80.7%), 100.0% (99.8%) for Determine; and 90.5% (80.8%), 99.7% (99.5%) for Quick Profile; with all three tests achieving minimal non-inferiority criteria. False negatives were typically observed in inactive HBsAg carriers. The anti-HBsAb Quick Profile test had excellent specificity (97.8%) and PPV (97.8%) albeit low sensitivity (58.3%), thus failing to establish non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: All three HBsAg rapid tests could be considered ideal for HBV screening in low HBV-prevalent countries, given the ease of use, rapidity, and high classification probabilities. The anti-HBsAb Quick Profile could be considered reliable only for positive tests.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis B/sangre , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Virus de la Hepatitis B/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Errores Diagnósticos , Francia , HumanosRESUMEN
In France, HIV testing can be easily performed in free and anonymous voluntary counselling testing (VCT) centres. The recent national study among French men who have sex with men (MSM) showed that 73% of those already tested for HIV had been tested in the previous two years. Nothing is known about the risk behaviours of MSM attending VCT centres. This study aimed to characterize sexual risk behaviours of MSM tested for HIV in such centres and identify factors associated with inconsistent condom use (ICU). A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to December 2009 in four VCT centres where a self-administered questionnaire was proposed to all MSM about to have a HIV test. ICU was defined as reporting non-systematic condom use during anal intercourse with casual male partners. Among the 287 MSM who fully completed their questionnaire, 44% reported ICU in the previous six months. Among those who had been already tested, 63% had had their test in the previous two years. Factors independently associated with ICU included: never avoiding one-night stands, not having been recently HIV tested, experiencing difficulty in using condoms when with a HIV negative partner or when under the influence of drugs or alcohol and finally, reporting to have had a large number of casual male partners in the previous six months. The rate of recently tested MSM was high in our study. Nevertheless, this rate was lower than that found in the last national study. Furthermore those not recently tested were significantly more likely to report high risk behaviours. We therefore recommend that further efforts be made to adapt the offer of both HIV testing and counselling to meet the specific needs of hard-to-reach MSM. Accordingly, an additional community-based offer of HIV testing to reach most-at-risk MSM is forthcoming in France.