Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(3): e077868, 2024 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458778

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In Canada, Métis people are one of three distinct Indigenous peoples whose rights are recognised and affirmed in Section 35 of the federal Constitution Act, 1982. In line with Métis people having a unique culture, history, language and way of life, a distinctions-based approach is critical to understand the current landscape of Métis-specific health. In this paper, we present a scoping review protocol to describe this research landscape in Canada led by the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review protocol is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews reporting guidelines and follows Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. We will search electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Anthropology Plus, Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples of North America, Canadian Business and Current Affairs, Indigenous Studies Portal, Informit Indigenous Collection, Collaborative Indigenous Garden, PubMed, ProQuest), grey literature sources and reference lists from selected papers. Two reviewers (HMB and SK) will double-blind screen all titles/abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. Any health-related study or health report that includes a Métis-specific health, well-being or Métis social determinant of health outcome will be included. Relevant variables will be extracted following an iterative process whereby the data charting will be reviewed and updated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Findings from this scoping review will be shared back through the MNO's existing community-based communication channels. Traditional academic dissemination will also be pursued. Research ethics board approval is not required, since data are from peer-reviewed publications or publicly shared health reports and knowledge translation products.


Asunto(s)
Proyectos de Investigación , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Humanos , América del Norte , Ontario
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 287, 2024 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global concern, with Indigenous Peoples bearing the highest burden. Previous studies exploring HCV prevalence within Indigenous populations have predominantly used a pan-Indigenous approach, consequently resulting in limited availability of Métis-specific HCV data. The Métis are one of the three recognized groups of Indigenous Peoples in Canada with a distinct history and language. The Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) is the only recognized Métis government in Ontario. This study aims to examine the prevalence of self-reported HCV testing and positive results among citizens of the MNO, as well as to explore the association between sociodemographic variables and HCV testing and positive results. METHODS: A population-based online survey was implemented by the MNO using their citizenship registry between May 6 and June 13, 2022. The survey included questions about hepatitis C testing and results, socio-demographics, and other health related outcomes. Census sampling was used, and 3,206 MNO citizens responded to the hepatitis C-related questions. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were used to analyze the survey data. RESULTS: Among the respondents, 827 (25.8%, CI: 24.3-27.3) reported having undergone HCV testing and 58 indicated testing positive, resulting in a prevalence of 1.8% (CI: 1.3-2.3). Respondents with a strong sense of community belonging, higher education levels, and lower household income were more likely to report having undergone HCV testing. Among those who had undergone testing, older age groups, individuals with lower education levels, and retired individuals were more likely to test positive for HCV. CONCLUSION: This study is the first Métis-led and Métis-specific study to report on HCV prevalence among Métis citizens. This research contributes to the knowledge base for Métis health and will support the MNO's health promotion program and resources for HCV. Future research will examine the actual HCV incidence and prevalence among MNO citizens.


Asunto(s)
Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C , Humanos , Anciano , Ontario/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Grupos Raciales
3.
Can J Public Health ; 115(2): 209-219, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189860

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study objective is to measure the influence of psychological antecedents of vaccination on COVID-19 vaccine intention among citizens of the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO). METHODS: A population-based online survey was implemented by the MNO when COVID-19 vaccines were approved in Canada. Questions included vaccine intention, the short version of the "5C" psychological antecedents of vaccination scale (confidence, complacency, constraint, calculation, collective responsibility), and socio-demographics. Census sampling via the MNO Registry was used achieving a 39% response rate. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and multinomial logistic regression models (adjusted for sociodemographic variables) were used to analyze the survey data. RESULTS: The majority of MNO citizens (70.2%) planned to be vaccinated. As compared with vaccine-hesitant individuals, respondents with vaccine intention were more confident in the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, believed that COVID-19 is severe, were willing to protect others from getting COVID-19, and would research the vaccines (Confident OR = 19.4, 95% CI 15.5-24.2; Complacency OR = 6.21, 95% CI 5.38-7.18; Collective responsibility OR = 9.83, 95% CI 8.24-11.72; Calculation OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.28-1.59). Finally, respondents with vaccine intention were less likely to let everyday stress prevent them from getting COVID-19 vaccines (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.42-0.53) compared to vaccine-hesitant individuals. CONCLUSION: This research contributes to the knowledge base for Métis health and supported the MNO's information sharing and educational activities during the COVID-19 vaccines rollout. Future research will examine the relationship between the 5Cs and actual uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among MNO citizens.


RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons cherché à mesurer l'influence des antécédents psychologiques de vaccination sur l'intention de se faire vacciner contre la COVID-19 chez les citoyennes et citoyens de la Nation métisse de l'Ontario (NMO). MéTHODE: Un sondage populationnel en ligne a été mis en œuvre par la NMO quand des vaccins contre la COVID-19 ont été approuvés au Canada. Les questions posées ont porté sur l'intention de se faire vacciner, la version abrégée du modèle « 5C ¼ de l'échelle de vaccination (Confiance, Contraintes, Complaisance, Calcul et responsabilité Collective) et le profil sociodémographique. Nous avons utilisé l'échantillonnage fondé sur le recensement via le registre de la NMO pour obtenir un taux de réponse de 39 %. Des statistiques descriptives, des analyses bivariées et des modèles de régression logistique multinomiale (ajustés selon les variables sociodémographiques) ont servi à analyser les données du sondage. RéSULTATS: La majorité (70,2 %) des citoyennes et citoyens de la NMO prévoyaient se faire vacciner. Comparativement aux personnes réticentes à l'égard de la vaccination, les personnes ayant l'intention de se faire vacciner avaient plus confiance en l'innocuité des vaccins contre la COVID-19, considéraient la COVID-19 comme une maladie grave, étaient disposées à protéger les autres contre la COVID-19 et cherchaient à se renseigner au sujet des vaccins (Confiance : RC = 19,4, IC95% 15,5­24,2; Complaisance : RC = 6,21, IC95% 5,38­7,18; responsabilité Collective : RC = 9,83, IC95% 8,24­11,72; Calcul : RC = 1,43, IC95% 1,28­1,59). Enfin, les répondantes et les répondants ayant l'intention de se faire vacciner étaient moins susceptibles de laisser le stress quotidien les empêcher de se faire vacciner contre la COVID-19 (RC = 0,47, IC95% 0,42­0,53) comparativement aux personnes réticentes à l'égard de la vaccination. CONCLUSION: Cette étude contribue à la base de connaissances sur la santé des Métis et a appuyé les activités de sensibilisation et d'échange d'informations de la NMO pendant le déploiement des vaccins contre la COVID-19. Une étude future portera sur la relation entre les « 5C ¼ et le recours réel aux vaccins contre la COVID-19 chez les citoyennes et citoyens de la NMO.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Intención , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Ontario/epidemiología , Vacilación a la Vacunación , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación
4.
Vaccine ; 41(38): 5640-5647, 2023 08 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The burden of the current COVID-19 pandemic is not shared equally in Canadian society, with Indigenous Peoples being disproportionately affected. Moreover, there is a lack of research pertaining to vaccination behaviour in Métis communities. This Métis-specific and Métis-led qualitative study endeavours to understand COVID-19 vaccine behaviour among citizens of the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO). METHODS: Data was collected via one-on-one interviews. Participants were recruited via the MNO's existing social media channels. Participants filled out a screening survey indicating their intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 as yes, no, or unsure. Sixteen participants (9 yes, 3 unsure, 4 no) were interviewed. Interviews averaged 30 min, and the questions and probes were developed in collaboration with the MNO. The interviewer received Métis-specific cultural safety training. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and uploaded to NVivo 12. RESULTS: A deductive analysis using the Social Ecological Model framework (SEM) for vaccine behaviour and two blinded coders was used to understand the data. An additional factor, COVID-19 public health measures, was added to the framework to better capture the experiences of participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the factors with the greatest number of coded references included Vaccine roll-out and availability, Organization of the public into priority groups, Public discourse, Interpersonal influences, Interface with health professionals, Knowledge state, Trust, and Vaccine risk perception. Bandwagoning (following others' behaviour) and Freeloading (perceiving enough people have been vaccinated), both factors of the SEM, were not discussed. Yes, no, and unsure participant groups were compared to understand the influences of each factor based on COVID-19 vaccination intention. CONCLUSIONS: MNO citizens COVID-19 vaccine behaviour was negatively and positively influenced by a number of factors. This information will allow the MNO and public health units to better tailor their messaging for COVID-19 vaccine uptake campaigns and future pandemic emergencies.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Ontario/epidemiología , Pandemias , Grupos Raciales , Vacunación
5.
CMAJ Open ; 9(2): E548-E555, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021012

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acceptance of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is critical to achieving high levels of immunization. The objectives of this study were to understand mothers' SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions to explore reasons for and against SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: Participants from the All Our Families pregnancy longitudinal cohort whose children had reached ages 9-12 years were invited in May-June 2020 to complete a survey on the impact of COVID-19. The survey covered topics about the impact of the pandemic and included 2 specific questions on mothers' intentions to vaccinate their child against SARS-CoV-2. Current responses were linked to previously collected data, including infant vaccine uptake. Multinomial regression models were run to estimate associations between demographic factors, past vaccination status and vaccination intention. Qualitative responses regarding factors affecting decision-making were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The response rate was 53.8% (1321/2455). A minority of children of participants had partial or no vaccinations at age 2 (n = 200, 15.1%). A total of 60.4% of mothers (n = 798) intended to vaccinate their children with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 8.6% (n = 113) did not intend to vaccinate and 31.0% (n = 410) were unsure. Lower education, lower income and incomplete vaccination history were inversely associated with intention to vaccinate. Thematic analysis of qualitative responses showed 10 themes, including safety and efficacy, long-term effects and a rushed process. INTERPRETATION: Within a cohort with historically high infant vaccination, a third of mothers remained unsure about vaccinating their children against SARS-CoV-2. Given the many uncertainties about future SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, clear communication regarding safety will be critical to ensuring vaccine uptake.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Intención , Madres/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Canadá , Niño , Escolaridad , Etnicidad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Renta , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Can J Public Health ; 112(5): 938-946, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021493

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to assess the reach and delivery of opportunistic postpartum depression (PPD) symptom screening at well-child clinic (WCC) immunization appointments in Alberta. The relationship between socio-demographic factors and PPD symptom screening status, and PPD symptom scores was explored. METHOD: In this retrospective population-based cohort study, administrative health data from WCC immunization appointments were used to assess the PPD symptom screening delivery and scores from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. The associations with maternal age and area-level material deprivation were determined by multivariable statistics. RESULTS: The number of births ranged from 51,537 to 55,787 annually. The percentage of mothers screened for PPD symptoms using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale decreased between 2012 and 2016, from 80.1% to 69.7%. Of those screened, 3-3.2% of the mothers were identified to be at high risk for PPD, annually. Screening status varied according to maternal age: mothers ≤29 years were more likely to be screened than mothers 30-34 years, while mothers ≥35 years were the least likely to be screened. Logistic regression analyses, adjusting for age, found the odds of not being screened increased with increases in area-level material deprivation. Language/cultural barriers were the most commonly reported reasons for not screening. CONCLUSION: Opportunistic PPD symptom screening at WCCs can be an efficient method to identify mothers who need postpartum support and to inform population-level public health surveillance. Additional work is needed to further understand barriers to PPD symptom screening, especially language, cultural, and socio-demographic factors.


RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Évaluer la portée et l'exécution du dépistage opportuniste des symptômes de dépression du post-partum (DPP) lors des visites d'immunisation en clinique du bien-être de l'enfant (CBEE) en Alberta. Nous avons exploré la relation entre les facteurs sociodémographiques et la situation à l'égard du dépistage des symptômes de DPP, ainsi que les pointages des symptômes de DPP. MéTHODE: Pour cette étude de cohorte populationnelle rétrospective, nous avons utilisé les données administratives sur la santé des visites d'immunisation en CBEE pour évaluer l'exécution et les pointages du dépistage des symptômes de DPP entre le 1er janvier 2012 et le 31 décembre 2016. Les associations avec l'âge maternel et la défavorisation matérielle régionale ont été déterminées par analyses statistiques multivariées. RéSULTATS: Le nombre de naissances variait entre 51 537 et 55 787 par année. Le pourcentage de mères dépistées pour les symptômes de DPP à l'aide de l'échelle de dépression postnatale d'Édimbourg a diminué sur la période de l'étude, passant de 80,1 % en 2012 à 69,7 % en 2016. Parmi les mères dépistées, 3 à 3,2 % par année ont été identifiées comme présentant un risque élevé de DPP. La situation à l'égard du dépistage variait selon l'âge maternel : les mères de 29 ans et moins étaient plus susceptibles d'être dépistées que celles de 30 à 34 ans, et les mères de 35 ans et plus étaient les moins susceptibles d'être dépistées. Des analyses de régression logistique, après ajustement pour tenir compte de l'âge, ont déterminé que la probabilité de ne pas être dépistée augmentait avec l'augmentation de la défavorisation matérielle régionale. Les barrières linguistiques ou culturelles ont été les raisons les plus communément citées de ne pas avoir réalisé de dépistage. CONCLUSION: Le dépistage opportuniste des symptômes de DPP dans les CBEE peut être un moyen efficace d'identifier les mères ayant besoin d'un soutien post-partum et d'orienter la surveillance de la santé publique à l'échelle de la population. D'autres études sont nécessaires pour mieux comprendre les barrières au dépistage des symptômes de DPP, en particulier les facteurs linguistiques, culturels et sociodémographiques.


Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto , Tamizaje Masivo , Madres , Adulto , Alberta/epidemiología , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Servicios de Salud del Niño , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Madres/psicología , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Vaccine ; 39(22): 2938-2964, 2021 05 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933317

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population's socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age. SYNTHESIS: The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations. Most low SES parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura de Vacunación , Vacunación , Niño , Países Desarrollados , Humanos , Inmunización , Clase Social
8.
Can J Public Health ; 108(2): e124-e128, 2017 Jun 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28621647

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assessing timeliness and completeness of vaccine administration is important for evaluating the effectiveness of immunization programs. Few studies have reported timeliness, particularly in Canada. The objective of this study was to examine timeliness of the receipt of vaccination for each routine childhood recommended vaccine by 24 months of age among children in a community-based pregnancy cohort in Calgary, Alberta. METHODS: Survey data from a community-based pregnancy cohort in Alberta were linked to Public Health vaccination records of children (n = 2763). The proportion of children receiving early, timely, delayed, or no vaccination was calculated. A dose was considered early if it was administered before the recommended age in days as per the vaccination schedule, timely if administered at any time from start of recommended age in days to age in days when delay counts were initiated, and delayed if it was administered on or after age in days when delay counts were initiated. Series completion rates were also calculated. RESULTS: For multi-dose vaccines, over 80% of children had timely doses at 2, 4 and 6 months. By 12 months, this proportion decreased to 65% (95% CI: 63%-66%) for meningococcal conjugate group C, 61% (95% CI: 59%-62%) for measles antigen-containing vaccines and 64% (95% CI: 62%-65%) for varicella antigen-containing vaccines. At 18 months, only 55% (95% CI: 53%-56%) of the children had a timely 4th dose of diphtheria, acellular pertussis, tetanus, polio, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine. Eventual series completion rate for all recommended vaccines was 77% (95% CI: 75%-79%). CONCLUSION: The timeliness and completeness of routine childhood vaccination in preschool children in this community-based pregnancy cohort is lower than provincial targets. Data on timeliness of vaccination can inform further work on barriers and enablers to vaccination in order to meet provincial targets.


Asunto(s)
Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Alberta , Estudios de Cohortes , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Lactante , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
9.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 20(1): 40-49, 2017 Dec 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340126

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Socio-economic disparities in smoking rates persist, in Ontario, despite public health care and universal tobacco control policies. Mechanisms for continuing disparities are not fully understood. Unequal access or utilization of assistance for cessation may contribute. The objective of this research was to use longitudinal data on smokers to examine the associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and access to care measures and assisted and unassisted quit attempts. METHODS: Data were taken from 3578 smokers with at least one follow-up interview participating in the Ontario Tobacco Survey (OTS). Multinomial regression models with imputed missing values were run for each measure of SES and access to care to assess the association with quitting behavior and use of assistance, unadjusted and while adjusting for smoking history and demographic covariates. RESULTS: Adjusted analyses found smokers living in areas with the lowest ethnic concentration were more likely to make an assisted quit attempt compared to unassisted quitting (RR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.08-2.50) or making no quit attempt (RR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.15-2.37). Smokers who reported visiting a doctor in the previous 6 months were more likely to quit with assistance versus unassisted compared to those not visiting a doctor, whether they were advised (RR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.43-2.48) or not advised to quit (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.01-1.74). Similar results were seen when comparing assisted quit attempts with no quit attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted analyses showed that quitting with assistance was unrelated to measures of SES except ethnic concentration. Physician intervention with patients who smoke is important for increasing assisted quit attempts. IMPLICATIONS: For most measures of SES there were no significant associations with either assisted or unassisted quitting adjusting for demographic and smoking history. Smokers who live in areas with the lowest ethnic concentration were most likely to use assistance as were smokers who visited their doctor and were advised to quit smoking. Interventions to increase the delivery of effective quitting methods in smokers living in areas with high ethnic concentrations and to increase physician compliance with asking and advising patients to quit may increase assisted quit attempts.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Fumar/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Etnicidad/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Clase Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
10.
Can J Public Health ; 106(6): e401-7, 2015 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26680432

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to examine how participation in prenatal programs delivered by Ontario public health units influences pregnant women's pregnancy-related knowledge. Secondary objectives were to examine the socio-demographic characteristics of women participating in these programs and assess program satisfaction. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted of 511 adult pregnant women who were registered for a prenatal program within one of seven Ontario public health units. Participants completed a pre-program survey, which examined socio-demographic and pregnancy characteristics, and baseline pregnancyrelated knowledge. After finishing the program, participants completed a post-program survey investigating pregnancy-related knowledge and program satisfaction. Pregnancy-related knowledge was assessed using the Healthy Pregnancies Knowledge Survey, which captures knowledge within three subtopic areas: healthy pregnancies, healthy lifestyles and breastfeeding. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated a significant increase in mean knowledge scores, both overall and across each subtopic area. Most participants reported that their program satisfied their questions either mostly or very well across all content areas examined. CONCLUSION: This study is the first large-scale effort to examine the ability of prenatal programs offered through Ontario public health units to influence clients' pregnancy-related knowledge. These findings contribute to the evidence base for prenatal education program planning.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Educación Prenatal , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Ontario , Satisfacción Personal , Embarazo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Adulto Joven
11.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 1127, 2014 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25363082

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parenthood has been associated with declines in leisure-time exercise and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), but less is known about its impact on sedentary time and light-intensity activity. Although the health benefits of MVPA are well established, a growing body of research has been showing that even after controlling for MVPA levels, a detrimental dose-response association exists between sedentary time and adverse health outcomes and a beneficial dose-response association exists for light-intensity activity. METHODS: This study examined the impact of parenthood, the number of children in the home, and the age of the youngest child on objectively measured physical activity (i.e., accelerometer derived daily minutes of sedentary, light, and MVPA) among a nationally representative cross-sectional sample of 2234 men and women who participated in the 2009-2011 Canadian Health Measures Survey. RESULTS: After controlling for sociodemographic variables, ANCOVAs indicated that parents engaged in more light activity but less MVPA than non-parents and women whose youngest child was aged 12-15 years were more sedentary than women without children. Among both men and women, having a child <6 years of age in the home was associated with the greatest amount of light activity and lowest MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: Modest differences emerged between the physical activity level of parents and non-parents for both genders and across intensity levels. In general, parenthood was associated with less MVPA and more light-intensity activity, and more differences emerged among women compared to men. More research is needed before conclusions can be drawn regarding the health consequences of these differences.


Asunto(s)
Padres , Conducta Sedentaria , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos
12.
Addict Behav ; 39(3): 512-9, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24333037

RESUMEN

AIMS: The idea that most smokers quit without formal assistance is widely accepted, however, few studies have been referenced as evidence. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature to determine what proportion of adult smokers report attempting to quit unassisted in population-based studies. METHODS: A four stage strategy was used to conduct a search of the literature including searching 9 electronic databases (PUBMED, MEDLINE (OVID) (1948-), EMBASE (1947-), CINAHL, ISI Web of Science with conference proceedings, PsycINFO (1806-), Scopus, Conference Papers Index, and Digital Dissertations), the gray literature, online forums and hand searches. RESULTS: A total of 26 population-based prevalence studies of unassisted quitting were identified, which presented data collected from 1986 through 2010, in 9 countries. Unassisted quit attempts ranged from a high of 95.3% in a study in Christchurch, New Zealand, between 1998 and 1999, to a low of 40.6% in a national Australian study conducted between 2008 and 2009. In 24 of the 26 studies reviewed, a majority of quit attempts were unassisted. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that a majority of quit attempts in population-based studies to date are unassisted. However, across and within countries over time, it appears that there is a trend toward lower prevalence of making quit attempts without reported assistance or intervention.


Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Humanos , Prevalencia
13.
Radiology ; 268(3): 684-93, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23674784

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of digital direct radiography (DR) and computed radiography (CR) compared with that of screen-film mammography (SFM) in large concurrent cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board and did not require informed consent. Concurrent cohorts of women aged 50-74 years screened with DR (n = 220 520), CR (n = 64 210), or SFM (n = 403 688) between 2008 and 2009 were identified and followed for 12 months. Performance was compared between cohorts, with SFM as the referent cohort. Associations were examined by using mixed-effect logistic regression. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate was similar for DR (4.9 per 1000; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.7, 5.2) and SFM (4.8 per 1000; 95% CI: 4.7, 5.0); however, the rate was significantly lower for CR (3.4 per 1000; 95% CI: 3.0, 3.9) (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.93). Recall rates were higher for DR (7.7%; 95% CI: 7.6%, 7.8%) and lower for CR (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.5%, 6.7%) than for SFM (7.4%; 95% CI: 7.3%, 7.5%). Positive predictive value was lower for CR (5.2%; 95% CI: 4.7%, 5.8%) than for SFM (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.4%, 6.8%); however, the adjusted odds were not significant. CONCLUSION: Although DR is equivalent to SFM for breast screening among women aged 50-74 years, the cancer detection rate was lower for CR. Screening programs should monitor the performance of CR separately and may consider informing women of the potentially lower cancer detection rates.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Película para Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Ontario/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
14.
BMC Public Health ; 12: 518, 2012 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22788119

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although few studies have linked cognitive variables with adherence to mammography screening in women with family histories of breast and/or ovarian cancer, research studies suggest cognitive phenomena can be powerful adherence predictors. METHODS: This prospective study included 858 women aged 30 to 71 years from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry with at least one first-degree relative diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Data on beliefs about breast cancer screening and use of mammography were obtained from annual telephone interviews spanning three consecutive years. Self-reported mammogram dates were confirmed with medical imaging reports. Associations between beliefs about breast cancer screening and adherence with annual mammography were estimated using polytomous logistic regression models corrected for familial correlation. Models compared adherers (N = 329) with late-screeners (N = 382) and never-screeners (N = 147). RESULTS: Women who believed mammography screening should occur annually were more likely to adhere to annual screening recommendations than women who believed it should happen less often (OR: 5.02; 95% CI: 2.97-8.49 for adherers versus late-screeners; OR: 6.82; 95% CI: 3.29-14.16 for adherers versus never-screeners). Women who believed mammography screening should start at or before age 50 (rather than after) (OR: 9.72; 95% CI: 3.26-29.02) were significantly more likely to adhere when compared with never-screeners. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that women with a family history of breast cancer should be strongly communicated recommendations about initial age of screening and screening intervals as related beliefs significantly predict adequate adherence.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Mamografía/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación Cualitativa , Sistema de Registros
15.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 21(6): 499-506, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22273849

RESUMEN

Most studies reporting more favourable biological features of screen-detected breast cancers compared with symptomatic or interval cancers include initial or prevalent screens and therefore may not indicate the real benefit of screening on breast cancer mortality. We conducted case-case comparisons within a cohort of eligible women (N=771 715) who were aged 50-69 between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2003. A randomly selected sample of breast cancers (N=1848) diagnosed among these women were compared by detection method. Tumour characteristics of interval cancers (N=362) diagnosed after 6-24 months of a negative screen or symptomatic breast cancers (N=491) were compared with subsequent screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed within 6 months of a positive screen (N=995) using polytomous logistic regression. Tumours were evaluated for clinical presentation, histology and expression of hormone receptors. Women with symptomatic detected [odds ratio (OR)=7.48, 95% confidence interval (CI)=5.38-10.38] and interval cancers (OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.56-3.10) were more often diagnosed at stage III-IV versus I than women with rescreen-detected cancers. After adjusting for tumour size, women with symptomatic cancers had tumours of higher grade (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.05-2.15) and mitotic score (OR=1.69, 95% CI=1.15-2.49) and women with interval cancers had tumours of higher mitotic score (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.01-2.28) compared with women diagnosed at screening. Subsequent screen-detected cancers are not only detected at an earlier stage but are also less aggressive, leading to a better prognosis. As long-term mortality reduction for breast screening may depend on subsequent screens, our study indicates that mammography screening can be effective in women aged 50-69.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Qual Life Res ; 21(8): 1315-25, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22038397

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Measuring utility for cost-utility analysis (CUA) is challenging in children. The objectives were to characterize pediatric CUAs, appraise their quality, and identify determinants of higher quality. METHODS: Descriptive data were imported from the PEDE database for 305 pediatric CUAs published from 1997 to 2009, and quality was rated using the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ) in 213 studies. The impact on quality of publication year, journal type, and whether utility was measured was analyzed using multiple regression. RESULTS: CUAs increased over time and the largest proportion was from North America (38%). Children aged 1-12 years (39%) and preventative interventions (51%) were studied most frequently. Whereas a societal perspective was most common in papers published before 2007 (49%), a third-party payer perspective was subsequently most frequent (63%). Utility was measured prospectively in 8% of studies. Domains that demonstrated the poorest quality were Perspective, Costs and resource use, Outcomes, Analysis, Incremental analysis and Conflict of interest. Quality increased significantly over time for most domains and was greater in studies published in methods/health economic journals. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of pediatric CUAs is increasing. Few studies ascertain utility prospectively, suggesting the need for better instruments for pediatric health state valuation and measurement.


Asunto(s)
Protección a la Infancia/economía , Pediatría/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Adolescente , Canadá , Niño , Protección a la Infancia/psicología , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Cancer Nurs ; 34(4): 293-301, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21681146

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A woman's experience during her initial breast screen can influence her participation in subsequent screening. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between a woman's satisfaction with her initial screening experience and compliance to biennial screening at centers with and without nurses. METHODS: A stratified random sample of compliers and noncompliers to biennial screening was selected from a cohort of 16 858 eligible women aged 50 to 65 years attending centers with and without nurses for their initial screen at the Ontario Breast Screening Program in 2002. Of these eligible women, 3387 were sent questionnaires, 2640 (77.9%) were contacted, and 1901 (72.0%) were interviewed. The association between satisfaction with initial screen and compliance was estimated separately for centers with and without nurses using logistic regression. RESULTS: Women attending centers with nurses were significantly less likely to comply with their next screen after their clinical breast examination if they were not completely satisfied with the service they received (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.57) or agreed that the clinical breast examination caused discomfort to their breasts (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.94). In addition, women attending centers with or without nurses were significantly less likely to comply if they did not understand why they needed to return for screening. CONCLUSIONS: : Nurses at screening centers have an opportunity to significantly impact a woman's compliance to biennial breast screening by providing a positive initial screening experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Emphasis should be placed on improving a woman's overall satisfaction with her initial screening experience.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Mamografía/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/enfermería , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario
18.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 103(12): 942-50, 2011 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21540443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the prognostic value of tumor characteristics by type of breast cancer diagnosed in the interval between mammographic screenings with screen-detected breast cancers. METHODS: We conducted a case-case study within the cohort of women (n = 431 480) in the Ontario Breast Screening Program who were aged 50 years and older and were screened between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2002. Interval cancers, defined as breast cancers diagnosed within 24 months after a negative screening mammogram, were designated as true interval cancers (n = 288) or missed interval cancers (n = 87) if they were not identified at the time of screening but were identified in retrospect. Screen-detected breast cancers (n = 450) were selected to match interval cancers. Tumors were evaluated for stage, grade, mitotic index, histology, and expression of hormone receptors and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Both true and missed interval cancers were of higher stage and grade than matched screen-detected breast cancers. However, true interval cancers had a higher mitotic index (OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.81 to 5.42), a higher percentage of nonductal histology (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.05 to 3.59), and were more likely to be both estrogen receptor-negative (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.32 to 3.30) and progesterone receptor-negative (OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.68 to 3.70) compared with matched screen-detected tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, interval cancers were of higher stage and grade compared with screen-detected cancers. True interval cancers were more likely to have additional adverse prognostic features of estrogen and progesterone receptor negativity and nonductal morphology. The findings suggest a need for more sensitive screening modalities to detect true interval breast cancers and different approaches for early detection of fast-growing tumors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Ontario , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , Receptores de Progesterona/análisis , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 12(12): 1195-202, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20978108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Occasional smokers represent an important segment of all smokers and have been described to be a heterogeneous group in terms of past experience and likelihood of maintaining nondaily smoking behavior. METHODS: In the prospective Ontario Tobacco Survey, 408 occasional smokers were followed for a year. Characteristics of subgroups of occasional smokers, as suggested by previous literature, were studied for personal and smoking behavior group differences. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was also used to empirically identify subgroups of occasional smokers using average linkage. Smoking status at 1-year follow-up was examined overall and by the identified subgroups to determine if any were useful predictors of persistent status as nondaily smoking and likelihood of smoking cessation. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen among the subgroups of occasional smokers suggested in previous studies including the number of quit attempts, setting a firm quit date, and whether or not participants cared others knew they smoked in descriptive analyses. Exploratory cluster analysis suggested 4 clusters of occasional smokers based on differences in age, perceived addiction, and history of daily smoking. Subgroups based on participants' history of smoking, self-reported addiction level, and empirically identified cluster subgroups resulted in significant differences of smoking status at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that occasional smokers may be a heterogeneous group with different subgroups characterized by age, accumulated smoking experience and smoking pattern, as well as factors associated with the likelihood of quitting altogether, over time, and perceived addiction.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Conducta Adictiva/epidemiología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Fumar/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Conducta Adictiva/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Periodicidad , Prevalencia , Asunción de Riesgos , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Medio Social , Adulto Joven
20.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 18(3): 739-47, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19240235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that predisposing factors such as previous screening experience, participation in preventive health behaviors, and knowledge/beliefs about breast cancer and screening influence a woman's decision to make a timely return for a second screen. METHODS: A stratified random sample of compliers and noncompliers to biennial screening were selected from a cohort of 51,242 women ages 50 to 65 years who had their initial screen at the Ontario Breast Screening Program. In total, 1,901 women were telephone-interviewed. The associations between predisposing factors and compliance were estimated separately for centers with and without nurses using logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographics and smoking status. RESULTS: Women screened at nurse centers were less likely to comply if they thought women should stop having mammograms before age 70 years [odds ratio (OR), 0.39; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.19-0.79], did not consider mammograms very likely to find cancer (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95), felt their likeliness of getting breast cancer was below average (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89), or believed a high-fat diet was not an important risk factor for breast cancer (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97). Women attending nurse centers were significantly more likely to comply if they sometimes had thoughts or worries about developing breast cancer (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.80). CONCLUSIONS: Nurses at screening centers may reinforce a woman's knowledge or beliefs about breast cancer or screening and as a result increase their compliance to biennial breast screening.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/enfermería , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Logísticos , Mamografía/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA