Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2400188, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39361910

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There has been a global increase in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), yet there has been very limited exploration of its impact in Indonesia. This study aimed to determine the clinicopathologic characteristics and the overall survival (OS) of EOCRC compared with those of average-onset colorectal cancer (AOCRC). METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed from all patients presenting with colorectal cancer (CRC) at Dr Sardjito General Hospital (Yogyakarta, Indonesia) between 2016 and 2019. Sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment variables were extracted. t Tests were used to compare characteristics of EOCRC and AOCRC patient groups. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze age and other potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: The total population (N = 1,276) comprised EOCRC (n = 149; 11.7%) and AOCRC (n = 1,127; 88.3%) patients. EOCRC patients were more likely to have a higher education level, be single, have out-of-pocket insurance, be underweight, and have signet ring histology (all P values <.05), compared with AOCRC patients. EOCRC and AOCRC groups had a comparable estimated 5-year OS of 34.2% and 36.9%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), hemoglobin level, cancer stage, and treatment intention were independent prognostic factors for OS (all P values <.05). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this first major study of EOCRC in Indonesia highlights its role in the overall burden of CRC and its connection with social determinants of health. Patients with EOCRC are more commonly underweight and generally have a higher proportion of signet ring histology than AOCRC, yet OS in both groups is similar. Future research is required to identify risk factors to inform the content and focus of public health education activities, alongside delineating the biology and causes of early and average onset of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Indonesia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246638, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33577563

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the survival outcome and prognostic factors of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer accessing treatment in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. METHODS: Data on 759 patients with NPC diagnosed from 2007 to 2016 at Dr Sardjito General Hospital were included. Potential prognostic variables included sociodemographic, clinicopathology and treatment parameters. Multivariable analyses were implemented using semi-parametric Cox proportional hazards modelling and fully parametric survival analysis. RESULTS: The median time of observation was 14.39 months. In the whole cohort the median observed survival was 31.08 months. In the univariable analysis, age, education status, insurance type, BMI, ECOG index, stage and treatment strategy had an impact on overall survival (OS) (p values <0.01). Semi-parametric multivariable analyses with stage stratification showed that education status, ECOG index, and treatment modality were independent prognostic factors for OS (p values <0.05). In the fully parametric models age, education status, ECOG index, stage, and treatment modality were independent prognostic factors for OS (p values <0.05). For both multivariable analyses, all treatment strategies were associated with a reduced hazard (semi-parametric models, p values <0.05) and a better OS (parametric models, p values <0.05) compared with no treatment. Furthermore, compared with radiation alone or chemotherapy alone, a combination of chemotherapy and radiation either in a form of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), sequential chemotherapy and radiation, or induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT demonstrated a reduced hazard (hazard ratio/HR 0.226, 95% confidence interval/CI 0.089-0.363, and HR 0.390, 95%CI 0.260-0.519) and a better OS (time ratio/TR 3.108, 95%CI 1.274-4.942 and TR 2.531, 95%CI 1.829-3.233) (p values < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Median OS for the cohort was low compared to those reported in both endemic and non-endemic regions. By combining the findings of multivariable analyses, we showed that age, education status, ECOG index, stage and first treatment modality were independent predictors for the OS.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Indonesia/epidemiología , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patología , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Clin Case Rep ; 8(12): 3178-3183, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33363902

RESUMEN

Metastatic breast cancer may present as a pericardial effusion that can progress to a life-threatening cardiac tamponade. Pericardial window followed by initial chemotherapy needs to be immediately applied in order to achieve a favorable outcome.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA