Lower Weight-Based Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing is Associated with Superior Outcomes after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplant with Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is commonly included in post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). In the non-PTCy setting, higher MMF dose/kg has been shown to reduce rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). When used in conjunction with PTCy, MMF is dosed at 15 mg/kg three times daily up to a maximum dose of 3 g/day. Thus, patients who weigh ≥67 kg receive 3 g/day and a variable dose/kg of MMF. We investigated the impact of MMF dose/kg on clinical outcomes following haploidentical PBSCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. All consecutive adult patients with hematologic malignancies receiving haploidentical T cell replete peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) with PTCy/MMF and either tacrolimus or sirolimus at the Moffitt Cancer Center or City of Hope between April 2014-August 2020 were included. For analyses, MMF dose relative to patient actual body weight (mg/kg/day), was stratified into categories of low (<29 mg/kg/day), low intermediate (29-34 mg/kg/day), high intermediate (35-41 mg/kg/day), and high (>41 mg/kg/day). Three hundred eighty-six patients were included. Of these, 54 patients received low dose, 73 low intermediate, 137 high intermediate and 122 high dose MMF by relative weight exposure. In multivariate analysis, low MMF dose exposure was associated with reduced rates of relapse in comparison to the high dose group (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.94, P = .03). This led to superior PFS among patients with low compared to high MMF dose exposure (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.99, P = .045). MMF relative dose exposure was not associated with engraftment, GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, or OS. In this study of patients receiving haploidentical PBSCT with PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis, low MMF dose/kg was associated with improved rates of relapse and PFS. Future prospective studies should investigate optimal dosing strategies of MMF when given with the PTCy regimen.

Outcomes of CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Patients with Reduced Renal Function Including Dialysis.

Patients with renal impairment (RI) are typically excluded from trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. We evaluated the outcomes of patients with RI receiving standard of care (SOC) CAR T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) after 2 or more prior lines of therapy, renal and survival outcomes were compared based on RI and fludarabine dose reduction (DR) status. RI was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as determined by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation using day -5 creatinine (Cr) values. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was identified and graded using standard Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Renal recovery was considered to occur if Cr was within .2 mg/mL of baseline by day +30. Fludarabine was considered DR if given at <90% of the recommended Food and Drug Administration label dose. Among 166 patients treated with CAR T cell therapy were 17 patients (10.2%) with baseline RI and 149 (89.8%) without RI. After CAR T cell infusion, the incidence of any grade AKI was not significantly different between patients with baseline RI and those without RI (42% versus 21%; P = .08). Similarly, severe grade 2/3 AKI was seen in 1 of 17 patients (5.8%) with baseline RI and in 11 of 149 patients (7.3%) without RI (P = 1). Decreased renal perfusion (28 of 39; 72%) was the most common cause of AKI, with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) contributing to 17 of 39 AKIs (44%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients with RI and those without RI or between those who received standard-dose fludarabine and those who received reduced-dose fludarabine. In contrast, patients with AKI had worse clinical outcomes than those without AKI (multivariable PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.7; OS: HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.4). Notably, peak inflammatory cytokine levels were higher in patients who experienced AKI. Finally, we describe 2 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis who received lymphodepletion and CAR T cell therapy. Baseline renal function did not affect renal or efficacy outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in DLBCL. On the other hand, patients with AKI went on to experience worse clinical outcomes. AKI was commonly related to CRS and high peak inflammatory cytokine levels. CAR T cell therapy is feasible in patients with ESRD and requires careful planning of lymphodepletion.

Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease: Emerging Insights and Updates into Detection, Prevention, and Treatment.

Acute graft-versus-host disease remains a devastating complication following hematopoietic cell transplantation, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Vast research efforts continue to refine or develop new means of prediction, assessment, prevention, and treatment of this syndrome. Recent updates in acute graft-versus-host disease include more definitive guidance and definitions for its grading and diagnosis. Biomarker use is being incorporated into early stages following hematopoietic cell transplantation to aid in the detection and prediction of long-term outcomes. New preventive strategies under investigation include the use of vedolizumab or tocilizumab as upfront prophylaxis. Finally, although steroids remain the backbone of therapy once treatment is warranted, the efficacy of several agents including vedolizumab, tocilizumab, ruxolitinib, and α1 antitrypsin are being evaluated as potential therapeutic options.

Reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan confers similar survival to busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative regimens for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia.

Optimal conditioning chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains uncertain. Myeloablative regimens such as fludarabine/busulfan are favored over reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel); however, it is not known if Flu/Mel is inferior. We analyzed hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with AML and MDS who received fludarabine with once-daily intravenous busulfan targeted to either area under the curve (AUC) 5300 µM*L/min (Flu/Bu 5300) (n = 246) or AUC 3500 µM*L/min (Flu/Bu 3500) (n = 81), or Flu/Mel (n = 69). Flu/Bu regimens were compared separately to Flu/Mel. After 2-year follow-up, no differences in overall or relapse-free survival were found between Flu/Bu 5300 or 3500 versus Flu/Mel though relapse rates were significantly higher; 33.1% (p = 0.024), 44.6% (p = 0.002), versus 19.4%, respectively. Flu/Bu 5300 (p = 0.008) and Flu/Bu 3500 (p < 0.001) groups were prognostic for relapse compared to Flu/Mel. Flu/Mel yields lower relapse rates and similar survival benefit when compared to Flu/Bu 3500 or 5300 µM*L/min.