Validation of a Monte Carlo model of a NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber model using electron backscatter experiments.

The accuracy of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results relies on validating the MC models used in the calculations. In this work, a MC model for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber was built and validated against megavoltage electron backscatter experiments using materials of water, graphite, aluminium and copper. Electron energies ranged between 6-18 MeV and the chamber's air cavity was at the depth of maximum dose, z(max). A chamber model based on manufacturer's specifications resulted in systematic discrepancies of several percents between measured and simulated backscatter factors. Tuning of the MC chamber model against backscatter factors to improve agreement increased the chamber's front window mass thickness by 35% over the reported value of 104 mg cm(-2) in the IAEA's TRS-398 absorbed dose protocol. The large increase in chamber window mass thickness was verified by measurements on a disassembled NACP-02 chamber. The new backscatter factor results based on the tuned MC NACP-02 chamber model matched the experimental results within 1-2 standard deviations. We conclude therefore that for MC simulations near z(max), tuning of the NACP-02 chamber model against experimental backscatter measurements is an acceptable method for validating the chamber model.

Perturbation correction factors for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber in water in high-energy electron beams.

Recent dosimetry protocols for clinical high-energy electron beams recommend measurements of absorbed dose-to-water with a plane-parallel or cylindrical ionization chamber. For well-guarded plane-parallel ionization chambers, the ionization chamber perturbation factor in water, p(Q), has a recommended value of unity in all protocols. This assumption was investigated in detail in this study for one of the recommended ionization chambers in the protocols: the Scanditronix NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the NACP-02 ionization chamber with the EGSnrc code were validated against backscatter experiments. MC simulations were then used to calculate p(wall), p(cav) and p(Q) perturbation factors and water-to-air Spencer-Attix stopping powers in 4-19 MeV electron beams of a calibration laboratory (NPL), and in 6-22 MeV clinical electron beams from a Varian CL2300 accelerator. Differences between calculated and the currently recommended (Burns et al 1996 Med. Phys. 23 383-8) stopping powers, water-to-air, were found to be limited to 0.9% at depths between the reference depth z(ref) and the depth where the dose has decreased to 50% of the maximum dose, R50. p(wall) was found to exceed unity by 2.3% in the 4 MeV NPL calibration beam at z(ref). For higher energy electron beams p(wall) decreased to a value of about 1%. Combined with a p(cav) about 1% below unity for all energies at z(ref), this was found to cause p(Q) to exceed unity significantly for all energies. In clinical electron beams all three perturbation factors were found to increase with depth. Our findings indicate that the perturbation factors have to be taken into account in calibration procedures and for clinical depth dose measurements with the NACP-02 ionization chamber.

The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.

This report contains the recommendations of the Electron Dosimetry Working Party of the UK Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM). The recommendations consist of a code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV. The code is based on the absorbed dose to water calibration service for electron beams provided by the UK standards laboratory, the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). This supplies direct N(D,w) calibration factors, traceable to a calorimetric primary standard, at specified reference depths over a range of electron energies up to approximately 20 MeV. Electron beam quality is specified in terms of R(50,D), the depth in water along the beam central axis at which the dose is 50% of the maximum. The reference depth for any given beam at the NPL for chamber calibration and also for measurements for calibration of clinical beams is 0.6R(50.D) - 0.1 cm in water. Designated chambers are graphite-walled Farmer-type cylindrical chambers and the NACP- and Roos-type parallel-plate chambers. The practical code provides methods to determine the absorbed dose to water under reference conditions and also guidance on methods to transfer this dose to non-reference points and to other irradiation conditions. It also gives procedures and data for extending up to higher energies above the range where direct calibration factors are currently available. The practical procedures are supplemented by comprehensive appendices giving discussion of the background to the formalism and the sources and values of any data required. The electron dosimetry code improves consistency with the similar UK approach to megavoltage photon dosimetry, in use since 1990. It provides reduced uncertainties, approaching 1% standard uncertainty in optimal conditions, and a simpler formalism than previous air kerma calibration based recommendations for electron dosimetry.

Characterization of the water-equivalent material WTe for use in electron beam dosimetry.

This paper describes the characterization of the water-equivalent material WTe (produced by St Bartholomew's Hospital, London). The use of epoxy resin phantoms offers a number of advantages over water for radiotherapy dosimetry in terms of robustness and ease of use, but the published uncertainties in the fluence corrections for such phantoms significantly increase the overall uncertainty in the measurement of absorbed dose to water at the reference point. Depth-ionization data were obtained in water and WTe for electron beams in the range 4 MeV to 16 MeV and it was found that the measured fluence in the WTe phantom was approximately 0.4% higher than in a water phantom at the same depth. For measurements only at the reference depth this difference was less, with the fluence in the WTe phantom being 0.2% higher. The standard uncertainty on this value is estimated to be +/- 0.12%, which represents a significant improvement over previous measurements. It was also found that the range scaling factor is not equal to unity, as previously recommended for this material, but that the data was best fitted by the relation 1 mm WTe = 1.01 mm water (with an uncertainty of +/- 0.2%). The results obtained confirm previous investigations of WTe as to its suitability for reference ion chamber dosimetry in the radiotherapy clinic. However, the recommendation is still to use a water phantom wherever possible.

Determination of absorbed dose calibration factors for therapy level electron beam ionization chambers.

Over several years the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) has been developing an absorbed dose calibration service for electron beam radiotherapy. To test this service, a number of trial calibrations of therapy level electron beam ionization chambers have been carried out during the last 3 years. These trials involved 17 UK radiotherapy centres supplying a total of 46 chambers of the NACP, Markus, Roos and Farmer types. Calibration factors were derived from the primary standard calorimeter at seven energies in the range 4 to 19 MeV with an estimated uncertainty of +/-1.5% at the 95% confidence level. Investigations were also carried out into chamber perturbation, polarity effects, ion recombination and repeatability of the calibration process. The instruments were returned to the radiotherapy centres for measurements to be carried out comparing the NPL direct calibration with the 1996 IPEMB air kerma based Code of Practice. It was found that, in general, all chambers of a particular type showed the same energy response. However, it was found that polarity and recombination corrections were quite variable for Markus chambers-differences in the polarity correction of up to 1% were seen. Perturbation corrections were obtained and were found to agree well with the standard data used in the IPEMB Code. The results of the comparison between the NPL calibration and IPEMB Code show agreement between the two methods at the +/-1% level for the NACP and Farmer chambers, but there is a significant difference for the Markus chambers of around 2%. This difference between chamber types is most likely to be due to the design of the Markus chamber.

The calibration of therapy level electron beam ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.

During 1998, NPL plans to introduce the world's first absorbed dose calibration service for electron beam radiotherapy. The service will be based on the primary standard graphite calorimeter, and will enable the direct calibration of electron ionization chambers, without reference to air kerma standards. This calibration is a two-step process. Firstly, a set of NACP-designed parallel-plate reference chambers have been calibrated against the calorimeter over the last few years. These chambers are then used to calibrate user chambers by direct comparison in a water phantom under standard conditions. This paper describes the calibration of the reference chambers against the calorimeter and the derivation of absorbed dose to water calibration factors (with an estimated uncertainty in this calibration of +/-1.50% at the 95% confidence level).

The UK primary standard calorimeter for photon-beam absorbed dose measurement.

A description is given of the UK primary standard graphite calorimeter system. The calorimeter measures absorbed dose to graphite for photon radiations from 60Co to 19 MV x-rays, and is the basis of the NPL therapy-level absorbed dose to water calibration service. Absorbed dose to graphite from the photon calorimeter has been compared with three other standards: an ionization chamber and cavity theory, for 60Co gamma radiation; the NPL electron calorimeter, for 12-14 MeV electron beams; and the BIPM 60Co absorbed dose standard. The three standards agreed within 0.5% which is similar to the measurement uncertainties.