Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(4): 320-5, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25707341

RESUMEN

This study aimed to determine the impact of preoperative staging on the treatment of clinical T2N0 (cT2N0) esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. We reviewed a retrospective cohort of 27 patients treated at a single institution between 1999 and 2011. Clinical staging was performed with computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound. Patients were separated into two groups: neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (NEOSURG) and surgery alone (SURG). There were 11 patients (41%) in the NEOSURG group and 16 patients (59%) in the SURG group. In the NEOSURG group, three of 11 patients (27%) had a pathological complete response and eight (73%) were partial or nonresponders after neoadjuvant therapy. In the SURG group, nine of 16 patients (56%) were understaged, 6 (38%) were overstaged, and 1 (6%) was correctly staged. In the entire cohort, despite being clinically node negative, 14 of 27 patients (52%) had node-positive disease (5/11 [45%] in the NEOSURG group, and 9/16 [56%] in the SURG group). Overall survival rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.96). Many cT2N0 patients are clinically understaged and show no preoperative evidence of node-positive disease. Consequently, neoadjuvant therapy may have a beneficial role in treatment.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Esofagectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Periodo Preoperatorio , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Dis Esophagus ; 23(2): 136-44, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19515189

RESUMEN

Controversy exists regarding optimal treatment practices for esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy has received focus as one of the index procedures for both hospital and surgical quality despite a relative paucity of controlled trials to define best practices. A survey was created to determine the degree of heterogeneity in the treatment of esophageal cancer among a diverse group of surgeons and to use high-volume (HV) (>/=15 cases/year) and low-volume (LV) (<15 cases/year) designations to discern specific differences in the management of esophageal cancer from the surgeon's perspective. Based on society rosters, surgeons (n = 4000) in the USA and 15 countries were contacted via mail and queried regarding their treatment practices for esophageal cancer using a 50-item survey instrument addressing demographics, utilization of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and choice of surgical approach for esophageal resection and palliation. There were 618 esophageal surgeons among respondents (n = 1447), of which 77 (12.5%) were considered HV. The majority of HV surgeons (87%) practiced in an academic setting and had cardiothoracic training, while most LV surgeons were general surgeons in private practice (52.3%). Both HV and LV surgeons favored the hand-sewn cervical anastomosis and the stomach conduit. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is performed more frequently by HV surgeons when compared with LV surgeons (P = 0.045). Most HV surgeons use neoadjuvant therapy for patients with nodal involvement, while LV surgeons are more likely to leave the decision to the oncologist. With a few notable exceptions, substantial heterogeneity exists among surgeons' management strategies for esophageal cancer, particularly when grouped and analyzed by case volume. These results highlight the need for controlled trials to determine best practices in the treatment of this complex patient population.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Stents/estadística & datos numéricos , Grapado Quirúrgico/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Sutura/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 12(7): 1177-84, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18470572

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: For patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer, diagnostic laparoscopy may identify liver and peritoneal metastases that are difficult to detect with other staging modalities. The aim of this study was to utilize a population-based pancreatic cancer database to assess the cost effectiveness of preoperative laparoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from a state cancer registry were linked with primary medical record data for years 1996-2003. De-identified patient records were reviewed to determine the role and findings of laparoscopic exploration. Average hospital and physician charges for laparotomy, biliary bypass, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and laparoscopy were determined by review of billing data from our institution and Medicare data for fiscal years 2005-2006. Cost-effectiveness was determined by comparing three methods of utilization of laparoscopy: (1) routine (all patients), (2) case-specific, and (3) no utilization. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 298 potentially resectable patients, 86 underwent laparoscopy. The prevalence of unresectable disease was 14.1% diagnosed at either laparotomy or laparoscopy. The mean charge per patient for routine, case-specific, and no utilization of laparoscopy was $91,805, $90,888, and $93,134, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cost analysis indicates that the case-specific or routine use of laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer does not add significantly to the overall expense of treatment and supports the use of laparoscopy in patients with known or suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Laparoscopía/economía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/economía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/economía , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Oregon , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/economía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios/economía , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Dis Esophagus ; 21(5): 416-21, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19125795

RESUMEN

Evidence suggests that patients with psychiatric illnesses may be more likely to experience a delay in diagnosis of coexisting cancer. The association between psychiatric illness and timely diagnosis and survival in patients with esophageal cancer has not been studied. The specific aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the impact of coexisting psychiatric illness on time to diagnosis, disease stage and survival in patients with esophageal cancer. All patients with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer between 1989 and 2003 at the Portland Veteran's Administration hospital were identified by ICD-9 code. One hundred and sixty patients were identified: 52 patients had one or more DSM-IV diagnoses, and 108 patients had no DSM-IV diagnosis. Electronic charts were reviewed beginning from the first recorded encounter for all patients and clinical and demographic data were collected. The association between psychiatric illness and time to diagnosis of esophageal cancer and survival was studied using Cox proportional hazard models. Groups were similar in age, ethnicity, body mass index, and history of tobacco and alcohol use. Psychiatric illness was associated with delayed diagnosis (median time from alarm symptoms to diagnosis 90 days vs. 35 days in patients with and without psychiatric illness, respectively, P < 0.001) and the presence of advanced disease at the time of diagnosis (37% vs. 18% of patients with and without psychiatric illness, respectively, P= 0.009). In multivariate analysis, psychiatric illness and depression were independent predictors for delayed diagnosis (hazard ratios 0.605 and 0.622, respectively, hazard ratio < 1 indicating longer time to diagnosis). Dementia was an independent risk factor for worse survival (hazard ratio 2.984). Finally, psychiatric illness was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving surgical therapy. Psychiatric illness is a risk factor for delayed diagnosis, a diagnosis of advanced cancer, and a lower likelihood of receiving surgical therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Dementia is associated with worse survival in these patients. These findings emphasize the importance of prompt evaluation of foregut symptoms in patients with psychiatric illness.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Surg Endosc ; 21(9): 1593-9, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17294310

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a major cause of liver disease in morbidly obese patients. Clinical predictors of NASH remain elusive, as do molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis. METHODS: A series of 35 morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery had a liver biopsy performed for standard histologic analysis. In addition, RNA was obtained from liver tissue and analyzed for leptin receptor gene expression. Regression analysis was used to correlate clinical variables, including serum leptin levels and hepatic leptin receptor gene expression, with the presence of histologically confirmed NASH. RESULTS: Of the 35 subjects enrolled, 29% had steatosis only, 60% had NASH, and 11% had normal liver histology. Among the clinical variables studied, only diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of NASH. There was a trend toward lower levels of mRNA encoding the long form of the leptin receptor in hepatic tissue from patients with NASH compared to those with steatosis only. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of NASH in obese patients. Downregulation of hepatic leptin receptor may play a role in the pathogenesis of NASH.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Hígado Graso/diagnóstico , Leptina/sangre , Hígado/metabolismo , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Receptores de Superficie Celular/metabolismo , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Hígado Graso/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/metabolismo , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Receptores de Superficie Celular/genética , Receptores de Leptina , Factores de Riesgo , Transcripción Genética
6.
Surg Endosc ; 19(7): 967-73, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15920680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine the national proportions and mortality rate for bile duct injuries resulting from laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) that required operative reconstruction for repair over a 10-year period and to investigate the major factors associated with the mortality rate in this group of patients. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of >7 million patient records per year, we extracted and analyzed data for LC during the years 1990-2000. Procedures that involved biliary reconstructions performed as part of another primary procedure were excluded. Using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), we used procedure-specific codes that enabled us to calculate national estimates for LC for the time period under review. We then calculated biliary reconstruction procedures that occurred after LC for this cohort of patients. Finally, we analyzed in-hospital mortality, as well as the patient, institutional, and outcome characteristics associated with biliary reconstructions. RESULTS: The percentage of cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically has increased over the years for which data are available (from 52% in 1991 to 75% in 2000). Despite this increase, the mortality rate for this group of patients has remained consistently low over the study period (mean, 0.45%; range 0.33-0.58%). Within this group of patients, the average rate of bile duct injuries requiring operative repair was 0.15% for the years under study. The reconstruction rates ranged from 0.25% in 1992 to 0.09% in 1999. For 2000, the most recent year for which data are available, biliary reconstruction was performed in 0.10% of all patients who underwent LC. The average mortality rate for patients undergoing biliary reconstruction for the years 1991 to 2000 was 4.5%. After multivariate analysis, age, African American ethnicity, type of admission, source of admission, and hospital location, and teaching status were all found to correlate significantly with death after-biliary reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: These data show an increase in the percentage of cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically over the years under study and an associated low mortality rate. In contrast, although the number of bile duct injuries appears to be decreasing, these procedures continue to be associated with a significant mortality rate.


Asunto(s)
Conductos Biliares/lesiones , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colecistitis/cirugía , Colelitiasis/cirugía , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA