Improving image quality of sparse-view lung tumor CT images with U-Net.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to improve the image quality (IQ) of sparse-view computed tomography (CT) images using a U-Net for lung metastasis detection and determine the best tradeoff between number of views, IQ, and diagnostic confidence. METHODS: CT images from 41 subjects aged 62.8 ± 10.6 years (mean ± standard deviation, 23 men), 34 with lung metastasis, 7 healthy, were retrospectively selected (2016-2018) and forward projected onto 2,048-view sinograms. Six corresponding sparse-view CT data subsets at varying levels of undersampling were reconstructed from sinograms using filtered backprojection with 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 views. A dual-frame U-Net was trained and evaluated for each subsampling level on 8,658 images from 22 diseased subjects. A representative image per scan was selected from 19 subjects (12 diseased, 7 healthy) for a single-blinded multireader study. These slices, for all levels of subsampling, with and without U-Net postprocessing, were presented to three readers. IQ and diagnostic confidence were ranked using predefined scales. Subjective nodule segmentation was evaluated using sensitivity and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); clustered Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. RESULTS: The 64-projection sparse-view images resulted in 0.89 sensitivity and 0.81 DSC, while their counterparts, postprocessed with the U-Net, had improved metrics (0.94 sensitivity and 0.85 DSC) (p = 0.400). Fewer views led to insufficient IQ for diagnosis. For increased views, no substantial discrepancies were noted between sparse-view and postprocessed images. CONCLUSIONS: Projection views can be reduced from 2,048 to 64 while maintaining IQ and the confidence of the radiologists on a satisfactory level. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our reader study demonstrates the benefit of U-Net postprocessing for regular CT screenings of patients with lung metastasis to increase the IQ and diagnostic confidence while reducing the dose. KEY POINTS: • Sparse-projection-view streak artifacts reduce the quality and usability of sparse-view CT images. • U-Net-based postprocessing removes sparse-view artifacts while maintaining diagnostically accurate IQ. • Postprocessed sparse-view CTs drastically increase radiologists' confidence in diagnosing lung metastasis.

Improving Automated Hemorrhage Detection at Sparse-View CT via U-Net-based Artifact Reduction.

Purpose To explore the potential benefits of deep learning-based artifact reduction in sparse-view cranial CT scans and its impact on automated hemorrhage detection. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a U-Net was trained for artifact reduction on simulated sparse-view cranial CT scans in 3000 patients, obtained from a public dataset and reconstructed with varying sparse-view levels. Additionally, EfficientNet-B2 was trained on full-view CT data from 17 545 patients for automated hemorrhage detection. Detection performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with differences assessed using the DeLong test, along with confusion matrices. A total variation (TV) postprocessing approach, commonly applied to sparse-view CT, served as the basis for comparison. A Bonferroni-corrected significance level of .001/6 = .00017 was used to accommodate for multiple hypotheses testing. Results Images with U-Net postprocessing were better than unprocessed and TV-processed images with respect to image quality and automated hemorrhage detection. With U-Net postprocessing, the number of views could be reduced from 4096 (AUC: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]) to 512 (0.97 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98], P < .00017) and to 256 views (0.97 [95% CI: 0.96, 0.97], P < .00017) with a minimal decrease in hemorrhage detection performance. This was accompanied by mean structural similarity index measure increases of 0.0210 (95% CI: 0.0210, 0.0211) and 0.0560 (95% CI: 0.0559, 0.0560) relative to unprocessed images. Conclusion U-Net-based artifact reduction substantially enhanced automated hemorrhage detection in sparse-view cranial CT scans. Keywords: CT, Head/Neck, Hemorrhage, Diagnosis, Supervised Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.