RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Many but not all persons with bipolar disorder require hospital care because of severe mood episodes. Likewise, some but not all patients experience long-term occupational dysfunction that extends beyond acute mood episodes. It is not known whether these dissimilar outcomes of bipolar disorder are driven by different polygenic profiles. Here, polygenic scores (PGSs) for major psychiatric disorders and educational attainment were assessed for associations with occupational functioning and psychiatric hospital admissions in bipolar disorder. METHODS: A total of 4,782 patients with bipolar disorder and 2,963 control subjects were genotyped and linked to Swedish national registers. Longitudinal measures from at least 10 years of registry data were used to derive percentage of years without employment, percentage of years with long-term sick leave, and mean number of psychiatric hospital admissions per year. Ordinal regression was used to test associations between outcomes and PGSs for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and educational attainment. Replication analyses of hospital admissions were conducted with data from the Bipolar Disorder Research Network cohort (N=4,219). RESULTS: Long-term sick leave and unemployment in bipolar disorder were significantly associated with PGSs for schizophrenia, ADHD, major depressive disorder, and educational attainment, but not with the PGS for bipolar disorder. By contrast, the number of hospital admissions per year was associated with higher PGSs for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, but not with the other PGSs. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar disorder severity (indexed by hospital admissions) was associated with a different polygenic profile than long-term occupational dysfunction. These findings have clinical implications, suggesting that mitigating occupational dysfunction requires interventions other than those deployed to prevent mood episodes.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Herencia Multifactorial , Sistema de Registros , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Herencia Multifactorial/genética , Adulto , Suecia/epidemiología , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/genética , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Escolaridad , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/genética , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/genética , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios de Casos y ControlesRESUMEN
Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a complex disease. It is heterogeneous, both at the phenotypic and genetic level, although the extent and impact of this heterogeneity is not fully understood. One way to assess this heterogeneity is to look for patterns in the subphenotype data, identify a more phenotypically homogeneous set of subjects, and perform a genome-wide association-study (GWAS) and subsequent secondary analyses restricted to this homogeneous subset. Because of the variability in how phenotypic data was collected by the various BD studies over the years, homogenizing the phenotypic data is a challenging task, and so is replication. As members of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC), we have access to the raw genotypes of 18,711 BD cases and 29,738 controls. This amount of data makes it possible for us to set aside the intricacies of phenotype and allow the genetic data itself to determine which subjects define a homogeneous genetic subgroup. In this paper, we leverage recent advances in heterogeneity analysis to look for distinct homogeneous genetic BD subgroups (or biclusters) that manifest the broad phenotype we think of as Bipolar Disorder. As our data was generated by 27 studies and genotyped on a variety of platforms (OMEX, Affymetrix, Illumina), we use a biclustering algorithm capable of covariate-correction. Covariate-correction is critical if we wish to distinguish disease-related signals from those which are a byproduct of ancestry, study or genotyping platform. We rely on the raw genotyped data and do not include any data generated through imputation. We first apply this covariate-corrected biclustering algorithm to a cohort of 2524 BD cases and 4106 controls from the Bipolar Disease Research Network (BDRN: OMEX). We find evidence of genetic heterogeneity delineating a statistically significant bicluster comprising a subset of BD cases which exhibits a disease-specific pattern of differential-expression across a subset of SNPs. This pattern replicates across the remaining data-sets collected by the PGC containing 5781/8289 (OMEX), 3581/7591 (Illumina), and 6825/9752(Affymetrix) cases/controls, respectively. This bicluster includes subjects diagnosed with bipolar type-I, as well as subjects diagnosed with bipolar type-II. However, the bicluster is enriched for bipolar type-I over type-II and may represent a collection of correlated genetic risk-factors. By investigating the bicluster-informed polygenic-risk-scoring (PRS), we find that the disease-specific pattern highlighted by the bicluster can be leveraged to eliminate noise from our GWAS analyses and improve not only risk prediction, particularly when using only a relatively small subset (e.g., ~ 1%) of the available SNPs, but also SNP replication. Though our primary focus is only the analysis of disease-related signal, we also identify replicable control-related heterogeneity. Covariate-corrected biclustering of raw genetic data appears to be a promising route for untangling heterogeneity and identifying replicable homogeneous genetic subtypes of complex disease. It may also prove useful in identifying protective effects within the control group. This approach circumvents some of the difficulties presented by subphenotype data collected by meta-analyses or 23 andMe, e.g., missingness, assessment variation, and reliance on self-report.
RESUMEN
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a heritable mental illness with complex etiology. While the largest published genome-wide association study identified 64 BD risk loci, the causal SNPs and genes within these loci remain unknown. We applied a suite of statistical and functional fine-mapping methods to these loci, and prioritized 22 likely causal SNPs for BD. We mapped these SNPs to genes, and investigated their likely functional consequences by integrating variant annotations, brain cell-type epigenomic annotations, brain quantitative trait loci, and results from rare variant exome sequencing in BD. Convergent lines of evidence supported the roles of SCN2A, TRANK1, DCLK3, INSYN2B, SYNE1, THSD7A, CACNA1B, TUBBP5, PLCB3, PRDX5, KCNK4, AP001453.3, TRPT1, FKBP2, DNAJC4, RASGRP1, FURIN, FES, YWHAE, DPH1, GSDMB, MED24, THRA, EEF1A2, and KCNQ2 in BD. These represent promising candidates for functional experiments to understand biological mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Additionally, we demonstrated that fine-mapping effect sizes can improve performance and transferability of BD polygenic risk scores across ancestrally diverse populations, and present a high-throughput fine-mapping pipeline (https://github.com/mkoromina/SAFFARI).
RESUMEN
Bipolar disorder (BD) features heterogenous clinical presentation and course of illness. It remains unclear how subphenotypes associate with genetic loadings of BD and related psychiatric disorders. We investigated associations between the subphenotypes and polygenic risk scores (PRS) for BD, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder (MDD) in two BD cohorts from Sweden (N = 5180) and the UK (N = 2577). Participants were assessed through interviews and medical records for inter-episode remission, psychotic features during mood episodes, global assessment of functioning (GAF, function and symptom burden dimensions), and comorbid anxiety disorders. Meta-analyses based on both cohorts showed that inter-episode remission and GAF-function were positively correlated with BD-PRS but negatively correlated with schizophrenia-PRS (SCZ-PRS) and MDD-PRS. Moreover, BD-PRS was negatively, and MDD-PRS positively, associated with the risk of comorbid anxiety disorders. Finally, SCZ-PRS was positively associated with psychotic symptoms during mood episodes. Assuming a higher PRS of certain psychiatric disorders in cases with a positive family history, we further tested the associations between subphenotypes in index BD people and occurrence of BD, schizophrenia, or MDD in their relatives using Swedish national registries. BD patients with a relative diagnosed with BD had: (1) higher GAF and lower risk of comorbid anxiety than those with a relative diagnosed with schizophrenia or MDD, (2) lower risk of psychotic symptoms than those with a relative diagnosed with schizophrenia. Our findings shed light on the genetic underpinnings of the heterogeneity in clinical manifestations and course of illness in BD, which ultimately provide insights for developing personalized approaches to the diagnosis and treatment.
RESUMEN
This study aims to explore the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics of 30 women who committed filicide and compare them to those of 60 postpartum women who did not commit filicide, including 30 with severe postpartum mental illness and 30 without a known history of psychiatric disorders. Clinical assessment included a face-to-face interview with the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II Disorders. Information on socio-economic, medical, and personal factors was collected using the Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and organized in a clinical vignette and OPCRIT ratings. Consensus best-estimate diagnoses were made according to DSM-V criteria. Inference was conducted using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U rank test for continuous variables. Family history of violent death, psychotic symptoms (OR 8.3; CI 95% 2.26-36.13), severe insomnia (9.8; 2.28-61.75), and a schizophrenia spectrum or bipolar diathesis (4.8; 1.22-23.86) were associated with history of filicide. Rates of history of sexual abuse in childhood were higher in both the filicide and the severe postpartum mental illness groups compared to healthy controls (6.7; 1.25-70.46 and 7.8; 1.47; 80.47 respectively). Conversely, we did not observe any difference in the rates of history of sexual abuse in adulthood across groups. The lack of adequate postpartum psychiatric care was an important precipitating factor in many cases of infanticide and even late filicide. This study underscores the need for increasing awareness by health care professionals and the wider society of the complex dynamics and psychiatric risks associated with motherhood.
RESUMEN
Sleep problems are extremely common during the postpartum period. The role of sleep in the development of postpartum psychosis (PP) is, however, still under-researched. This narrative review aims to (1) provide a summary of the existing evidence for the associations between sleep problems and PP, (2) discuss the relevant risk factors associated with sleep problems and PP, and (3) suggest future lines of research in this area. Some of the existing literature suggests an association between sleep problems, specifically insomnia, sleep loss and sleep disruption during pregnancy and postpartum, and PP, with the most relevant risk factors including history of bipolar disorder and time of delivery. However, it is still unclear whether the previously mentioned sleep problems are a symptom of, or a trigger for PP. Thus, further research is needed to identify the specific role of sleep problems in PP, using longitudinal designs and more objective measures of sleep. This will allow appropriate detection, intervention and support for women experiencing and/or at risk for PP.
RESUMEN
It remains inconclusive whether postpartum depression (PPD) and depression with onset outside the postpartum period (MDD) are genetically distinct disorders. We aimed to investigate whether polygenic risk scores (PGSs) for major mental disorders differ between PPD cases and MDD cases in a nested case-control study of 50,057 women born from 1981 to 1997 in the iPSYCH2015 sample in Demark. We identified 333 women with first-onset postpartum depression (PPD group), who were matched with 993 women with first-onset depression diagnosed outside of postpartum (MDD group), and 999 female population controls. Data on genetics and depressive disorders were retrieved from neonatal biobanks and the Psychiatric Central Research Register. PGSs were calculated from both individual-level genetic data and meta-analysis summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR), accounting for the selection-related reproductive behavior. After adjustment for covariates, higher PGSs for severe mental disorders were associated with increased ORs of both PPD and MDD. Compared with MDD cases, MDD PGS and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder PGS were marginally but not statistically higher for PPD cases, with the OR of PPD versus MDD being 1.12 (95% CI: 0 .97-1.29) and 1.11 (0.97-1.27) per-standard deviation increase, respectively. The ORs of PPD versus MDD did not statistically differ by PGSs of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or autism spectrum disorder. Our findings suggest that relying on PGS data, there was no clear evidence of distinct genetic make-up of women with depression occurring during or outside postpartum, after taking the selection-related reproductive behavior into account.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Depresión Posparto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Femenino , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) that is more heritable, yet is understudied in psychiatric genetics. The authors conducted meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to investigate the genetic architecture of PPD. METHOD: Meta-analyses were conducted on 18 cohorts of European ancestry (17,339 PPD cases and 53,426 controls), one cohort of East Asian ancestry (975 cases and 3,780 controls), and one cohort of African ancestry (456 cases and 1,255 controls), totaling 18,770 PPD cases and 58,461 controls. Post-GWAS analyses included 1) single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based heritability ([Formula: see text]), 2) genetic correlations between PPD and other phenotypes, and 3) enrichment of the PPD GWAS findings in 27 human tissues and 265 cell types from the mouse central and peripheral nervous system. RESULTS: No SNP achieved genome-wide significance in the European or the trans-ancestry meta-analyses. The [Formula: see text] of PPD was 0.14 (SE=0.02). Significant genetic correlations were estimated for PPD with MDD, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, insomnia, age at menarche, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Cell-type enrichment analyses implicate inhibitory neurons in the thalamus and cholinergic neurons within septal nuclei of the hypothalamus, a pattern that differs from MDD. CONCLUSIONS: While more samples are needed to reach genome-wide levels of significance, the results presented confirm PPD as a polygenic and heritable phenotype. There is also evidence that despite a high correlation with MDD, PPD may have unique genetic components. Cell enrichment results suggest GABAergic neurons, which converge on a common mechanism with the only medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for PPD (brexanolone).
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Depresión Posparto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Femenino , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Depresión Posparto/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genéticaAsunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Periodo PospartoRESUMEN
Postpartum psychosis is a psychiatric emergency that is currently not represented in diagnostic systems, to the detriment of people with lived experience. Engaging with stakeholders offers an important avenue to improve clinical practice and make research more impactful, by providing perspectives based on first-hand, expert experience. There is a paucity of reports on stakeholders' engagement in psychiatry. Activities have thus far been limited to Western countries and there are few reports on postpartum psychosis. We report the results of public involvement activities (in the form of discussion groups) with key stakeholders in India, Malawi and the UK. These discussions centred around the clinical picture of postpartum psychosis and the terminologies used to describe these episodes. Seven major areas were highlighted: how postpartum psychosis is handled within services, common symptoms and characteristics, impact of episode, barriers to care, non-medical approaches, terminology and research areas of interest. According to the discussions, postpartum psychosis presents similarly across countries, although there are differences in access to services, approaches to mental health and terminologies used within and across countries. With this understanding comes the foundation for cross-cultural assessment, service improvement and a stakeholder-informed research agenda.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría , Trastornos Psicóticos , Trastornos Puerperales , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Salud Mental , Periodo PospartoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current definitions and clinical heterogeneity in bipolar disorder are major concerns as they obstruct aetiological research and impede drug development. Therefore, stratification of bipolar disorder is a high priority. To inform stratification, our analysis aimed to examine the patterns and relationships between polygenic liability for bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia with multidimensional symptom representations of bipolar disorder. METHODS: In this analysis, data from the UK Bipolar Disorder Research Network (BDRN) were assessed with the Operational Checklist for Psychotic Disorders. Individuals with bipolar disorder as defined in DSM-IV, of European ancestry (self-reported), aged 18 years or older at time of interview, living in the UK, and registered with the BDRN were eligible for inclusion. Psychopathological variables obtained via interview by trained research psychologists or psychiatrists and psychiatric case notes were used to identify statistically distinct symptom dimensions, calibrated with exploratory factor analysis and validated with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA was extended to include three polygenic risk scores (PRSs) indexing liability for bipolar disorder, MDD, and schizophrenia in a multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) structural equation model to estimate PRS relationships with symptom dimensions. FINDINGS: Of 4198 individuals potentially eligible for inclusion, 4148 (2804 [67·6%] female individuals and 1344 [32·4%] male individuals) with a mean age at interview of 45 years (SD 12·03) were available for analysis. Three reliable dimensions (mania, depression, and psychosis) were identified. The MIMIC model fitted the data well (root mean square error of approximation 0·021, 90% CI 0·019-0·023; comparative fit index 0·99) and suggests statistically distinct symptom dimensions also have distinct polygenic profiles. The PRS for MDD was strongly associated with the depression dimension (standardised ß 0·125, 95% CI 0·080-0·171) and the PRS for schizophrenia was strongly associated with the psychosis dimension (0·108, 0·082-0·175). For the mania dimension, the PRS for bipolar disorder was weakly associated (0·050, 0·002-0·097). INTERPRETATION: Our findings support the hypothesis that genetic heterogeneity underpins clinical heterogeneity, suggesting that different symptom dimensions within bipolar disorder have partly distinct causes. Furthermore, our results suggest that a specific symptom dimension has a similar cause regardless of the primary psychiatric diagnosis, supporting the use of symptom dimensions in precision psychiatry. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust and UK Medical Research Council.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/genética , Manía , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Reino Unido , Herencia Multifactorial/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genéticaRESUMEN
Our paper describes the process of creating a stakeholder group for service development and research in Postpartum Psychosis (PP) at a Perinatal Psychiatry Service in India. We involved women who have recovered from PP as `experts by experience' in identifying areas that need attention from a research and service perspectives. A total of 13 group meetings were conducted, in which 9 group meetings involved women with lived experiences of PP and 4 group meetings were with the family members involved in the care of women during the PP episode. Of the 58 participants, 23 women and two family members expressed their willingness to participate in future stakeholder meetings. Involvement of women with PP and their caregivers as stakeholders in mental health decision-making appears feasible in a LMIC setting and should be encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría , Trastornos Psicóticos , Trastornos Puerperales , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Trastornos Puerperales/terapia , Trastornos Puerperales/psicología , Salud Mental , Periodo PospartoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women with bipolar disorder have approximately 40 %-50 % chance of having a perinatal bipolar recurrence. Knowing the factors associated will be beneficial for the prediction and prevention of episodes. We aim to establish if borderline personality disorder traits, as measured by the BEST (Borderline Evaluation of Severity over Time) scale, are associated with perinatal psychiatric outcomes. METHODS: We recruited women with bipolar disorder as part of the BDRN (Bipolar Disorder Research Network) study. Women were interviewed and we collected their demographic and clinical information. Participants subsequently completed the BEST questionnaire. We analysed the association of BEST scores with lifetime presence/absence of perinatal bipolar relapse and, employing multinomial logistic regression, with different subtypes of perinatal outcomes: postpartum psychosis; postpartum depression, and other episodes. RESULTS: In our sample of 807, although there was no significant association between the BEST total score and perinatal episodes as a whole (adjustedOR 1.01 CI95% [0.99, 1.03], p = 0.204), we found significant differing associations with different subtypes of episodes. Women scoring highly on BEST were less likely to experience a postpartum psychotic episode (RRR 0.96 CI95% [0.94, 0.99], p = 0.005) but more likely to experience a non-psychotic depressive episode (RRR 1.03 CI95% [1.01, 1.05], p = 0.007) than no relapse. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its cross-sectional design and self-report nature of BEST. CONCLUSIONS: In women with bipolar disorder, borderline traits differentiate the risk of postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis, emphasise the importance of considering risk factors for these perinatal episodes separately, and may help individualise the risk for women in the perinatal period.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Depresión Posparto , Trastornos Psicóticos , Trastornos Puerperales , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Trastornos Puerperales/psicología , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Recurrencia , PersonalidadRESUMEN
Importance: Understanding the origins of clinical heterogeneity in bipolar disorder (BD) will inform new approaches to stratification and studies of underlying mechanisms. Objective: To identify components of genetic liability that are shared between BD, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder (MDD) and those that differentiate each disorder from the others and to examine associations between heterogeneity for key BD symptoms and each component. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using data from the Bipolar Disorder Research Network in the United Kingdom, components of liability were identified by applying genomic structural equation modeling to genome-wide association studies of schizophrenia, BD, and MDD. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) representing each component were tested for association with symptoms in an independent BD data set. Adults with DSM-IV BD or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, were included. Data were collected from January 2000 to December 2013, and data were analyzed from June 2020 to February 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: PRS representing the components of liability were tested for association with mania and depression, psychosis, and mood incongruence of psychosis in participants with BD, measured using the Bipolar Affective Disorder Dimensional Scale. Results: Of 4429 included participants, 3012 (68.0%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 46.2 (12.3) years. Mania and psychosis were associated with the shared liability component (mania ß = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.23-0.34; P = 3.04 × 10-25; psychosis ß = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.04-0.07; P = 2.33 × 10-13) and the components that differentiate each of schizophrenia (mania ß = 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.14; P = .002; psychosis ß = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.04; P = 1.0 × 10-4) and BD (mania ß = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.20; P = 1.99 × 10-7; psychosis ß = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.03; P = .006) from the other disorders. The BD differentiating component was associated with mania independently of effects on psychosis (ß = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.20; P = 4.32 × 10-6) but not with psychosis independently of mania. Conversely, the schizophrenia differentiating component was associated with psychosis independently of effects on mania (ß = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.003-0.03; P = .02), but not with mania independently of psychosis. Mood incongruence of psychosis was associated only with the schizophrenia differentiating component (ß = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05; P = .005). Depression was associated with higher MDD differentiating component (ß = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.12; P = .01) but lower BD differentiating component (ß = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.06; P = 7.06 × 10-5). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of BD, clinical heterogeneity reflected the burden of liability to BD and the contribution of alleles that have differentiating effects on risk for other disorders; mania, psychosis, and depression were associated with the components of genetic liability differentiating BD, MDD, and schizophrenia, respectively. Understanding the basis of this etiological heterogeneity will be critical for identifying the different pathophysiological processes underlying BD, stratifying patients, and developing precision therapeutics.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Esquizofrenia , Adulto , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/genética , Femenino , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Humanos , Masculino , Manía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/genéticaRESUMEN
We report results from the Bipolar Exome (BipEx) collaboration analysis of whole-exome sequencing of 13,933 patients with bipolar disorder (BD) matched with 14,422 controls. We find an excess of ultra-rare protein-truncating variants (PTVs) in patients with BD among genes under strong evolutionary constraint in both major BD subtypes. We find enrichment of ultra-rare PTVs within genes implicated from a recent schizophrenia exome meta-analysis (SCHEMA; 24,248 cases and 97,322 controls) and among binding targets of CHD8. Genes implicated from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of BD, however, are not significantly enriched for ultra-rare PTVs. Combining gene-level results with SCHEMA, AKAP11 emerges as a definitive risk gene (odds ratio (OR) = 7.06, P = 2.83 × 10-9). At the protein level, AKAP-11 interacts with GSK3B, the hypothesized target of lithium, a primary treatment for BD. Our results lend support to BD's polygenicity, demonstrating a role for rare coding variation as a significant risk factor in BD etiology.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Esquizofrenia , Proteínas de Anclaje a la Quinasa A/genética , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Exoma/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/genética , Secuenciación del ExomaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Many studies have examined the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of the public, but few have focused on individuals with existing severe mental illness with longitudinal data before and during the pandemic. AIMS: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of people with bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: In an ongoing study of people with BD who used an online mood monitoring tool, True Colours, 356 participants provided weekly data on their mental health. Symptoms of depression, mania, insomnia, and suicidal thoughts were compared in 2019 and 2020. From May 2020, participants also provided weekly data on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety, coping strategies, access to care, and medications. RESULTS: On average, symptoms of depression, mania, insomnia, and suicidal thoughts did not significantly differ in 2020 compared to 2019, but there was evidence of heterogeneity. There were high rates of anxiety about the pandemic and its impact on coping strategies, which increased to over 70% of responders in January 2021. A significant proportion of participants reported difficulty accessing routine care (27%) and medications (21%). CONCLUSIONS: Although mood symptoms did not significantly increase during the pandemic overall, we observed heterogeneity among our BD sample and other impacted areas. Individuals' unique histories and psychosocial circumstances are key and should be explored in future qualitative studies. The significant impacts of the pandemic may take time to manifest, particularly among those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, highlighting the need for further long-term prospective studies.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , COVID-19 , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Depresión , Humanos , Manía , Salud Mental , Pandemias , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For more than 150 years, controversy over the status of post-partum psychosis has hindered research and caused considerable confusion for clinicians and women, with potentially negative consequences. We aimed to explore the hypothesis that genetic vulnerability differs between women with first-onset post-partum psychosis and those with bipolar disorder more generally. METHODS: In this case-control study on first-onset post-partum psychosis and bipolar disorder in the UK, we included 203 women with first-onset post-partum psychosis (defined as a manic, mixed, or psychotic depression episode within 6 weeks of delivery without a psychiatric history) and 1225 parous women with a history of bipolar disorder. Information on women with bipolar disorder was obtained from the Bipolar Disorder Research Network database, and participants were recruited through screening community mental health teams across the UK and via the media and patient support organisations. All were assessed using a semistructured face-to-face psychiatric interview and psychiatric case note review. 2809 women from the general population were recruited via the national UK Blood Services and the 1958 Birth Cohort (UK National Child Development Study) as controls and matched to cases according to genetic ancestry. All self-reported their ethnicity as White and were recruited from across the UK. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were generated from discovery genome-wide association studies of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression. Logistic regression was used to model the effect of each PRS on diagnosis, and the RRs and ORs presented were adjusted for ten principal components of genetic variation to account for population stratification. FINDINGS: 203 women with first-onset post-partum psychosis (median age at interview: 46 years [IQR 37-55]) and 1225 women with bipolar disorder (49 years [41-58]) were recruited between September, 1991, and May, 2013, as well as 2809 controls. Women with first-onset post-partum psychosis had similar bipolar disorder and schizophrenia PRSs to women with bipolar disorder, which were significantly higher than those of controls. When compared with controls, women with first-onset post-partum psychosis had an adjusted relative risk ratio (RR) for bipolar disorder PRSs of 1·71 (95% CI 1·56-1·86, p<0·0001) and for schizophrenia PRSs of 1·82 (1·66-1·97, p<0·0001). The effect sizes were similar when comparing women with bipolar disorder to controls (adjusted RR 1·77 [1·69-1·84], p<0·0001 for bipolar disorder PRSs; 2·00 (1·92-2·08), p<0·0001 for schizophrenia PRSs). Although women with bipolar disorder also had higher major depression PRSs than did controls (1·24 [1·17-1·31], p<0·0001), women with first-onset post-partum psychosis did not differ from controls in their polygenic liability to major depression (0·97 (0·82-1·11), p=0·63). INTERPRETATION: Our study supports the recognition of first-onset post-partum psychosis as a separate nosological entity within the bipolar disorder spectrum both in research and clinical settings. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Trastornos Psicóticos/genética , Trastornos Puerperales/genética , Adulto , Trastorno Bipolar/complicaciones , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Herencia Multifactorial , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastornos Puerperales/epidemiología , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Importance: Schizophrenia is a clinically heterogeneous disorder. It is currently unclear how variability in symptom dimensions and cognitive ability is associated with genetic liability for schizophrenia. Objective: To determine whether phenotypic dimensions within schizophrenia are associated with genetic liability to schizophrenia, other neuropsychiatric disorders, and intelligence. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a genetic association study, 3 cross-sectional samples of 1220 individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were recruited from community, inpatient, and voluntary sector mental health services across the UK. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to create phenotypic dimensions from lifetime ratings of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery. Analyses of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were used to assess whether genetic liability to schizophrenia, other neuropsychiatric disorders, and intelligence were associated with these phenotypic dimensions. Data collection for the cross-sectional studies occurred between 1993 and 2016. Data analysis for this study occurred between January 2019 and March 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome measures included phenotypic dimensions defined from confirmatory factor analysis relating to positive symptoms, negative symptoms of diminished expressivity, negative symptoms of motivation and pleasure, disorganized symptoms, and current cognitive ability. Exposure measures included PRSs for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and intelligence. Results: Of the 1220 study participants, 817 were men (67.0%). Participants' mean (SD) age at interview was 43.10 (12.74) years. Schizophrenia PRS was associated with increased disorganized symptom dimension scores in both a 5-factor model (ß = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.22; P = 2.80 × 10-4) and a 3-factor model across all samples (ß = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05-0.15; P = 2.80 × 10-4). Current cognitive ability was associated with genetic liability to schizophrenia (ß = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.04; P = 1.63 × 10-3) and intelligence (ß = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.16-0.30; P = 1.52 × 10-10). After controlling for estimated premorbid IQ, current cognitive performance was associated with schizophrenia PRS (ß = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.02; P = 8.50 × 10-3) but not intelligence PRS. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that genetic liability for schizophrenia is associated with higher disorganized dimension scores but not other symptom dimensions. Cognitive performance in schizophrenia appears to reflect distinct contributions from genetic liabilities to both intelligence and schizophrenia.