Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 68(1): 10-15, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460757

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is recommended in high risk populations based on local conditions. Differences in lifestyle and risk factors between countries with different income status make risk stratification based on geographic location necessary. The majority of epidemiological studies on AAA have reported data from high income countries. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and risk factors for AAA in an upper middle income country in Eastern Europe. METHODS: A pilot screening project for AAA, supported by a mass media campaign, was conducted in 2023 in seven cities in Serbia. Ultrasound evaluation of the abdominal aorta was performed by a registered vascular surgeon on individuals who agreed to participate. Participants who attended screening completed a questionnaire on demographic and clinical information. To assess risk factors for AAA, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to compute the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariable logistic regression was subsequently performed with adjustments for sex, age, family history of AAA, and other relevant factors. RESULTS: A total of 4 046 participants (51.2% male and 48.8% female; mean age 68.8 ± 7.6 years) responded to the campaign. An aneurysm was found in 195 (4.8%) screened individuals (8.2% of men and 1.3% of women). In males aged 50 - 64 years, the prevalence of AAA was 5.4%. Male sex, older age, family history of AAA, being a smoker or ex-smoker, being overweight, and alcohol consumption were predictors of AAA in the univariable analysis. After adjustments in the multivariable analysis, male sex (OR 8.04, 95% CI 4.87 - 13.28), older age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.07), positive family history (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.61 - 3.78), smoker status (OR 3.10, 95% CI 2.10 - 4.59), ex-smoker status (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.39 - 3.27), and being overweight (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.25 - 2.74) were independent risk factors for AAA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AAA has not been reduced in all countries, and screening strategies might be changed based on local epidemiological data. The results of this pilot study underline the importance of exploring the prevalence of AAA in populations with a high prevalence of smoking.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Tamizaje Masivo , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Serbia/epidemiología , Ultrasonografía , Factores de Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Factores Sexuales
2.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 64(5): 504-512, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to further evaluate sex differences of perioperative and 30-day complications after carotid surgery in patients with both asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective cohort study including 2013 consecutive patients, who were treated surgically due to extracranial carotid artery stenosis and prospectively followed. Patients who underwent carotid artery stenting and who were treated conservatively were excluded. The primary endpoints for this study were hospital stroke/transitory ischemic attack (TIA) and overall survival rates. Secondary outcomes included all other hospital adverse events, 30-day stroke/TIA, and 30-day mortality rates. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was higher in female patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (3% vs. 0.5%, P=0.018). Bleeding requiring re-intervention occurred more often in female patients with both asymptomatic (1.5% vs. 0.4%, P=0.045) and symptomatic carotid stenosis (2.4% vs. 0.2%, P=0.022). 30-day stroke/TIA and mortality rates were higher in female patients with both asymptomatic (stroke/TIA 4.4% vs. 2.5%, P=0.041; mortality 3.3% vs. 1.6%, P=0.046) and symptomatic carotid stenosis (stroke/TIA 8.3% vs. 4.2%, P=0.040; mortality 4.1% vs. 0.7%, P=0.006). After adjusting for all confounding factors, female gender remained an important predicting factor for 30-day stroke/TIA in asymptomatic (OR=1.4, 95%CI 1.0-4.7, P=0.041) and symptomatic patients (OR=1.7, 95%CI 1.1-5.3, P=0.040), as well as for 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with asymptomatic (OR=1.5, 95%CI 1.1-4.1, P=0.030) and symptomatic carotid artery disease (OR=1.2, 95%CI 1.0-5.2, P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Female gender is important predicting factor for stroke/TIA and all-cause mortality, both perioperative and during the first 30 days after carotid surgery.

3.
J Card Surg ; 36(10): 3805-3816, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34268799

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We present single-institution results of types I and II hybrid procedures for aortic arch disease with 30-day and long-term results and review of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients that underwent zone 0 endografting and open bypass from ascending aorta to the arch vessels at our institution between January 2013 and 2020. The following data for the systematic review were extracted from eligible studies: 30-day/in-hospital mortality, stroke rate, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rate, renal failure requiring dialysis, development of retrograde dissection, early (<30 days) types I and III endoleak, follow-up length, late (>30 days) endoleak, and late (>30 days) mortality. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent hybrid aortic arch treatment in our institution. The most common aortic arch pathology was degenerative aortic aneurysm. The rate of retrograde dissection and SCI was 8.33%. Regarding the literature data, a total of 768 patients undergoing types I and II hybrid aortic arch debranching procedure. The pooled rate of 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 10.96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.21-14.06), SCI pooled rate was 2.91% (95% CI, 1.76%-4.33%), and retrograde dissection pooled rate was 3.22% (95% CI, 1.99-4.72). CONCLUSION: Hybrid arch techniques provide safe alternative to open repair with acceptable short- and midterm results.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica , Disección Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Humanos , Diálisis Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
World J Surg ; 45(7): 2280-2289, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33730179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transit time flow meter (TTFM) allows quick and accurate intraoperative graft assessment. The main study goal is to evaluate the influence of graft flow measurements on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing bellow the knee (BTK) vein bypass surgery. METHODS: Between January 1st, 1999 and January 1st, 2006, 976 CLTI consecutive patients underwent lower extremity bypass surgery. When applying the exclusion criteria, 249 patients were included in the final analysis. Control measurements were performed at the end of the procedure. Patients were divided according to the mean (more/less than 100 ml/min) and diastolic graft flow (more/less than 40 ml/min) values in four groups. The primary endpoints were a major adverse limb event (male) and primary graft patency. RESULTS: After the median follow-up of 68 months, a group with the mean graft flow below 100 ml/min and the diastolic graft flow below 40 ml/min had the highest rates of male (χ2 = 36.60, DF = 1, P < 0.01, log-rank test) and the worst primary graft patency (χ2 = 53.05, DF = 1, P < 0.01, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: In patients with CLTI undergoing BTK vein bypass surgery, TTFM parameters, especially combined impact of mean graft flow less than 100 ml/min and diastolic graft flow less than 40 ml/min, were associated with an increased risk of poor long-term male and primary graft patency.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas , Injerto Vascular , Humanos , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
5.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 62(2): 146-152, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885925

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic occlusion (AAO) represents potentially fatal acute vascular emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and intervention. Clinical condition of patients with AAO is frequently severely devastated when surgical intervention is questionable. Our objective was to retrospectively review our institutional experience with AAO and assess predictors of intrahospital mortality and morbidity. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study with prospectively collected data between January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2018. The total number of 28 consecutive patients with AAO were included in our analysis. Patients with acute aortic thrombosis manifested by bilateral acute limb ischemia were divided in two groups based on potential caues of AAO (embolism or in-situ thrombosis) differentiated according to condition of aortoilical segment. RESULTS: We identified 28 patients with AAO. All of them underwent either aortobifemoral bypass (N.=20, 71%) or bilateral trans-femoral thrombectomy (N.=8, 29%). The overall in-hospital mortality was 36%. Factors that influenced in-hospital mortality were: paralysis (OR=4.41, 95% CI: 1.88-21.78) and higher lactate values on admission (OR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.83), postoperative development of severe acute kidney injury (OR=3.08, 95% CI: 1.42-14.66), hemodialysis (OR=10.74, 95% CI: 1.64-109.78) and bowel ischemia (OR=5.19, 95% CI: 1.58-55.63). CONCLUSIONS: Paralysis, higher lactate values, development of acute kidney injury, hemodialysis and bowel ischemia are predictors of worse outcome and may be used for risk stratification of patients with acute aortic occlusion and improve counseling patients and their families about expected postoperative outcomes. Patients with embolism and malignant disease have worse outcome; however, this should be tested in future studies on larger sample.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/mortalidad , Embolia/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Isquemia/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Trombosis/mortalidad , Anciano , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Embolia/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/cirugía , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis/cirugía
7.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2020: 2408-2411, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33018492

RESUMEN

The scope of this paper is to present a new carotid vessel segmentation algorithm implementing the U-net based convolutional neural network architecture. With carotid atherosclerosis being the major cause of stroke in Europe, new methods that can provide more accurate image segmentation of the carotid arterial tree and plaque tissue can help improve early diagnosis, prevention and treatment of carotid disease. Herein, we present a novel methodology combining the U-net model and morphological active contours in an iterative framework that accurately segments the carotid lumen and outer wall. The method automatically produces a 3D meshed model of the carotid bifurcation and smaller branches, using multispectral MR image series obtained from two clinical centres of the TAXINOMISIS study. As indicated by a validation study, the algorithm succeeds high accuracy (99.1% for lumen area and 92.6% for the perimeter) for lumen segmentation. The proposed algorithm will be used in the TAXINOMISIS study to obtain more accurate 3D vessel models for improved computational fluid dynamics simulations and the development of models of atherosclerotic plaque progression.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Imagenología Tridimensional , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Europa (Continente) , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 72(3): 910-917, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139307

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare early and long-term results of open repair of patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA) with matched cohort of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study used prospectively collected data from an institutional registry from 1786 patients between 2009 and 2015. Patients with IAAA and AAA were matched by propensity score analysis controlling for demographics, baseline comorbidities, and AAA parameters in a 1:2 ratio. Patients were followed for 5 years. RESULTS: There were 76 patients with IAAA and 152 patients with AAA. Patients with IAAA had more common intraoperative lesion of intraabdominal organs (P = .04), longer in-hospital (P = .035) and intensive care (P = .048) stays and a higher in-hospital mortality rate (P = .012). There were four patients (5.26%) with in-hospital lethal outcome in IAAA there were no deaths in the AAA group. During the follow-up, there was no difference in survival (χ2 = 0.07; DF = 1; P = .80) and overall aortic related complications (χ2 = 1.25; DF = 1; P = .26); however, aortic graft infection was more frequent in IAAA group (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Open repair of IAAA is challenging and comparing to AAA carries a higher perioperative risk and long-term infection rate, even in high-volume centers. The main causes of complications are intraoperative injury of adjacent organs, bleeding, and coronary events. Patients with AAA in a matched cohort showed equal long-term survival, which should be assessed in bigger registries.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Inflamación/cirugía , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Inflamación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inflamación/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Puntaje de Propensión , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 61(1): 24-36, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32079378

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Open repair (OR), fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) and endovascular exclusion using parallel graft (chEVAR) are complementary procedures used for treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (jrAAA). The aim of our study was to assess available literature and analyze dispersion of OR, fEVAR and chEVAR procedures among reported papers related to treatment of jrAAA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The PubMed database was systematically searched using predefined strategy and key words related to treatment of jrAAA on September 28th, 2019. Studies were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria with at least five patients treated with at least one of the procedures while systematic reviews, meta-analysis, reviews, comments, editorials and letters were excluded as well as studies without clear classification of the location of the aneurysm, studies not specifying the number of patients treated with each of the techniques or not discriminated between aortic pathologies (juxtarenal, paravisceral and thoracoabdominal), hybrid procedures, endoanchors or with branched stent-graft. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 1533 papers were identified while papers that met inclusion criteria were either representing experience of single institution (87 papers) or from multicenter studies (6 papers), national or international registries (18 papers). In the period between January 1977 and December 2017, treatment of 5664 patients with jrAAA was reported in 87 papers as a single institution report. Out of them 2531 (45%) were treated with OR, 2592 (46%) with fEVAR and 541 (9%) with chEVAR. Out of 29 institutions reporting OR, there were 11 (37.9%) with more than 100 treated patients while 21 (41.1%) out of 51 institutions that reported more than 50 jrAAA treated with fEVAR. Only four institutions reported results of all three treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results reported in the literature, regardless of its complexity and costs, fEVAR for jrAAA has been accepted in substantial number of hospitals worldwide, while number of reported procedures is reaching OR.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Asian J Surg ; 43(1): 139-147, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113693

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Subclavian artery aneurysms (SAAs) are rare, but they may cause life- and limb-threatening complications. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of all SAA patients that underwent treatment at the Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade between January 1st 2006 and January 1st 2018. The paper includes analysis of etiology and therapeutic options based on the experience from our institution. RESULTS: Twenty (80%) of SAAs involved extrathoracic (ET), while five (20%) intrathoracic (IT) segment. Out of total five IT SAAs, two were asymptomatic (40%), one had dyspnea (20%), while two (40%) had hematothorax due to rupture. Seven (35%) patients with ET SAA had shoulder pain and pulsatile mass, five (25%) acute, seven (35%) had chronic limb ischemia, while one was asymptomatic (5%). Two IT SAAs were treated with open surgery (OS). Other three cases underwent hybrid procedure. One case with ET SAA was treated endovascularly due to hostile anatomy, while in all other 19 cases of ET SAAs open repair was performed, which included: graft interposition in 10 (52.63%), end-to-end anastomosis in 7 (36.84%) cases, while bypass procedure in 2 (10.52%) patients. One of our patients (4%) died during the first 30 postoperative days. CONCLUSIONS: SAAs are rare, however because of their natural history they have huge clinical significance. OS is the method of choice in cases of ET SAAs caused by TOS. Endovascular and hybrid treatment decrease significantly perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in cases of intrathoracic SAAs and thus should be the first option.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Arteria Subclavia/cirugía , Adulto , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Pronóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA